On 2023-11-22, Thomas Schmitt wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Karen Lewellen wrote:
>> ..ah, typo indeed.
>> it should be rsh.
>
> Quite a while ago rsh has been put in the pillory for not encrypting the
> connection. The town crier urged everybody to use ssh instead.
>
I explicitely nuke any rsh attempts in my
Hi,
Karen Lewellen wrote:
> ..ah, typo indeed.
> it should be rsh.
Quite a while ago rsh has been put in the pillory for not encrypting the
connection. The town crier urged everybody to use ssh instead.
Found in the web:
https://fossies.org/linux/alpine/imap/docs/FAQ.txt
_4.3 How does the c-
Thomas Schmitt (12023-11-21):
> Can it be that "rhs" is a typo and should rather be "rsh" ?
IMAP is the only protocol I know that officially has a
“preauthenticated” mode, where a user can run the server under their own
UID and interact with it through its standard input and output, going
directly
..ah, typo indeed.
it should be rsh.
However, it seems that setting is now missing from the alpine
configuration options available via the s command from the main menu?
On Tue, 21 Nov 2023, Thomas Schmitt wrote:
Hi,
Karen Lewellen wrote:
I cannot find out what rhs means.
Getting an rhs to
Hi,
Karen Lewellen wrote:
> I cannot find out what rhs means.
> Getting an rhs to imap server timeout with one of the new office emails.
Can it be that "rhs" is a typo and should rather be "rsh" ?
The web has old messages which resemble what you describe:
Subject:
"[Alpine-info] Why do I ge
Hi folks,
Our organization curtain up distribution inc.
www.curtainupdistribution.org
uses alpine as provided by dreamhost.
Although not showing up everywhere meaning the error must have a fix
laughs, I cannot find out what rhs means.
Getting an rhs to imap server timeout with one of the new of
On Sat, 16 Jun 2012 15:05:50 -0400, Gilbert Sullivan wrote:
> On 06/16/2012 02:04 PM, Camaleón wrote:
>> You have to ask yourself if you really need that package in your
>> system. I never heard of it before nor read about it is needed for
>> running VB nor any other virtual machine :-?
>>
>>
On 06/16/2012 02:04 PM, Camaleón wrote:
> On Sat, 16 Jun 2012 13:47:38 -0400, Gilbert Sullivan wrote:
>
>> On 06/16/2012 01:28 PM, Camaleón wrote:
>
Matthew pointed out that my use of netscript 2.4 is sort of
non-standard for a regular Debian desktop.
>>>
>>> (...)
>>>
>>> And he is rig
On 06/16/2012 01:24 PM, Tom H wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 16, 2012 at 10:42 AM, Camaleón wrote:
>> On Fri, 15 Jun 2012 19:56:59 -0400, Gilbert Sullivan wrote:
>>> On 06/15/2012 12:58 PM, Camaleón wrote:
>>
> Thank you for your ideas, and I'll return to this thread when I have
> any kind of inform
On Sat, 16 Jun 2012 13:47:38 -0400, Gilbert Sullivan wrote:
> On 06/16/2012 01:28 PM, Camaleón wrote:
>>> Matthew pointed out that my use of netscript 2.4 is sort of
>>> non-standard for a regular Debian desktop.
>>
>> (...)
>>
>> And he is right.
>>
>> The first thing I would do is removing t
On 06/16/2012 01:28 PM, Camaleón wrote:
> On Sat, 16 Jun 2012 13:06:11 -0400, Gilbert Sullivan wrote:
>
>> On 06/16/2012 10:42 AM, Camaleón wrote:
>>> If you are using the "resolvconf" package I bet you have to trust what
>>> the "/etc/revolv.conf" file warning says in uppercase about do not
>>> e
On Sat, 16 Jun 2012 13:06:11 -0400, Gilbert Sullivan wrote:
> On 06/16/2012 10:42 AM, Camaleón wrote:
>> If you are using the "resolvconf" package I bet you have to trust what
>> the "/etc/revolv.conf" file warning says in uppercase about do not
>> editing the file because is dynamically changed ;
On Sat, Jun 16, 2012 at 10:42 AM, Camaleón wrote:
> On Fri, 15 Jun 2012 19:56:59 -0400, Gilbert Sullivan wrote:
>> On 06/15/2012 12:58 PM, Camaleón wrote:
>
Thank you for your ideas, and I'll return to this thread when I have
any kind of information.
