On Thu, Apr 19, 2007 at 06:12:24PM -0400, Faheem Mitha wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, 20 Apr 2007, Alex Samad wrote:
>
> >On Thu, Apr 19, 2007 at 05:15:25PM -0400, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote:
> >>On Thu, Apr 19, 2007 at 05:06:47PM -0400, Faheem Mitha wrote:
> >>>
> >>>/sbin/route -n
> >>>
> >>>Kernel IP rou
On Fri, 20 Apr 2007, Alex Samad wrote:
On Thu, Apr 19, 2007 at 05:15:25PM -0400, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote:
On Thu, Apr 19, 2007 at 05:06:47PM -0400, Faheem Mitha wrote:
/sbin/route -n
Kernel IP routing table
Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric RefUse
Iface
152.
On Thu, Apr 19, 2007 at 06:12:24PM -0400, Faheem Mitha wrote:
>
> On Fri, 20 Apr 2007, Alex Samad wrote:
>
> >
> >have a look for ip (it part of the iproute package)
> >
> >Usage: ip addr {add|del} IFADDR dev STRING
> > ip addr {show|flush} [ dev STRING ] [ scope SCOPE-ID ]
> >
On Thu, Apr 19, 2007 at 05:15:25PM -0400, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 19, 2007 at 05:06:47PM -0400, Faheem Mitha wrote:
> >
> > /sbin/route -n
> >
> > Kernel IP routing table
> > Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric RefUse
> > Iface
> > 152.3.172.0 0.0
On Thu, 19 Apr 2007, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote:
On Wed, Apr 18, 2007 at 09:18:10PM -0400, Faheem Mitha wrote:
eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:E0:81:31:33:8C
inet addr:152.3.172.111 Bcast:152.3.173.255 Mask:255.255.254.0
eth1 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:E0:81:31:3
On Thu, Apr 19, 2007 at 05:06:47PM -0400, Faheem Mitha wrote:
>
> /sbin/route -n
>
> Kernel IP routing table
> Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric RefUse
> Iface
> 152.3.172.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.254.0 U 0 00 eth1
> 152.3.172.0 0.0.0.0
On Wed, Apr 18, 2007 at 09:18:10PM -0400, Faheem Mitha wrote:
>
> eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:E0:81:31:33:8C
> inet addr:152.3.172.111 Bcast:152.3.173.255 Mask:255.255.254.0
>
> eth1 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:E0:81:31:33:64
> inet addr:152.3.172.60 Bc
On Wed, 18 Apr 2007, Faheem Mitha wrote:
Hi everyone,
I've got a server on which there are two network cards. One of the network
cards has been configured, and has been running satisfactorily for a while. I
recently plugged in the other network card and started using it for a
different IP a
On Wed, 18 Apr 2007, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote:
On Wed, Apr 18, 2007 at 06:28:29PM -0400, Faheem Mitha wrote:
Just to be clear, the interfaces are both of the form 152.3.172.*.
If for example they were reconfigured so that one was of the form
152.3.171.* and the other was of the form 152.3.1
On Wed, Apr 18, 2007 at 06:28:29PM -0400, Faheem Mitha wrote:
>
> Just to be clear, the interfaces are both of the form 152.3.172.*.
>
> If for example they were reconfigured so that one was of the form
> 152.3.171.* and the other was of the form 152.3.172.& (say) then would the
> problem just
On Wed, 18 Apr 2007, Faheem Mitha wrote:
On Wed, 18 Apr 2007, Roberto C. S?nchez wrote:
Well, there is your problem.
Having two physical interfaces on the same subnet is generally a bad
idea:
http://lists.debian.org/debian-user/2007/01/msg01633.html
http://lists.debian.org/debian-firewall/
On Wed, 18 Apr 2007, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote:
Well, there is your problem.
Having two physical interfaces on the same subnet is generally a bad
idea:
http://lists.debian.org/debian-user/2007/01/msg01633.html
http://lists.debian.org/debian-firewall/2005/03/msg00073.html
You have to really k
On Wed, 18 Apr 2007, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote:
Well, there is your problem.
Having two physical interfaces on the same subnet is generally a bad
idea:
http://lists.debian.org/debian-user/2007/01/msg01633.html
http://lists.debian.org/debian-firewall/2005/03/msg00073.html
You have to really k
On Wed, Apr 18, 2007 at 05:39:40PM -0400, Faheem Mitha wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, 18 Apr 2007, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote:
>
> >On Wed, Apr 18, 2007 at 04:20:49PM -0400, Faheem Mitha wrote:
> >>
> >>Hi everyone,
> >>
> >>I've got a server on which there are two network cards. One of the network
> >>card
On Wed, 18 Apr 2007, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote:
On Wed, Apr 18, 2007 at 04:20:49PM -0400, Faheem Mitha wrote:
Hi everyone,
I've got a server on which there are two network cards. One of the network
cards has been configured, and has been running satisfactorily for a
while. I recently plugged
On Wed, Apr 18, 2007 at 04:20:49PM -0400, Faheem Mitha wrote:
>
> Hi everyone,
>
> I've got a server on which there are two network cards. One of the network
> cards has been configured, and has been running satisfactorily for a
> while. I recently plugged in the other network card and started
Hi everyone,
I've got a server on which there are two network cards. One of the network
cards has been configured, and has been running satisfactorily for a
while. I recently plugged in the other network card and started using it
for a different IP address. However, I've been having persisten
17 matches
Mail list logo