On 2021-06-25 at 11:10, Жора Волков wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>
> System.map-5.10.0-7-amd64 file has the following content:
>
>>> ffff B The real System.map is in the
> linux-image--dbg package
>
> My question is - whether this change is permanent and
Hello everyone,
System.map-5.10.0-7-amd64 file has the following content:
>> B The real System.map is in the
linux-image--dbg package
My question is - whether this change is permanent and will be in the final
release as well, or it's a temporary thing?
If the f
Eriberto wrote:
> To refine kernel options and compile under Sarge.
>
> Thanks!
>
I see. I will see if I can report back in a couple of weeks. I have
some machines running Xen and Sarge that I need to upgrade, but I have
not yet had the opportunity.
-Roberto
--
Roberto C. Sanchez
http://fam
To refine kernel options and compile under Sarge.
Thanks!
Roberto C. Sanchez escreveu:
> Out of curiousity, why not use the packages that are available from the
official repository?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTE
Eriberto wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> I downloaded the linux-source-2.6.16 and linux-patch-debian-2.6.16. I
> applied the XEN patch and tried:
>
> # make menuconfig (I made a basic configuration)
> # make-kpkg --append-to-version=-686-xen --revision=1.0 -us -uc
> kernel_image
>
> However near of the
the messages:
-
if [ -r System.map -a -x /sbin/depmod ]; then /sbin/depmod -ae -F
System.map -b /usr/src/linux-source-2.6.16/debian/tmp-image -r
2.6.16-686-std-xen; fi
make[2]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/linux-source-2.6.16'
test
On Tue 31 May 05, 1:49 PM, Jon Dowland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> LeVA wrote:
>
> >Hi!
> >
> >Would someone please tell me what are those /boot/System.map* files for?
> >
> >Thanks!
> >
> >Daniel
> >
>
> The website <http://
On Tuesday 31 May 2005 11:52, LeVA wrote:
> Would someone please tell me what are those /boot/System.map* files for?
I gather that it supplies the debugging info (ie, symbols names; names of
functions etc) for the kernel image it applies to.
--
Lee.
Please do not CC replies directly to
LeVA wrote:
Hi!
Would someone please tell me what are those /boot/System.map* files for?
Thanks!
Daniel
The website <http://www.dirac.org/linux/system.map/> (via google)
describes it so well that any attempt to summarize would pale in
comparison. So I won't :)
--
To
Hi!
Would someone please tell me what are those /boot/System.map* files for?
Thanks!
Daniel
--
LeVA
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
helo everyone. i just installed debian stable unto an old pentium pro, and
all seemed to go well. however, when i do a ps aux, i get the following
warning:
{module_list} {module_list_R__ver_module_list}
Warning: /boot/System.map-2.2.20 does not match kernel data.
what'd i do wrong? is t
Hi,
On my machine,
bash$ file /boot/System.map-2.2.5-15
/boot/System.map-2.2.5-15: ASCII text
This problem came up after I had to restore my backup install to eradicate some
hacker's backdoor software.
Chip
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> On Sun, May 05, 2002 at 01:31:48AM -0400, Fu
On Sun, May 05, 2002 at 01:31:48AM -0400, Fu-Dong Chiou wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am getting the following error messages,
>
> bash# ps
> Warning: /boot/System.map-2.2.5-15 not parseable as a System.map
> Warning: /boot/System.map not parseable as a System.map
> USER PID
Hi,
I am getting the following error messages,
bash# ps
Warning: /boot/System.map-2.2.5-15 not parseable as a System.map
Warning: /boot/System.map not parseable as a System.map
USER PID %CPU %MEM VSZ RSS TTY STAT START TIME COMMAND
...
when I run top or ps (the message also
} {__VERSIONED_SYMBOL(shmem_file_setup)}
Warning: /boot/System.map-2.4.4-xfs does not match kernel data.
