Tuesday, May 23, 2000, 8:41:46 AM, John wrote:
> Go back and read the text you snipped. The question got changed to "text
> editor with best Perl syntax highlighting", without a concomitant change in
> subject line. (X)Emacs certainly qualifies, despite it's editing functions
> being only a subset of it's full functionality.

    Right, because were are still on simple editor.  Again, I fail to see how
Emacs qualifies since it isn't simple nor is it a text editor.

-- 
         Steve C. Lamb         | I'm your priest, I'm your shrink, I'm your
         ICQ: 5107343          | main connection to the switchboard of souls.
-------------------------------+---------------------------------------------


Reply via email to