Re: No image from analog cameras with TW6816 video capture card.

x 768 max and 728 x 488 NTSC, to work with a bluecherry > TW-220-8 board, identified by lshw as: > > Intersil Techwell TW6816 multimedia video controller Rev 10. > > The driver (tw68): > > The first suspicious thing is that the board is apparently not detected by the > ker

Re: Firefox and Video DRM

On Fri 31 Jan 2025 at 14:06:57 (+0200), Henrik Ahlgren wrote: > On Fri, 2025-01-31 at 21:53 +1100, George at Clug wrote: > > The same (now that I am using backports): > > $ yt-dlp --version > > 2025.01.15 > > Due to the nature of this program (Google plays the cat and mouse > game), new versions a

Re: Don't set APT::Default-Release to backports (was: Re: Firefox and Video DRM)

On Sat, 1 Feb 2025, Max Nikulin wrote: > On 01/02/2025 02:34, Eddie wrote: > > In Synaptic go to "Settings" - 'Preferences" - "Distributions" > > then select "Prefer Versions From" - backports > > Do not do it. It is not a supposed way to use backports. > > > It is

Re: Don't set APT::Default-Release to backports (was: Re: Firefox and Video DRM)

On Sat, Feb 1, 2025 at 2:17 AM Max Nikulin wrote: > > On 01/02/2025 02:34, Eddie wrote: > > In Synaptic go to "Settings" - 'Preferences" - "Distributions" > > then select "Prefer Versions From" - backports > > Do not do it. It is not a supposed way to use backports. >

Don't set APT::Default-Release to backports (was: Re: Firefox and Video DRM)

On 01/02/2025 02:34, Eddie wrote: In Synaptic go to "Settings" - 'Preferences" - "Distributions" then select "Prefer Versions From" - backports Do not do it. It is not a supposed way to use backports. It is therefore recommended to only select single backported

Re: Firefox and Video DRM

On Fri, 31 Jan 2025 22:52:18 +0100 (CET) Roger Price wrote: > deb http://deb.debian.org/debian/ bookworm-backports main contrib > non-free > > Note the http and not https. Is this critical ? Normally, not. It may if you use an apt cache such as apt-cacher-ng. Those cannot inspect an HTTPS str

Re: Firefox and Video DRM

On Fri, 31 Jan 2025 22:41:29 +0100 (CET) Roger Price wrote: > Should I add allow-insecure=yes or allow-downgrade-to-insecure=yes to > sources.list, or is there some better way? Neither. Your line was incorrect. Also, best practice is to create a new file: root@hawk:~# cat /etc/apt/sources.list

Re: Firefox and Video DRM

On Saturday, 01-02-2025 at 09:01 Roger Price wrote: > On Fri, 31 Jan 2025, Jeffrey Walton wrote: > > It is bookworm-backports, not debian-backports. See > > . > > My error, I corrected my sources.list. Command apt update then ran > correctly, > and comman

Re: Firefox and Video DRM

On Fri, 31 Jan 2025, Jeffrey Walton wrote: > It is bookworm-backports, not debian-backports. See > . My error, I corrected my sources.list. Command apt update then ran correctly, and command root@maria ~ apt -t bookworm-backports install yt-dlp youtubedl-gu

Re: Firefox and Video DRM

On Saturday, 01-02-2025 at 08:41 Roger Price wrote: > On Fri, 31 Jan 2025, Eddie wrote: > > On 1/31/25 12:40, Henrik Ahlgren wrote: > > > Packages from backports are pinned with low priority (100) and never > > > installed by default. So in order to install a backported package, you > > > need t

Re: Firefox and Video DRM

On Sat, 1 Feb 2025, George at Clug wrote: > # apt remove yt-dlp youtubedl-gui I successfully removed yt-dlp and youtubedl-gui with this command. My sources.list contains the line deb http://deb.debian.org/debian/ bookworm-backports main contrib non-free Note the http and not https. Is this cr

Re: Firefox and Video DRM

On Fri, Jan 31, 2025 at 4:41 PM Roger Price wrote: > > On Fri, 31 Jan 2025, Eddie wrote: > > On 1/31/25 12:40, Henrik Ahlgren wrote: > > > Packages from backports are pinned with low priority (100) and never > > > installed by default. So in order to install a backported package, you > > > need to