UIDPID PPID C STIME TTY TIME CMD
root 1 0 0 Jul16 ?00:00:05 init
root 2 1 0 Jul16 ?00:00:00 [keventd]
... snip ...
This does not
also sprach omicron (on Wed, 16 May 2001 03:57:53PM +0530):
> what does it mean ? I *did* compile (and recompile ) my kernel a
> dozen times..is it because of that ?
yes. copy the file /usr/src/linux/System.map to
/boot/System.map-`uname -r` and you are set.
System.map maps kernel a
hello
when i do `ps` , i get the following error message on stderr...
{inet_release} {inet_release_R__ver_inet_release}
Warning: /boot/System.map-2.4.2 does not match kernel data.
{inet_release} {inet_release_R__ver_inet_release}
Warning: /boot/System.map does not match kernel data
> To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
> Subject: Re: /boot/System.map-2.2.18pre21
>
>
> Ethan Benson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >On Fri, Apr 13, 2001 at 10:56:36AM +0100, Wayne Brown wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >> I have managed to destroy this file (stupid I
al Message-
From: Pann McCuaig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, April 13, 2001 6:22 AM
To: Debian User (E-mail)
Subject: Re: /boot/System.map-2.2.18pre21
On Fri, Apr 13, 2001 at 04:36, Ethan Benson wrote:
> in short i think sharing /boot across distributions is a bad idea, too
> ma
On Fri, Apr 13, 2001 at 04:36, Ethan Benson wrote:
> in short i think sharing /boot across distributions is a bad idea, too
> many distributions are too broken in fscking things up in /boot for it
> to work very well.
That may be a little too harsh. I agree that sharing /boot directly is a
Bad
^^
The double '$'s are for the benefit of make. Replace them with single
'$'s if running manually.
> sort > /boot/System.map-2.2.18pre21
Something like:
nm vmlinux | egrep -v 'compiled|\.o$| [aU] |\.\.ng$|LASH[RL]DI' | sort
... would be
rnels.
it can be messy, redhat distros screw around making System.map ->
System.map-X.X.XX symlinks which is retarded and wrong.
> Should you have a System.map-x.x.y file for each?
System.map is looked for like so:
/boot/System.map-`uname -r`
so make sure you have matching System.map
Ahhh...
This brings up another question I've been gnawing on.
If you have three kernels in, say, /hda1/boot - they could be for different
distros on different partitions, or just different custom kernels.
Should you have a System.map-x.x.y file for each?
What other files need to be there
> Thanks in advance.
nm /boot/vmlinux-2.2.18pre21 |
grep -v '\(compiled\)\|\(\.o$$\)\|\( [aU]
\)\|\(\.\.ng$$\)\|\(LASH[RL]DI\)' |
sort > /boot/System.map-2.2.18pre21
--
Ethan Benson
http://www.alaska.net/~erbenson/
pgpKnS1JyXpOh.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Hi,
I have managed to destroy this file (stupid I know) *gg*. My system still
seems to work though. Is this a critical file? Can I replace it?
I cant find any mention of this file in my books, any help appreciated.
Thanks in advance.
Regards
Wayne.
'Don't be suprised if you are playing in Root and
t; >=20
> > I have the same problem after upgrading my (system's) kernel to 2.4.0.
> > I put the 2.4.0 source to /usr/src2/linux directory, and when top=20
> > executed, the System.map looked up is the one in /usr/src/linux (in=20
> > which I put the 2.2.13 source).
>
On Thu, 11 Jan 2001, Liam Ward wrote:
> A reboot usually solves this for me but maybe you've already tried
> that...
Reboot? What is a "reboot"...? What is it, tell me. (An inquiring mind
wants to know.)
;-)
Well, I haven't tried that. (I guess Linux has spoiled me.)
Oki
c2/linux directory, and when top
> > executed, the System.map looked up is the one in /usr/src/linux (in
> > which I put the 2.2.13 source).
