On Mon, Feb 12, 2024 at 8:57 PM Gilles Mocellin
wrote:
>
> Le lundi 12 février 2024, 19:23:39 CET Hugues MORIN-TRENEULE a écrit :
> > Salut
> >
> > Merci pour l'info
> >
> > Malheureusement même si j'entrevois de quoi tu parles, je ne sais pas trop
> > comment faire en pratique.
> >
> > Donc si
Hi,
On Mon, May 15, 2023 at 08:11:50PM +0530, amit agari wrote:
> Has ebtables package been removed from Debian 9 stretch distribution?
stretch is EOL so the entire distribution has been "removed" to
archive.debian.org. But after putting archive.debian.org in your
/etc/apt/sources.
On Mon 15 May 2023 at 20:11:50 (+0530), amit agari wrote:
> Has ebtables package been removed from Debian 9 stretch distribution?
http://archive.debian.org/debian/pool/main/e/ebtables/
appears to have ebtables_2.0.10.4-3.5+b1_amd64.deb
which is probably what you're looking for.
Cheers,
David.
Hi,
Has ebtables package been removed from Debian 9 stretch distribution?
Regards
On Thu, 27 Apr 2023, Greg Wooledge wrote:
On Thu, Apr 27, 2023 at 05:08:10PM +0800, justzx wrote:
Error message:
Ign:39 http://cdn-fastly.deb.debian.org/debian-security
stretch/updates/non-free Sources
Stretch (Debian 9) probably no longer has a debian-security repo, if
it was recently
On Thu, 27 Apr 2023 17:08:10 +0800
justzx wrote:
Hello justzx,
>W: The repository 'http://cdn-fastly.deb.debian.org/debian-current
>stretch-backports Release' does not have a Release file.
Usually means your url is malformed. The 404 errors later seem to
corroborate this.
On Thu, Apr 27, 2023 at 05:08:10PM +0800, justzx wrote:
> Error message:
>
> Ign:39 http://cdn-fastly.deb.debian.org/debian-security
> stretch/updates/non-free Sources
Stretch (Debian 9) probably no longer has a debian-security repo, if
it was recently moved to the archive. Remo
Error message:
Ign:39 http://cdn-fastly.deb.debian.org/debian-security
stretch/updates/non-free Sources
Ign:40 http://cdn-fastly.deb.debian.org/debian-security
stretch/updates/contrib Sources
Ign:41 http://cdn-fastly.deb.debian.org/debian-security
stretch/updates/main amd64 Packages
Ign:42 http
On Sat, 15 Apr 2023 05:34:36 +0100 (BST)
Tim Woodall wrote:
> On Fri, 14 Apr 2023, Charles Curley wrote:
>
> [...]
> [...]
> [...]
> That page is out of date. On the LTS page itself:
>
> Debian 9 "Stretch"
>
> i386, amd64, armel, armhf
Charles Curley writes:
> On Fri, 14 Apr 2023 19:41:37 +0100
> Brian wrote:
>
>> I thought stretch is unsupported by Debian. Where did the update come
>> from?
>
> Stretch is oldoldstable, and under LTS support.
> https://www.debian.org/releases/
Actually LTS su
On Sat, 15 Apr 2023 at 04:24, Tim Woodall wrote:
> On Fri, 14 Apr 2023, Brian wrote:
> >>> I thought stretch is unsupported by Debian. Where did the update come
> >>> from?
> It's been moved to archive.debian.org. Just hasn't been deleted from the
>
On Fri, 14 Apr 2023, Charles Curley wrote:
On Fri, 14 Apr 2023 19:41:37 +0100
Brian wrote:
I thought stretch is unsupported by Debian. Where did the update come
from?
Stretch is oldoldstable, and under LTS support.
https://www.debian.org/releases/
That page is out of date. On the LTS
On Fri, 14 Apr 2023, Brian wrote:
I thought stretch is unsupported by Debian. Where did the update come from?
It may or may not be supported, but it's still there AFAICT:
[DIR] binary-amd64/ 2021-08-14 07:43
[ ] Packages.gz 2020-07-18 10:409.2M
[ ] base-file
On Fri, 14 Apr 2023 19:41:37 +0100
Brian wrote:
> I thought stretch is unsupported by Debian. Where did the update come
> from?
