On Thu, 6 Feb 2025 14:51:17 +
Joe wrote:
>
> > On 2/6/25 8:20 AM, Charles Curley wrote:
> > >
> > > And for those who are wondering, this is going on in trixie.
[...]
> The quick fix in sources.list for debian is to add signed-by into
> existing lines after deb or deb-src:
>
> deb \
> [
On Thu, Feb 06, 2025 at 08:53:49AM -0700, Charles Curley wrote:
On Thu, 6 Feb 2025 10:42:27 -0500
Michael Stone wrote:
>...except that, per the rest of the discussion in that bug, it almost
>certainly won't be able to predict which signer to apply for each
>sources.list entry. That you'll prob
Also, there is https://wiki.debian.org/SourcesList .
Regards,
Jörg.
Hi,
On Thu, Feb 06, 2025 at 08:27:54AM -0500, Dan Ritter wrote:
> Charles Curley wrote:
> > Another option would be to retain all comments, and let the user
> > manually convert commented out entries. Simple, easy to do, and only a
> > little obnoxious for the user.
> >
> > And for those who are
On Thu, 6 Feb 2025 08:53:49 -0700
Charles Curley wrote:
> However, it is not in the man page for apt or apt-get.
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1094784
--
Does anybody read signatures any more?
https://charlescurley.com
https://charlescurley.com/blog/
On Thu, 6 Feb 2025 15:30:02 +
Joe wrote:
> Why in the world bother making your own scripts when you can just do
>
> # apt modernize-sources
> The following files need modernizing:
> - /etc/apt/sources.list.d/google-chrome-beta.list
> - /etc/apt/sources.list.d/google-earth-pro.list
> -
Andy Smith wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, Feb 06, 2025 at 01:51:49AM -0500, songbird wrote:
>> when doing the upgrade you do have the option of doing
>> a test run to see what changes are made or not making the
>> changes at that time.
>>
>> when going through this process the comments in
>> sources
On Thu, 6 Feb 2025 10:42:27 -0500
Michael Stone wrote:
> >...except that, per the rest of the discussion in that bug, it almost
> >certainly won't be able to predict which signer to apply for each
> >sources.list entry. That you'll probably have to add on your own.
>
> It even tells you that!
On Thu, Feb 06, 2025 at 10:22:17AM -0500, The Wanderer wrote:
I haven't seen this hit yet (though I probably will next time I
dist-upgrade against testing), but a comment in bug #1094263 leads me to
suspect that there is now supposed to be an 'apt modernize-sources'
sub-command, which looks like
On Thu, 6 Feb 2025 08:09:37 -0700
Charles Curley wrote:
> On Thu, 6 Feb 2025 14:51:17 +
> Joe wrote:
>
> > The long-term fix is a file standard.sources root:root 644 in
> > /etc/sources.list.d containing:
>
> Is there anything that tells one how to make this conversion? Better
> yet, a s
On 2025-02-06 at 10:09, Charles Curley wrote:
> On Thu, 6 Feb 2025 14:51:17 + Joe wrote:
>
>> The long-term fix is a file standard.sources root:root 644 in
>> /etc/sources.list.d containing:
>
> Is there anything that tells one how to make this conversion? Better
> yet, a script or two to d
On Thu, Feb 06, 2025 at 08:09:37AM -0700, Charles Curley wrote:
Is there anything that tells one how to make this conversion? Better
yet, a script or two to do it for us? There will be a lot of people
scrambling to convert at the last minute.
Yes, current version prompts on what to do.
On Thu, 6 Feb 2025 14:51:17 +
Joe wrote:
> The long-term fix is a file standard.sources root:root 644 in
> /etc/sources.list.d containing:
Is there anything that tells one how to make this conversion? Better
yet, a script or two to do it for us? There will be a lot of people
scrambling to co
On Thu, 6 Feb 2025 08:54:28 -0500
Frank McCormick wrote:
> On 2/6/25 8:20 AM, Charles Curley wrote:
> > On Thu, 6 Feb 2025 07:53:07 +
> > Andy Smith wrote:
> >
> >> Having said that, I am not sure how the complaint could be
> >> addressed since from what I understand you are basically ask
On Feb 06, 2025, Frank McCormick wrote:
>
>
> On 2/6/25 8:20 AM, Charles Curley wrote:
> > On Thu, 6 Feb 2025 07:53:07 +
> > Andy Smith wrote:
> >
> > > Having said that, I am not sure how the complaint could be addressed
> > > since from what I understand you are basically asking for other
On 2/6/25 8:20 AM, Charles Curley wrote:
On Thu, 6 Feb 2025 07:53:07 +
Andy Smith wrote:
Having said that, I am not sure how the complaint could be addressed
since from what I understand you are basically asking for otherwise
valid but commented-out sources.list lines to be converted in
Charles Curley wrote:
> On Thu, 6 Feb 2025 07:53:07 +
> Andy Smith wrote:
>
> > Having said that, I am not sure how the complaint could be addressed
> > since from what I understand you are basically asking for otherwise
> > valid but commented-out sources.list lines to be converted into
> >
On Thu, 6 Feb 2025 07:53:07 +
Andy Smith wrote:
> Having said that, I am not sure how the complaint could be addressed
> since from what I understand you are basically asking for otherwise
> valid but commented-out sources.list lines to be converted into
> inactive deb822 files, which seems l
Hi,
On Thu, Feb 06, 2025 at 01:51:49AM -0500, songbird wrote:
> when doing the upgrade you do have the option of doing
> a test run to see what changes are made or not making the
> changes at that time.
>
> when going through this process the comments in
> sources.list were discarded.
I thin
when doing the upgrade you do have the option of doing
a test run to see what changes are made or not making the
changes at that time.
when going through this process the comments in
sources.list were discarded.
i don't know about other people or what they put in
sources.list, but i normall
20 matches
Mail list logo
