Hi folks,
On 2/19/21 2:47 PM, Harald Dunkel wrote:
I already cleared the cache of apt-cacher-ng, but the problem comes back.
What would you suggest how to proceed?
Mystery solved: apt-cacher-ng used /var/cache/apt-cacher-ng instead
of /export/cache/apt-cacher-ng I had configured some time ag
On Fri, Feb 19, 2021 at 04:26:17PM +0100, Kamil Jońca wrote:
> Harald Dunkel writes:
>
> > Hi folks,
> >
> > aptitude shows
> >
> > E: Failed to fetch
> >
> > http://deb.debian.org/debian/pool/main/s/spectre-meltdown-checker/spectre-meltdow
Harald Dunkel writes:
> Hi folks,
>
> aptitude shows
>
> E: Failed to fetch
>
> http://deb.debian.org/debian/pool/main/s/spectre-meltdown-checker/spectre-meltdown-checker_0.42-1_all.deb:
> Hash Sum mismatch
>Hashes of e
On Fri, 19 Feb 2021 14:47:34 +0100
Harald Dunkel wrote:
> E: Unable to fetch some packages; try '-o APT::Get::Fix-Missing=true'
> to continue with missing packages
>
> I already cleared the cache of apt-cacher-ng, but the problem comes
> back. What would you suggest how to proceed?
You didn't s
Hi folks,
aptitude shows
E: Failed to fetch
http://deb.debian.org/debian/pool/main/s/spectre-meltdown-checker/spectre-meltdown-checker_0.42-1_all.deb:
Hash Sum mismatch
Hashes of expected file:
- SHA256:a5b777497c860a51ce1f1fd888f727531ea60be625ffe6787aebf12823177e2f
- MD5Sum
Hello all,
I would like to avoid the "has sum mismatch" error during a preseed deployment.
For that I can:
- write a file in /etc/apt/apt.conf.d/ after /target mount (when /target apt
can be modified) and before package installation
Content:
Acquire::By-Hash "yes"
The pro
Sven Joachim writes:
> On 2018-04-14 17:24 +0200, Felix Natter wrote:
>
>> I shut down a virtualbox sid VM, and it turned out it was running
>> "unattended upgrades". On next start, apt-get update fails:
>>
>> =
>> Get:22 http://ftp2.de.debian.org/d
On 04/14/2018 08:24 AM, Felix Natter wrote:
> apt-get update on sid: Hash Sum mismatch
That means try again later or try a different source. :)
Cheers!
--
Jimmy Johnson
Devuan Beowulf - TDE-Trinity R14.0.5 - AMD A8-7600 - EXT4 at sda8
Registered Linux User #380263
On 2018-04-14 17:24 +0200, Felix Natter wrote:
> I shut down a virtualbox sid VM, and it turned out it was running
> "unattended upgrades". On next start, apt-get update fails:
>
> =
> Get:22 http://ftp2.de.debian.org/debian unstable/contrib amd64 Co
1 Metadata
Hash Sum mismatch
Hashes of expected file:
- Filesize:72292 [weak]
- SHA256:64b9be98f14db2f20b9730981fc799db28903d53adec5e501ad25ffe965d5c7e
- MD5Sum:138830c87e09a8e9a1b2f449c8687e13 [weak]
Hashes of received file:
matecs writes:
> some corrupted index files hit the mirrors.
> i've tried more, with the same results.
> someone should take a look at it...
[...]
> E: Failed to fetch
> store:/var/lib/apt/lists/partial/ftp.at.debian.org_debian_dists_sid_non-free_dep11_Components-amd64.yml.xz
On 03.11.2017 14:03, matecs wrote:
> hi,
> some corrupted index files hit the mirrors.
> i've tried more, with the same results.
> someone should take a look at it...
