On 31/3/25 03:23, Marc Shapiro wrote:
I was looking into Brave the other day, but what stopped me was the lack
of anything to replace Video Download Helper. Am I missing something?
Is there a way to download YouTube videos in Brave, or do I stick with
Firefox?
Marc
To download youtube vide
On Tue, 1 Apr 2025 15:16:52 -0400
Eben King wrote:
Hello Eben,
>On 4/1/25 14:02, Brad Rogers wrote:
>>
>> The error message that now displays, is thus;
I wrote none of that.
You do Bret Busby, who is far more knowledgeable than I with regard to
this matter, a disservice.
Please take more care
On 4/1/25 14:02, Brad Rogers wrote:
The error message that now displays, is thus;
"
Ad blockers violate YouTube's Terms of Service
It looks like you may be using an ad blocker. Video playback is blocked
unless YouTube is allowlisted or the ad blocker is disabled.
Ads allow YouTube to be used
On Mon, 31 Mar 2025 21:14:18 -0700
Marc Shapiro wrote:
Hello Marc,
>Yes, but that version does not download from YouTube. I have yt-dlp,
Ah; I have no interest in yt.
--
Regards _ "Valid sig separator is {dash}{dash}{space}"
/ ) "The blindingly obvious is never immedia
On 1/4/25 12:14, Marc Shapiro wrote:
On 3/30/25 12:30 PM, Brad Rogers wrote:
On Sun, 30 Mar 2025 12:23:04 -0700
Marc Shapiro wrote:
Hello Marc,
I was looking into Brave the other day, but what stopped me was the
lack of anything to replace Video Download Helper.
I've got VDH installed in B
On 3/30/25 12:30 PM, Brad Rogers wrote:
On Sun, 30 Mar 2025 12:23:04 -0700
Marc Shapiro wrote:
Hello Marc,
I was looking into Brave the other day, but what stopped me was the
lack of anything to replace Video Download Helper.
I've got VDH installed in Brave.
https://chromewebstore.google.
I was looking into Brave the other day, but what stopped me was the lack
of anything to replace Video Download Helper. Am I missing something?
Is there a way to download YouTube videos in Brave, or do I stick with
Firefox?
Marc
On 3/6/25 1:25 PM, Greg Wooledge wrote:
On Thu, Mar 06, 2025
?
>
You may want to try out KDE's Falkon Web Browser. It is fast. It comes with
ad blocking. Cosmetically it looks good in KDE.
>
> Marc
>
>
> On 3/6/25 1:25 PM, Greg Wooledge wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 06, 2025 at 21:50:27 +0100, KISER JD wrote:
> >> The C
On Sun, 30 Mar 2025 12:23:04 -0700
Marc Shapiro wrote:
Hello Marc,
>I was looking into Brave the other day, but what stopped me was the
>lack of anything to replace Video Download Helper.
I've got VDH installed in Brave.
https://chromewebstore.google.com/detail/video-downloadhelper/lmjnegcaekl
On 3/9/25 1:05 AM, Christopher David Howie wrote:
On 3/6/25 4:25 PM, Greg Wooledge wrote:
I ended up installing Brave. Sure, it's Chromium-based, and it will
eventually drop support for Manifest v2 extensions, including uBlock
Origin (even though it's supported right now). But it has its own
b
i currently use firefox and have mostly been ok with it.
would like to try something else.
currently running testing.
any that have any filtering capabilities? yt and a few
other sites are intolerable without a decent blocker.
songbird
On 7/3/25 01:57, Bret Busby wrote:
On 7/3/25 01:32, songbird wrote:
i currently use firefox and have mostly been ok with it.
would like to try something else.
currently running testing.
any that have any filtering capabilities? yt and a few
other sites are intolerable without a d
On 3/6/25 12:32, songbird wrote:
any that have any filtering capabilities? yt and a few
other sites are intolerable without a decent blocker.
