On Fri, Jun 06, 2003 at 11:48:16AM -0400, David Z Maze wrote:
> Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> >> Even though the kernel apparently cannot be built with 3.x, I tried
> >> it as you suggested. It got further than before, but now it can't
> >> build the (debian stock) lm-sensors-source
On Fri, Jun 06, 2003 at 11:48:16AM -0400, David Z Maze wrote:
> Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> >> Even though the kernel apparently cannot be built with 3.x, I tried
> >> it as you suggested. It got further than before, but now it can't
> >> build the (debian stock) lm-sensors-source
Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Even though the kernel apparently cannot be built with 3.x, I tried
>> it as you suggested. It got further than before, but now it can't
>> build the (debian stock) lm-sensors-source modules:
...
> That's a multi-line string which is a C extension no lon
martin f krafft writes:
> Trying this right now... but no, the -march is still athlon.
Are you selecting "athlon" in menuconfig? If so, don't.
--
John Hasler
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Dancing Horse Hill
Elmwood, Wisconsin
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe".
also sprach Jamin W. Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003.06.05.1800 +0200]:
> Well, TMK, "athlon" is indeed an invalid -march option with gcc-2.95.
> After installing gcc-2.95 did you start with a completely fresh kernel
> source tree, or simply attempt compiling in the previous tree again?
> Based o
On Thu, Jun 05, 2003 at 05:17:51PM -0500, John Hasler wrote:
> martin f krafft writes:
> > Trying this right now... but no, the -march is still athlon.
>
> Are you selecting "athlon" in menuconfig? If so, don't.
I select Athlon for processor type in menuconfig and compile 2.4.20
with gcc 2.95.4
On Thu, 5 Jun 2003 12:29:27 -0400
"Michael P. Soulier" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 05/06/03 martin f krafft did speaketh:
>
> > i just tried to compile the kernel.org 2.4.20 kernel, but it bailed
> > out, line 440 of ide-cd.h contains invalid syntax -- for gcc-3.3.
> > the kernel README says
On 05/06/03 martin f krafft did speaketh:
> i just tried to compile the kernel.org 2.4.20 kernel, but it bailed
> out, line 440 of ide-cd.h contains invalid syntax -- for gcc-3.3.
> the kernel README says that 2.95.3 has to be used, so I installed
> 2.95.4-17 from Debian. Now the error doesn't app
On Thu, 5 Jun 2003 17:27:50 +0200
martin f krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> i just tried to compile the kernel.org 2.4.20 kernel, but it bailed
> out, line 440 of ide-cd.h contains invalid syntax -- for gcc-3.3.
> the kernel README says that 2.95.3 has to be used, so I installed
> 2.95.4-17 fro
hmm, ive never had kernel compile errors before, but
it sounds like you had one thing, then got an error,
then upgraded..
so I first off would do a "make mrproper" to
reupdate the compilation so it knows how your system
is setup since youve recently changed it
hope that helps
--- martin f kra
On Thu, Jun 05, 2003 at 05:27:50PM +0200, martin f krafft wrote:
> i just tried to compile the kernel.org 2.4.20 kernel, but it bailed
> out, line 440 of ide-cd.h contains invalid syntax -- for gcc-3.3.
> the kernel README says that 2.95.3 has to be used, so I installed
> 2.95.4-17 from Debian. Now
On Thu, Jun 05, 2003 at 05:27:50PM +0200, martin f krafft wrote:
> i just tried to compile the kernel.org 2.4.20 kernel, but it bailed
I heard from #debian on irc.freenode.net that gcc 3.3 is unable to
compile kernels. Here is what the bot says:
" i guess 2.4bug is look at
http://bugs.debian.org/
On Fri, 6 Jun 2003 10:16:36 +0200
martin f krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> also sprach Chris Metzler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003.06.06.0952
> +0200]:
>> I'm coming in late to this thread; but as I understand it, you get
>> the usual errors compiling the kernel with gcc-3.3; but when you
>> compil
i just tried to compile the kernel.org 2.4.20 kernel, but it bailed
out, line 440 of ide-cd.h contains invalid syntax -- for gcc-3.3.
the kernel README says that 2.95.3 has to be used, so I installed
2.95.4-17 from Debian. Now the error doesn't appear anymore, but
a new one appeeared:
gcc-2.95 -
also sprach Chris Metzler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003.06.06.0952 +0200]:
> I'm coming in late to this thread; but as I understand it, you get
> the usual errors compiling the kernel with gcc-3.3; but when you
> compile your kernel with gcc-2.95, it gripes about the athlon
> switch. Is that right? I
On Fri, 6 Jun 2003 08:41:05 +0200
martin f krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Even though the kernel apparently cannot be built with 3.x, I tried
> it as you suggested. It got further than before, but now it can't
> build the (debian stock) lm-sensors-source modules:
>
> kernel/busses/i2c-ali15
On Fri, Jun 06, 2003 at 08:41:05AM +0200, martin f krafft wrote:
> also sprach .waffle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003.06.05.1828 +0200]:
> > set your environment variable CC to gcc-3.2 (make sure 3.2 is
> > installed first!) Debian gcc-3.3 has compat issues with the linux
> > kernel... I find it best to
also sprach John Hasler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003.06.06.0017 +0200]:
> Are you selecting "athlon" in menuconfig? If so, don't.
I am selecting "Athlon/Duron/K7" and it has worked before.
--
Please do not CC me when replying to lists; I read them!
.''`. martin f. krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
also sprach Paul <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003.06.05.1808 +0200]:
> so I first off would do a "make mrproper" to
> reupdate the compilation so it knows how your system
> is setup since youve recently changed it
This, unfortunately, did not help.
also sprach .waffle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003.06.05.
19 matches
Mail list logo
