wing address(es) failed:
>>>>
>>>>debian-user@lists.debian.org
>>>> SMTP error from remote mail server after RCPT
>>>> TO::
>>>> host bendel.debian.org [82.195.75.100]: 554 5.1.8
>>>> :
>>>> Sender addr
On 2018-02-19, Curt wrote:
> On 2018-02-18, Karol Augustin wrote:
>>>
>>> A message that you sent could not be delivered to one or more of its
>>> recipients. This is a permanent error. The following address(es) failed:
>>>
>>>debian-user@
On 2018-02-18, Karol Augustin wrote:
>>
>> A message that you sent could not be delivered to one or more of its
>> recipients. This is a permanent error. The following address(es) failed:
>>
>>debian-user@lists.debian.org
>> SMTP error from
his is a permanent error. The following address(es) failed:
>
>debian-user@lists.debian.org
> SMTP error from remote mail server after RCPT
> TO::
> host bendel.debian.org [82.195.75.100]: 554 5.1.8
> :
> Sender address rejected: Domain not found
>
&g
-user@lists.debian.org
SMTP error from remote mail server after RCPT
TO::
host bendel.debian.org [82.195.75.100]: 554 5.1.8
:
Sender address rejected: Domain not found
Domain not found. This is quite sudden; it worked, now it ain't working.
'gmane.org' is
the dom
b1 wrote:
> On Thu, 2010-04-22 at 17:28 +, Camaleón wrote:
>> On Thu, 22 Apr 2010 16:20:01 +0200, b1 wrote:
>>
>> > Currently I am trying to set up a Debian Lenny Server, but I am stuck
>> > at mail delivery. The server I am trying to set up, has no FQDN, so I
>> > used my ISP-Mailserver as a
On Thu, 2010-04-22 at 17:28 +, Camaleón wrote:
> On Thu, 22 Apr 2010 16:20:01 +0200, b1 wrote:
>
> > Currently I am trying to set up a Debian Lenny Server, but I am stuck at
> > mail delivery. The server I am trying to set up, has no FQDN, so I used
> > my ISP-Mailserver as a smarthost (I enab
On Thu, 22 Apr 2010 16:20:01 +0200, b1 wrote:
> Currently I am trying to set up a Debian Lenny Server, but I am stuck at
> mail delivery. The server I am trying to set up, has no FQDN, so I used
> my ISP-Mailserver as a smarthost (I enabled the proper SMTP
> authentication in exim4).
> This setup
Hi Sjoerd
Thank you for your answer.
I just logged onto the Debian machine (per ssh) and tried it again.
Unfortunately it failed again. As before it gave the 451 Local Error.
On Thu, 2010-04-22 at 16:24 +0200, Sjoerd Hardeman wrote:
> b1 schreef:
> > This looks very strange to me. Independently
b1 schreef:
This looks very strange to me. Independently from my mailserver the
telnet command should have succeeded on both machines. But it failed on
my debian box. What could be wrong? Is this a problem of my setup, or is
my ISP blocking something?
Did you try your Debian machine again? It mig
Hello alltogether
Currently I am trying to set up a Debian Lenny Server, but I am stuck at
mail delivery. The server I am trying to set up, has no FQDN, so I used
my ISP-Mailserver as a smarthost (I enabled the proper SMTP
authentication in exim4).
This setup worked a few days, before I suddenly r
Uwe Dippel wrote:
> This isn't all too helpful, I know. Exim in Debian is a political
> decision; due to licensing. The first thing I always do to any Debian-box
> is installing Postfix.
Um, what? Postfix is DFSG free and included in Debian main.
--
see shy jo
signature.asc
Description: Digita
Uwe,
I find that if I revert to exim4 monolithic configuration, my e-mail
works, and so I've obviously done something to the split configuration
file. I'm subscribing to pkg-exim4-users and will try to resolve the
issue there.
Thanks.
--
Haines Brown, KB1GRM
--
T
On Tue, 25 Dec 2007 13:37:59 -0500, Haines Brown wrote:
> $ hostname
> teufel
>
> $ hostname -a
> teufel
Here I have:
$ hostname
wira
$ hostname -a
wira
and fetchmail runs pretty well, including SSL.
Why would the whole fingerprint come up if you didn't use SSL ?
Have you tried telnet, then ?
Uwe Dippel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Tue, 25 Dec 2007 07:50:01 -0500, Haines Brown wrote:
>
>> There seems to be a problem getting my fetchmail requests being
>> authenticated at the mail server. Here's what fetchmail tells me:
>> ...