If you're talking about ads, Noscript and Ghostery on FF take care of
them for me.
is anyone using opera
On 3/9/25 08:35, debian-u...@howorth.org.uk wrote:
D MacDougall wrote: > On 3/8/25 12: 34,
debian-user@ howorth. org. uk wrote: > > That's just a blank page
except for a picture of a duck, the word > > DuckDuckGo and a search
box. No explanation of anything
D MacDougall wrote:
> On 3/8/2
On Sun, 9 Mar 2025 11:15:12 -0400
Ken Burns wrote:
> Key point: "(if the user opts-in to them)". If the user (myself
> included) clicks the readily displayed option to opt out, then you
> get very effective ad blocking, combined with exceptional privacy.
>
Yes, and since privacy is a huge field
D MacDougall wrote:
> On 3/8/25 12:34, debian-u...@howorth.org.uk wrote:
> > That's just a blank page except for a picture of a duck, the word
> > DuckDuckGo and a search box. No explanation of anything at any
> > length?
>
>
> Very odd. On my phone I see exactly what you see plus several
Greg Wooledge wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 08, 2025 at 13:39:18 -0800, Charlie Gibbs wrote:
> > On Sat Mar 8 13:29:36 2025 debian-u...@howorth.org.uk wrote:
> > > D MacDougall wrote:
> > >> https://duckduckgo.com
> > >
> > > That's just a blank page except for a picture of a duck, the word
> > > D
On Sun, Mar 09, 2025 at 11:34:41 -0400, deb...@kcburns.com wrote:
> On 3/9/25 1:05 AM, Christopher David Howie wrote:
> > Many of my friends keep recommending Brave, but I cannot get past the
> > fact that their business model is to strip ads from sites and insert
> > their own ads instead (if the
On 3/9/25 1:05 AM, Christopher David Howie wrote:
On 3/6/25 4:25 PM, Greg Wooledge wrote:
I ended up installing Brave. Sure, it's Chromium-based, and it will
eventually drop support for Manifest v2 extensions, including uBlock
Origin (even though it's supported right now). But it has its own
b
On 08/03/2025 22:56, Greg Wooledge wrote:
On Sat, Mar 08, 2025 at 13:39:18 -0800, Charlie Gibbs wrote:
On Sat Mar 8 13:29:36 2025 debian-u...@howorth.org.uk wrote:
D MacDougall wrote:
https://duckduckgo.com
That's just a blank page except for a picture of a duck, the word
DuckDuckGo and a
On Sun, Mar 9, 2025 at 4:22 AM Christopher David Howie
wrote:
>
> On 3/6/25 4:25 PM, Greg Wooledge wrote:
> > I ended up installing Brave. Sure, it's Chromium-based, and it will
> > eventually drop support for Manifest v2 extensions, including uBlock
> > Origin (even though it's supported right n
On 3/8/25 12:34, debian-u...@howorth.org.uk wrote:
> That's just a blank page except for a picture of a duck, the word
> DuckDuckGo and a search box. No explanation of anything at any length?
Very odd. On my phone I see exactly what you see plus several other
things on the page. One other thin
On Sat, Mar 8, 2025 at 10:02 PM John Hasler wrote:
>
> Greg writes:
> > looking at the HTML source with Ctrl-U, it's all one line. Seriously,
> > who does that?
>
> "Website builders" and "content management systems". Modern Web
> designers never deal with HTML.
There are also server-side compo
On 3/6/25 4:25 PM, Greg Wooledge wrote:
I ended up installing Brave. Sure, it's Chromium-based, and it will
eventually drop support for Manifest v2 extensions, including uBlock
Origin (even though it's supported right now). But it has its own
built-in ad blocking*by default*, so you don't actua
On 3/7/25 11:49 AM, Jeffrey Walton wrote:
I believe all the major browsers are using Manifest v3 nowadays.