>
> why /usr/src2? you should use /usr/src only and if you want to keep 2.2.13
> and 2.4.0 apart just use /usr/src/linux-2.4.0 and /usr/src/li
On Thu, Jan 11, 2001 at 04:30:25PM +0700 or thereabouts, Oki DZ wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have the same problem after upgrading my (system's) kernel to 2.4.0.
> I put the 2.4.0 source to /usr/src2/linux directory, and when top
> executed, the System.map looked up is the one i
en top
> executed, the System.map looked up is the one in /usr/src/linux (in
> which I put the 2.2.13 source).
>
> BTW, I have removed the System.map's in /usr/src/linux and
> /usr/src2/linux; surely enough, when top executed, there's no warning
> reported. The question is, w
Hi,
I have the same problem after upgrading my (system's) kernel to 2.4.0.
I put the 2.4.0 source to /usr/src2/linux directory, and when top
executed, the System.map looked up is the one in /usr/src/linux (in
which I put the 2.2.13 source).
BTW, I have removed the System.map's i
k 2.2.18pre21
kernel:
/etc/cron.daily/status:
{module_list} {module_list_R__ver_module_list}
Warning: /boot/System.map-2.2.18pre21 does not match kernel data.
Diego Biurrun
On Tue, Jan 02, 2001 at 08:31:41AM -0500, David B . Harris wrote:
>
> To quote Ethan Benson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> # well i also used gcc-2.95.2 as that is also what is in potato.
> #
> # i should note one other detail, i build the kernel on straight potato
> # (with potato modutils) and install
To quote Ethan Benson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
# well i also used gcc-2.95.2 as that is also what is in potato.
#
# i should note one other detail, i build the kernel on straight potato
# (with potato modutils) and install the package on a different machine
# that has upgraded modutils. but i don't s
On Tue, Jan 02, 2001 at 01:14:03AM -0500, S.Salman Ahmed wrote:
>
> Either a configuration option (or options) and/or the fact that I am
> using unstable/sid (all packages), and that my kernel has been compiled
> using gcc-2.95.2.
well i also used gcc-2.95.2 as that is also what is in potato.
i
not* be a -prerelease1 -prerelease2 et al. so
we can all look forward to -prerelease2-test14-pre7-ac5 ;-)
(when i checked yesterday there was already a -prerelease-ac1)
fwiw, i have run 2.4.0-test11 several test12-pre and test12 proper
without any of this System.map problems. strace of ps shows it fi
On Mon, 1 Jan 2001 16:00:25 -0500, S.Salman Ahmed said:
> Add me to the list of people having that problem:
>
> @viper:[/home/ssahmed] ps
> {scsi_do_cmd} {__VERSIONED_SYMBOL(scsi_do_cmd)}
> Warning: /boot/System.map-2.4.0-test12 does not match kernel data.
>PID TTY
On Mon, 1 Jan 2001 15:08:31 -0500, David B.Harris said:
> Hey there :)
>
> I'm new to the list(but I've actually subscribed ;), and I'm having a
> bit of an irritant considering an error I get often:
>
> {module_list} {module_list_R__ver_module_list}
>
Hey there :)
I'm new to the list(but I've actually subscribed ;), and I'm having a
bit of an irritant considering an error I get often:
{module_list} {module_list_R__ver_module_list}
Warning: /usr/src/linux/System.map does not match kernel data.
The error appears when I run
On Sun, Dec 03, 2000 at 11:48:16PM -0500, Debian Ghost wrote:
> Hey Guys,
> Somehow I have a messed up system.map file.
> Could someone tell me what this file is/does, and how I can fix mine?
The System.map is created during compiling your kernel. I guess you
recently compiled a kerne
Hey Guys,
Somehow I have a messed up system.map file.
Could someone tell me what this file is/does, and how I can fix mine?