Stretch is oldoldstable, and under LTS support.
https://www.debian.org/releases/
I would encourage the original poster to consider installing bullseye
rathe
On Fri, 14 Apr 2023 davidson wrote:
On Fri, 14 Apr 2023 Brian wrote:
On Fri 14 Apr 2023 at 18:48:06 +0200, Bernard wrote:
Hi to Everyone,
I am writing from my laptop on Ubuntu, but the problem I have is
with my Desktop running Debian Stretch.
Having unfortunately Okayed a proposal for an
On 2023-04-14 at 15:53, davidson wrote:
> On Fri, 14 Apr 2023 Brian wrote:
>
>> On Fri 14 Apr 2023 at 18:48:06 +0200, Bernard wrote:
>>
>>> Hi to Everyone,
>>>
>>> I am writing from my laptop on Ubuntu, but the problem I have is
>>> with m
On Fri, 14 Apr 2023 Brian wrote:
On Fri 14 Apr 2023 at 18:48:06 +0200, Bernard wrote:
Hi to Everyone,
I am writing from my laptop on Ubuntu, but the problem I have is
with my Desktop running Debian Stretch.
Having unfortunately Okayed a proposal for an update (which I
rarely do…), upon
On Fri 14 Apr 2023 at 19:41:37 (+0100), Brian wrote:
> On Fri 14 Apr 2023 at 18:48:06 +0200, Bernard wrote:
> > I am writing from my laptop on Ubuntu, but the problem I have is with my
> > Desktop running Debian Stretch.
> > Having unfortunately Okayed a proposal for an upda
Bernard wrote:
...
> How can I get back to my old system prior to this failed update ? What
> else can I do ?
>
> Thanks in advance for your help in restoring my system
take a look at the files in /var/log/apt
history should tell you what was updated last and you could
try to install a prev
Hi to Everyone,
I am writing from my laptop on Ubuntu, but the problem I have is with my
Desktop running Debian Stretch.
Having unfortunately Okayed a proposal for an update (which I rarely
do…), upon restarting the system fails to launch X server.
My /var/log/messages are available at
http
On 09/13/2022 08:28 AM, Roger Price wrote:
On Tue, 13 Sep 2022, Richard Owlett wrote:
It's been so long since I set up Debian I've forgotten how to set
timing for going into hibernation. It's currently set for a much to primare panel has
large a delay.
Where do I look for instructions and des
On Tue, 13 Sep 2022, Richard Owlett wrote:
It's been so long since I set up Debian I've forgotten how to set timing for
going into hibernation. It's currently set for a much to large a delay.
Where do I look for instructions and descriptions?
I use Right Click on screen, and then Application
It's been so long since I set up Debian I've forgotten how to set timing
for going into hibernation. It's currently set for a much to large a delay.
Where do I look for instructions and descriptions?
TIA
On 4/05/22 18:57, Tixy wrote:
On Wed, 2022-05-04 at 00:44 +0300, IL Ka wrote:
Linux kernel is backward compatible. Linus calls it "we do not break
userspace".
That means _old_ applications should work on new kernel
There's also the issue of what config options the kernel is built with.
I'm su
On Wed, 2022-05-04 at 00:44 +0300, IL Ka wrote:
> Linux kernel is backward compatible. Linus calls it "we do not break
> userspace".
> That means _old_ applications should work on new kernel
There's also the issue of what config options the kernel is built with.
I'm sure there's been at least one
Linux kernel is backward compatible. Linus calls it "we do not break
userspace".
That means _old_ applications should work on new kernel
On Wed, May 4, 2022 at 12:40 AM Richard Hector
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> For various reasons, I have some stretch LXC containers, on a buste
Hi all,
For various reasons, I have some stretch LXC containers, on a buster
host that I now need to upgrade. That will mean they end up running on
buster's 5.10 kernel.
Is that likely to be a problem?
If so, I guess I can leave the host on buster's kernel for the time
being,
Thank you for the additional information you have supplied regarding
this Bug report.
This is an automatically generated reply to let you know your message
has been received.
Your message is being forwarded to the package maintainers and other
interested parties for their attention; they will rep
Hi,
for the reference, the issue is solved by this config below.
Ales
---
cat /etc/network/interfaces
auto lo
iface lo inet loopback
#auto ens3f0
#iface ens3f0 inet manual
#auto ens3f1
#iface ens3f1 inet manual
allow-hotplug ens3f0
iface ens3f0 inet manual
allow-hotplug
piorunz wrote:
...