Re: Firefox and Video DRM

On Fri, 31 Jan 2025, Eddie wrote: > On 1/31/25 12:40, Henrik Ahlgren wrote: > > Packages from backports are pinned with low priority (100) and never > > installed by default. So in order to install a backported package, you > > need to do it like: > > > > apt install yt-dlp/bookworm-backports > >

Re: Firefox and Video DRM

On Saturday, 01-02-2025 at 03:57 Roger Price wrote: > On Fri, 31 Jan 2025, Henrik Ahlgren wrote: > > > On Fri, 2025-01-31 at 21:53 +1100, George at Clug wrote: > > > The same (now that I am using backports): > > > $ yt-dlp --version > > > 2025.01.15 > > > > In fact, 2025.01.26 just landed in b

Re: Firefox and Video DRM

On 1/31/25 12:40, Henrik Ahlgren wrote: On Fri, 2025-01-31 at 17:57 +0100, Roger Price wrote: I followed the instructions for synaptic at https://wiki.debian.org and added the repository deb http://deb.debian.org/debian bookworm-backports main contrib non-free I clicked on ¨Reload" to rel

Re: Firefox and Video DRM

On Fri, 2025-01-31 at 17:57 +0100, Roger Price wrote: > I followed the instructions for synaptic at https://wiki.debian.org and added > the repository > > deb http://deb.debian.org/debian bookworm-backports main contrib non-free > > I clicked on ¨Reload" to reload the package listings and searc

Re: Firefox and Video DRM

On Friday 31 January 2025 01:50:52 am George at Clug wrote: > Does anyone use Firefox to watch DRM protected Video content? > > Is it normal for DRM to display lots of ads whenever Firefox is > loaded? > > I did enable DRM once, a long time ago, and I started getting annoy

Re: Firefox and Video DRM

On Fri, 31 Jan 2025, Henrik Ahlgren wrote: > On Fri, 2025-01-31 at 21:53 +1100, George at Clug wrote: > > The same (now that I am using backports): > > $ yt-dlp --version > > 2025.01.15 > > In fact, 2025.01.26 just landed in bookworm-backports today. I followed the instructions for synaptic at h

Re: Firefox and Video DRM

On Fri, 2025-01-31 at 21:53 +1100, George at Clug wrote: > > > The same (now that I am using backports): > $ yt-dlp --version > 2025.01.15 Due to the nature of this program (Google plays the cat and mouse game), new versions are released fairly frequently. In fact, 2025.01.26 just landed in book

Re: Firefox and Video DRM

On Friday, 31-01-2025 at 21:42 Bret Busby wrote: > On 31/1/25 18:19, George at Clug wrote: > > > > > > On Friday, 31-01-2025 at 20:41 Henrik Ahlgren wrote: > >> On Fri, 2025-01-31 at 19:24 +1100, George at Clug wrote: > >>> I have two answers (which might not be good answers, if so someone may

Re: Firefox and Video DRM

On Friday, 31-01-2025 at 21:30 Bret Busby wrote: > On 31/1/25 16:24, George at Clug wrote: > > > > > > On Friday, 31-01-2025 at 18:57 Bret Busby wrote: > >> On 31/1/25 14:50, George at Clug wrote: > >>> Does anyone use Firefox to watch DRM protected V

Re: Firefox and Video DRM

On 31/1/25 18:19, George at Clug wrote: On Friday, 31-01-2025 at 20:41 Henrik Ahlgren wrote: On Fri, 2025-01-31 at 19:24 +1100, George at Clug wrote: I have two answers (which might not be good answers, if so someone may be able to correct me) 1) For some time now yt-dlp has been unable to

Re: Firefox and Video DRM

> > > > Does anyone use Firefox to watch DRM protected Video content? > > > > Is it normal for DRM to display lots of ads whenever Firefox is > > loaded? > > > Hi! What type(s) of ads are you seeing? In other words, are they for > random consumer product

