On Sun, 2004-07-18 at 04:07, cwinl wrote:
> hi,all
>
> http://ertw.com/blog/archives/make_bzimage_vs_make_zimage-170404.html
>
> someone tell me that the kernel made by 'make bzImage' is smaller then
> the one 'make zImage' made it.
>
> is it c
On Sun, 18 Jul 2004 16:07:26 +0800, cwinl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> hi,all
>
> http://ertw.com/blog/archives/make_bzimage_vs_make_zimage-170404.html
>
> someone tell me that the kernel made by 'make bzImage' is smaller then the one 'make
> zImage
hi,all
http://ertw.com/blog/archives/make_bzimage_vs_make_zimage-170404.html
someone tell me that the kernel made by 'make bzImage' is smaller then the one 'make
zImage' made it.
is it correct?
--
P4/2.4B
ELSA 528/128
512MB DDR333
240GB
MSI 845PE
BenQ FP557s
Pioneer D
Hi,
I'm running debian unstable, and all of a sudden I can't compile a kernel.
The actual compilation seems to go ok (and leaves a vmlinux in the root of
the kernel source tree), but when trynig to make a zImage or bzImage I get
the error:
ld -m elf_i386 -Ttext 0x1000 -e startup_32
-Original Message-
From: Morten Liebach <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Mon, 7 Aug 2000 10:34:44 +0200
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: how to make a zImage
Hi,
Thanks. The book is Debian GNU/Linux Unleashed with a CD containing the
binaries for slink. It has a chap
> Now, you say you _have_to_ have a zImage, so you just have to compile
> all that you can as modules, and only have the bare essentials that you
> need _in_ the kernel, untill you partitions are mounted and you can
> load the modules.
I heard that the zImage support is going to be
On 7, aug, 2000 at 04:08:00 +0800, Joey Kool wrote:
> Hi,
> I have found the steps to making a new kernel. If I have a
> kernel-source.deb file, can I just do a make zImage supposing I have just
> installed debian with a bzImage?
>
Yes!
> regards,
> joey
>
>
Hi,
I have found the steps to making a new kernel. If I have a kernel-source.deb
file, can I just do a make zImage supposing I have just installed debian with a
bzImage?
regards,
joey
-Original Message-
From: "Joey Kool" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Mon, 07 Aug 2000 1
x27;t make head or tail of
it. (maybe I should read another 10 more times?) Thank you. This is because I
want to do a "make zImage". My laptop can't stand a bzImage. Or can the
kernel-package make a zImage kernel??
regards,
joey
--
___
Get
On 09 Jun 2000, Bolan Meek wrote:
[snip]
> I don't think you're supposed to `make clean` after `make dep`:
> you'll be removing some of the work done by `make menuconfig`
> and `make dep`. I always go straight to `make zImage` or bzImage`
> after `make dep`.
>
"adam.edgar" wrote:
>
> I have run into a bit of a problem when compiling the test kernel
> under potato. When I make zImage it runs all the way to the end and then
> crashes after reporting that the system is to large.
In that case, use `make bzImage`. It
I have run into a bit of a problem when compiling the test kernel
under potato. When I make zImage it runs all the way to the end and then
crashes after reporting that the system is to large. Yet the size it
reports is actualy smaller than that of the current kernel (The default
for potato
cls--colo spgs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
cls> i'm working on my first kernel recompile. i'm at the
cls> point where i need to move the recompiled kernel to the
cls> to boot location. unfortunately, i cannot find the
cls> recompiled kernel.
Since nobody seems to have suggested it yet, why don't
You're looking in the right place (/usr/src/linux/arch/i386/boot) for the
zImage file. If it's not there, your description is missing some detail
that, if we know it, would explain what happened. A couple of possibilities:
1. You never mention actually making the symlink "ln -s
ot;linux-2.2.14.tar.gz" (from
> http://www.kernel.org) to /usr/src.
>
> 3. as root and from /usr/src, i ran "tar xvzf
> lin*.tar.gz"
>
> 4. cd to /usr/src/linux
>
> 5. ran "make mrproper"
>
> 6. ran "make config"
>
> 7. c
I never made a zImage, I guess you should make a bzImage (it's
smaller), but if you want to find it just go to /usr/src/linux and type
find . | grep Image
By the way a bzImage always resides in $SRCDIR/arch/i386/boot/
Ron Rademaker
PS. Don't forget to make and install your modu
I'm sure someone here can tell you exactly where it is. I would guess
somewhere in the directory where you unpacked the source code. A couple
of ways you could find it is use the 'find' command or 'updatedb' and
then use 'locate zImage'
hth,
kent
cls--c
rrently running potato on kernel 2.0.36.
2. downloaded "linux-2.2.14.tar.gz" (from
http://www.kernel.org) to /usr/src.
3. as root and from /usr/src, i ran "tar xvzf
lin*.tar.gz"
4. cd to /usr/src/linux
5. ran "make mrproper"
6. ran "make config"
7. co
On Wed, Sep 02, 1998 at 02:21:42PM +0200, Nils Rennebarth wrote:
> It's small enough to include it for your convienience
which I didn't do. Here it is
Nils
--
*-*
| Quotes from the net: L> Linus Torvalds, W> Winfried Tr
a known problem, and that thinkpads, tecras, and
> some other laptops can't boot from a bzImage.
There is a kernel patch however that lets me boot my tecra from a bzImage
It's small enough to include it for your convienience
> The kernel I get from 'make zImage' fails in
e.
The kernel I get from 'make zImage' fails in the same way.
However, 'make bzImage' gives me a kernel that is only ONE byte smaller
(340654 vs 340655).
The files themselves are quite different internally, but this made me
suspicious anyway.
I'm working with 2.0.34
I&
On Fri, 6 Mar 1998, Ian Perry wrote:
> Hi,
> Can anyone please tell me the difference between the files vmliniz and
> zImage ?
>
> I recompiled the kernel-2.0.32 and the new vmlinux file in the linux
> directory was 1087525 bytes
> while the original kernel-2.0.32 vmlinux
Hi,
Can anyone please tell me the difference between the files vmliniz and
zImage ?
I recompiled the kernel-2.0.32 and the new vmlinux file in the linux
directory was 1087525 bytes
while the original kernel-2.0.32 vmlinux file was 675524 bytes... quite a
difference.
the new zImage file was
> David Densmore wrote:
> >
> > After executing the command make zImage, I cannot find zImage.
> >
> > Here are the last 6 lines of screen output from make zImage. Is this
> > of any significance?
> >
> > make[1]: Entering directory
> > `/us
src/kernel-source-2.0.30/arch/i386/boot'
> > as86 -0 -a -o bootsect.o bootsect.s
> > make[1]: as86: Command not found
> > make[1]: *** [bootsect.o] Error 127
> > make[1]: Leaving directory
> > `/usr/src/kernel-source-2.0.30/arch/i386/boot'
> > make: *** [zIma
David Densmore wrote:
>
> After executing the command make zImage, I cannot find zImage.
>
> Here are the last 6 lines of screen output from make zImage. Is this
> of any significance?
>
> make[1]: Entering directory
> `/usr/src/kernel-source-2.0.30/arch/i386/boot
After executing the command make zImage, I cannot find zImage.
Here are the last 6 lines of screen output from make zImage. Is this
of any significance?
make[1]: Entering directory `/usr/src/kernel-source-2.0.30/arch/i386/boot'
as86 -0 -a -o bootsect.o bootsect.s
make[1]: as86: Comman
27 matches
Mail list logo