>>>
>>> Ok, keep us informed. I feel
On 06/16/2012 10:42 AM, Camaleón wrote:
> If you are using the "resolvconf" package I bet you have to trust what
> the "/etc/revolv.conf" file warning says in uppercase about do not
> editing the file because is dynamically changed ;-)
>
> http://wiki.debian.org/NetworkConfiguration#The_resolvco
On Fri, 15 Jun 2012 19:56:59 -0400, Gilbert Sullivan wrote:
> On 06/15/2012 12:58 PM, Camaleón wrote:
(...)
>>> Thank you for your ideas, and I'll return to this thread when I have
>>> any kind of information.
>>
>> Ok, keep us informed. I feel curious about what's going on here :-)
>>
>>
> J
On 06/15/2012 12:58 PM, Camaleón wrote:
> On Fri, 15 Jun 2012 12:18:03 -0400, Gilbert Sullivan wrote:
>
>> On 06/15/2012 10:35 AM, Camaleón wrote:
>
>>> Anyway, I'd also run the following tests:
>>>
>>> 1/ Just for testing purposes, you can momentary disable wicd and test
>>> with a static IP con
On Fri, 15 Jun 2012 12:18:03 -0400, Gilbert Sullivan wrote:
> On 06/15/2012 10:35 AM, Camaleón wrote:
>> Anyway, I'd also run the following tests:
>>
>> 1/ Just for testing purposes, you can momentary disable wicd and test
>> with a static IP configuration defined at "/etc/network/interfaces". I
Hi, Camaleón.
FYI I filed a bug against netscript package -- 677...@bugs.debian.org
Best,
Gilbert
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4fdb6728.1030...@co
On 06/15/2012 10:35 AM, Camaleón wrote:
> On Thu, 14 Jun 2012 14:44:57 -0400, Gilbert Sullivan wrote:
>
>> On 06/14/2012 01:34 PM, Camaleón wrote:
>
>>> To be sincere, I don't know what's originating the problem. If you say
>>> the network settings are properly configured, why Exim4 is that lazy?
On Thu, 14 Jun 2012 14:44:57 -0400, Gilbert Sullivan wrote:
> On 06/14/2012 01:34 PM, Camaleón wrote:
>> To be sincere, I don't know what's originating the problem. If you say
>> the network settings are properly configured, why Exim4 is that lazy?
>> :-?
>>
>> Searching for "exim boot speed up"
On 06/14/2012 01:34 PM, Camaleón wrote:
> On Thu, 14 Jun 2012 13:07:17 -0400, Gilbert Sullivan wrote:
>
>> On 06/14/2012 10:21 AM, Camaleón wrote:
>
> (...)
>
>>> I ask this to have an idea on where to put the focus in either a) long
>>> delay -timeout- but NIC settings are finally okay or b) lo
On Thu, 14 Jun 2012 13:07:17 -0400, Gilbert Sullivan wrote:
> On 06/14/2012 10:21 AM, Camaleón wrote:
(...)
>> I ask this to have an idea on where to put the focus in either a) long
>> delay -timeout- but NIC settings are finally okay or b) long delay -
>> timeout- with NIC settings unconfigured
sing "/etc/network/interfaces" with a dynamic IP setup, you can
> configure a secondary fall-back setting in the event your system can't
> get the settings from DHCP server (this is done from dhcp-client and you
> can define time-out intervals, IP settings, and all that stuff).
&
ystem can't
get the settings from DHCP server (this is done from dhcp-client and you
can define time-out intervals, IP settings, and all that stuff).
- If using WICD (or N-M) you have to control this from WICD provided
tools which, to be sincere, I don't know what they are nor how they
On 06/13/2012 03:01 PM, Gilbert Sullivan wrote:
> On 06/13/2012 02:28 PM, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
>> On Mi, 13 iun 12, 13:44:44, Gilbert Sullivan wrote:
>>>
>>> Yup, I'm using Wicd. When I'm ready to leave one location to trave to
>>> the next, I choose the next network's configuration from within Wi
On 06/13/2012 02:28 PM, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
> On Mi, 13 iun 12, 13:44:44, Gilbert Sullivan wrote:
>>
>> Yup, I'm using Wicd. When I'm ready to leave one location to trave to
>> the next, I choose the next network's configuration from within Wicd.