Re: Firefox and Video DRM

On 31/1/25 16:24, George at Clug wrote: On Friday, 31-01-2025 at 18:57 Bret Busby wrote: On 31/1/25 14:50, George at Clug wrote: Does anyone use Firefox to watch DRM protected Video content? Is it normal for DRM to display lots of ads whenever Firefox is loaded? I did enable DRM once, a

Re: Firefox and Video DRM

; that I wanted to watch were not from Youtube. At the time the DRM video was on a news site, from memory. If I come across a DRM video again, I can check. However checking a few news site today, I do not know how to find the video's URL for me to use in downloading. It is good to be able

Re: Firefox and Video DRM

hat I wanted to watch were not from Youtube. yt-dlp supports plenty of video services: 7live, 1News, 1tv, 20min, 23video, 247sports, 24tv.ua, 3qsdn, 3sat, 4tube, 56.com, 6play, 7plus, 8tracks, 9c9media, 9gag, 9News, 9now.com.au, abc.net.au, abcnews, abcotvs, AbemaTV, AbemaTVTitle, acast, AcF

Re: Firefox and Video DRM

On Fri, 2025-01-31 at 17:50 +1100, George at Clug wrote: > > Does anyone use Firefox to watch DRM protected Video content? > > Is it normal for DRM to display lots of ads whenever Firefox is > loaded? Hi! What type(s) of ads are you seeing? In other words, are they for

Re: Firefox and Video DRM

On Friday, 31-01-2025 at 18:57 Bret Busby wrote: > On 31/1/25 14:50, George at Clug wrote: > > Does anyone use Firefox to watch DRM protected Video content? > > > > Is it normal for DRM to display lots of ads whenever Firefox is loaded? > > > > I did enable

Re: Firefox and Video DRM

On 31/1/25 14:50, George at Clug wrote: Does anyone use Firefox to watch DRM protected Video content? Is it normal for DRM to display lots of ads whenever Firefox is loaded? I did enable DRM once, a long time ago, and I started getting annoying ads whenever Firefox was loaded. It took a while

Firefox and Video DRM

Does anyone use Firefox to watch DRM protected Video content? Is it normal for DRM to display lots of ads whenever Firefox is loaded? I did enable DRM once, a long time ago, and I started getting annoying ads whenever Firefox was loaded. It took a while for me to determine it was because of

Re: Video Board Support?

Sent from my iPhone

Re: "lists.debian.org - where can you help?" (Video)

On Thu, Jan 02, 2025 at 13:49:04 -0500, Jeffrey Walton wrote: > I wanted to respond with something like > . The link in the bot in #debian is . There may of course be others.

Re: "lists.debian.org - where can you help?" (Video)

On Thu, Jan 2, 2025 at 1:22 PM Andy Smith wrote: > > Perhaps not quite on topic but over the holiday period I watched this > presentation about lists.debian.org and found it very interesting. > > > https://berlin2024.mini.debconf.org/talks/12-listsdebianorg-where-can-you-help/ > > Or if y

"lists.debian.org - where can you help?" (Video)

Hi, Perhaps not quite on topic but over the holiday period I watched this presentation about lists.debian.org and found it very interesting. https://berlin2024.mini.debconf.org/talks/12-listsdebianorg-where-can-you-help/ Or if you prefer YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PVx

Re: Blank kms screen before starting gstreamer video on kmssink

ample ! autoaudiosink > > which uses the hardware decoder on the NXP i.MX6 SoC. > > The problem I have is that for videos which do not match the aspect ratio of > the screen (e.g. 1280x720 video on 1280x1080 screen) there is still console > text visible on the portion of the

Blank kms screen before starting gstreamer video on kmssink

that for videos which do not match the aspect ratio of the screen (e.g. 1280x720 video on 1280x1080 screen) there is still console text visible on the portion of the screen which is not overlayed with the gstreamer video output. Does anybody know how I can blank the kms screen in shell script

usermod video,audio (was: Re: nvidia driver for GTX 970)

On 16/08/2024 06:15, George at Clug wrote: usermod -a -G video,audio [myusername] It should not be necessary. Udev and systemd-logind "uaccess" feature grants permissions to the current active user through ACLs.