I get this result from a ps -ef :
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/work_data> ps -ef | grep netscape
{no_halt} {init_task_union}
Warning: /boot/System.map-2.2.15 does not match ker
On Tue, 21 Nov 2000, Liam Ward wrote:
> I'm getting the following message when I run ps/top:
> Warning: /boot/System.map-2.2.17 does not match kernel data.
The message comes from a kernel symbol checking routine in (as far as i
remember) misc/symbol.c in the ps source tree.
I _knew_
Did you just upgrade your kernel? (I know 2.2.18pre21 or something just
came out). I usually just make a symlink from /boot/System.map to
/usr/src/linux/System.map. Then whenever I upgrade my kernel my System
map stays consistent.
Chris
On Tue, Nov 21, 2000 at 04:37
Hi all,
I'm getting the following message when I run ps/top:
Warning: /boot/System.map-2.2.17 does not match kernel data.
I'm assuming (hoping :-) that this is because I did a security update
yesterday and something's not quite right.
Any hints on what to do here?
Thanks,
L
> > Just kinda curious...how important is it to place the new System.map file
> > (created when you compiled a new kernel) in the /boot directory? I have
> > compiled a number of kernels and, after looking at this discussion, I
> > checked my /boot directory to see if I
"Robert A. Jacobs" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Just kinda curious...how important is it to place the new System.map file
> (created when you compiled a new kernel) in the /boot directory? I have
> compiled a number of kernels and, after looking at this discussi
* Philipp Schulte <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [181100 19:25]:
> On Fri, Nov 17, 2000 at 10:48:29AM -0600, Jason Holland wrote:
>
> > You can recreate your System.map by running make install in /usr/src/linux,
> > or wherever your kernel source is that you recently recompiled.
&
On Fri, Nov 17, 2000 at 10:48:29AM -0600, Jason Holland wrote:
> You can recreate your System.map by running make install in /usr/src/linux,
> or wherever your kernel source is that you recently recompiled.
Sure he can recreate it this way but he still needs to copy it to the
right plac
support, but that is all I've done.
How did you install your new kernel - maybe you didn't install the new
System.map?
if you didn't do it that way: you should really use make-kpkg to make a debian
package of your new kernel and then install it with dpkg. just search this
mailing
You can recreate your System.map by running make install in /usr/src/linux,
or wherever your kernel source is that you recently recompiled.
Jason
>
> Recently I started getting a message when I do a ps -ef | grep *something.
>
> The message reads about my system map not matching
netscape
{no_halt} {init_task_union}
Warning: /boot/System.map-2.2.15 does not match kernel data.
{no_halt} {init_task_union}
Warning: /boot/System.map does not match kernel data.
Thanks so much,
D. Ghost
%% Gnanasekaran Thoppae <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
gt> How do i generate new System.map file? Do I need this file
gt> whenever I generate new kernels and modules?
The simplest thing to do is to use the kernel-package tool to build
yourself a new kernel package, then install it
Gnanasekaran Thoppae <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> How do i generate new System.map file?
It gets generated during the Linux build process.
> Do I need this file whenever I generate new kernels and modules?
It is better to have a correct System.map under /boot for the curren
hi,
How do i generate new System.map file?
Do I need this file whenever I generate new kernels and modules?
-gnana
, I see that size
> > of /boot/System.map-2.2.17 is different from that of
> > /usr/src/kernel-source-2.2.17/System.map
>
> Just curious people, but what purpose does the system map serve?
>
> Mike
>
> --
> Michael P. Soulier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
On Tue, Oct 17, 2000 at 09:35:12AM -0700, Lazar Fleysher wrote:
> Yes, it happend after I compiled the kernel, and yes, I see that size
> of /boot/System.map-2.2.17 is different from that of
> /usr/src/kernel-source-2.2.17/System.map
Just curious people, but what purpose does the s
Lazar Fleysher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Yes, it happend after I compiled the kernel, and yes, I see that size
> of /boot/System.map-2.2.17 is different from that of
> /usr/src/kernel-source-2.2.17/System.map
>
> If I understand you correctly, after compiling the k
On 17 Oct 2000, Moritz Schulte wrote:
> > after upgrade to 2.2.17 (from 2.0.36) I have noticed that when I give the
> > ps command I get the following error:
> >
> > {aic7xxx_patch6_func} {rpc_debug}
> > Warning: /boot/System.map-2.2.17 does not match kernel dat
Lazar Fleysher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> after upgrade to 2.2.17 (from 2.0.36) I have noticed that when I give the
> ps command I get the following error:
>
> {aic7xxx_patch6_func} {rpc_debug}
> Warning: /boot/System.map-2.2.17 does not match kernel data.