>> fetchmail: Issuer Organization: Courier Mail Serv
Uwe writes:
> Exim in Debian is a political decision; due to licensing.
I wrote:
> Not true.
Uwe writes:
> Maybe what I wrote is not true, but when you search the archives, the
> discussion has never ceased, from 1999 onwards. One term you'll find is
> that postfix was not "DFSG-free". (DFSG=Debi
On Tue, 25 Dec 2007 07:23:59 -0600, John Hasler wrote:
>> Exim in Debian is a political decision; due to licensing.
>
> Not true.
Maybe what I wrote is not true, but when you search the archives,
the discussion has never ceased, from 1999 onwards. One term
you'll find is that postfix was not "DF
On Tue, 25 Dec 2007 07:50:01 -0500, Haines Brown wrote:
> There seems to be a problem getting my fetchmail requests being
> authenticated at the mail server. Here's what fetchmail tells me:
> ...
> fetchmail: Issuer Organization: Courier Mail Server
> fetchmail: Issuer CommonName: localhost
Uwe Dippel writes:
> Exim in Debian is a political decision; due to licensing.
Not true.
--
John Hasler
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
the confituration somehow. At first, all downloaded messages were
>> deleted as spam, and as I fiddled, fetchmail could not download messages
>> because the mail server did not like the information it received (SMTP
>> error: 550 Administrative prohibition), and now fetchmail does not
ed as spam, and as I fiddled, fetchmail could not download messages
> because the mail server did not like the information it received (SMTP
> error: 550 Administrative prohibition), and now fetchmail does not even
> see any messages.
This isn't all too helpful, I know. Exim in Debi
mail server did not like the information it received (SMTP
error: 550 Administrative prohibition), and now fetchmail does not even
see any messages.
I'm running debian etch. Doing # exim4 -d did not reveal anything
meaninfful to me. When all mail was rejected as spam, my exim4 reject
log had en
Reason given was: verify_sender(): DNS error: Host
name lookup failure: Connection timed out.
fetchmail: SMTP< 450 4.4.3 Try again later.
fetchmail: SMTP error: 450 4.4.3 Try again later.
fetchmail: SMTP> RSET
fetchmail: SMTP< 250 2.3.0 Reset state
not flushed
$ man smail-config
Has
On Fri, Oct 27, 2006 at 01:16:33PM -0400, J F wrote:
>
> My fetchmail seems wedged.
> Usually this is cause by somebody faking a domain
> and spamming.
> Does anybody know how to flush this email or
> get my fetchmail to fetch it?
>
> Smail is my MTA (mail transport agent).
> I recall it is the
My fetchmail seems wedged.
Usually this is cause by somebody faking a domain
and spamming.
Does anybody know how to flush this email or
get my fetchmail to fetch it?
Smail is my MTA (mail transport agent).
I recall it is the thing that flag the spam and
plugs up fetchmail.
Any ideas?
| > What exactly does error "334 VXNlcm5hbWU6" mean?
The 334 is the response code from the server. The data after it is
base64 encoded and decodes to "Username:".
On Sun, Jan 04, 2004 at 09:03:21PM -0500, Jerome R. Acks wrote:
| Solved. I had to change entries in /etc/email-addresses from
| [EMA
host after a long failure
> period
> *** Frozen (delivery error message)
>
> If I try to thaw message and deliver with "exim -M", I get:
>
> 23:42:24 1Acziv-0000X5-00 Unfrozen by forced delivery
> 23:42:24 1Acziv-X5-00 SMTP error from remote mailer after AUTH
> P
-00 Unfrozen by forced delivery
23:42:24 1Acziv-X5-00 SMTP error from remote mailer after AUTH
PLAIN: host outgoing.verizon.net [206.46.170.8]: 334 VXNlcm5hbWU6
23:42:24 1Acziv-X5-00 == [EMAIL PROTECTED] T=remote_smtp
defer (0): SMTP error from remote mailer after AUTH PLAIN: host
outgo
>On Sat, 16 Nov 2002 08:21:39 -0500, Kevin Coyner wrote:
>
> On Sat, Nov 16, 2002 at 12:34:04PM +, Colin Watson wrote..