Re: change video driver

On 2024-07-07 09:36, mick.crane wrote: On [cough] Trixie, just how do I change the video driver. I'm using driver xserver-xorg-video-nvidia-tesla-470 on older kernel There must have been a reason, likely the available resolution. With kernel 6.9.7-amd64 have to "startx" and the

change video driver

On [cough] Trixie, just how do I change the video driver. I'm using driver xserver-xorg-video-nvidia-tesla-470 on older kernel There must have been a reason, likely the available resolution. With kernel 6.9.7-amd64 have to "startx" and then the available displays in Xfce are

Re: Re: nouveau on old NV GPUs (was: NVidia 340 video driver in Bookworm?)

On Wed, 2024-07-03 at 23:24 +0200, Hans wrote: > I believe I got a solution. However, you may not be happy with it, > but maybe it will work. Thanks to Hans for the detailed list, which I was not able to use successfully. I had probably either broken something first, or didn't follow the instructi

Re: nouveau on old NV GPUs (was: NVidia 340 video driver in Bookworm?)

This should not have been happened. Maybe you dis something in a wrong way? I treid myself and it did not deinstall kde. It is important, not to do any upgrade while the entry for sid is in sources.list. Just install both packages (as told in the wiki), then after this install remove the si

Re: Re: nouveau on old NV GPUs (was: NVidia 340 video driver in Bookworm?)

> next. I don't have a choice for my laptop, where the NVidia graphic > chip is soldered to the mother board, but for my desktop if Mint > doesn't work out, I'll give serious consideration to getting a > supported video card from *not* NVidia. > Linux Mint current versi

Re: Re: nouveau on old NV GPUs (was: NVidia 340 video driver in Bookworm?)

, saying "you have held broken packages." I've been told that Mint includes NVidia drivers, so I'll try that next. I don't have a choice for my laptop, where the NVidia graphic chip is soldered to the mother board, but for my desktop if Mint doesn't work out, I'

Re: nouveau on old NV GPUs (was: NVidia 340 video driver in Bookworm?)

Tried again, somehow there was no subject sent with my last mail. So, well, I believe I got a solution. However, not everyone might be happy with it, but maybe it will work. I am running the kernel 6.7.12+bpo-amd64 on my system. This is a backport kernel, but it might also work with other

Re: nouveau on old NV GPUs (was: NVidia 340 video driver in Bookworm?)

At the time they were a big > step up. Now NVidia doesn't support them in Debian. What do you > recommend for them? Multiple monitors. No gaming but an occasional > video. And some features of the KDE Kinfocenter, especially the System > Monitor, either don't work at all, or jus

Re: Re: nouveau on old NV GPUs (was: NVidia 340 video driver in Bookworm?)

Hi van Snyder, I believe I got a solution. However, you may not be happy with it, but maybe it will work. I am running the kernel 6.7.12+bpo-amd64 on my system. This is a backport kernel, but it might also work with other kernels, too. You also need to install the build environment, the eas

Re: nouveau on old NV GPUs (was: NVidia 340 video driver in Bookworm?)

ve them to me when computers were decommissioned. At the time they were a big step up. Now NVidia doesn't support them in Debian. What do you recommend for them? Multiple monitors. No gaming but an occasional video. And some features of the KDE Kinfocenter, especially the System Monitor, either

Re: nouveau on old NV GPUs (was: NVidia 340 video driver in Bookworm?)

dia software by following > the installation instructions provided with it, and often fails anyhow. IOW, > once NVidia driver installation is attempted, a clean Debian installation, > absent xserver-xorg-video-nouveau, is the typical path to nouveau success. > -- I'd almost go f

Re: nouveau on old NV GPUs (was: NVidia 340 video driver in Bookworm?)

Van Snyder composed on 2024-06-07 13:29 (UTC-0700): > Has anybody been able to install the NVidia 340.108 video driver in > Debian 12? > The messages I found said "Support for it ended in 2019. Use nouveau." It should have said more. Some of what it should have included

Re: NVidia 340 video driver in Bookworm?

Hans: Thanks for the note. It seems that nouveau is a bit more stable in Debian 12.5 than it had been in Debian 10.1. At least I hope it is. So far, it hasn't crashed. MfG, Van On Mon, 2024-06-10 at 10:11 +0200, Hans wrote: > No, the NV6800M needs 340xx driver, not 390xx as I prior posted. Howev

Re: NVidia 340 video driver in Bookworm?