>> With the aforementioned /etc/network/interfaces
On Mi, 13 iun 12, 13:44:44, Gilbert Sullivan wrote:
>
> Yup, I'm using Wicd. When I'm ready to leave one location to trave to
> the next, I choose the next network's configuration from within Wicd.
> With the aforementioned /etc/network/interfaces file (set to use DHCP)
> Wicd always has me set up
the boot process halts for
>>>> one minute at two places -- the configuring interface line, and the
>>>> configuring MTA line. (I'm guessing the configuring MTA time out
>>>> happens because the configuring interface time out precedes it.)
>>>
&g
ring interface line, and the
>>> configuring MTA line. (I'm guessing the configuring MTA time out
>>> happens because the configuring interface time out precedes it.)
>>
>> Yes, that's likely what happens. The MTA daemon has to wait until it
>> gets a v
rious network locations. Since then, when I have set Wicd to connect
>> to one of the fixed IP address locations, the boot process halts for one
>> minute at two places -- the configuring interface line, and the
>> configuring MTA line. (I'm guessing the configuring MTA time out
o one of the fixed IP address locations, the boot process halts for one
> minute at two places -- the configuring interface line, and the
> configuring MTA line. (I'm guessing the configuring MTA time out happens
> because the configuring interface time out precedes it.)
Yes, that&
(I'm guessing the configuring MTA time out happens
because the configuring interface time out precedes it.)
My /etc/network/interfaces file on this system is:
8<
# This file describes the network interfaces available on your system
On Mon, 22 Nov 2004 13:37:17 +, michael
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Andrea Vettorello wrote:
>
>
> > On Sat, 20 Nov 2004 13:59:33 +, michael
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >>michael wrote:
> >>
> >>>I can't see any discussion on this list of the merits (or otherwise!) of
> >>>timeo
Andrea Vettorello wrote:
On Sat, 20 Nov 2004 13:59:33 +, michael
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
michael wrote:
I can't see any discussion on this list of the merits (or otherwise!) of
timeoutd or autolog (or better equivalent)... thoughts?
Michael running on
2.4.27-1-686-smp #1 SMP Fri Sep 3 06:34:
On Sat, 20 Nov 2004 13:59:33 +, michael
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> michael wrote:
> > I can't see any discussion on this list of the merits (or otherwise!) of
> > timeoutd or autolog (or better equivalent)... thoughts?
> > Michael running on
> > 2.4.27-1-686-smp #1 SMP Fri Sep 3 06:34:36 UTC
michael wrote:
I can't see any discussion on this list of the merits (or otherwise!) of
timeoutd or autolog (or better equivalent)... thoughts?
Michael running on
2.4.27-1-686-smp #1 SMP Fri Sep 3 06:34:36 UTC 2004 i686 GNU/Linux
Actually autolog doesn't do what it claims. I logged in to a console
I can't see any discussion on this list of the merits (or otherwise!) of
timeoutd or autolog (or better equivalent)... thoughts?
Michael running on
2.4.27-1-686-smp #1 SMP Fri Sep 3 06:34:36 UTC 2004 i686 GNU/Linux
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe".
ngs there... But on a LAN it shouldn't take too
> much time to connect, so I want to set up a slow time-out of 1 second
> for example. But how can I tell it smbmount?
Please set your mailer/editor linewrap to 68-75 characters. I strongly
recommend 72 as a good default.
While many mail
Hi list,
I've set up auto-mounting for a samba-share. My problem is that xmms probes all
directories, including the share's mount-point. When the server is down, it hangs
there... But on a LAN it shouldn't take too much time to connect, so I want to set up
a slow time-out
On Sat, 27 Mar 2004 03:10:07 +0100, Antony Gelberg
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>On Sat, Mar 27, 2004 at 12:16:33AM +0100, Ulrich Sucker wrote:
>> Hi folks!
>>
>> During debugging a mail problem, I found a very interesting problem.
>> My mail server says "connection timed out" if he tries to connec
On Sat, 27 Mar 2004 02:00:14 +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>On Sat, Mar 27, 2004 at 12:16:33AM +0100, Ulrich Sucker wrote:
>> Hi folks!
>>
>> During debugging a mail problem, I found a very interesting problem.