Most support Mv3 now, but AFAIK only Chrome has actually disabled Mv2
support. All of my Mv2 extensions continue to work on Firefox.
--
Chris Howie
http://www.chrishowie.com
http://en.
On 9/3/25 06:56, Greg Wooledge wrote:
P.S. looking at the HTML source with Ctrl-U, it's all one line. Seriously,
who does that?
hobbit:~$ xclip -o | wc
02960 44363
44 kilobytes of HTML/CSS/Javascript, all in one. stupid. line. Well,
they found a way to make me stop trying to re
On Sun, Mar 09, 2025 at 07:04:30 +0800, Bret Busby wrote:
> That long line of code, might not be completely stupid. It might have some
> hidden AI thing (that they figure no member of the public would find, due to
> the length of the line), that starts playing "Rubber Ducky, you're the one",
> in a
Greg writes:
> looking at the HTML source with Ctrl-U, it's all one line. Seriously,
> who does that?
"Website builders" and "content management systems". Modern Web
designers never deal with HTML.
--
John Hasler
j...@sugarbit.com
Elmwood, WI USA
On Sat, Mar 08, 2025 at 13:39:18 -0800, Charlie Gibbs wrote:
> On Sat Mar 8 13:29:36 2025 debian-u...@howorth.org.uk wrote:
> > D MacDougall wrote:
> >> https://duckduckgo.com
> >
> > That's just a blank page except for a picture of a duck, the word
> > DuckDuckGo and a search box. No explanation
On Sat Mar 8 13:29:36 2025 debian-u...@howorth.org.uk wrote:
> D MacDougall wrote:
>
>> On 2025-03-08, D MacDougall wrote: =20
> ...
>>> I've been using DuckDuckGo as my primary search engine for
>>> years and have found that it's gradually been improving to the
>>> point that I seldom have ca
D MacDougall wrote:
> > On 2025-03-08, D MacDougall wrote:
> ...
> > > I've been using DuckDuckGo as my primary search engine for
> > > years and have found that it's gradually been improving to the
> > > point that I seldom have cause to use any other. Along the way I
> > > discovered that th
On 2025-03-08, D MacDougall wrote:
...
> I've been using DuckDuckGo as my primary search engine for
> years and have found that it's gradually been improving to the point that
> I seldom have cause to use any other. Along the way I discovered that
> they also make a browser.
...
In the Play
On 2025-03-08, D MacDougall wrote:
>>
>> >I use a "DNS privé" that's effective in blocking ads on my Android phone.
>>
> Since the subject of browsers on phones has come up I thought I'd put in
> my 2 bits. I've been using DuckDuckGo as my primary search engine for
> years and have found that it'
On Sat, 8 Mar 2025, poc...@homemail.com wrote:
> Pi-hole is your friend https://pi-hole.net/
Interesting, but for the moment I don't fancy pi-hole as my DNS server. Roger
On Sat, 8 Mar 2025, Chris Green wrote:
> > > ... some humongous hosts file to block ads
> >
> wget https://raw.githubusercontent.com/StevenBlack/hosts/master/hosts
>
131425 ad servers. Fantastic! Thanks, Roger
On 3/6/25 12:32 PM, songbird wrote:
i currently use firefox and have mostly been ok with it.
would like to try something else.
currently running testing.
any that have any filtering capabilities? yt and a few
other sites are intolerable without a decent blocker.
songbird
h
Roger Price wrote:
> On Fri, 7 Mar 2025, Greg wrote:
>
> > On 2025-03-07, Stefan Monnier wrote:
> > I believe David Wright uses some humongous hosts file to block ads on
> > his computer rather than a brower add-on (if I'm remembering and
> > understanding
> > correctly).
>
> I do something si
On Fri, 7 Mar 2025, Greg wrote:
> On 2025-03-07, Stefan Monnier wrote:
> I believe David Wright uses some humongous hosts file to block ads on
> his computer rather than a brower add-on (if I'm remembering and understanding
> correctly).