> In real life no one wants to care of it! Nvidia not, because this > costs money and the developers not, because this is Nvidia and > proprietrary (what is not quite correct, because the kernel-module, > which is the part, that can not be build, is open-source). Since you say it's "open source

Re: NVidia 340 video driver in Bookworm?

No, the NV6800M needs 340xx driver, not 390xx as I prior posted. However, I have a GF-119 in my Lenovo T520, where nvidia-detect says, it needs 340xx. But, although I got 340xx compiled for the kernel, it did not start. I then build 390xx, which worked like a charm. This happened on my notebook

Re: NVidia 340 video driver in Bookworm?

On Mon, 2024-06-10 at 01:13 +0200, Toni Mas Soler wrote: > El Fri, 07 Jun 2024 14:56:23 -0700Van Snyder < > van.sny...@sbcglobal.net> va escriure el següent: > > On Fri, 2024-06-07 at 22:47 +0200, Hans wrote: > > > Just a hint: Sometimes the nvidia-config module says, you > > > need340.xx, but this

Re: NVidia 340 video driver in Bookworm?

El Fri, 07 Jun 2024 14:56:23 -0700 Van Snyder va escriure el següent: > On Fri, 2024-06-07 at 22:47 +0200, Hans wrote: > > Just a hint: Sometimes the nvidia-config module says, you need > > 340.xx, but this is not always true. My card (with th eolder > > kernel) was running 390.xx, although th es

Re: NVidia 340 video driver in Bookworm?

On 08/06/2024 03:29, Van Snyder wrote: Has anybody been able to install the NVidia 340.108 video driver in Debian 12? I am not aware of current state of affairs. Several years ago it was possible to rebuild the .deb package (that uses DKMS) with additional patches to make the code compatible

Re: NVidia 340 video driver in Bookworm?

On Fri, 2024-06-07 at 22:47 +0200, Hans wrote: > Just a hint: Sometimes the nvidia-config module says, you need 340.xx, but > this is not always true. My card (with th eolder kernel) was running 390.xx, > although th esystem told me, I have to use 340.xx. 390.xx was running like a > charm, 340.x

Re: NVidia 340 video driver in Bookworm?

to install the NVidia 340.108 video driver in > Debian 12? > > The messages I found said "Support for it ended in 2019. Use nouveau." > > But I seem to have trouble with nouveau. When I was running Debian 10 > on a Dell Vostro 1700 laptop with NVidia GeForce 8400M graphic

NVidia 340 video driver in Bookworm?

Has anybody been able to install the NVidia 340.108 video driver in Debian 12? The messages I found said "Support for it ended in 2019. Use nouveau." But I seem to have trouble with nouveau. When I was running Debian 10 on a Dell Vostro 1700 laptop with NVidia GeForce 8400M graphics,

Re: No image from analog cameras with TW6816 video capture card.

68 max and 728 x 488 NTSC, to work with a bluecherry > TW-220-8 board, identified by lshw as: > > Intersil Techwell TW6816 multimedia video controller Rev 10. > > The driver (tw68): > > The first suspicious thing is that the board is apparently not detected by the > kerne

No image from analog cameras with TW6816 video capture card.

220-8 board, identified by lshw as: Intersil Techwell TW6816 multimedia video controller Rev 10. The driver (tw68): The first suspicious thing is that the board is apparently not detected by the kernel, or not identified as matching what the tw58 driver supports. Before a manual modprobe -v tw68

Re: video issue following latest bullseye update

D. R. Evans composed on 2023-09-13 08:54 (UTC-0600): > I have removed /etc/X11/xorg.conf, and the problem remains. > So in this case, where should I report the issue? Follow the instructions on https://www.debian.org/Bugs/Reporting and be sure to include when the problem began. I'd probably sele

Re: video issue following latest bullseye update

D. R. Evans composed on 2023-05-22 14:39 (UTC-0600): > Do you really mean "DDX", not "DIX"? < > I made the edit according to your instructions (i.e., "DDX") but I'm not > certain that your e-mail didn't contain a typo. My first thread post did have a bad one: sudo sed -i 'a/^B_