> Warning: /
Hi everybody,
after upgrade to 2.2.17 (from 2.0.36) I have noticed that when I give the
ps command I get the following error:
{aic7xxx_patch6_func} {rpc_debug}
Warning: /boot/System.map-2.2.17 does not match kernel data.
Warning: /usr/src/linux/System.map has an incorrect kernel version.
after
On Sat, Sep 23, 2000 at 02:44:47PM +0200, Carel Fellinger wrote:
> Hai,
>
> the other day I noticed that running ps gives the following warning:
>
>$ ps
>{module_list} {module_list_R__ver_module_list}
>Warning: /boot/System.map-2.2.17-ide does not match kern
Hai,
the other day I noticed that running ps gives the following warning:
$ ps
{module_list} {module_list_R__ver_module_list}
Warning: /boot/System.map-2.2.17-ide does not match kernel data.
PID TTY TIME CMD
...
I'm running kernel 2.2.17-ide. When I switch back to 2
"kernel: cannot find map file"
> >
> > I think this has to do with me recompiling a new kernel. My
> > question
> > is where can I find this map file? is it the same "System.map" found in the
> > new /usr/src/linux directo
On Sat, Mar 04, 2000 at 01:48:34AM +, Ed Cogburn wrote:
> "Hausheer, Geoffrey" wrote:
> >
> > I just installed 'frozen' as my first trial of debian. I had a general
> > question:
> > I have two System.Map files on my system. a /System.Ma
"Hausheer, Geoffrey" wrote:
>
> I just installed 'frozen' as my first trial of debian. I had a general
> question:
> I have two System.Map files on my system. a /System.Map and
> /boot/System.map-2.2.14
> My system crashed (damn laptop suspend and X), and w
I just installed 'frozen' as my first trial of debian. I had a general
question:
I have two System.Map files on my system. a /System.Map and
/boot/System.map-2.2.14
My system crashed (damn laptop suspend and X), and when I rebooted I got a
message about something worng with
System.Map
On Wed, Sep 29, 1999 at 06:53:32PM -0700, Seth R Arnold wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 29, 1999 at 05:02:51PM +0200, Jonas Steverud wrote:
> >
> > When I run some programs (ps, top, etc) I get
> > Warning: /boot/System.map-2.2.10 does not match kernel data.
> >
> > Is ther
On Wed, Sep 29, 1999 at 05:02:51PM +0200, Jonas Steverud wrote:
>
> When I run some programs (ps, top, etc) I get
> Warning: /boot/System.map-2.2.10 does not match kernel data.
>
> Is there some way of fixing this/get rid of the message?
>
> I've compiled the kern
On 30-Sep-99 Salman Ahmed wrote:
> If you are compiling the kernel by hand, then you need to copy the
> System.map from that directory into /boot right after the kernel has been
> compiled. I am not sure but it might have to be named with the kernel
> version ie /boot/System.map-2.2
[I don't know if you received an answer to this question, so
here goes]
>>>>> "Jonas" == Jonas Steverud <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Jonas> When I run some programs (ps, top, etc) I get Warning:
Jonas> /boot/System.map-2.2.10 does not match ker
On 30 Apr 1999, Arcady Genkin wrote:
> So it looks like the kernel *does* need this file. What's the function
> and why did it work without it?