I do something similar but it's limited. What's the best w
On 2025-03-07, Stefan Monnier wrote:
>>> I do have uBlock Origin installed and working in the browsers as well.
>>> Getting used to this and then using my phone on mobile data is a jarring
>>> experience!
>>
>>I don't understand. Why don't you install uBlock Origin on your phone?
>I use a "DNS
* On 2025 07 Mar 08:09 -0600, fxkl4...@protonmail.com wrote:
> On Thu, 6 Mar 2025, Nate Bargmann wrote:
>
> > My answer is to block as much as possible at my router. As I run
> > OpenWrt for my router, I have the Adblock package installed and running.
> > This way I get blocking applied for other
Hello,
from what I understand, the point is not if a web browser implements
Manifest V3, but how it does so.
Chrome disables certain features (blocking WebRequest) used by adblockers.
Chromium still allows to install Ublock Origin (normal version, not Lite
version) but warns that perhaps in
On Thu, Mar 6, 2025 at 4:25 PM Greg Wooledge wrote:
>
> On Thu, Mar 06, 2025 at 21:50:27 +0100, KISER JD wrote:
> > The Chromium-based browsers will soon lose many adblock capabilities due to
> > Manifest V3.
> >
>
> When I updated google-chrome-stable the other day, it informed me
> that it was
On 2025-03-07, Stefan Monnier wrote:
>> I do have uBlock Origin installed and working in the browsers as well.
>> Getting used to this and then using my phone on mobile data is a jarring
>> experience!
>
> I don't understand. Why don't you install uBlock Origin on your phone?
I use a "DNS privé"
On Thu, 6 Mar 2025, Nate Bargmann wrote:
> My answer is to block as much as possible at my router. As I run
> OpenWrt for my router, I have the Adblock package installed and running.
> This way I get blocking applied for other devices such as our phones and
> Chromium when it disables uBlock orig
* On 2025 06 Mar 21:57 -0600, Stefan Monnier wrote:
> > I do have uBlock Origin installed and working in the browsers as well.
> > Getting used to this and then using my phone on mobile data is a jarring
> > experience!
>
> I don't understand. Why don't you install uBlock Origin on your phone?
O
Greg Wooledge wrote:
...
> One of the possible answers was to switch to "uBlock Origin Lite",
> which is less capable (it can't "phone home" to update its block lists
> because Manifest v3 doesn't permit that), but may still be good enough
> for most people.
>
> Another answer is to use Firefox. I
On 07/03/2025 04:25, Greg Wooledge wrote:
One of the possible answers was to switch to "uBlock Origin Lite",
which is less capable (it can't "phone home" to update its block lists
because Manifest v3 doesn't permit that), but may still be good enough
for most people.
I believed that main limita
> I do have uBlock Origin installed and working in the browsers as well.
> Getting used to this and then using my phone on mobile data is a jarring
> experience!
I don't understand. Why don't you install uBlock Origin on your phone?
Stefan "using uMatrix on his phone"
My answer is to block as much as possible at my router. As I run
OpenWrt for my router, I have the Adblock package installed and running.
This way I get blocking applied for other devices such as our phones and
Chromium when it disables uBlock origin.
There are other options I'm aware of but have
songbird writes:
> i currently use firefox and have mostly been ok with it.
>
> would like to try something else.
>
> currently running testing.
>
> any that have any filtering capabilities? yt and a few
> other sites are intolerable without a decent blocker.
>
>
> songbird
If you wer
Hi,
On Thu, Mar 06, 2025 at 12:32:33PM -0500, songbird wrote:
> i currently use firefox and have mostly been ok with it.
>
> would like to try something else.
As far as I'm aware every alternative to Firefox is one or more of:
- Chromium, so strictly worse
- Based on Chromium, so strictly
On Thu, Mar 06, 2025 at 21:50:27 +0100, KISER JD wrote:
> The Chromium-based browsers will soon lose many adblock capabilities due to
> Manifest V3.