Re: video issue following latest bullseye update

But I am still seeing the original problem I reported. Could it be that your PC doesn't like LightDM? Try switching to TDM. All my TDM has never worked properly on this machine; TDM doesn't correctly figure out which video card to use (at least, it didn't last time I tried

Re: video issue following latest bullseye update

entifier "DDX" # MatchDriver "amdgpu" # Driver "amdgpu" # MatchDriver "intel" # Driver "intel" # MatchDriver "modesetting" # Driver "modesetting" # MatchDriver "nouveau" Driver &

Re: video issue following latest bullseye update

ble state. systemctl restart OK; so that would be: systemctl restart lightdm Useful to know; thank you. I reinstalled xserver-xorg-video-nouveau from the console, and (fortunately) when I rebooted LDM came up as usual and I was able to log in as I normally do. Obviously, the original issue st

Re: video issue following latest bullseye update

D. R. Evans composed on 2023-05-18 14:17 (UTC-0600): > Felix Miata wrote: >> Try using the (default) modesetting DIX display driver instead of Nouveau. >> Remove >> package >> xserver-xorg-video-nouveau >> and reboot to see if it makes a difference. &g

Re: video issue following latest bullseye update

Felix Miata wrote on 5/15/23 13:25: Try using the (default) modesetting DIX display driver instead of Nouveau. Remove package xserver-xorg-video-nouveau and reboot to see if it makes a difference. I did this, and when I rebooted I was in the Linux console instead of Light DM

Re: video issue following latest bullseye update

mick.crane composed on 2023-05-18 04:43 (UTC+0100): > D. R. Evans wrote: ... > I found my display worked better after running > nvidia-detect/testing,now 525.105.17-1 amd64 [installed] >NVIDIA GPU detection utility > which told me which driver to install. Did you read the whole thread? OP has

Re: video issue following latest bullseye update

On 2023-05-17 17:15, D. R. Evans wrote: Felix Miata wrote on 5/15/23 13:25: Try using the (default) modesetting DIX display driver instead of Nouveau. Remove package xserver-xorg-video-nouveau Synaptic is telling me that this will also remove: xserver-xorg-video-all Is it OK

Re: video issue following latest bullseye update

On Wed, 17 May 2023 10:15:28 -0600 "D. R. Evans" wrote: Hello D., >Is it OK that that will also be removed? As Felix says, "Yes." Further to that, you may also remove, at your discretion, any video driver you do not use. In the interest of full disclosure; I've n

Re: video issue following latest bullseye update

D. R. Evans composed on 2023-05-17 10:15 (UTC-0600): > Felix Miata wrote: >> Try using the (default) modesetting DIX display driver instead of Nouveau. >> Remove >> package >> xserver-xorg-video-nouveau > Synaptic is telling me that this will also remov

Re: video issue following latest bullseye update

Felix Miata wrote on 5/15/23 13:25: Try using the (default) modesetting DIX display driver instead of Nouveau. Remove package xserver-xorg-video-nouveau Synaptic is telling me that this will also remove: xserver-xorg-video-all Is it OK that that will also be removed? Doc

Re: video issue following latest bullseye update

On Mon, May 15, 2023 at 11:49 AM D. R. Evans wrote: > Following an update this morning to one of my bullseye systems, an > irritating > video problem has surfaced. The best way I can think of to describe the > problem is that if one has a line of black text on what is supposed to be

Re: video issue following latest bullseye update

D. R. Evans composed on 2023-05-15 12:50 (UTC-0600): > Felix Miata wrote on 5/15/23 11:16: >> D. R. Evans composed on 2023-05-15 09:49 (UTC-0600): >>> I'm wondering if someone can walk me through how to figure out what video >>> driver I am using, and what oth

Re: video issue following latest bullseye update

Felix Miata wrote on 5/15/23 11:16: D. R. Evans composed on 2023-05-15 09:49 (UTC-0600): I'm wondering if someone can walk me through how to figure out what video driver I am using, and what other drivers might be available to try? Not without knowing anything about your GPU: Y

Re: video issue following latest bullseye update

D. R. Evans composed on 2023-05-15 09:49 (UTC-0600): > I'm wondering if someone can walk me through how to figure out what video > driver I am using, and what other drivers might be available to try? Not without knowing anything about your GPU: sudo sed -i 'a/^B_ALLOW_UPDATE/#

video issue following latest bullseye update

Following an update this morning to one of my bullseye systems, an irritating video problem has surfaced. The best way I can think of to describe the problem is that if one has a line of black text on what is supposed to be a white background, to the right of the text a clear, short tail of

Re: Bookworm: the latest Bookworm upgrade broke video playback in the vlc player?