>
If I recall correctly
If I recall correctly the map file is used to provide symbolic
identifiers for debugging kernels. So the kernel needs this
to
forward to hearing more
> discussion on this. Any Kernel mavens around?
Here's how this changed after I copied the system map into the /boot
directory
Apr 30 08:43:45 main syslogd 1.3-3#31: restart.
Apr 30 08:43:45 main kernel: klogd 1.3-3#31, log source = /proc/kmsg started.
Apr 30 08:
Subject: Re: LILO - System.map conflict
Date: Thu, Apr 29, 1999 at 08:20:59PM -0400
In reply to:Arcady Genkin
Quoting Arcady Genkin([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
[ snip]
> > I find the discussion about the system.map file interesting as I have
> > no problem with new kerne
the kernel is, ie slink2.2.3, potato2.2.5,
> Slack2.2.6, etc. I have never copied/moved or otherwise done anything
> with the system.map file. All distributions have the same lilo.conf
> file, so that I can run lilo from any of them.
>
> I find the discussion about the system.ma
Subject: LILO - System.map conflict
Date: Wed, Apr 28, 1999 at 10:55:08AM -0500
In reply to:Fethi A. Okyar
Quoting Fethi A. Okyar([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
>
> I admit that I am crating a lot of trouble myself, just
> poking in things and compiling new kernels, but thats the
On Wed, 28 Apr 1999 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] dixit:
> ~>
> ~> The standard procedure is to make a symlink between /System.map and
> ~> /boot/System.map-x.y.z (assuming that you're using the x.y.z kernel).
> ~> If you have more than one kerne
[EMAIL PROTECTED] dixit:
~>
~> The standard procedure is to make a symlink between /System.map and
~> /boot/System.map-x.y.z (assuming that you're using the x.y.z kernel).
~> If you have more than one kernel on the system, you're supposed to
~> have a System.map-x.y
|> So the question is:
|> Is the map file that is mentioned in lilo.conf not the same file
|> as the Syetm.map file, and am I supposed to place the System.map
|> file in a special location without lilo's knowledge?
These are different files with different functions. The /boot/m
"Fethi A. Okyar" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
I'm sorry for not being able to provide an in-depth answer, but I also
compile kernels by hand, and also have several images referenced from
lilo.conf. However, I _never_ worried about system maps. All I need to
do is copy the new kernel image to wher
Fethi A. Okyar wrote:
>
[...]
> Now I moved the new kernel to /boot as bzImage.x.y.z and I also
> moved the new System.map to /boot/map.x.y.z. I edited my
> /etc/lilo.conf file so that it has the entries such as
>
> ...
> boot=/boot/map.x.y.z
> ...
> linux=/boot/bzIma
o
moved the new System.map to /boot/map.x.y.z. I edited my
/etc/lilo.conf file so that it has the entries such as
...
boot=/boot/map.x.y.z
...
linux=/boot/bzImagex.y.z
...
but what happens each time I run lilo is, it (lil0) destroys the
new System.map file I just moved there, by replacing it by a mu
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Fethi A. Okyar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>1.
>DO I need a separate System.map file for each
>kernel that I compile, cause each time it also
>spits out a new System.map file.
Well, things like klogd and ps like to look at the System.m
1.
DO I need a separate System.map file for each
kernel that I compile, cause each time it also
spits out a new System.map file.
2.
If the answer is yes, how do I specify each
system.map that correspond to their kernel in
my lilo.conf file (i.e how are they supposed to
be stored
1.
DO I need a separate System.map file for each
kernel that I compile, cause each time it also
spits out a new System.map file.
2.
If the answer is yes, how do I specify each
system.map that correspond to their kernel in
my lilo.conf file (i.e how are they supposed to
be stored
On 14-Feb-99 Alec Smith wrote:
> Look in /boot. That's where the System.map is on my Debian boxes.
Thanks, just came to Debian from OpenLinux, and that filesystem is very
different.
