On Thursday 05 June 2008 00:20, Tony Heal wrote:
> I am trying to mount an smbfs as the backup user and something is not
> right. I can run this as root and it works fine
>
>
>
> mount -t smbfs -o owner=backup -o lfs -o
> username=administrator,password=XX //192.168.2.2
Hi all
On 6/5/08, Marc Shapiro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Tony Heal wrote:
>
>>
>> I am trying to mount an smbfs as the backup user and something is not
>> right. I can run this as root and it works fine
>>
>> mount -t smbfs –o owner=backup -o lfs
Tony Heal wrote:
I am trying to mount an smbfs as the backup user and something is not
right. I can run this as root and it works fine
mount -t smbfs –o owner=backup -o lfs -o
username=administrator,password=XX //192.168.2.200/drobo /media/drobo/
yet when I mount it that way the
I am trying to mount an smbfs as the backup user and something is not right.
I can run this as root and it works fine
mount -t smbfs -o owner=backup -o lfs -o
username=administrator,password=XX //192.168.2.200/drobo /media/drobo/
yet when I mount it that way the backup user has no
Arthur Marsh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hugh Lawson wrote, on 31/03/08 00:06:
> > Arthur Marsh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> >> The smbfs package, which depends on samba-common includes the
> >> mount.cifs binary:
> > [ snip ]
> >
&
Hugh Lawson wrote, on 31/03/08 00:06:
Arthur Marsh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
The smbfs package, which depends on samba-common includes the
mount.cifs binary:
[ snip ]
The format of the /etc/fstab entry changed, requiring the IP address
of the remote system rather than just the N
Arthur Marsh wrote:
The format of the /etc/fstab entry changed, requiring the IP address
of the remote system rather than just the NetBIOS name:
In my system, now using smbfs 3.0.28-2+b1, I've always cifs-mounted
Windows shares using the name of the host, not the IP.
There is, howeve
Arthur Marsh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> The smbfs package, which depends on samba-common includes the
> mount.cifs binary:
[ snip ]
> The format of the /etc/fstab entry changed, requiring the IP address
> of the remote system rather than just the NetBIOS name:
>
>
Amit Uttamchandani wrote, on 30/03/08 07:40:
As smbfs is no longer maintained, what is the proper way to mount samba shares
in linux?
Most of the user guides out there rely on 'mount -t smbfs ' to mount
windows shares. I heard there is a mount -t cifs? But that doesn't s
As smbfs is no longer maintained, what is the proper way to mount samba shares
in linux?
Most of the user guides out there rely on 'mount -t smbfs ' to mount
windows shares. I heard there is a mount -t cifs? But that doesn't seem to work
in etch box that I have.
In the
Mark Fletcher wrote:
DUH -- question is about smbfs package not
smbclient...
Hi list
I have a question about the smbclient package. What
does it provide that isn't provided by SMB FS support
in the kernel?
I currently run a 2.6.15.4 kernel and am about to
build myself a 2.6.17.7 kernel
DUH -- question is about smbfs package not
smbclient...
Hi list
I have a question about the smbclient package. What
does it provide that isn't provided by SMB FS support
in the kernel?
I currently run a 2.6.15.4 kernel and am about to
build myself a 2.6.17.7 kernel from kernel.org (using
iven that the recent kernels
have SMB FS support available in them, what is the
purpose of the Debian smbfs package? Is this a
question of distro-clash ie is this something that
used to be needed but isn't needed on the most
up-to-the-minute kernels? Or is smbfs providing
something that the kern
On 12/20/05, Noah Dain <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
any fuse filesystem will incur quite a bit of overhead. If you arelooking for high throughput, fuse is not what you want.
ok, i had read about this but anything than smbfs would be better!! ;-)
try using cifs. smbfs is deprecated. Bot
On 12/19/05, fabrizio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> hi everybody.
> At the moment i'm using smbmount and smbfs utilities, but i'm not satisfied
> with this tool, cause using gnome with nautilus and browsing dirs or shares
> is really slow and not efficient.
> so i&
hi everybody.
At the moment i'm using smbmount and smbfs utilities, but i'm not
satisfied with this tool, cause using gnome with nautilus and browsing
dirs or shares is really slow and not efficient.
so i'm looking at fusefs + smbfs. is someone using it? how are the performances? is
Arafangion <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Thursday 15 December 2005 22:51, Björn Lindström wrote:
>> On my home network I mount a couple of shares from a Windows system on
>> my Debian system using smbfs.
>>
>> However, as soon as the Windows system is turned
On Thursday 15 December 2005 22:51, Björn Lindström wrote:
> On my home network I mount a couple of shares from a Windows system on
> my Debian system using smbfs.
>
> However, as soon as the Windows system is turned off (which is often,
> the user turns it off every night) an
On my home network I mount a couple of shares from a Windows system on
my Debian system using smbfs.
However, as soon as the Windows system is turned off (which is often,
the user turns it off every night) and then on again, smbfs has lost
contact with the Windows share. Any attempts to use it
Hi,
I had automount with SMBFS working with Suse, now I have installed Sarge
and cannnot get it to work.