Oct 28, 2022, 09:34 by brchu...@netscape.net: > Looking at the list of upgraded packages and the reported symptom, it is > probably something in the qt5 > upgrade from 5.15.4 -> 5.15.6, perhaps qtwayland5 or the libqt5multimedia5* > packages. > > It would also probably be helpful to report what

Re: Bookworm: the latest Bookworm upgrade broke video playback in the vlc player?

Oct 28, 2022, 04:42 by loca...@tutanota.com: > Hi, > > It looks like the latest Bookworm upgrade broke video playback in the vlc > player for me. Was working fine before. The video seems to be playing (the > progress marker is moving) but instead of the video output onl

Bookworm: the latest Bookworm upgrade broke video playback in the vlc player?

Hi, It looks like the latest Bookworm upgrade broke video playback in the vlc player for me. Was working fine before. The video seems to be playing (the progress marker is moving) but instead of the video output only a blank black rectangle is shown. The VLC video output is set to "X

Re: Monochrome video on Firefox 106.0

Can you share the sample of the video? -- Regards Robbi Nespu PGP: D311 B5FF EEE6 0BE8 9C91 FA9E 0C81 FA30 3B3A 80BA OpenPGP_0x0C81FA303B3A80BA.asc Description: OpenPGP public key OpenPGP_signature Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Monochrome video on Firefox 106.0

Running Firefox 106.0 on updated Sid. Video is monochrome but stills are full color. Video is sometimes black & white, sometimes red, sometimes green, sometimes blue, sometimes blotches of different colors. Video sometimes changes from one color to another. Color is ok in Chromium. Anyone

Re: Installer BoF video link - [WAS Re: Installing on Rock Pi 4]

Andrew M.A. Cater (12022-07-20): > > > I think it is usual practice for this kind of video to become > > > available for viewing > > > on demand in the near future. > > > > > > My recollection of the discussion is that Gunnar's work is welcome

Installer BoF video link - [WAS Re: Installing on Rock Pi 4]

ebian-installer-and-images-team-bof/ > > I think it is usual practice for this kind of video to become > > available for viewing > > on demand in the near future. > > > > My recollection of the discussion is that Gunnar's work is welcomed > > by the install

Re: Does this video on YouTube tutorial complacent with Debian 11 Bullseye System Administration?

On Fri, Apr 29, 2022 at 04:00:52PM -0600, Charles Curley wrote: > On Fri, 29 Apr 2022 17:04:32 -0400 > Greg Wooledge wrote: > > > On Fri, Apr 29, 2022 at 10:53:21PM +0200, Marco Möller wrote: > > > So, I share the question of the OP. Does anybody with a sound > > > knowledge on Debian has a profo

Re: Does this video on YouTube tutorial complacent with Debian 11 Bullseye System Administration?

On Fri, 29 Apr 2022 17:04:32 -0400 Greg Wooledge wrote: > On Fri, Apr 29, 2022 at 10:53:21PM +0200, Marco Möller wrote: > > So, I share the question of the OP. Does anybody with a sound > > knowledge on Debian has a profound, up-to-date tutorial to > > recommend, or would know if the one linked i

Re: Does this video on YouTube tutorial complacent with Debian 11 Bullseye System Administration?

On Fri, Apr 29, 2022 at 10:53:21PM +0200, Marco Möller wrote: > So, I share the question of the OP. Does anybody with a sound knowledge on > Debian has a profound, up-to-date tutorial to recommend, or would know if > the one linked in the OP's question is indeed up-to-date and nicely Debian > compa

Re: Does this video on YouTube tutorial complacent with Debian 11 Bullseye System Administration?