>
When I updated google-chrome-stable the other day, it informed me
that it was disabling uBlock Origin. Thus began my own search for
some answers
On Thu, Mar 6, 2025, at 18:32, songbird wrote:
> i currently use firefox and have mostly been ok with it.
>
> would like to try something else.
>
> currently running testing.
>
> any that have any filtering capabilities? yt and a few
> other sites are intolerable without a decent blocker.
>
Bret Busby wrote:
> On 7/3/25 01:32, songbird wrote:
> >i currently use firefox and have mostly been ok with it.
> >
> >would like to try something else.
> >
> >currently running testing.
> >
> >any that have any filtering capabilities? yt and a few
> > other sites are intolera
On 2025-03-06 12:32, songbird wrote:
i currently use firefox and have mostly been ok with it.
would like to try something else.
currently running testing.
any that have any filtering capabilities? yt and a few
other sites are intolerable without a decent blocker.
songbird
On 7/3/25 01:32, songbird wrote:
i currently use firefox and have mostly been ok with it.
would like to try something else.
currently running testing.
any that have any filtering capabilities? yt and a few
other sites are intolerable without a decent blocker.
songbird
Try t
On Thu, 13 Feb 2025 15:52:38 -0800
David Hoff Jr wrote:
> I have a fresh install on Debian 12 with all updates. I am trying
> to use Links web browser to access the dailycaller.com web site but am
> being blocked. A message says to enable cookies which I have tried
> using "link
* David Hoff Jr [25-02/13=Th 15:52 -0800]:
> I have a fresh install on Debian 12 with all updates. I am trying
> to use Links web browser to access the dailycaller.com web site but am
> being blocked. A message says to enable cookies which I have tried using
> "link
I have a fresh install on Debian 12 with all updates. I am trying
to use Links web browser to access the dailycaller.com web site but am
being blocked. A message says to enable cookies which I have tried using
"links -enable-cookies dailycaller.com", but to no avail. Is there a
solution
; > Richmond writes:
> >
> >> When playing videos in a web browser, and sending the sound to
> a
> >> bluetooth speaker (amazon echo) I get playback problems;
> stuttering,
> >> sound quality reduction to AM radio level or lower). The
Lee writes:
> On Sun, Apr 7, 2024 at 3:30 PM Richmond wrote:
>>
>> Richmond writes:
>>
>> > Richmond writes:
>> >
>> >> When playing videos in a web browser, and sending the sound to a
>> >> bluetooth speaker (amazon echo) I get pla
On Sun, Apr 7, 2024 at 3:30 PM Richmond wrote:
>
> Richmond writes:
>
> > Richmond writes:
> >
> >> When playing videos in a web browser, and sending the sound to a
> >> bluetooth speaker (amazon echo) I get playback problems; stuttering,
> >> so
Have you tried a LIVE-version of another Linux distribution? It will be
interesting to compare.
вс, 7 апр. 2024 г. в 22:30, Richmond :
> Richmond writes:
>
> > Richmond writes:
> >
> >> When playing videos in a web browser, and sending the sound to a
> >> b
Richmond writes:
> Richmond writes:
>
>> When playing videos in a web browser, and sending the sound to a
>> bluetooth speaker (amazon echo) I get playback problems; stuttering,
>> sound quality reduction to AM radio level or lower). These things can
>> clear u
Richmond writes:
> When playing videos in a web browser, and sending the sound to a
> bluetooth speaker (amazon echo) I get playback problems; stuttering,
> sound quality reduction to AM radio level or lower). These things can
> clear up after a minute or two, or be reduced.
>
When playing videos in a web browser, and sending the sound to a
bluetooth speaker (amazon echo) I get playback problems; stuttering,
sound quality reduction to AM radio level or lower). These things can
clear up after a minute or two, or be reduced.