--
Andrew
Look in /boot. That's where the System.map is on my Debian boxes.
On Sun, 14 Feb 1999, Pollywog wrote:
> Where does Debian put System.map? I just recompiled a kernel, but my first
> kernel did not have a System.map. I know some distributions put them in / but
> some don&
Where does Debian put System.map? I just recompiled a kernel, but my first
kernel did not have a System.map. I know some distributions put them in / but
some don't.
thanks
--
Andrew
Hi,
Firstly, get a newer kernel-package package, if at all
possible. The newer kernel-package no longer tries to put vmlinux on
/boot (there used to be a reason, but that is no longer usefule for
post 2.0 kernels).
vmlinux is produced in the normal process of building a kernel
Hi,
Certain commands, like klog, ps, and lsof, use the System.map
file to get the name of kernel symbols. make-kpkg ensure that a
System.map file is placed where things can find it.
manoj
>>"Chris" == Chris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Chris> I
Sorry if I caused a hasstle on the list - our mail sysop had blocked mail
from ix.netcom.com - he reconed he got too much spam from there.
I convinced him otherwise, and he's removed the block
Chris
On Sun, 24 May 1998, David A. Bandel wrote:
> Chris,
>
> The S
I accidentally ran across this one when compiling the kernel:
make install
This isn't documented, AFAIK. It installs the system map, and offers to run
lilo or make a disk. Why isn't this documented?
Did anyone anwer the question "what is the system map for?" I'd also like to
know the an
anything about System.map :(
Thanks for any information,
Chris
On Sun, 24 May 1998, Bill Mitchell wrote:
> Off the top of my head ---
>
> That file gives the memory addresses of symbolic variables used in
> the kernel. The memory contents of the kernel data in these variab
Hi,
I was wondering if somebody could give me an idea of what the System.map
file is for? I've allways compiled my own kernels, and never had to worry
about this file (never had any problems). However I tried to use the
command lsof, and it complains that it can't find a System.m
On Fri, 20 Jun 1997 15:36:17 -0700 , Stephen Zander wrote:
>
> Is there some way to pass an alternate name from /System.map (or
> /boot/System.map) to the kernel at boot? I'm mucking with a
> custom kernel but want to leave the 2.0.30 image safely intact.
> I've se
Is there some way to pass an alternate name from /System.map (or
/boot/System.map) to the kernel at boot? I'm mucking with a
custom kernel but want to leave the 2.0.30 image safely intact.
I've setup lilo.confto recognise /vmlinuz.2.0.30 as a valid
kernel but can't figure out how
On Sun, 20 Apr 1997 23:17:02 - "Martin Bialasinski"
([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> I have build a custom kernel.deb package and successfully installed
> it. The package also installed a System.map file. Obviously this file
> has some symbol to memaddress infos and is di
Hi,
as a newbie to linux, I have a question about the System.map file.
I have build a custom kernel.deb package and successfully installed
it. The package also installed a System.map file. Obviously this file
has some symbol to memaddress infos and is different in a kernel with
different
When I boot up, the kernel tells me that it cannot find
/System.map. I have it as a symlink to /boot/System.map_2.0.27
and I checked that root has read permission to both.
What is wrong? I tried specifying /System.map in the line in
init.d/syslogd that starts /sbin/klogd, but cannot find the
177,7 @@
$(DRIVERS) \
$(LIBS) -o vmlinux
$(NM) vmlinux | grep -v '\(compiled\)\|\(\.o$$\)\|\( a \)' | sort >
System.map
+ cp System.map System.map.$(VERSION).$(PATCHLEVEL).$(SUBLEVEL).`
cat .version`
symlinks:
rm -f include/asm
I've compiled custom kernels that weren't part of any debian
distribution yet (2.0.7 patched with aic7xxx fixes). In
/var/adm/messages there's a complaint that the booting kernel couldn't
read the map. Checking old /var/adm/messages, it appears that what's
wanted is
100 matches
Mail list logo