> thanks,
> cs
>
>
I've seen this error occasionally and I think this happens when mirror
wasn't synced completely yet. So, give it
11-03-0228.38.pdiff [22.9 kB]
Err:24 http://ftp.at.debian.org/debian sid/non-free amd64 DEP-11
Metadata
Hash Sum mismatch
Hashes of expected file:
- Filesize:65721 [weak]
-
SHA256:0eb5ea70b4c46a7c0889e9601d16cedf3eb4ff55bf3b77ef2af2bcd3dcf48cec
- MD5Sum:68fdfbc3bc806010ba4c9fc8d4c
On 2016-08-18, Greg Wooledge wrote:
>
> There is a phenomenon in one of the online communities that I engage with.
> A sort of wink-nudge superstition, if you will: "If you want something
> to happen, complain in chat about it not happening." Posting in IRC
> didn't work in this case, but apparen
On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 12:33:27PM -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> On Thu, 18 Aug 2016, Greg Wooledge wrote:
> > Now, starting last week, the problem is that when I try to apt-get update,
> > the files coming from security.debian.org HANG at 100% complete. It
> > looks something like t
On Thu, 18 Aug 2016, Greg Wooledge wrote:
> Now, starting last week, the problem is that when I try to apt-get update,
> the files coming from security.debian.org HANG at 100% complete. It
> looks something like this:
While it really might be something else completely, the anti-virus
function of
On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 04:47:55AM -0700, poiuytrez wrote:
> I have frequent errors when I do apt-get update:
> W: Failed to fetch
> http://http.debian.net/debian/dists/jessie-backports/main/source/Sources
> Hash Sum mismatch
For you, I would suggest trying a different mir
On Thu, 18 Aug 2016 04:47:55 -0700 (PDT)
poiuytrez wrote:
Hello poiuytrez,
>What's wrong and what would you recommend?
If it persists for more than a day or two, I usually do;
# rm -r /var/lib/apt/lists/*
Not elegant but it works.
--
Regards _
/ ) "The blindingly obviou
Hello,
I have frequent errors when I do apt-get update:
W: Failed to fetch
http://http.debian.net/debian/dists/jessie-backports/main/source/Sources Hash
Sum mismatch
W: Failed to fetch
http://http.debian.net/debian/dists/jessie-backports/main/i18n/Translation-en
Hash Sum mismatch
W
Hi,
I install a mirror on my server 172.17.11.85 with apt-mirror
from a machine ( the server itself ), apt-get update works correctly
from another machine (remote machine), I got error on some directory and
not in others , here is the output:
OK:
Atteint ftp://172.17.11.85 jessie-backports/non
Maybe.. How can I check it ? But If I use IP address ( that use the
mirror.list) in my source.list, the update works well.
So the original site works well. I think it has some problem with my
local mirror, but do not know how can I check and solve it..
On Mon, Sep 21, 2015 at 5:47 PM, Don Armstro
On Mon, 21 Sep 2015, Toth Zoltan wrote:
> Hi Everibody
>
> I have a problem after upgrade debian wheezy to jessie.
> I have a local debian mirror ( Debian jessie 3.16.0-4-amd64) with
> "jessie and wheezy" distribution.
It's likely that your mirror is out of sync and/or was mirrored from a
mirro
et
upgrade It worked well
- apt source.list replaced to jessie distribution apt-get update,
apt-get-upgrade and apt-get dist-upgrade It worked well
After reboot I try to run apt-get update I get Hash Sum mismatch.
Failed to fetch
http://slxxx/debian/dists/jessie/main/binary-amd64/Packages
I have complete the task using galculator manually
Thanks anyway!
On Fri, 9/18/15, David Wright wrote:
Subject: Re: how to sum a column in openoffice calc
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Date: Friday, September 18, 2015, 11:06 PM
It was
Quoting Li Wei (root...@yahoo.com):
> I don't have Excel
> I open the file with oocalc
It was suggested in Carl Fink's posting
https://lists.debian.org/debian-user/2015/09/msg00743.html
that the numbers that you are trying to sum are not numbers at all.