When playing from nvlc however I get no such
On 8/4/23 19:26, David Wright wrote:
On Thu 03 Aug 2023 at 15:56:07 (-0700), David Christensen wrote:
On 8/2/23 19:05, Greg Wooledge wrote:
On Wed, Aug 02, 2023 at 07:01:22PM -0700, David Christensen wrote:
Interesting. Is there a Debian specification that explains the 127.0.1.1
entry?
http
On Thu 03 Aug 2023 at 15:56:07 (-0700), David Christensen wrote:
> On 8/2/23 19:05, Greg Wooledge wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 02, 2023 at 07:01:22PM -0700, David Christensen wrote:
> > > Interesting. Is there a Debian specification that explains the 127.0.1.1
> > > entry?
> >
> > https://www.debian.or
On 8/2/23 19:05, Greg Wooledge wrote:
On Wed, Aug 02, 2023 at 07:01:22PM -0700, David Christensen wrote:
Interesting. Is there a Debian specification that explains the 127.0.1.1
entry?
https://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/debian-reference/ch05.en.html#_the_hostname_resolution
I'm sure there ar
On Wed 02 Aug 2023 at 14:48:30 (-0400), gene heskett wrote:
> On 8/2/23 13:21, Greg Wooledge wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 02, 2023 at 01:07:13PM -0400, gene heskett wrote:
> > > On 8/2/23 07:14, Greg Wooledge wrote:
> > > > On Wed, Aug 02, 2023 at 08:43:32AM +0100, Darac Marjal wrote:
> > > > > * "localh
On Wed, Aug 02, 2023 at 08:05:11PM -0400, gene heskett wrote:
[...]
> show mea link to the doc that explains that please
> Cheers, Gene Heskett.
There's not "the doc", but many of them. For starters, rfc5735 [1]
tells us that the whole subnet 127.0.0.0/8 is available for
loopback purposes (I've
On Thu 03 Aug 2023 at 07:48:54 (+0800), jeremy ardley wrote:
> On 3/8/23 07:34, Greg Wooledge wrote:
> > > On Wed 02 Aug 2023 at 16:00:24 (-0400), gene heskett wrote:
> > > > On 8/2/23 15:15, Brian wrote:
> > > > > Where is the line with 127.0.1.1? Debian always provides that.
> > > > >
> > > > Tr
On Wed, Aug 02, 2023 at 07:01:22PM -0700, David Christensen wrote:
> Interesting. Is there a Debian specification that explains the 127.0.1.1
> entry?
https://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/debian-reference/ch05.en.html#_the_hostname_resolution
I'm sure there are others, but this was the first one I
On 8/2/23 16:34, Greg Wooledge wrote:
On Wed 02 Aug 2023 at 16:00:24 (-0400), gene heskett wrote:
On 8/2/23 15:15, Brian wrote:
Where is the line with 127.0.1.1? Debian always provides that.
True, but I've never seen a description of what that does or what its
for.
https://www.debian.org/do
On 8/2/23 16:26, David Wright wrote:
On Wed 02 Aug 2023 at 16:00:24 (-0400), gene heskett wrote:
On 8/2/23 15:15, Brian wrote:
On Wed 02 Aug 2023 at 14:52:26 -0400, gene heskett wrote:
On 8/2/23 14:26, Brian wrote:
No - that isn't the way it works. Give what is asked for, not a censored
versi
On 8/2/23 17:02, Brian wrote:
On Wed 02 Aug 2023 at 16:00:24 -0400, gene heskett wrote:
On 8/2/23 15:15, Brian wrote:
On Wed 02 Aug 2023 at 14:52:26 -0400, gene heskett wrote:
On 8/2/23 14:26, Brian wrote:
No - that isn't the way it works. Give what is asked for, not a censored
version that
On 8/2/23 17:02, Brian wrote:
On Wed 02 Aug 2023 at 16:00:24 -0400, gene heskett wrote:
On 8/2/23 15:15, Brian wrote:
On Wed 02 Aug 2023 at 14:52:26 -0400, gene heskett wrote:
On 8/2/23 14:26, Brian wrote:
No - that isn't the way it works. Give what is asked for, not a censored
version that
On 3/8/23 07:34, Greg Wooledge wrote:
On Wed 02 Aug 2023 at 16:00:24 (-0400), gene heskett wrote:
On 8/2/23 15:15, Brian wrote:
Where is the line with 127.0.1.1? Debian always provides that.