>> My mail server says "connection timed out" if he tries to connect to
>> some spec
On Sat, Mar 27, 2004 at 12:16:33AM +0100, Ulrich Sucker wrote:
> Hi folks!
>
> During debugging a mail problem, I found a very interesting problem.
> My mail server says "connection timed out" if he tries to connect to
> some specific systems which are properly run under windows.
> I tried to con
On Sat, Mar 27, 2004 at 12:16:33AM +0100, Ulrich Sucker wrote:
> Hi folks!
>
> During debugging a mail problem, I found a very interesting problem.
> My mail server says "connection timed out" if he tries to connect to
> some specific systems which are properly run under windows.
> I tried to con
On Sat, Mar 27, 2004 at 12:16:33AM +0100, Ulrich Sucker wrote:
> Hi folks!
>
> During debugging a mail problem, I found a very interesting problem.
> My mail server says "connection timed out" if he tries to connect to
> some specific systems which are properly run under windows.
> I tried to con
Hi folks!
During debugging a mail problem, I found a very interesting problem.
My mail server says "connection timed out" if he tries to connect to
some specific systems which are properly run under windows.
I tried to connect the system via telnet and telnet timed out also.
Then I tried some oth
hai List,
Since a couple off hours I have this output on screen just after the
system freezes. Is this an software or hardware problem and what should
I do?
hdd: status timeout: status=0xff { Busy }
hdd: drive not ready for command
ide1: reset: success
--
-
Gnu PG- key:
On Wed, Jun 06, 2001 at 08:01:50PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| hai List,
|
| Since a couple off hours I have this output on screen just after the
| system freezes. Is this an software or hardware problem and what should
| I do?
|
| hdd: status timeout: status=0xff { Busy }
| hdd: drive not
On Wed, Jun 06, 2001 at 03:25:14PM -0400, D-Man wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 06, 2001 at 08:01:50PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> | hai List,
> |
> | Since a couple off hours I have this output on screen just after the
> | system freezes. Is this an software or hardware problem and what should
> | I d
-D
Sorry for bothering you again. But I've checked the system logs and I
found some strange things, maybe -D can help me out here?
>From /proc/interrupts:
CPU0
0: 125425 XT-PIC timer
1: 2201 XT-PIC keyboard
2: 0 XT-PIC casc
On Thu, Jun 07, 2001 at 11:34:12AM +0300, the person known as Dragos Delcea
wrote:
> do a
> $ ls -l /dev/scd0
> I think it points to the sr0
> although I can't be sure, I don't have a scsi cdrom...
brw-rw1 root cdrom 11, 0 May 19 17:28 [40;33;01m/dev/scd0
> the problem wit
On Thu, Jun 07, 2001 at 10:52:10AM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...]
> kernelversion 2.2.19 (potato)
> So it's dying? All I could remember when I installed that I had some
> problems using it with Linux (Red Hat 6 at the time). I 've checked
> the bios and all my drives have a smart function en
Just on the off chance. I can't print
because I get an error message saying to increase the time out settings but when
I do it makes no difference. I have tried closing down everything and
leaving it and coming back to no avail. Any ideas?
Regards
Shirley
I have a dialup connection on to my ISP from a single machine using pine,
exim, fetchmail and procmail. My machine's name is Johann and
alpha.futurenet.co.za (alternatively futurenet.co.za) is my ISP.
I cannot remember receiving this message before. It happened twice today:
I was trying to send
> Did you enable SCSI tape drive support in the kernel? I'm not sure if the
> Debian kernel image has support for this compiled in or not.
Usually it's a loadable module, st
--
|||| ||| Marco Frattola Microsoft is not the answer
||`..'|| |||... Piacenza, Italy
Did you enable SCSI tape drive support in the kernel? I'm not sure if the
Debian kernel image has support for this compiled in or not.
I'm using a Conner tape drive (DDS-2 and a couple of years old) with an
Adapted 2940UW with no problem.
-Ossama
___
Hi,
I am trying to connect my linux to a Conner SCSI tape. The LUN number on
the tape is correspondent with the Adaptec BIOS, ie number 6. The SCSI host
is detected but not the tape device. I got the following error at boot time:
(scsi0:0:-1:-1) Scanning channel for devices.
scsi: aborting comman
56 matches
Mail list logo