In /etc/auto.master
#/misc /etc/auto.misc --timeout=60
/smb/etc/auto.smb -v -d
#/misc /etc/auto.misc
#/net /etc/auto.net
In /etc/auto.smb (all on one line):
test -fstype
Hello,
When I mount a smbfs share that has the noauto option, /var/log/messages
shows this error:
kernel: smbfs: Unrecognized mount option noauto
Something similar happens when I try to remount a smbfs share,
s/noauto/remount/.
I suspect this is because this paragraph from man mount:
Mount
On Wednesday August 3 2005 15:57, Christof Hurschler wrote:
> How can I circumvent the 2GiB limit? Can I mount the share as cifs?
You can if the client's kernel supports it. For some reason, smbmount doesn't
do CIFS and there doesn't seem to be a CIFS equivalent, so you'll have to use
mount wit
imit on the SAMBA side but they appear
to be about ancient Linux SMBFS/Samba versions.
Besides that: I have managed to copy the full Debian Sarge i386 and amd64 DVD's
from my W2K machine to my Debian Sarge (both i386 and AMD64) machines and back
again...
Groeten,
Joost Kraaije
> --- Ursprüngliche Nachricht ---
> Von: Nicos Gollan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> An: debian-user@lists.debian.org
> Betreff: Re: Copying Large Files >2Gb to smbfs mount
> Datum: Wed, 3 Aug 2005 15:27:38 +0200
>
> On Wednesday August 3 2005 14:52, Joost Kraaijeveld wr
On Wednesday August 3 2005 14:52, Joost Kraaijeveld wrote:
> Christof Hurschler schreef:
> > I thought that the file size limit for NTFS was much bigger
> > than 2Gb. Is this maybe a samba limitation?
>
> Not that I know: I have copied 4 Gb (Debian ISO images) back and forth
> between Debian Sar
Hi Christof,
Christof Hurschler schreef:
> I've tried Googeling around on this but haven't really found
> an answer.
>
> I have a debian (Kanotix 2005-3) system from which I'd like to copy
> partition images to a NTFS share on a W2K box. It works well
> with files
> smaller than 2Gb big. Files
I've tried Googeling around on this but haven't really found an answer.
I have a debian (Kanotix 2005-3) system from which I'd like to copy
partition images to a NTFS share on a W2K box. It works well with files
smaller than 2Gb big. Files 2Gb or larger are simply cut of and terminated
with an e
After migration to 2.6 kernel I am experiencing smbfs stalls quite
often. The smb connection stops to be available after some time, then I
need to remount.
Does anyone else experience this problem too?
Hi
I'm desperate to find the right mailing list but I can't find anything on the
'net, the only place I found was a dead sourceforge site.
no-one on this list can help and I appreciate that it might not be the right
list. I tried the samba list but they told me samba is not s
ted 3 times
Could this be related to my smbfs problem-- and any ideas on how to fix this?
Thanks,
Sam
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
(this works):
/etc/fstab:
//wardrobe/backup /backup smbfs
defaults,fmask=644,dmask=755,password=***,user=*** 0 0
Once the share is mounted I am able to list directories, create and modify
small files (touch, echo, etc). I don't get any errors and things look
like they are wo
also sprach martin f krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004.05.27.1843 +0200]:
> We are running a 3.0.2a Samba server here, which works fine, except
> for one detail: when a Windows users creates a folder in a "guest ok
> = no" share, that folder is not accessible to Linux users
Hi all,
We are running a 3.0.2a Samba server here, which works fine, except
for one detail: when a Windows users creates a folder in a "guest ok
= no" share, that folder is not accessible to Linux users via
smbfs, even though the UNIX permissions are fine. In fact, the
folder is
Hi folks,
i have the case :
debian testing/unstable
ii smbfs 3.0.0final-1
Linux neit 2.6.0-test11
now i'm downloading huge archive of books ( at now 30GB downloaded ) on smbfs mount.
On other side is winddoze 2000 server sp3.
after some time the smbfs mounts hang (all, not only t
BTW, doing an strace on smbclient, it loads codepage.850,
unicode_map.850 and unicode_map.ISO8859-1.
Doing an lsmod, the only loaded nls table is nls_utf8.
--
João Miguel Neves
signature.asc
Description: Esta =?ISO-8859-1?Q?=E9?= uma parte de me
I haven't found a reference to this on the archives, so maybe someone
will help me:
I have a file on a Windows NT4 server called: encadernação.jpg
Going through smbclient, the filename is encadernação.jpg. If I go
through smbfs (either fstab, automount or smbmount directly), I see the
fil
installing I got the package smbclient with apt-get install.
That is all I did, when I now connect to the shared folder with the command:
mount -t smbfs -o username=xxx,password=yyy //10.0.0.10/share /mnt/share I
get an error called:
smbfs: mount_data version 1919251317 is not supported
mount
>
> > # modprobe smbfs
> > # Can´t locate module smbfs
> >
> > It says it cant locate the needed module, and I am sure that
> > "apt-get install smbfs" says "Sorry, smbfs is already the newest version"
> >
> > Where is the module smb
ou
start. type "mkboot" as root (otherwise if you hit a problem you may not
be able to boot the system to get out of trouble)
HTH
Clive
> > > # modprobe smbfs
> > > # Can´t locate module smbfs
> > >
> > > It says it cant locate the needed module, and I
On (06/06/03 12:16), Informática. Cabildo de La Gomera wrote:
> Doesn´t works!