>
> > On Sat, Nov 16, 2002 at 03:45:38AM +, Pigeon wrote:
> > > On Fri, 15 Nov 2002 11:38:37 -0500, Derrick 'dman' Hudson wrote:
> > > >On Fri, Nov 15, 2002 at 09:08:4
On Sat, Nov 16, 2002 at 12:34:04PM +, Colin Watson wrote..
> On Sat, Nov 16, 2002 at 03:45:38AM +, Pigeon wrote:
> > On Fri, 15 Nov 2002 11:38:37 -0500, Derrick 'dman' Hudson
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >On Fri, Nov 15, 2002 at 09:08:48AM -0500, Kevin Coyner wrote:
> > >> Can
On Sat, Nov 16, 2002 at 03:45:38AM +, Pigeon wrote:
> On Fri, 15 Nov 2002 11:38:37 -0500, Derrick 'dman' Hudson
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >On Fri, Nov 15, 2002 at 09:08:48AM -0500, Kevin Coyner wrote:
> >> Can anyone interpret this syslog message for me?
> >
> >Yes. :-)
>
> SWITCH NOBO
"Derrick" == Derrick Hudson writes:
Derrick> 2) disable the syntax checks in exim since it can't
Derrick> really reject mail because you're not running your own
Derrick> mail site (What I mean is this: take my system for
Derrick> example, my exim setup receives mail directly
On Fri, 15 Nov 2002 11:38:37 -0500, Derrick 'dman' Hudson
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>On Fri, Nov 15, 2002 at 09:08:48AM -0500, Kevin Coyner wrote:
>
>> Can anyone interpret this syslog message for me?
>
>Yes. :-)
SWITCH NOBOYDIE
(sorry, couldn't resist it) Pigeon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email t
On Fri, Nov 15, 2002 at 09:08:48AM -0500, Kevin Coyner wrote:
| Can anyone interpret this syslog message for me?
Yes. :-)
| Nov 15 08:59:24 sakura fetchmail[19276]: SMTP error: 550 Syntax error in
| 'To' header: "@" or "." expected after "Low": failin
I'll use this as the example
this is a valid to header
To: "Debian User" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
in your case the header had no @ in it only this:
so it failed
i do not think this is a fetchmail error or a misconfiguuration on your
behalf
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a
Can anyone interpret this syslog message for me?
Nov 15 08:59:24 sakura fetchmail[19276]: SMTP error: 550 Syntax error in
'To' header: "@" or "." expected after "Low": failing address is:
Nov 15 08:59:24 sakura fetchmail[19276]: not flushed
Clearly
On Tue, Feb 05, 2002 at 01:35:59PM +, p wrote:
> ...sorry (mutt, exim, & fetchmail).
ah, ic :-)
> after sleeping on it, i think i'm going to re-roll my kernel (2.4.0),
> as i recall trying to use my pcmcia modem, which would dial out but
> could never connect. (that was months ago since i
On Mon, Feb 04, 2002 at 09:19:50PM +, Jonathan Matthews wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 04, 2002 at 06:37:14PM +, p wrote:
> > debs,
> >
> > when i fetchmail, i get an smtp error:
> >
> > fetchmail: smtp connect to localhost failed
> > fetchmail: smt
On Mon, Feb 04, 2002 at 06:37:14PM +, p wrote:
> debs,
>
> when i fetchmail, i get an smtp error:
>
> fetchmail: smtp connect to localhost failed
> fetchmail: smtp transaction error while fetching from pcisys.net
> fetchmail: query status=10 (smtp)
>
> suggestion
debs,
when i fetchmail, i get an smtp error:
fetchmail: smtp connect to localhost failed
fetchmail: smtp transaction error while fetching from pcisys.net
fetchmail: query status=10 (smtp)
suggestions?
thx.
b.
//
On Mon, Jan 21, 2002 at 11:05:57AM -0600, Lance Hoffmeyer wrote:
| I cannot send email with balsa although mutt can send email fine.
| Anyone have any suggestions?
Don't use remote smtp in balsa. mutt doesn't. mutt simply pipes the
message to your local MTA (probably exim) which you must have se
I cannot send email with balsa although mutt can send email fine. Anyone have
any suggestions?