True, but I've never seen a description of what that does or what its
for.
https://www.debian.org/d
> On Wed 02 Aug 2023 at 16:00:24 (-0400), gene heskett wrote:
> > On 8/2/23 15:15, Brian wrote:
> > > Where is the line with 127.0.1.1? Debian always provides that.
> > >
> > True, but I've never seen a description of what that does or what its
> > for.
https://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/debian-r
On Wed 02 Aug 2023 at 16:00:24 (-0400), gene heskett wrote:
> On 8/2/23 15:15, Brian wrote:
> > On Wed 02 Aug 2023 at 14:52:26 -0400, gene heskett wrote:
> > > On 8/2/23 14:26, Brian wrote:
> > > > No - that isn't the way it works. Give what is asked for, not a censored
> > > > version that suits y
On 8/2/23 15:17, Greg Wooledge wrote:
On Wed, Aug 02, 2023 at 08:14:41PM +0100, Brian wrote:
Where is the line with 127.0.1.1? Debian always provides that.
Either deleted, or not provided by Armbian in the first place. In any
case, it's not immediately relevant to this thread's issue, so long
On 8/2/23 15:15, Brian wrote:
On Wed 02 Aug 2023 at 14:52:26 -0400, gene heskett wrote:
On 8/2/23 14:26, Brian wrote:
No - that isn't the way it works. Give what is asked for, not a censored
version that suits you.
ok, same cat in full:
gene@bpi52:~$ cat /etc/hosts
127.0.0.1 localhost
On 8/2/23, Brian wrote:
> On Wed 02 Aug 2023 at 14:52:26 -0400, gene heskett wrote:
>
>> On 8/2/23 14:26, Brian wrote:
>> > No - that isn't the way it works. Give what is asked for, not a
>> > censored
>> > version that suits you.
>> >
>> ok, same cat in full:
>> gene@bpi52:~$ cat /etc/hosts
>> 127
On Wed, Aug 02, 2023 at 08:14:41PM +0100, Brian wrote:
> Where is the line with 127.0.1.1? Debian always provides that.
Either deleted, or not provided by Armbian in the first place. In any
case, it's not immediately relevant to this thread's issue, so long as
the web service doesn't redirect to
Gene,
On Wed, Aug 02, 2023 at 02:05:48PM -0400, gene heskett wrote:
> this is a blatent attack by chrome
You've absolutely no evidence to suggest that, and other people
have already pointed out they are unable to replicate your issues.
Like almost every thread you start or derail here this is
ove
On 8/2/23 14:26, Brian wrote:
On Wed 02 Aug 2023 at 13:07:13 -0400, gene heskett wrote:
On 8/2/23 07:14, Greg Wooledge wrote:
On Wed, Aug 02, 2023 at 08:43:32AM +0100, Darac Marjal wrote:
* "localhost:80" - This is ambiguous
[...]
It would be nice if we had an exact recipe for how to repr
On 8/2/23 13:21, Greg Wooledge wrote:
On Wed, Aug 02, 2023 at 01:07:13PM -0400, gene heskett wrote:
On 8/2/23 07:14, Greg Wooledge wrote:
On Wed, Aug 02, 2023 at 08:43:32AM +0100, Darac Marjal wrote:
* "localhost:80" - This is ambiguous
[...]
