On 1/13/2020 10:03 AM, David Wright wrote:
Once again, I can tell you nothing about Pluma.
Pluma is a direct descendant of the Gnome 2 text editor, whose name
currently escapes me.
On Mon, 13 Jan 2020, at 16:01, Richard Owlett wrote:
> On 01/13/2020 07:57 AM, Jeremy Nicoll wrote:
> > [ *MASSIVE* snip ]
Fuck off.
--
Jeremy Nicoll - my opinions are my own.
ghlighting rules.
> >
> > Do you understand the purpose of syntax highlighting (in general)?
>
> Yes. Its specific goal is to aid a programmer WHILE coding.
This is contradicted by the reference I gave you, and by links
contained in that wiki page.
> However, I'm trying
On 01/13/2020 07:57 AM, Jeremy Nicoll wrote:
[ *MASSIVE* snip ]
Put it another way, if you put just a handful of lines in a separate
file, does that file get coloured the same way?
I took that some steps further.
The *observability* of the problem is dependent on at least font size,
font fac
On Mon 13 Jan 2020 at 05:46:36 (-0600), Richard Owlett wrote:
> On 01/12/2020 01:20 PM, David Wright wrote:
> > " "
>
> Please read post before replying.
> That *INCLUDES* Subject.
The only word in your subject line that I didn't specifically refer to
was "Pluma". I haven't come across Pluma in
rules.
> >
> > Do you understand the purpose of syntax highlighting (in general)?
>
> Yes. Its specific goal is to aid a programmer WHILE coding.
> However, I'm trying to understand a vendor supplied bash script.
A programmer coding, is the same thing as a programmer (a
On 2020-01-13, Richard Owlett wrote:
>
> That is too detailed(ww?). It is similar to "not being able to see
> forest for the trees".
I'm afraid I took you at your word in light of your long and contentious
record of rebuffing responders who don't.
But damned if you do and damned if you don't,
On 01/13/2020 06:13 AM, Jeremy Nicoll wrote:
On Mon, 13 Jan 2020, at 11:52, Richard Owlett wrote:
I was looking for a description of what Pluma was trying to accomplish
by their highlighting rules.
Do you understand the purpose of syntax highlighting (in general)?
Yes. Its specific goal is
On Mon, 13 Jan 2020, at 11:52, Richard Owlett wrote:
> I was looking for a description of what Pluma was trying to accomplish
> by their highlighting rules.
Do you understand the purpose of syntax highlighting (in general)?
(It's to /aid/ a programmer, reducing the chance of
On 01/12/2020 07:40 AM, Curt wrote:
On 2020-01-12, Richard Owlett wrote:
I am NOT interested in adding any new features.
What are the default rules for a file with extension 'sh'?
TIA
As pluma is a gedit fork as well as a gtk application I suppose it gets
its syntax highlighting
On 01/12/2020 01:20 PM, David Wright wrote:
" "
Please read post before replying.
That *INCLUDES* Subject.
nt, or you've
been using a system that *does* provide it. Which? assuming you now
know what syntax highlighting is.
Syntax highlighting is complemented by indentation. Whereas the former
is normally imposed on the source when the editor opens the file,
indentation is normally contained as part
On 1/12/20 5:59 AM, Richard Owlett wrote:
> I'm attempting to understand a shell script.
> to add highlighting which Pluma does not provide by default.
A bit OT reply: vim does do highlighting that makes some sense (to me),
in sh and Python, anyway.
--
Glenn English
On 2020-01-12, Richard Owlett wrote:
>
> I am NOT interested in adding any new features.
> What are the default rules for a file with extension 'sh'?
> TIA
As pluma is a gedit fork as well as a gtk application I suppose it gets
its syntax highlighting rules from here (on
I'm attempting to understand a shell script.
Pluma is apparently highlighting it based on the file extension (which
is 'sh').
I thought I understood what its highlighting meant.
I didn't ;{
I attempted to do a web search and got primarily hits on people wishing
to add highlighting which Pluma
On 01.03.2010 16:59, Mart Frauenlob wrote:
> On 01.03.2010 12:06, Mart Frauenlob wrote:
>> On 28.02.2010 09:29, Mart Frauenlob wrote:
>
>>> after I upgraded from etch to lenny a few days ago (new config files
>>> have been installed for vim), I noticed that synta
On 01.03.2010 16:32, Mart Frauenlob wrote:
> On 01.03.2010 14:56, Jordan Metzmeier wrote:
>> Check `update-alternatives --list vim` to ensure your not running vim-tiny.