The Remote SMTP field has my ISP's domain listed mail.ISP.com
Lance
--
Lance Hoffmeyer
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Subject: smtp error
Date: Mon, Nov 06, 2000 at 06:43:09PM -0700
In reply to:cls-colo spgs
Quoting cls-colo spgs([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> debs,
>
> one of my potatoes has a smtp error:
>
> $ fetchmail
> fetchmail: imap connection to mail.pcisys.net failed: conne
On Mon, Nov 06, 2000 at 06:20:33PM -0800, Eric G . Miller wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 06, 2000 at 06:43:09PM -0700, cls-colo spgs wrote:
> > debs,
> >
> > one of my potatoes has a smtp error:
> >
> > $ fetchmail
> > fetchmail: imap connection to mail.pcisy
On Mon, Nov 06, 2000 at 06:43:09PM -0700, cls-colo spgs wrote:
> debs,
>
> one of my potatoes has a smtp error:
>
> $ fetchmail
> fetchmail: imap connection to mail.pcisys.net failed: connection refused
> 25 messages for at mail.pcisys.net (86395 octets).
> reading mess
debs,
one of my potatoes has a smtp error:
$ fetchmail
fetchmail: imap connection to mail.pcisys.net failed: connection refused
25 messages for at mail.pcisys.net (86395 octets).
reading message 1 of 25 (3349 octets)..fetchmail: smtp connect t localhost
failed
fetchmail: smtp transaction
Hi
can someone please explain what this error means :
TRANSPORT:smtp ERROR:(ERR175) host retry file locked
i am using smail on our debian mail server...
and we have just set a system where our hl7 result messages are emailed to
the clients mailbox rather then use uucp.
So.. does this error mea
Greetings,
After upgrading to the lastest greatest Debian Sendmail my sendmail
doesn't work any longer. Using Qpopper is not a problem to retrieve the
mail, but when I try to send something out I get an error:
The recipient "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" is not acceptable to your SMTP
server. The
Hi,
I had the same error and this is what happened:
It doesn't hurt to try and telnet localhost at port 25 to check if sendmail is
working.
However, the reason for the denied permission is you have to specify that your
machine is also called as localhost.
PS: I use exim and the setup questi
I'm trying to get mail from my server, and fetchmail is encountering
some error.
161 messages (1 seen) for at students.uiuc.edu (902152 octets).
reading message 1 of 161 (1390 header octets) .fetchmail: SMTP connect
to localhost failed
fetchmail: SMTP transaction error while fetching from
studen
On Mon, 8 Jun 1998, Tom Malloy wrote:
: If fetchmail say I have a smtp transfer error, where should I look to
: figure out what that means and how to fix it? Is that a fetchmail or
: smail problem or something else. Thanks
You could give `fetchmail -v` a try, to determine which program is ha
If fetchmail say I have a smtp transfer error, where should I look to
figure out what that means and how to fix it? Is that a fetchmail or
smail problem or something else. Thanks
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, 05 Jan 1998, Daniel Martin ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> I think I've heard odd things about networking on hamm not knowing
> about localhost - tell me, is localhost mentioned in /etc/hosts? Can
> you telnet to localhost? What does /etc/host.conf look like?
/etc/hosts:
127.0.0.1
Thanks, Scott, it works as advertised now. I have now checked
and find that it is Bug#16147. I would never have suspected smail of
being the culprit.
Bob
On Mon, 5 Jan 1998 "Scott K. Ellis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Yep, the latest smail package messes up if you want it installed in
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Robert D. Hilliard) writes:
> On my hamm system, fetchmail fails with the following message:
>
> bob:vc-2:bob>fetchmail
> fetchmail: 29 messages at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> reading message 1 (4310 bytes) ..fetchmail: SMTP connect to (null)
> failed
> fetchmail: SMTP transaction
> fetchmail: 29 messages at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> reading message 1 (4310 bytes) ..fetchmail: SMTP connect to (null)
> failed
> fetchmail: SMTP transaction error while fetching from
> post.metrolink.net
Upgrade the "netbase" and "netstd" packages.
-
On Mon, 5 Jan 1998, Robert D. Hilliard wrote:
> On my hamm system, fetchmail fails with the following message:
>
> bob:vc-2:bob>fetchmail
> fetchmail: 29 messages at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> reading message 1 (4310 bytes) ..fetchmail: SMTP connect to (null)
> failed
> fetchmail: SMTP transaction
On my hamm system, fetchmail fails with the following message:
bob:vc-2:bob>fetchmail
fetchmail: 29 messages at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
reading message 1 (4310 bytes) ..fetchmail: SMTP connect to (null)
failed
fetchmail: SMTP transaction error while fetching from
post.metrolink.net
I have ins
58 matches
Mail list logo
