On Wed, 18 Apr 2007, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote:
On Wed, Apr 18, 2007 at 06:28:29PM -0400, Faheem Mitha wrote:
Just to be clear, the interfaces are both of the form 152.3.172.*.
If for example they were reconfigured so that one was of the form
152.3.171.* and the other was of the form 152.3.172.& (say) then would the
problem just disappear?
That largely depends on your subnet mask and how your network is routed.
What is the output of `/sbin/ifconfig` with both interfaces up?
See below. The problem interface is eth0. The original one, which still
seems to work Ok, is eth1.
Thanks. Faheem.
****************************************************************************
eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:E0:81:31:33:8C
inet addr:152.3.172.111 Bcast:152.3.173.255 Mask:255.255.254.0
inet6 addr: fe80::2e0:81ff:fe31:338c/64 Scope:Link
UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1
RX packets:2362483 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
TX packets:3663 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
collisions:0 txqueuelen:1000
RX bytes:156143284 (148.9 MiB) TX bytes:617795 (603.3 KiB)
eth1 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:E0:81:31:33:64
inet addr:152.3.172.60 Bcast:152.3.173.255 Mask:255.255.254.0
inet6 addr: fe80::2e0:81ff:fe31:3364/64 Scope:Link
UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1
RX packets:14220041 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
TX packets:26761605 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
collisions:0 txqueuelen:1000
RX bytes:2763292401 (2.5 GiB) TX bytes:35308449413 (32.8 GiB)
Interrupt:169
lo Link encap:Local Loopback
inet addr:127.0.0.1 Mask:255.0.0.0
inet6 addr: ::1/128 Scope:Host
UP LOOPBACK RUNNING MTU:16436 Metric:1
RX packets:2317579 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
TX packets:2317579 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
collisions:0 txqueuelen:0
RX bytes:3617337316 (3.3 GiB) TX bytes:3617337316 (3.3 GiB)