>>
> eris:~# update-alternatives --display vim
> vim - status is auto.
> link currently points to /usr/bin/vim.basic
> /usr/bin/v
On 01.03.2010 12:06, Mart Frauenlob wrote:
> On 28.02.2010 09:29, Mart Frauenlob wrote:
>> after I upgraded from etch to lenny a few days ago (new config files
>> have been installed for vim), I noticed that syntax highlighting for my
>> bash scripts is not working as before.
On 01.03.2010 14:56, Jordan Metzmeier wrote:
> Check `update-alternatives --list vim` to ensure your not running vim-tiny.
>
eris:~# update-alternatives --display vim
vim - status is auto.
link currently points to /usr/bin/vim.basic
/usr/bin/vim.tiny - priority 10
/usr/bin/vim.basic - priority 30
Check `update-alternatives --list vim` to ensure your not running vim-tiny.
--
Jordan Metzmeier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
http://lists.debian.org/50e5edd51003010556p1
On 28.02.2010 09:29, Mart Frauenlob wrote:
> Hello,
>
>
> after I upgraded from etch to lenny a few days ago (new config files
> have been installed for vim), I noticed that syntax highlighting for my
> bash scripts is not working as before.
>
> There are some things i&
Hello,
after I upgraded from etch to lenny a few days ago (new config files
have been installed for vim), I noticed that syntax highlighting for my
bash scripts is not working as before.
There are some things i've noticed, where of the first is worse to me.
1: If I put the following stat
Glenn Becker wrote:
Apologies if this has been posted already.
I am trying to use vim to edit some html files. Never had a problem
setting the syntax before, but on my Debian install (testing), I get
this when I am inside a simple index.html file and type the ex command:
:syntax on
Error
Apologies if this has been posted already.
I am trying to use vim to edit some html files. Never had a problem
setting the syntax before, but on my Debian install (testing), I get this
when I am inside a simple index.html file and type the ex command:
:syntax on
Error detected while process
> Victor Munoz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hello.
> Since the sarge upgrade, everytime I open a TeX document, wherever I
> have some \section{} command, appears in Big Bold Blue letters.
> I don't like it. I'm perfectly happy with a change of color, but not a
> change of size.
You can set
On Fri, 2005-08-05 at 22:46 +0900, Victor Munoz wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 05, 2005 at 02:14:00PM +0100, michael wrote:
>
> > The emacs (sic) command to toggle font-lock (syntax highlighting) is
> > font-lock-mode
> >
>
> Yes, except that it disables all syntax high
On Fri, Aug 05, 2005 at 02:14:00PM +0100, michael wrote:
> The emacs (sic) command to toggle font-lock (syntax highlighting) is
> font-lock-mode
>
Yes, except that it disables all syntax highlighting. I don't want that. I
want syntax highlighting to change only font colors if ne
ut not a
> change of size.
>
> Does anyone know how to get rid of this? I've played with the
> Options->Syntax Highlighting menu (checking/unchecking the "Fonts" option),
> and the varios levels (Least,More,Even More,Most), but no success.
The emacs (sic) command to
played with the
Options->Syntax Highlighting menu (checking/unchecking the "Fonts" option),
and the varios levels (Least,More,Even More,Most), but no success.
Thanks for any help,
Victor
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL P
--- Steve Lamb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ha scritto:
I'm not sure if it will do what you want (match an end with a for
> or if) but might be a good starting place for further investigation.
thank you very much, i think now i have enough material to achieve what i need;
i'll let you know if success
(or
roberto wrote:
> the problem are not braces, sorry, but just pattern because i'm currently
> editing matlab files, so without braces...
Heh, without knowledge of what matlab source looks like I was presuming
there'd be braces in there somewhere. :D
Ok, what I've come up with. A quick ch
roberto wrote:
hello, i have the following question:
in my MATLAB code i have a lot of "for...end" or "ifend" and most of them
are nested one
inside the other, do you know how to recognise whose "for" or "if" an "end"
belongs to?
i know some editors are able to do this (vim, kwite...).
On Wednesday 06 July 2005 05:35, roberto wrote:
> --- Hans du Plooy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ha scritto:
> > You can enable syntax highlighting for vim by editing /etc/vim/vimrc
> > look for the line:
> >
> > " syntax on
> >
> > and uncomment it.The
--- Steve Lamb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ha scritto:
> roberto wrote:
> > how to achieve this in vim?