> New install would change network interface name anyway.
net.ifnames=0 works for me in that regards.
songbird
On 2021-08-18, mick crane wrote:
>>
>> Not sure I see how that analogy applies.
>>
>> If the 'water' is the knowledge of upgrading Debian releases as present
>> in the official release notes, then the chemical analysis is the advice
>> on upgrading from this list? In that case, it seems the hors
On 20/08/2021 12:40, Greg Wooledge wrote:
This line of thought probably comes from Windows, when any hardware
change causes problems, drivers installation, it can refuse to boot,
etc. Not a problem on Debian :)
It can be. Any change to the hardware, or even the mobo firmware, can
cause PCI da
On Fri, Aug 20, 2021 at 11:55:32AM +0100, piorunz wrote:
> On 19/08/2021 13:21, songbird wrote:
> > when i changed motherboards i figured it was worth a fresh
> > install
>
> This line of thought probably comes from Windows, when any hardware
> change causes problems, drivers installation, it can
On 19/08/2021 13:21, songbird wrote:
when i changed motherboards i figured it was worth a fresh
install
This line of thought probably comes from Windows, when any hardware
change causes problems, drivers installation, it can refuse to boot,
etc. Not a problem on Debian :)
Motherboard or even C
songbird writes:
> Anssi Saari wrote:
> ...
>> And yes, the working upgrades are the reason I've stuck with Debian
>> since Hamm. My ever evolving desktop computer is on its second
>> installation now since I reinstalled when I switched to 64-bits
>> somewhere in the decade before last.
> when
On 2021-08-18, Tixy wrote:
>>
>> With a normal system, a shortened version of the upgrade procedure
>> without the warnings and pre-checks and post-checks might be OK,
>> but this is *Gene*. We know he does not have normal systems.
>>
>> He needs *all* of the warnings.
>>
>
> I agree with all
rhkra...@gmail.com wrote:
...
> Aside: I have never (to the best of my recollection) done an upgrade from one
> version to the next, I install the new version on a clean disk (or new
> system)
> -- the only time I could envision doing an upgrade would be if stable became
> a
> rolling release.
Anssi Saari wrote:
...
> And yes, the working upgrades are the reason I've stuck with Debian
> since Hamm. My ever evolving desktop computer is on its second
> installation now since I reinstalled when I switched to 64-bits
> somewhere in the decade before last.
when i changed motherboards i fig
On 2021-08-17 7:21 p.m., Brian wrote:
> On Tue 17 Aug 2021 at 22:48:34 +, Andrew M.A. Cater wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Aug 17, 2021 at 11:05:44PM +0100, Brian wrote:
>>> On Tue 17 Aug 2021 at 16:54:54 -0400, Gene Heskett wrote:
>>>
>>>> Where do I f
Hi
On 2021-08-17 6:05 p.m., Brian wrote:
> On Tue 17 Aug 2021 at 16:54:54 -0400, Gene Heskett wrote:
>
>> Where do I find the recipe to update stretch to buster?
>
> What, in this helpful thread, do you find difficult to understand?
>
> You have a collection of im
On Wed, Aug 18, 2021 at 11:26:18AM -0500, David Wright wrote:
> On Wed 18 Aug 2021 at 07:39:26 (-0400), The Wanderer wrote:
> > On 2021-08-17 at 13:36, Brian wrote:
> > > On Tue 17 Aug 2021 at 16:00:57 +, Andrew M.A. Cater wrote:
> >
> > >> Do the update to Buster - take it as slow as you need
On Wednesday 18 August 2021 08:05:43 Andrew M.A. Cater wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 18, 2021 at 09:12:24AM +0100, Tixy wrote:
> > On Wed, 2021-08-18 at 09:03 +0200, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
> > > On Tue, Aug 17, 2021 at 10:01:32PM -0400, Greg Wooledge wrote:
> > > > On Tue, Aug 17, 2021 at 09:48:10PM -0400
On Wed 18 Aug 2021 at 07:39:26 (-0400), The Wanderer wrote:
> On 2021-08-17 at 13:36, Brian wrote:
> > On Tue 17 Aug 2021 at 16:00:57 +, Andrew M.A. Cater wrote:
>
> >> Do the update to Buster - take it as slow as you need to. Bring it
> >> bang up to date.