On 29.04.22 21:14, Greg Wooledge wrote: On Fri, Apr 29, 2022 at 12:04:11PM -0400, Tom D. wrote: I really need the latest tutorial. Why? Unix system administration changes very slowly. Most of the core concepts haven't changed much since the early 1980s. I disagree with this statement. Unde

Re: Does this video on YouTube tutorial complacent with Debian 11 Bullseye System Administration?

x any problems you're having *now*, or to add support/features that you are missing *now*. If you'd tell us what those issues are, we could advise. On a brand new Debian installation, especially on a laptop, the most common issues are firmware & drivers for wireless networking, v

Re: Does this video on YouTube tutorial complacent with Debian 11 Bullseye System Administration?

On Fri, Apr 29, 2022 at 12:04:11PM -0400, Tom D. wrote: > Respected Everyone, > > I have installed Debian 11 Bullseye on my Laptop and found the following > video tutorial. > > https://youtu.be/wsh64rjnRas > > Does this video tutorial coalign with Debian 11 Bullseye

Does this video on YouTube tutorial complacent with Debian 11 Bullseye System Administration?

Respected Everyone, I have installed Debian 11 Bullseye on my Laptop and found the following video tutorial. https://youtu.be/wsh64rjnRas Does this video tutorial coalign with Debian 11 Bullseye System Administration? I really need the latest tutorial. Thank you. Regards Adrian

Re: Fixed Mate desktop spamming xorg logs - now video jagged

artefacts developed such as black borders on menu panels. Not > so much a problem. > > The big problem now is video playing has obvious tearing of the image. > > My video card is > > 09:00.0 VGA compatible controller: Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. [AMD/ATI] > Caicos PRO

Fixed Mate desktop spamming xorg logs - now video jagged

C and the spamming stopped. MATE menu>System>Preferences>Look and Feel>Windows>General tab>Enable software compositing window manager checkbox. However, some artefacts developed such as black borders on menu panels. Not so much a problem. The big problem now is video playing

Re: toshiba video problem

Noah Sombrero writes: > Specs say 32 mb external video memory, which says to me that it is > shared ram. But limited to 32 mb, so higher resolution should not > cause a problem? 1440*900*4 (assuming 32 bits per pixel) is less than 5 MB so no, shouldn't cause a problem. For sur

Re: toshiba video problem

t;>>>DVI-I-1 disconnected (normal left inverted right x axis y axis) >>>>TV-1 disconnected (normal left inverted right x axis y axis) >>>># cat /etc/X11/xorg.conf.d/70-extensions.conf >>>>Section "Extensions" >>>>Option

Re: toshiba video problem

Noah Sombrero composed on 2022-04-06 15:45 (UTC-0400): > It must simply be something about not being able to manage 1440x900 > resolution. It might be worth trying an in between resolution, e.g. 1280x800, which like 1440x900, is a 16:10 mode, unlike 1024x768, which is 4:3. In troubleshooting mod

Re: toshiba video problem

>The mozilla.org build of Firefox ESR52 and of SeaMonkey 2.49.5 run too: >>># free >>> totalusedfree shared buff/cache >>> available >>>Mem: 1542280 592224 136556 19900 813500 >>&g

Re: toshiba video problem

Noah Sombrero composed on 2022-04-06 11:37 (UTC-0400): >>On Wed, 06 Apr 2022 00:50:01 -0400, Felix Miata wrote: >>>On all old limited >>>resource systems like this I automatically ease up the load by disabling >>>compositing > How can I do that? >>># cat /etc/X11/xorg.conf.d/70-extensions.conf

Re: toshiba video problem

totalusedfree shared buff/cache >> available >>Mem: 1542280 592224 136556 19900 813500 >>719904 >>Swap: 1927442840 189904 So, I ran System monitor and got cpu readings of 30% on

Re: toshiba video problem

On Wed, 06 Apr 2022 05:40:01 +0200, David Wright wrote: >On Tue 05 Apr 2022 at 13:09:57 (-0400), Noah Sombrero wrote: >> >> Finally, there is a caviat to all this. Laptops many times take a >> piece of motherboard ram for video ram, and larger resolutions take >>

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >