Ok thanks. I have not found those links. :-)
On 12/18/05, Srinidhi B S <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 12/17/05, Andrea Ganduglia <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > This morning onto new SSH account receiving:
> >
> > ~# ssh [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > s
Hi,
On 12/17/05, Andrea Ganduglia <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This morning onto new SSH account receiving:
>
> ~# ssh [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> ssh_exchange_identification: Connection closed by remote host
>
A quick search on Google fetched these links:
http://www.snai
On 12/17/05, Z F <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It might be that you need to use ssh2 while you are using ssh1 to connect
No. I'm using SSH2 like HOST
--
Openclose.it - Idee per il software libero
http://www.openclose.it
This morning onto new SSH account receiving:
~# ssh [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ssh_exchange_identification: Connection closed by remote host
I'm a longer user of ssh but this error is newer for me. I have try to
connect ssh account from 2 machine and 2 ip address.
--
Openclose.it - Idee per il sof
ce-versa) but i could ssh from
either A or C to an outside box B, and then back in to the
target computer (C or A).
A 10.1.1.1local LAN
B 10.10.10.10 way the heck Out There
C 10.1.1.5local LAN
the error was:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ssh 10.1.1.5
ssh_exchange_i
On Fri, Feb 21, 2003 at 01:23:45PM +0100, Rudy Gevaert wrote:
> ssh_exchange_identification: Connection closed by remote host
this looks like a hosts.allow or hosts.deny issue on the remote box...
sean
msg32175/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
file /home/rudy/.ssh/identity type 0
debug1: identity file /home/rudy/.ssh/id_rsa type -1
debug1: identity file /home/rudy/.ssh/id_dsa type -1
ssh_exchange_identification: Connection closed by remote host
debug1: Calling cleanup 0x8063a9c(0x0)
rudy@schamper:~$
What could this be? I can't rem
* Nathan E Norman ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) spake thusly:
> On Mon, Mar 25, 2002 at 09:57:13AM -0600, Dimitri Maziuk wrote:
> > > Curiosity just bit me in the butt. Where does the .in-addr.arpa come
> > > from?
> >
> > From the way bind works. See e.g. O'Reilly's "DNS and Bind".
>
> Well, er, it's n
On Mon, Mar 25, 2002 at 09:57:13AM -0600, Dimitri Maziuk wrote:
> > Curiosity just bit me in the butt. Where does the .in-addr.arpa come
> > from?
>
> From the way bind works. See e.g. O'Reilly's "DNS and Bind".
Well, er, it's not there because of the way BIND works. Rather, BIND
works that w
* Gary Turner ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) spake thusly:
> On Sun, 24 Mar 2002 18:29:39 -0600, Dimitri Maziuk wrote:
>
> >* Gary Turner ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) spake thusly:
> >> On Sun, 24 Mar 2002 13:12:56 -0600, Dimitri Maziuk wrote:
>
> >> >Didn't you read Sven's rely? It says "DNS problem" right there.
>
On Sun, 24 Mar 2002 18:29:39 -0600, Dimitri Maziuk wrote:
>* Gary Turner ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) spake thusly:
>> On Sun, 24 Mar 2002 13:12:56 -0600, Dimitri Maziuk wrote:
>> >Didn't you read Sven's rely? It says "DNS problem" right there.
>Make that "reply".
Hmph; I see so many typos on the lists,
* Gary Turner ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) spake thusly:
> On Sun, 24 Mar 2002 13:12:56 -0600, Dimitri Maziuk wrote:
>
> >* Gary Turner ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) spake thusly:
> >> On Sun, 24 Mar 2002 08:46:00 +0100, Sven Hoexter wrote:
> >>
> >> >On Sat, Mar 23, 2002 at 01:09:37PM -0800, Jaye Inabnit ke6sls wr
On Sun, 24 Mar 2002 13:12:56 -0600, Dimitri Maziuk wrote:
>* Gary Turner ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) spake thusly:
>> On Sun, 24 Mar 2002 08:46:00 +0100, Sven Hoexter wrote:
>>
>> >On Sat, Mar 23, 2002 at 01:09:37PM -0800, Jaye Inabnit ke6sls wrote:
>>
>
>Didn't you read Sven's rely? It says "DNS probl
* Gary Turner ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) spake thusly:
> On Sun, 24 Mar 2002 08:46:00 +0100, Sven Hoexter wrote:
>
> >On Sat, Mar 23, 2002 at 01:09:37PM -0800, Jaye Inabnit ke6sls wrote:
>
> >> My question now is this: do I need to make these hosts_allow entries into
> >> each of my linux computers?
Em Sáb, 2002-03-23 às 18:09, Jaye Inabnit ke6sls escreveu:
>
> Greetings again:
>
> I have sshd working again after adding an entry in my firewall/router's
> /etc/hosts.allow file, but I am rather concerned that sshd included
> tcp_wrappers without alerting users that are upgrading software
On Sun, 24 Mar 2002 08:46:00 +0100, Sven Hoexter wrote:
>On Sat, Mar 23, 2002 at 01:09:37PM -0800, Jaye Inabnit ke6sls wrote:
>> My question now is this: do I need to make these hosts_allow entries into
>> each of my linux computers? I still find it very odd that all the other
>> computers we
On Sat, Mar 23, 2002 at 01:09:37PM -0800, Jaye Inabnit ke6sls wrote:
>
> Greetings again:
>
> I have sshd working again after adding an entry in my firewall/router's
> /etc/hosts.allow file, but I am rather concerned that sshd included
> tcp_wrappers without alerting users that are upgradin
Greetings again:
I have sshd working again after adding an entry in my firewall/router's
/etc/hosts.allow file, but I am rather concerned that sshd included
tcp_wrappers without alerting users that are upgrading software via apt or
dselect! Unless I missed something, I always read all th
Greetings:
I am unable to connect to my cable firewall/router from my desktop box
suddenly. I have gone so far as to wipe out my known_hosts file from my .ssh
directory, but this still gives me the same error. What is unusual is that I
can ssh to any of the other computers on my lan, *th
19 matches
Mail list logo