> >>
> >> For the Buster to Bullsey
rhkra...@gmail.com writes:
> But, if I did do an upgrade from one version to the next, it would not
> surprise me if I forgot to read the upgrade notes.
For me, the instructions for upgrading in the release notes are the only
way I know how to find out how to upgrade Debian from one release to t
On Wednesday, August 18, 2021 07:39:26 AM The Wanderer wrote:
> On 2021-08-17 at 13:36, Brian wrote:
> > Of course! Do users not do this as a standard procedure? :)
>
> I don't - because I don't upgrade from one stable release to another; I
> track testing, continuously, throughout the development
On Wed, Aug 18, 2021 at 09:12:24AM +0100, Tixy wrote:
> On Wed, 2021-08-18 at 09:03 +0200, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 17, 2021 at 10:01:32PM -0400, Greg Wooledge wrote:
> > > On Tue, Aug 17, 2021 at 09:48:10PM -0400, Gene Heskett wrote:
> > > > On Tuesday 17 August 2021 18:48:34 Andrew
On 2021-08-17 at 13:36, Brian wrote:
> On Tue 17 Aug 2021 at 16:00:57 +, Andrew M.A. Cater wrote:
>> Do the update to Buster - take it as slow as you need to. Bring it
>> bang up to date.
>>
>> For the Buster to Bullseye -
>>
>> READ RELEASE NOTES :)
>
> Of course! Do users not do this as
turday. What did happen, and you appear not to have noticed, is
> that the definition of "oldstable" changed under your feet from
> "stretch" to "buster". So all of a sudden, you were 2588 packages out
> of date for your main repository.
What I interpreted Gene&
On 18/08/2021 07:57, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
On Wed, Aug 18, 2021 at 01:53:16AM +0100, piorunz wrote:
Why are you repeating this?
Because Andrew is a nice person. Which I do appreciate highly.
Why shouldn't he? Why would you not want him to do?
Please see my other reply:
"> Amazing analogy
On 2021-08-18 09:32, Tixy wrote:
On Wed, 2021-08-18 at 09:06 +0100, mick crane wrote:
On 2021-08-18 08:40, Tixy wrote:
> I agree with all of the above, but as the saying goes: 'you can lead a
> horse to water, but you can't make him drink'.
You can't blame a horse for wanting to see the chemica
On 18/08/2021 08:40, Tixy wrote:
I agree with all of the above, but as the saying goes: 'you can lead a
horse to water, but you can't make him drink'.
Amazing analogy. Gene has been given plenty of water, but he keeps
coming back for more while not taking even one sip yet. He failed to
RTFM but
On Tuesday 17 August 2021 18:48:34 Andrew M.A. Cater wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 17, 2021 at 11:05:44PM +0100, Brian wrote:
> > On Tue 17 Aug 2021 at 16:54:54 -0400, Gene Heskett wrote:
> > > Where do I find the recipe to update stretch to buster?
> >
> > What, in th
On Wed, 2021-08-18 at 09:06 +0100, mick crane wrote:
> On 2021-08-18 08:40, Tixy wrote:
>
> > I agree with all of the above, but as the saying goes: 'you can lead a
> > horse to water, but you can't make him drink'.
> You can't blame a horse for wanting to see the chemical analysis of the
> water
On Wed, 2021-08-18 at 09:03 +0200, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 17, 2021 at 10:01:32PM -0400, Greg Wooledge wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 17, 2021 at 09:48:10PM -0400, Gene Heskett wrote:
> > > On Tuesday 17 August 2021 18:48:34 Andrew M.A. Cater wrote:
> > > > [an abridged version of the release
On 2021-08-18 08:40, Tixy wrote:
I agree with all of the above, but as the saying goes: 'you can lead a
horse to water, but you can't make him drink'.
You can't blame a horse for wanting to see the chemical analysis of the
water and checking the vicinity for corpses.
mick
--
Key ID4BFEBB31
On Tue, 2021-08-17 at 22:01 -0400, Greg Wooledge wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 17, 2021 at 09:48:10PM -0400, Gene Heskett wrote:
> > On Tuesday 17 August 2021 18:48:34 Andrew M.A. Cater wrote:
> > > [an abridged version of the release notes]
>
> > Thank you Andy, thats more of the recipe I need to follow.
On Tue, Aug 17, 2021 at 10:01:32PM -0400, Greg Wooledge wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 17, 2021 at 09:48:10PM -0400, Gene Heskett wrote:
> > On Tuesday 17 August 2021 18:48:34 Andrew M.A. Cater wrote:
> > > [an abridged version of the release notes]
>
> > Thank you Andy, thats more of the recipe I need to f
On Wed, Aug 18, 2021 at 01:53:16AM +0100, piorunz wrote:
> On 17/08/2021 23:48, Andrew M.A. Cater wrote:
> >Gene,
> >
> >You have two upgrades to do.
> >
> >One from stretch -> buster. 9-10 That takes you from 2017 -> 2019.
> >
> >If you can
On Wed 18 Aug 2021 at 01:53:16 (+0100), piorunz wrote:
> On 17/08/2021 23:48, Andrew M.A. Cater wrote:
> > Gene,
> >
> > You have two upgrades to do.
> >
> > One from stretch -> buster. 9-10 That takes you from 2017 -> 2019.
> >
> > If you can
On Tue, Aug 17, 2021 at 09:48:10PM -0400, Gene Heskett wrote:
> On Tuesday 17 August 2021 18:48:34 Andrew M.A. Cater wrote:
> > [an abridged version of the release notes]
> Thank you Andy, thats more of the recipe I need to follow.
>
> Cheers, Gene Heskett
See, *this* is exactly what I tried to
Dan Ritter wrote:
...
> Tell us more about what you're doing, but also remember that you
> can't skip stable versions in an upgrade - you need to upgrade
> from stretch to buster, then to bullseye.
yes.
plus it is good to get rid of cruft if you don't need it
On Tuesday 17 August 2021 18:48:34 Andrew M.A. Cater wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 17, 2021 at 11:05:44PM +0100, Brian wrote:
> > On Tue 17 Aug 2021 at 16:54:54 -0400, Gene Heskett wrote:
> > > Where do I find the recipe to update stretch to buster?
> >
> > What, in th
On Tue, Aug 17 2021 at 08:01:46 PM, Gene Heskett wrote:
> On Tuesday 17 August 2021 16:57:44 Greg Wooledge wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Aug 17, 2021 at 04:54:54PM -0400, Gene Heskett wrote:
>> > Where do I find the recipe to update stretch to buster?
>>
>> It's still
On Tuesday 17 August 2021 17:45:49 piorunz wrote:
> On 17/08/2021 21:57, Greg Wooledge wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 17, 2021 at 04:54:54PM -0400, Gene Heskett wrote:
> >> Where do I find the recipe to update stretch to buster?
> >
> > It's still at
> > <
On 17/08/2021 23:48, Andrew M.A. Cater wrote:
Gene,
You have two upgrades to do.
One from stretch -> buster. 9-10 That takes you from 2017 -> 2019.
If you can reduce your /etc/apt/sources.list by commenting out third party
repositories like Trinity, that will help.
Why are you rep
On Tuesday 17 August 2021 16:57:44 Greg Wooledge wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 17, 2021 at 04:54:54PM -0400, Gene Heskett wrote:
> > Where do I find the recipe to update stretch to buster?
>
> It's still at
> <https://www.debian.org/releases/buster/amd64/release-notes/>.
That
On Tue 17 Aug 2021 at 22:48:34 +, Andrew M.A. Cater wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 17, 2021 at 11:05:44PM +0100, Brian wrote:
> > On Tue 17 Aug 2021 at 16:54:54 -0400, Gene Heskett wrote:
> >
> > > Where do I find the recipe to update stretch to buster?
> >
> >
On Tue, Aug 17, 2021 at 11:05:44PM +0100, Brian wrote:
> On Tue 17 Aug 2021 at 16:54:54 -0400, Gene Heskett wrote:
>
> > Where do I find the recipe to update stretch to buster?
>
> What, in this helpful thread, do you find difficult to understand?
>
> You have a collecti
On Tue 17 Aug 2021 at 16:54:54 -0400, Gene Heskett wrote:
> Where do I find the recipe to update stretch to buster?
What, in this helpful thread, do you find difficult to understand?
You have a collection of important machines in your charge. The
complexity of managing them does not appear
On 17/08/2021 21:57, Greg Wooledge wrote:
On Tue, Aug 17, 2021 at 04:54:54PM -0400, Gene Heskett wrote:
Where do I find the recipe to update stretch to buster?