>
> vim can find matching braces, be they curley, square or parens. If I
> recall correctly it is %. Python's declined my need for such matching. :)
the problem are not braces, sorry, but just
roberto wrote:
> how to achieve this in vim?
vim can find matching braces, be they curley, square or parens. If I
recall correctly it is %. Python's declined my need for such matching. :)
--
Steve C. Lamb | I'm your priest, I'm your shrink, I'm your
PGP Key: 8B6E99
--- Hans du Plooy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ha scritto:
> You can enable syntax highlighting for vim by editing /etc/vim/vimrc
> look for the line:
>
> " syntax on
>
> and uncomment it.Then look in the
> file /usr/share/vim/vim63/syntax/syncolor.vim and other files
"if" an "end"
> belongs to?
> i know some editors are able to do this (vim, kwite...).
You can enable syntax highlighting for vim by editing /etc/vim/vimrc
look for the line:
" syntax on
and uncomment it.Then look in the
file /usr/share/vim/vim63/syntax/syncolor.vim
hello, i have the following question:
in my MATLAB code i have a lot of "for...end" or "ifend" and most of them
are nested one
inside the other, do you know how to recognise whose "for" or "if" an "end"
belongs to?
i know some editors are able to do this (vim, kwite...).
I mean these for's
On Sat, Mar 06, 2004 at 04:08:09PM -0700, user list wrote:
> It seems that since the beginning of time, Xemacs never performed
> syntax highlightin automatically when a file is loaded. On one of my
> machines, however, it is now doing just that. I have always had
> syntax highli
It seems that since the beginning of time, Xemacs never performed
syntax highlightin automatically when a file is loaded. On one of my
machines, however, it is now doing just that. I have always had
syntax highlighting in my initialization file.
Does anyone know what I did right on that machine
How the heck do I turn off syntax highlighting for PHP-mode under
xemacs (I'm running debian unstable, xemacs21). Nothing seems to
work. I have font-lock disabled for every other mode, but not php.
Shouldn't:
(add-hook 'php-mode-user-hook 'turn-off-font-lock)
work?
M-x fon
On Wed, Sep 03, 2003 at 08:12:35AM +0530, Anand Raman wrote:
> Refreshing the screen Ctrl - L should help.. I have seen it on one or
> more occasions and hitting Ctrl L has always helped
Hmm, nope... :/
--
Emma Jane Hogbin
[[ 416 417 2868 ][ www.xtrinsic.com ]]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EM
Refreshing the screen Ctrl - L should help.. I have seen it on one or
more occasions and hitting Ctrl L has always helped
anand
-Original Message-
From: Emma Jane Hogbin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, September 03, 2003 2:29 AM
To: debian-user
Subject: syntax highlighting in
On Tue, 2 Sep 2003 21:04:36 -0400
Johann Koenig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Sylpheed does that? I'm using the "Default To:" for each folder. It
> still breaks when someone uses "Reply-To:," but I'm working on that :)
> My first patch (hopefully) to close out my own Feature Request.
Sylpheed-C
On Tue, 2 Sep 2003 20:39:46 -0400
Emma Jane Hogbin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Based on the folder I'm in the addresses do change--work, school, etc. To
> reset it after being in one folder vs. another I need to get it back to
> what it's supposed to be. In over a year of this setup you're the onl
On Tue, 02 Sep 2003 17:08:32 -0700
Steve Lamb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> However for people who's software checks for list headers and uses
> them for replies
Sylpheed does that? I'm using the "Default To:" for each folder. It
still breaks when someone uses "Reply-To:," but I'm working on that
On Tue, Sep 02, 2003 at 05:08:32PM -0700, Steve Lamb wrote:
> And you're using mutt. Yes, you can turn it off. You have no reason to
> have it set in the first place since from: and reply-to: are identical.
> However for people who's software checks for list headers and uses them for
> repli
On Tue, 2 Sep 2003 19:40:06 -0400
Emma Jane Hogbin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 02, 2003 at 02:30:28PM -0700, Steve Lamb wrote:
> > Do you have progressive searches turned on? BTW, could you turn off
> > reply-to since your from: and reply-to are the same?
> No and no. But thanks
On Tue, Sep 02, 2003 at 02:30:28PM -0700, Steve Lamb wrote:
> On Tue, 2 Sep 2003 16:59:17 -0400
> Emma Jane Hogbin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Sometimes when I'm searching for strings in Vim the syntax highlighting
> > gets turned off. I'm unable to reset it
On Tue, Sep 02, 2003 at 04:38:17PM -0500, Nathan Poznick wrote:
> I've seen syntax highlighting get messed up and just sort of "turn off",
> with the same characteristics, but only with much older vim versions
> is on a Redhat 6.2 machine). It could possibly be a
Thus spake Emma Jane Hogbin:
> Sometimes when I'm searching for strings in Vim the syntax highlighting
> gets turned off. I'm unable to reset it unless I (1) quit the program; (2)
> scroll to the top of the page and then scroll back down.
>
> Has anyone else experience
On Tue, 2 Sep 2003 16:59:17 -0400
Emma Jane Hogbin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Sometimes when I'm searching for strings in Vim the syntax highlighting
> gets turned off. I'm unable to reset it unless I (1) quit the program; (2)
> scroll to the top of the page and then
Sometimes when I'm searching for strings in Vim the syntax highlighting
gets turned off. I'm unable to reset it unless I (1) quit the program; (2)
scroll to the top of the page and then scroll back down.
Has anyone else experienced this problem? I'm using 6.1.474. It tends to
o
Jaque Moreau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >> it didn't work.
> >>
> > try
> >:set term=$TERM
>
> in vim? What does it do?
I read this thread from the middle and missed the rest. So, if I
understood your question correctly, you got colors in terminal, but not
while in vim. If that is true, you
Santanu Chatterjee schrieb im Artikel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Jaque Moreau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> >> it didn't work.
>> >>
>> > try
>> >:set term=$TERM
>>
>> in vim? What does it do?
>
> I read this thread from the middle and missed the rest. So, if I
> understood your question correc
There are no quotes because I have already deleted this question.
However, I just thought of something: I think vim is in vi
compatibility mode by default, unless you have a file called
.vimrc in your home dir. Try doing 'touch .vimrc'. Seems like
I had to do that.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
>> it didn't work.
>>
> try
>:set term=$TERM
in vim? What does it do?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> it didn't work.
>
> Check your TERM variable.
TERM=linux
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Jaque Moreau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Johann Koenig schrieb im Artikel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > Jaque Moreau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >> there is no syntax highlighting on console, only under xterm.
> >> syntax on is enabled in g
00
> > Jaque Moreau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >> there is no syntax highlighting on console, only under xterm.
> > In command mode (in VI), type ":syntax on" and see if that fixes
> > it. I would suppose, if it does, that either the global vimrc
Johann Koenig schrieb im Artikel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> --=.5UPOgFdrEYOzCL
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
>
> On Sat, 02 Aug 2003 22:20:06 +0200
> Jaque Moreau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> there is no syn
On Sat, 02 Aug 2003 22:20:06 +0200
Jaque Moreau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> there is no syntax highlighting on console, only under xterm.
>
> syntax on is enabled in global vimrc.
>
> where should I dig further?
>
> what information do you need?
In command mode (in
there is no syntax highlighting on console, only under xterm.
syntax on is enabled in global vimrc.
where should I dig further?
what information do you need?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Jörg Johannes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I have a file called header.tex in my home directory which I use for
> every LaTeX document. When I try to do
> \input{$HOME/header}
> at the very beginning of my document, emacs colors everything in
> math-mode-colour because of the "$"-sign.
(Does TeX
Hello List
I have a file called header.tex in my home directory which I use for
every LaTeX document. When I try to do
\input{$HOME/header}
at the very beginning of my document, emacs colors everything in
math-mode-colour because of the "$"-sign. I do not want to use the
absolute path, because
ntation, but I suspect that it uses regexps and string matching,
> rather than a full parser to do syntax highlighting, just like emacs. If
> that is in fact the case, then no, there's no way to do it. (Short of
> implementing a full C++ parser, of course.)
I thought that vim include
C++
aren't context-free. I'm an emacs user myself, so I can't speak as to vi's
implementation, but I suspect that it uses regexps and string matching,
rather than a full parser to do syntax highlighting, just like emacs. If
that is in fact the case, then no, there's no way to do it. (Short of
implementing a full C++ parser, of course.)
Richard
1st part...
You can do a 'locate .vim' to find where vim hides it's syntax files.
Mine are in /usr/share/vim/vim56/syntax. The files are pretty ugly,
but it should be too hard to find 'float' and add 'gfloat' to that
list.
I just test it, in c.vim, add gfloat to the end of line 121, so this:
syn
Hi,
Is it possible to get vim to have a look through your #included files
and colour the defined types? In particular, it would be nice to have
'gfloat' coloured similar to 'float', when including glib.h
Alternatively, should I be using :syntax match and friends?
Regards,
Mark.
t yet is how to get
automatic syntax highlighting on the console. I'm reading on on this one
but if some kind soul could give me a hint it sure would help. (I've
still problems groging lisp, much prefer Pyhton, almost thinking of
switching to vim just for the python support:)
--
groetjes, carel
"Jakob 'sparky' Kaivo" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> GNU Emacs doesn't (currently) support colors under ncurses, only under
> X. XEmacs, however, supports colors in both modes.
there are "rumors" on gnu.emacs.help that Emacs 21 will support
colors on tty's.
--
Felix Natter
on 5/23/00 1:49 PM, Steve Lamb at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Tuesday, May 23, 2000, 10:46:21 AM, John wrote:
>> Saying emacs isn't a text editor is like saying that a Leatherman isn't a
>> pocket knife -- it may be literally true, but is extremely misleading in
>> fact.
>
> Hey, don't tell me.
Tuesday, May 23, 2000, 10:46:21 AM, John wrote:
> Have you perhaps never used emacs?
I have.
> Saying emacs isn't a text editor is like saying that a Leatherman isn't a
> pocket knife -- it may be literally true, but is extremely misleading in
> fact.
Hey, don't tell me. Tell all the Em
on 5/23/00 1:37 PM, Steve Lamb at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Right, because were are still on simple editor. Again, I fail to see how
> Emacs qualifies since it isn't simple nor is it a text editor.
(Please note that I changed the subject line a couple messages back, to
remove the 'simple'.)
Ha
Tuesday, May 23, 2000, 8:41:46 AM, John wrote:
> Go back and read the text you snipped. The question got changed to "text
> editor with best Perl syntax highlighting", without a concomitant change in
> subject line. (X)Emacs certainly qualifies, despite it's editing functio
>> (X)Emacs with CPerl mode.
>
> Even that's not, hmmm, what it should be. Cases that come to mind are
> certain regular expressions and here documents. Unless I've been
> using a different Perl mode in Emacs.
I haven't noticed any issues, but I don't make huge usage of here documents,
and I te
nipped. The question got changed to "text
editor with best Perl syntax highlighting", without a concomitant change in
subject line. (X)Emacs certainly qualifies, despite it's editing functions
being only a subset of it's full functionality.
That said, could we pretty please with
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> M-x font-lock-mode ?
>
>
> On Mon, 15 May 2000, Britton wrote:
>
> >
> > Is there some way to do this? It seems it should be possible but I havn't
> > been able to find any reference to it in the emacs
> > docs. list-colors-display just produces an empty, colorl
M-x font-lock-mode ?
On Mon, 15 May 2000, Britton wrote:
>
> Is there some way to do this? It seems it should be possible but I havn't
> been able to find any reference to it in the emacs
> docs. list-colors-display just produces an empty, colorless list. Any
> info appreciated.
>
> Britton
Britton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Is there some way to do this? It seems it should be possible but I havn't
> been able to find any reference to it in the emacs
> docs. list-colors-display just produces an empty, colorless list. Any
> info appreciated.
Last time I checked into this one of t
Is there some way to do this? It seems it should be possible but I havn't
been able to find any reference to it in the emacs
docs. list-colors-display just produces an empty, colorless list. Any
info appreciated.
Britton Kerin
Mark Phillips writes:
Mark> How do you get colour highlighting for syntax in XEmacs - eg for latex
Mark> using AUC-TeX?
M-x font-lock-mode
Mark> Also, do you have any other nifty setups for XEmacs.
A good way to start in XEmacs in going to the HELP menu in the menubar
and grab
Mark Phillips wrote:
> How do you get colour highlighting for syntax in XEmacs - eg for latex
> using AUC-TeX?
Some people like font-latex.el, which comes as a contrib add-on
with AUC-TeX, which in turn is bundled with XEmacs. (The primary
font-latex support is for Emacs, so XEmacs bugs turn up
In your message you say:
> operating system ;-), the major functionnality of it is its incredible
> editing
> power. After some learning, you find a edition mode for amost any kinds of
> files (programming langages, ChangeLogs, resources files ...) with keyboard
> shortcuts, synt
84 matches
Mail list logo