Could you check that out
I don't have Excel
I open the file with oocalc
sort it and select part of it
then copy/paste to a new file in oocalc
On Fri, 9/18/15, Curt wrote:
Subject: Re: how to sum a column in openoffice calc
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Date: F
On 2015-09-17, Li Wei wrote:
> I have not realized the problem is so difficult
> I'd rather do manual calculation, it's one-time task
> The file is paste from a Excel file
I know how you feel. Have you tried opening the
Excel file directly in Open Office Calc?
Li Wei wrote:
> I have not realized the problem is so difficult
> I'd rather do manual calculation, it's one-time task
> The file is paste from a Excel file
Pasting from an Excel file looks odd to me, I guess it gives
unpredictable results.
Better open the Excel file with LO and paste it from ther
here is a workaround. Insert a new column O (next
to N) and put
this formula in O1: =N1+0 (0 = zero)
In LibreOffice, an addition like this converts the
alphanumeric string
into a number.
Now copy O1 to O2:O8 and you'll see that SUM(O1:O8) in O9
works.
Li Wei wrote:
> I have attach the calc file, it's in Chinese, (sorry)
> my question is how to display sum(N1:N8) in cell N9
I can see it now. N1:N8 do not contain numbers; they contain
alphanumeric strings. If you select N1, then this is what you see in
the formula bar: '-755.
On Wed, 2015-09-16 at 14:13 -0700, Li Wei wrote:
> Thanks to all those who reply!
>
> I have prefix equal sign, but it doesn't work
> I have attach the calc file, it's in Chinese, (sorry)
> my question is how to display sum(N1:N8) in cell N9
Hi,
There are also maili
On Wed, Sep 16, 2015 at 11:27:12PM +0200, Floris wrote:
> What is your decimal separator?
>
> Go to Tools --> Options --> language Settings --> Languages
>
> Because when I replace the dots, with a comma the formula
> =SUM(N1:N8) works
Interestingly, on my system t
Op Wed, 16 Sep 2015 23:13:34 +0200 schreef Li Wei :
Thanks to all those who reply!
I have prefix equal sign, but it doesn't work
I have attach the calc file, it's in Chinese, (sorry)
my question is how to display sum(N1:N8) in cell N9
Thanks!
What is your decimal separator?
G
On Wed, Sep 16, 2015 at 03:12:22PM +0200, Sven Arvidsson wrote:
> On Wed, 2015-09-16 at 06:02 -0700, Li Wei wrote:
> > I want sum of a column of values
> > I enter "SUM(N1:N8)" in cell N9
> > but can't get cell N9 to display sum
> >
> > Thanks in ad
On 2015-09-16, Lisi Reisz wrote:
> On Wednesday 16 September 2015 16:26:58 Curt wrote:
>> On 2015-09-16, Lars Noodén wrote:
>> > Wouldn't that be "=SUM(N1:N8)" instead, with an equal sign?
>>
>> That works for me.
>>
>> I just hit that G
On Wednesday 16 September 2015 16:26:58 Curt wrote:
> On 2015-09-16, Lars Noodén wrote:
> > Wouldn't that be "=SUM(N1:N8)" instead, with an equal sign?
>
> That works for me.
>
> I just hit that Greek letter (epsilon?).
I don't know the actual thing, bu
On 2015-09-16, Lars Noodén wrote:
>>
> Wouldn't that be "=SUM(N1:N8)" instead, with an equal sign?
>
That works for me.
I just hit that Greek letter (epsilon?).
On Wed, 2015-09-16 at 06:02 -0700, Li Wei wrote:
> I want sum of a column of values
> I enter "SUM(N1:N8)" in cell N9
> but can't get cell N9 to display sum
>
> Thanks in advance!!!
>
> PS: I'm in China and can't use google to find answer
On 09/16/2015 04:02 PM, Li Wei wrote:
> I want sum of a column of values
> I enter "SUM(N1:N8)" in cell N9
> but can't get cell N9 to display sum
>
> Thanks in advance!!!
>
> PS: I'm in China and can't use google to find answer
>
>
Wouldn
On Ma, 14 oct 14, 21:57:30, Hendrik Boom wrote:
> Whenever I do an
>aptitude update
> it seems to work OK, except for a series of messages at the end:
...
> Notice that this happens with *two* mirrors.
>
> Is there something I should do to stop this?
You could try reporting this to debian-mi
Whenever I do an
aptitude update
it seems to work OK, except for a series of messages at the end:
W: Failed to fetch http://ftp.ca.debian.org/debian/dists/testing/contrib/
source/SourcesIndex: Hash Sum mismatch
W: Failed to fetch http://ftp.ca.debian.org/debian/dists/testing/contrib/
binary
t; the local mirror with no problems. However when I try to update the
> > packages on the testing VM against it, I get two hash sum mismatch
> > errors:
> >
> > Failed to fetch
> > bzip2:/var/lib/apt/lists/partial/192.168.221.1_debian_dists_testing_main_source_Sour
he stable VM has been around for over a year and makes use of
> the local mirror with no problems. However when I try to update the
> packages on the testing VM against it, I get two hash sum mismatch
> errors:
>
> Failed to fetch
> bzip2:/var/lib/apt/lists/partial/192.168.221.1_d
problems. However when I try to update the
packages on the testing VM against it, I get two hash sum mismatch
errors:
Failed to fetch
bzip2:/var/lib/apt/lists/partial/192.168.221.1_debian_dists_testing_main_source_Sources
Hash Sum mismatch
Failed to fetch
bzip2:/var/lib/apt/lists/partial
Hey, I did!
It works all nice now!
Thanks,
Tamer
Am 28.03.2014 04:25, schrieb Scott Ferguson:
> On 28/03/14 13:51, Tamer Higazi wrote:
>> Hi people!
>>
>> when I run apt-get update, I always receive a bunch of error messages,
>> as well if I want to install something through aptitude, debian i
hpad.net/cherokee-webserver/ppa/ubuntu/dists/
> W: Failed to fetch
> http://ppa.launchpad.net/cherokee-webserver/ppa/ubuntu/dists/wheezy/main/binary-amd64/Packages
>
> 404 Not Found
Likewise
> W: Failed to fetch
> ftp://ftp.de.debian.org/debian/dists/testing/main/source/SourcesI
r/ppa/ubuntu/dists/wheezy/main/binary-amd64/Packages
404 Not Found
W: Failed to fetch
ftp://ftp.de.debian.org/debian/dists/testing/main/source/SourcesIndex
Hash Sum mismatch
W: Failed to fetch
ftp://ftp.de.debian.org/debian/dists/testing/non-free/source/SourcesIndex
Hash Sum mismatch
W: Failed to
On Sun, 16 Feb 2014 19:57:33 +
Brad Rogers wrote:
Hello Brad,
>Yesterday, when attempting to perform a system update, I got a complete
>set of Hash sum mismatch errors. I wasn't worried, as this sort of
>thing occasionally happens and sorts itself out.
Typical; further se
Hello All,
Yesterday, when attempting to perform a system update, I got a complete
set of Hash sum mismatch errors. I wasn't worried, as this sort of
thing occasionally happens and sorts itself out.
Today, I got the same issue. So, I tried to update a second machine,
which uses the
On Feb 4, 2014, at 12:25 AM, PaulNM wrote:
> On 02/04/2014 01:53 AM, Rick Thomas wrote:
>>
>> On Feb 3, 2014, at 8:37 PM, Scott Ferguson
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Mirrors were updating a couple of days ago and if you tried to use
>>> one during the updating period you would get errors. Could be t
On 02/04/2014 01:53 AM, Rick Thomas wrote:
>
> On Feb 3, 2014, at 8:37 PM, Scott Ferguson
> wrote:
>
>> Mirrors were updating a couple of days ago and if you tried to use
>> one during the updating period you would get errors. Could be the problem.
>
> What would it take to make a mirror
On Feb 3, 2014, at 8:37 PM, Scott Ferguson
wrote:
> Mirrors were updating a couple of days ago and if you tried to use
> one during the updating period you would get errors. Could be the problem.
What would it take to make a mirror update atomically? For example, download
all the updates
On 04/02/14 15:25, Rick Valenzuela wrote:
> On 02/03/2014 06:17 PM, Mark Allums wrote:
>>> Has anybody else experienced problems over the last couple of days?
>>> Or is there a local fix I can apply?
>>
>> I too have had this issue for a couple of days now.
>
> Same here, but it went away yesterda
On 02/03/2014 06:17 PM, Mark Allums wrote:
>> Has anybody else experienced problems over the last couple of days?
>> Or is there a local fix I can apply?
>
> I too have had this issue for a couple of days now.
Same here, but it went away yesterday.
--
Rick Valenzuela
Videojournalist
Phnom Penh
> I too have had this issue for a couple of days now.
>
> Mark
>
>
I've emailed Raphael
--
rob
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
http://lists.debian.org/CAOZWb-p-MFahSMxY5dS
> Has anybody else experienced problems over the last couple of days?
> Or is there a local fix I can apply?
I too have had this issue for a couple of days now.
Mark
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@
Has anybody else experienced problems over the last couple of days?
Or is there a local fix I can apply?
For ref:
About http.debian.net
Brought to you by Raphael Geissert, it aims to solve the problem of
choosing a Debian mirror, among other issues. The redirector uses the
geo and network locati
> > $ sudo
> > rm /var/cache/apt/pkgcache.bin /var/cache/apt/srcpkgcache.bin
> > /var/lib/apt/lists/partial/* /var/lib/apt/lists/* ;
> > sudo apt-get update ... $ sudo aptitude install r-base r-base-core
> > r-recommended r-base-dev ...
> > E: Failed to fetch
>
lib/apt/lists/* ; sudo apt-get update
> ...
> $ sudo aptitude install r-base r-base-core r-recommended r-base-dev
> ...
> E: Failed to fetch
> http://mirrors.nics.utk.edu/cran/bin/linux/debian/squeeze-cran/r-base-core_2.15.2-1~squeezecran.0_amd64.deb:
> Hash Sum mismatch
Since your
commended r-base-dev
...
E: Failed to fetch
http://mirrors.nics.utk.edu/cran/bin/linux/debian/squeeze-cran/r-base-core_2.15.2-1~squeezecran.0_amd64.deb:
Hash Sum mismatch
> There are also plenty of hits on google for:
> W: Failed to fetch bzip2: Hash Sum mismatch
I'll try that.
thanks a
:/var/lib/apt/lists/partial/lib.stat.cmu.edu_R_CRAN_bin_linux_debian_squeeze-cran_Packages:
> Hash Sum mismatch
> E: Some index files failed to download. They have been ignored, or old ones
> used instead.
> E: Couldn't rebuild package cache
[...]
> me@it:~ $ sudo rm /var/li
summary: trying to update R packages from recommended mirrors @
http://cran.r-project.org/mirrors.html
This has worked well for a long time, but now I keep getting errors like
Failed to fetch /squeeze-cran/: Hash Sum mismatch
No fix from either
sudo rm /var/lib/apt/lists/partial/*
sudo rm
On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 10:54:16PM -0500, Tom Roche wrote:
> did `sudo aptitude update`, and got
>
> > W: Failed to fetch
> > bzip2:/var/lib/apt/lists/partial/watson.nci.nih.gov_cran%5fmirror_bin_linux_debian_squeeze-cran_Packages:
> > Hash Sum mismatch
>
>
. But tonight I'm
getting
> E: Failed to fetch
> http://lib.stat.cmu.edu/R/CRAN/bin/linux/debian/squeeze-cran/r-base-core_2.15.2-1~squeezecran.0_amd64.deb:
> Hash Sum mismatch
So I changed my sources.list
- deb http://lib.stat.cmu.edu/R/CRAN/bin/linux/debian squee
On Fri, Jun 29, 2012 at 05:01:01PM +1000, Charlie wrote:
> On Fri, 29 Jun 2012 14:25:26 +1200 "Chris Bannister
> cbannis...@slingshot.co.nz" suggested this:
>
> >JFTR, problems with third party repositories are off topic on this
> >list. The repository 'www.deb-multimedia.org' is not affiliated
On Fri, Jun 29, 2012 at 12:59:23PM +0300, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
> On Vi, 29 iun 12, 14:25:26, Chris Bannister wrote:
> >
> > JFTR, problems with third party repositories are off topic on this list.
> > The repository 'www.deb-multimedia.org' is not affiliated with Debian in
> > anyway and in fact
On Vi, 29 iun 12, 14:25:26, Chris Bannister wrote:
>
> JFTR, problems with third party repositories are off topic on this list.
> The repository 'www.deb-multimedia.org' is not affiliated with Debian in
> anyway and in fact can be a possible source of problems.
Don't you think this is a bit harsh
On Fri, 29 Jun 2012 14:25:26 +1200 "Chris Bannister
cbannis...@slingshot.co.nz" suggested this:
>JFTR, problems with third party repositories are off topic on this
>list. The repository 'www.deb-multimedia.org' is not affiliated with
>Debian in anyway and in fact can be a possible source of prob
et: 3
> http://www.deb-multimedia.org/ wheezy/main libvlc5 i386 1:2.0.1-dmo3
> [51.4 kB] Fetched 7,863 kB in 13min 22s (9,795 B/s) E: Failed to fetch
> http://www.deb-multimedia.org/pool/main/v/vlc-dmo/libvlccore5_2.0.1-dmo3_i386.deb:
> Hash Sum mismatch
JFTR, problems with third party repos
On Thu, 28 Jun 2012 21:09:59 +1000
Charlie wrote:
Hello Charlie,
>But nothing has changed. [laughing]
{snip}
It might take time for the change to roll out fully.
--
Regards _
/ ) "The blindingly obvious is
/ _)radnever immediately apparent"
Going round on
i386
1:2.0.1-dmo3 [444 kB] Get: 2 http://www.deb-multimedia.org/ wheezy/main
vlc-data all 1:2.0.1-dmo3 [7,367 kB] Get: 3
http://www.deb-multimedia.org/ wheezy/main libvlc5 i386 1:2.0.1-dmo3
[51.4 kB] Fetched 7,863 kB in 13min 22s (9,795 B/s) E: Failed to fetch
http://www.deb-multimedia.org/pool/main/v/vl
On Thu, 28 Jun 2012 20:14:59 +1000
Charlie wrote:
Hello Charlie,
>I did, but thanks for the pointer in case I forgot.
YW.
>A kind reply from Christian Marillat says that there was a problem with
>his repository, but that's now fixed.
Good news. No need for me to suggest it, then. ;-)
--
On Thu, 28 Jun 2012 07:52:41 +0100 "Brad Rogers b...@fineby.me.uk"
suggested this:
>You did 'apt-get update' after changing the sources.list, didn't you?
>It looks as though you did, but to be sure.
I did, but thanks for the pointer in case I forgot.
A kind reply from Christian Marillat say
On Thu, 28 Jun 2012 16:19:09 +1000
Charlie wrote:
Hello Charlie,
>Thanks Brad, much obliged and the first part of your signature is
YW.
>probably true in my case.
Indeed. Put there originally as a reminder to me, but others seem to
benefit from it too. :-)
And following on from your othe
On Wed, 27 Jun 2012 23:12:19 +0100 "Brad Rogers b...@fineby.me.uk"
suggested this:
>On Thu, 28 Jun 2012 07:10:34 +1000
>Charlie wrote:
>
>Hello Charlie,
>
>>E: Failed to fetch
>>http://www.debian-multimedia.org/pool/main/v/vlc-dmo/libvlccore5_2.0.1-dmo3_i38
On Wed, 27 Jun 2012 23:12:19 +0100 "Brad Rogers b...@fineby.me.uk"
suggested this:
>On Thu, 28 Jun 2012 07:10:34 +1000
>Charlie wrote:
>
>Hello Charlie,
>
>>E: Failed to fetch
>>http://www.debian-multimedia.org/pool/main/v/vlc-dmo/libvlccore5_2.0.1-dmo3_i38
On Thu, 28 Jun 2012 07:10:34 +1000
Charlie wrote:
Hello Charlie,
>E: Failed to fetch
>http://www.debian-multimedia.org/pool/main/v/vlc-dmo/libvlccore5_2.0.1-dmo3_i386.deb:
>Hash Sum mismatch
Try deb-multimedia; It's been renamed.
--
Regards _
/ ) "The
One imagines that others are seeing this when updating Wheezy and it's
but a momentary passing problem?
E: Failed to fetch
http://www.debian-multimedia.org/pool/main/v/vlc-dmo/libvlccore5_2.0.1-dmo3_i386.deb:
Hash Sum mismatch
Be well,
Ch
On Fri, 18 Mar 2011 10:15:37 +0200, Γιώργος Πάλλας wrote:
> A short question: I have two 500GB HDDs and I want to use their space as
> one. Should I aggregate them with software RAID, or using LVM in regard
> to data safety? If one of them malfunctions, is one of the two
> approaches better?
As s
Boyd Stephen Smith Jr.:
>
> Buy another 500GB disk and do software RAID 5 if you really need 1TB of
> space.
> It won't be great, but it'll be a LOT safer than what you are proposing.
mdadm can even do RAID10 on three drives (IBM calls it RAID 1E). You'll
get 750GB of space with three 500GB dr
On 2011-03-18 03:44:32 Γιώργος Πάλλας wrote:
>The 'data safety' I mentioned gave the wrong impression. Let me
>rephrase: I want to use the two disks aggregated (i.e. 1TB), and the
>question is if one of the two solutions gives me better chances to get
>some of my data back, in case of a full or par
On 03/18/2011 03:15 AM, Γιώργος Πάλλας wrote:
Hi all!
A short question: I have two 500GB HDDs and I want to use their space as
one.
That's called "striping".
Should I aggregate them with software RAID, or using LVM in regard
to data safety? If one of them malfunctions, is one of the two
18/03/2011 09:15, Γιώργος Πάλλας wrote:
> Hi all!
>
> A short question: I have two 500GB HDDs and I want to use their space as
> one. Should I aggregate them with software RAID, or using LVM in regard
> to data safety? If one of them malfunctions, is one of the two
> approaches better?
>
>
Hi,
On 03/18/2011 09:44 AM, Γιώργος Πάλλας wrote:
On 18/03/2011 10:30 πμ, Michael Thompson wrote:
2011/3/18 Γιώργος Πάλλας:
Hi all!
A short question: I have two 500GB HDDs and I want to use their space as
one. Should I aggregate them with software RAID, or using LVM in regard
to data sa
Γιώργος Πάλλας:
>
> A short question: I have two 500GB HDDs and I want to use their space as
> one. Should I aggregate them with software RAID, or using LVM in regard
> to data safety? If one of them malfunctions, is one of the two
> approaches better?
If your goal is to use the disks as a single
On 03/18/2011 09:30 AM, Michael Thompson wrote:
2011/3/18 Γιώργος Πάλλας:
Hi all!
A short question: I have two 500GB HDDs and I want to use their space as
one. Should I aggregate them with software RAID, or using LVM in regard
to data safety? If one of them malfunctions, is one of the two
a
On 18/03/2011 10:30 πμ, Michael Thompson wrote:
> 2011/3/18 Γιώργος Πάλλας :
>
>> Hi all!