It's still at <https://www.debian.org/releases/buster/amd64/release-notes/>.
Or to by more precise, that's what m
On Tue, Aug 17, 2021 at 04:54:54PM -0400, Gene Heskett wrote:
> Where do I find the recipe to update stretch to buster?
It's still at <https://www.debian.org/releases/buster/amd64/release-notes/>.
; > some raid-ish stuff to prepare this array for use as /home in the
> > bullseye install, but something is ay least 5000% aglay.
> >
> > sudo apt update says it wants to gut much of the system and upgrade
> > 2588 packages. Yet my repo list looks like its normal
On Tue 17 Aug 2021 at 10:07:18 (-0400), Gene Heskett wrote:
> [Subject: Re: Still on stretch, getting ready for bullseye]
You have a habit of running systems about one release behind the
current stable, so can you just check that you really mean to
upgrade your machine to bullseye (11), and
8
packages. Yet my repo list looks like its normal stretch.
What is going on? Do I wind up on buster or should I kiss it all goodbye?
Thanks.
Cheers, Gene Heskett
I keep my OS images smaller than "16 GB" and use small, dedicated
devices to hold them (primarily 60 GB 2.5" SATA3
On Tue 17 Aug 2021 at 13:42:25 -0400, Greg Wooledge wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 17, 2021 at 06:36:15PM +0100, Brian wrote:
> > Comment out *everything* in sources.list and then edit to have only
> >
> > deb http://deb.debian.org/debian/ stretch main contrib non-free
> &
On Tue, Aug 17, 2021 at 06:36:15PM +0100, Brian wrote:
> Comment out *everything* in sources.list and then edit to have only
>
> deb http://deb.debian.org/debian/ stretch main contrib non-free
>
> Update and upgrade.
... and then make all the changes necessary for stretch.
&
On Tue 17 Aug 2021 at 16:00:57 +, Andrew M.A. Cater wrote:
[...]
> I think the others have mostly covered this but:
But it bears repeating for the OP and others.
Comment out *everything* in sources.list and then edit to have only
deb http://deb.debian.org/debian/ stretch main cont
% aglay.
>
> sudo apt update says it wants to gut much of the system and upgrade 2588
> packages. Yet my repo list looks like its normal stretch.
>
> What is going on? Do I wind up on buster or should I kiss it all goodbye?
>
> Thanks.
>
> Cheers, Gene Heskett
> -
On Tuesday 17 August 2021 09:08:43 Greg Wooledge wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 17, 2021 at 09:01:32AM -0400, Gene Heskett wrote:
> > Tell me where to read about an insitu upgrade from stretch to
> > buster,
>
> https://www.debian.org/releases/stable/amd64/release-notes/
>
>
> touched.
> > >
> > > So I thought I'd make sure I was up to date, annd possibly install
> > > some raid-ish stuff to prepare this array for use as /home in the
> > > bullseye install, but something is ay least 5000% aglay.
> > >
> > >
On 2021-08-17 9:08 a.m., Greg Wooledge wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 17, 2021 at 09:01:32AM -0400, Gene Heskett wrote:
>> Tell me where to read about an insitu upgrade from stretch to buster,
>
> https://www.debian.org/releases/stable/amd64/release-notes/
>
>> root@coyote:~$
On Tue, Aug 17, 2021 at 09:08:43AM -0400, Greg Wooledge wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 17, 2021 at 09:01:32AM -0400, Gene Heskett wrote:
> > Tell me where to read about an insitu upgrade from stretch to buster,
>
> https://www.debian.org/releases/stable/amd64/release-notes/
Whoops. Goo
On Tue, Aug 17, 2021 at 09:01:32AM -0400, Gene Heskett wrote:
> Tell me where to read about an insitu upgrade from stretch to buster,
https://www.debian.org/releases/stable/amd64/release-notes/
> root@coyote:~$ apt update
> Hit:1 http://security.debian.org stretch/updates InRelease
>
y for use as /home in the
> > bullseye install, but something is ay least 5000% aglay.
> >
> > sudo apt update says it wants to gut much of the system and upgrade
> > 2588 packages. Yet my repo list looks like its normal stretch.
> >
> > What is going on? Do I wi
it wants to gut much of the system and upgrade 2588
> packages. Yet my repo list looks like its normal stretch.