It would be nice if we had an exact recipe for
On 8/2/23 09:42, Stefan Monnier wrote:
It would be nice if we had an exact recipe for how to reproduce the
problem. Failing that, it'll be up to Gene to debug the situation on
his end. I'm still leaning toward an edited /etc/hosts file.
My guess is that his Chrome runs in a kind of container
On Wed, Aug 02, 2023 at 01:07:13PM -0400, gene heskett wrote:
> On 8/2/23 07:14, Greg Wooledge wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 02, 2023 at 08:43:32AM +0100, Darac Marjal wrote:
> > > * "localhost:80" - This is ambiguous
> > >
> [...]
> >
> > It would be nice if we had an exact recipe for how to reproduce
On 8/2/23 07:14, Greg Wooledge wrote:
On Wed, Aug 02, 2023 at 08:43:32AM +0100, Darac Marjal wrote:
* "localhost:80" - This is ambiguous
[...]
It would be nice if we had an exact recipe for how to reproduce the
problem. Failing that, it'll be up to Gene to debug the situation on
his end. I
> It would be nice if we had an exact recipe for how to reproduce the
> problem. Failing that, it'll be up to Gene to debug the situation on
> his end. I'm still leaning toward an edited /etc/hosts file.
My guess is that his Chrome runs in a kind of container that doesn't
have access to the host
On Wed, Aug 02, 2023 at 08:43:32AM +0100, Darac Marjal wrote:
> * "localhost:80" - This is ambiguous
>
> In the case of the latter, are you wanting to use the localhost scheme to
> access the resource called 80 (now, you're going to say "There is no
> protocol called localhost" and I think that Ch
On 01/08/2023 10:33, gene heskett wrote:
Google seems to have high jacked port 80, I cannot use it as a browser
to run klipper as a google search intercepts port 80, so localhost:80
cannot be used for troubleshooting or for running a 3d printer with
klipper..
I think this comes down to an amb
On Tuesday 01 August 2023 05:33:55 am gene heskett wrote:
> Google seems to have high jacked port 80, I cannot use it as a browser
> to run klipper as a google search intercepts port 80, so localhost:80
> cannot be used for troubleshooting or for running a 3d printer with
> klipper..
>
> FF has
On 1/8/23 20:54, gene heskett wrote:
On 8/1/23 06:26, Bret Busby wrote:
On 1/8/23 17:33, gene heskett wrote:
Google seems to have high jacked port 80, I cannot use it as a
browser to run klipper as a google search intercepts port 80, so
localhost:80 cannot be used for troubleshooting or for ru
On 8/1/23 06:26, Bret Busby wrote:
On 1/8/23 17:33, gene heskett wrote:
Google seems to have high jacked port 80, I cannot use it as a browser
to run klipper as a google search intercepts port 80, so localhost:80
cannot be used for troubleshooting or for running a 3d printer with
klipper..
F
On Tue, Aug 01, 2023 at 08:13:50AM -0400, gene heskett wrote:
> On 8/1/23 06:16, Phil Wyett wrote:
> > On Tue, 2023-08-01 at 05:33 -0400, gene heskett wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > Maybe direct this to the appropriate arena. Debians default browser is
> > Firefox, if there is no issue with FF means
On 8/1/23 06:16, Phil Wyett wrote:
On Tue, 2023-08-01 at 05:33 -0400, gene heskett wrote:
Google seems to have high jacked port 80, I cannot use it as a
browser
to run klipper as a google search intercepts port 80, so localhost:80
cannot be used for troubleshooting or for running a 3d printer wi
t;
> FF has no such problems.
On my system, with this package:
ii google-chrome-stable 115.0.5790.110-1 amd64 The web browser from
Google
and with Help -> About Google Chrome showing this version string:
Version 115.0.5790.110 (Official Build) (64-bit)
I cannot reproduce your re
1 - 100 of 661 matches
Mail list logo