>>
>> A short question: I have two 500GB HDDs and I want to use their space as
>> one. Should I aggregate them with software RAID, or using LVM in regard
>> to data safety? If one of them malfunctions, is o
2011/3/18 Γιώργος Πάλλας :
> Hi all!
>
> A short question: I have two 500GB HDDs and I want to use their space as
> one. Should I aggregate them with software RAID, or using LVM in regard
> to data safety? If one of them malfunctions, is one of the two
> approaches better?
Mirrored raid would be t
Hi all!
A short question: I have two 500GB HDDs and I want to use their space as
one. Should I aggregate them with software RAID, or using LVM in regard
to data safety? If one of them malfunctions, is one of the two
approaches better?
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
On Tue 01 Mar 2011 at 22:41:41 +0800, jida...@jidanni.org wrote:
> Seems to happen every other day,
> W: Failed to fetch
> bzip2:/var/lib/apt/lists/partial/ftp.tw.debian.org_debian_dists_unstable_main_binary-i386_Packages
> Hash Sum mismatch
> Anybody else notice such errors occ
Seems to happen every other day,
W: Failed to fetch
bzip2:/var/lib/apt/lists/partial/ftp.tw.debian.org_debian_dists_unstable_main_binary-i386_Packages
Hash Sum mismatch
Anybody else notice such errors occurring more and more?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
/apt/lists/partial/ftp.fr.debian.org_debian_dists_sid_main_binary-amd64_Packages
Hash Sum mismatch
I cannot find anything to fix it so far...
On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 11:18 PM, mike cutie and maia
wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
>
> Starting this afternoon I get this when running apt-get update
&g
Hi,
Starting this afternoon I get this when running apt-get update
W: Failed to fetch
bzip2:/var/lib/apt/lists/partial/ftp.us.debian.org_debian_dists_sid_main_bin
ary-amd64_Packages Hash Sum mismatch
I tried apt-get -fix-broken update
And apt-get -fix-missing update
On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 05:34:49PM +, Camaleón wrote:
> On Wed, 21 Apr 2010 15:27:59 +0200, Martin wrote:
>
> > When I tryed to install simutrans game with aptitude I got this error
> > and was not able to install it:
>
> (...)
>
> > I have original DVDs. Content of /cdrom/.disk/info is: Deb
On Wed, 21 Apr 2010 15:27:59 +0200, Martin wrote:
> When I tryed to install simutrans game with aptitude I got this error
> and was not able to install it:
(...)
> I have original DVDs. Content of /cdrom/.disk/info is: Debian GNU/Linux
> 5.0.4 "Lenny" - Official i386 DVD Binary-3 20100131-19:16
-data_100.0+ds1-4_all.deb: Hash Sum │
│ mismatch │
│[ Ok ]│
└──┘
A few days ago same thing
In <4a7b03e2.6070...@gmail.com>, pch0317 wrote:
>How to check crc32 sum for file.
>I have md5sum, sha256sum command but I can't see crc32sum.
I think POSIX standardized CRC32 as the "cksum" utility. IIRC, that's part
of coreutils.
--
Boyd Stephen Smith Jr.
Sven Hoexter wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 06, 2009 at 06:25:06PM +0200, pch0317 wrote:
>
>> Hi
>> How to check crc32 sum for file.
>> I have md5sum, sha256sum command but I can't see crc32sum.
>>
>
> libarchive-zip-perl: /usr/bin/crc32
>
> apt-file
On Thu, Aug 06, 2009 at 06:25:06PM +0200, pch0317 wrote:
> Hi
> How to check crc32 sum for file.
> I have md5sum, sha256sum command but I can't see crc32sum.
libarchive-zip-perl: /usr/bin/crc32
apt-file helped to locate it.
HTH
Sven
--
They're the cowards We are rebels
Hi
How to check crc32 sum for file.
I have md5sum, sha256sum command but I can't see crc32sum.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
1 - 100 of 117 matches
Mail list logo