>
> What is going on? Do I wind up on buster or should I kiss it all goodbye?
Tell us more about what you're doing, but also remember that you
can't skip stable versi
its normal stretch.
What is going on? Do I wind up on buster or should I kiss it all goodbye?
Thanks.
Cheers, Gene Heskett
--
"There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty:
soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order."
-Ed Howdershelt (Author)
If we desire respect
Thanks for your replay, Reco.
Yes, in Stretch networking works well both - with and/or without directive
"auto".
In contrast Buster with:
auto bond0.20
iface bond0.20 inet manual
auto bond0.21
iface bond0.21 inet manual
gateway is unreachable by ping.
So I don't kno
Hi.
On Thu, Jun 03, 2021 at 03:28:47PM +0200, deb...@centrum.cz wrote:
It's just a guess, but you have "auto" for "bond0":
> auto bond0
> iface bond0 inet manual
But what you do not have is "auto" for VLAN interfaces you build on top
of bond0:
> iface bond0.20 inet manual
> iface bond0
Hello,
in Stretch I have done this by Debian way with /etc/network/interfaces an it
goes well.
The same configuration in Buster is interpreted differently and doesn't work.
Config from interfaces:
auto lo
iface lo inet loopback
allow-hotplug ens3f0
I upgraded on 25th May office computer Debian Stretch to Buster. Home
directory comes from NFS server. Chromium browser now longer has the stored
passwords available.
Other browsers, Firefox and Google Chrome, do have the passwords still.
Where did chromium browser on Stretch store the passwords
Alexander V. Makartsev composed on 2021-05-10 12:29 (UTC+0500):
> Felix Miata wrote:
>> ...
>> <https://www.linuxquestions.org/questions/linux-desktop-74/intel-82810e-dc-133-vga-controller-driver-update-4175694158/>
>>
>> I have Stretch, Buster & Bullseye
Le 10/05/2021 à 09:28, Felix Miata a écrit :
didier gaumet composed on 2021-05-10 09:13 (UTC+0200):
DRI not working in Debian while working in Opensuse: I would surmise
that is a missing firmware in the former and not in the latter
On 10.05.2021 08:27, Felix Miata wrote:
I un-mothballed a 20+ year old Dell GX110 with i810e graphics in an attempt to
assist a linuxquestions.org Stretch user stuck with 640x480 VESA in X, here:
<https://www.linuxquestions.org/questions/linux-desktop-74/intel-82810e-dc-133-vga-controller-dri
didier gaumet composed on 2021-05-10 09:13 (UTC+0200):
> DRI not working in Debian while working in Opensuse: I would surmise
> that is a missing firmware in the former and not in the latter
ii firmware-linux-free
Hello,
DRI not working in Debian while working in Opensuse: I would surmise
that is a missing firmware in the former and not in the latter
I un-mothballed a 20+ year old Dell GX110 with i810e graphics in an attempt to
assist a linuxquestions.org Stretch user stuck with 640x480 VESA in X, here:
<https://www.linuxquestions.org/questions/linux-desktop-74/intel-82810e-dc-133-vga-controller-driver-update-4175694158/>
I have S
Hi all,
after upgrading from Debian Stretch (cacti 0.8.x) to Buster (cacti 1.2.x),
I can't access the cacti web ui anymore. I only get a message "System log
file is not available for writing, please enable write access Log:
/usr/share/cacti/site/log/cacti.log" in the browser.
Am
Andrei POPESCU wrote:
> Try comparing kernel messages (dmesg).
Or install the old kernel image into the buster and try to eliminate or
confirm it depends on library or on kernel driver.
>From what I read it is kernel driver issue and it was fixed, then broken
then fixed, then broken etc.
On Lu, 18 ian 21, 14:09:17, Ottavio Caruso wrote:
>
> I have a usb flash drive with an old (2 years or so) Debian Testing image
> (Buster, which in the meantime is stable) running kernel 4.9.0-14 (same as
> the one I'm currently running now, but probably built on top of different
> libraries). I i
h was the first kernel that came with
> Stretch?
The exact version that was released with stretch might be difficult to
find out.
A good approximation would be to search for the first Debian Security
Advisory (DSA) for linux in stretch, it will mention the next higher
version.
Kind
1 - 100 of 3568 matches
Mail list logo
