On Sat, 16 Jun 2012 13:06:11 -0400, Gilbert Sullivan wrote: > On 06/16/2012 10:42 AM, Camaleón wrote: >> If you are using the "resolvconf" package I bet you have to trust what >> the "/etc/revolv.conf" file warning says in uppercase about do not >> editing the file because is dynamically changed ;-) >> >> http://wiki.debian.org/NetworkConfiguration#The_resolvconf_program >> >> OTOH, I never used this package before, I don't know what's for nor how >> is configured so I can't give you any feedback on this other than >> reading the available docs and man pages :-) >> >> > Hi, Camaleón! > > Oh yes. I know now to fiddle with that file -- and any other that warns > twinkies like me to keep hands off! > > I believe I am in the process of learning something of real use from > Matthew Grant, who has been corresponding with me wrt Bug# 677642 on the > Debian BTS. > > I've been wondering why the resolvconf package was apparently behaving > differently than it used to behave, and why the /etc/resolv.conf looked > different than it used to look. > > Matthew pointed out that my use of netscript 2.4 is sort of non-standard > for a regular Debian desktop.
(...) And he is right. The first thing I would do is removing that package if you don't need it at all (I don't have it installed, BTW, and running "apt-cache rdepends netscript" returns void so no other package seems to depend on it). Greetings, -- Camaleón -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/jrifng$tm4$1...@dough.gmane.org