>
> # modprobe smbfs
> # Can´t locate module smbfs
>
> It says it cant locate the needed module, and I am sure that
> "apt-get install smbfs" says "Sorry, smbfs is already the newe
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, Jun 06, 2003 at 12:16:32PM +0100, Inform?tica. Cabildo de La Gomera wrote:
> Where is the module smbfs? How can I install it?
OK, you can go ahead and remove that smbfs package and get
kernel-source-$KVERS and kernel-package
See
Doesn´t works!
# modprobe smbfs
# Can´t locate module smbfs
It says it cant locate the needed module, and I am sure that
"apt-get install smbfs" says "Sorry, smbfs is already the newest version"
Where is the module smbfs? How can I install it?
Fernando Febles Armas
J
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, Jun 06, 2003 at 10:16:50AM +0100, Inform?tica. Cabildo de La Gomera wrote:
> ?Can someone tell me how to add support to smbfs to the Kernel?
Try modprobe smbfs. If this works, then add to the end of
/etc/modules this simple line:
sm
I've installed debian stable (woody 3.0r1) whith
kde and samba. I can browse my M$ network with
Komba2, can see all my PCs and shared resources,
but when I try to mount I get the message:
smbmount exited with errors.
ERROR: smbfs filesystem not supported by the
kernel
Please refer t
running 'unstable' with KDE 3.1.1 and the smbfs packages
> installed. I have two shares (exported via Samba on FreeBSD) mounted. When
> I use a KDE application to open a file in either directory the application
> repeatedly receieves SIGBUS, causing the application to become
> unr
Hello. I am running 'unstable' with KDE 3.1.1 and the smbfs packages
installed. I have two shares (exported via Samba on FreeBSD) mounted. When
I use a KDE application to open a file in either directory the application
repeatedly receieves SIGBUS, causing the application to become
un
Tim Verry wrote:
Nope, just installed from 3.0_r0/i386/debian-30r0-i386-binary-1.iso
This:
http://packages.debian.org/cgi-bin/
search_contents.pl?word=smbfs.o&searchmode=searchfiles&case=insensitive&version=stable&arch=i386
tells me that smbfs.o is in the 2.2.20 kernel image package, so that
On Tue, 2002-11-26 at 16:52, Tim Verry wrote:
> I have a pentium 200, non mmx. Do I need i586 or can I use i686?
You must choose i586, mmx or not. Same for the K6. i686 would PPro
upwards.
From the kernel doc, a few widely used conventions of varying relevance
to the current topic :
Here are t
I have a pentium 200, non mmx. Do I need i586 or can I use i686?
On Monday 25 November 2002 17:42, sean finney wrote:
> i think your problem is that the kernel installed by default doesn't
> seem to support smbfs. if you're not completely attached to said kernel
> and want
Hi
I'm not sure if I'm totally out here, but have u tryed apt-get install
smbfs?
If I do apt-cache show smbfs it gives a lot of output, here is some:
Source: samba
Version: 2.999+3.0.alpha20-3
Replaces: smbfsx
Depends: netbase (>= 2.02), samba-common (= 2.999+3.0.alpha20-3), libc6
Tim Verry said:
> I can't find it at all, used "locate" and KDE's "find files". Would there
> be any harm in just acquiring this file and throwing it in there?
if you can get the file from the 2.2.20 kernel there wouldn't be
much harm, you would probably have to load it via insmod -f smbfs.o
(t
idepci/fs are all things that are
NOT in use, such as ntfs.o
I can't find it at all, used "locate" and KDE's "find files". Would there be
any harm in just acquiring this file and throwing it in there?
Seneca, no dice. But a puzzling clue.
> apt-get install sm
On Mon, Nov 25, 2002 at 04:06:26PM -0500, Tim Verry wrote:
>
> mount -t smbfs -o username=me,password=foobar //server/share /dir/dir
> ERROR: smbfs filesystem not supported by the kernel
> Please refer to the smbmnt(8) manual page
> smbmnt failed: 255
> Have a variety of sam
Tim Verry said:
> Nope, just installed from 3.0_r0/i386/debian-30r0-i386-binary-1.iso
>
> I've never compiled any kernels. I'm curious though how to do it if it's
> the answer to this problem. Hopefully then I can figure out what went
> wrong.
>
> I assume that it should have just been in the ke
i think your problem is that the kernel installed by default doesn't
seem to support smbfs. if you're not completely attached to said kernel
and want to join the rest of the 2.4 world, i recommend:
# apt-get install kernel-image-2.4.18
you may need to add a line to lilo.conf about i
hat pretty basic.
>
> from the rest of your comments i get the idea that you possibly compiled
> your own 2.2.20 kernel. the smbfs is part of the kernel not part of
> samba. smbfs in samba I belive is limited to the wrapper scripts to
> call mount.
>
> If you are running a debian
Tim Verry said:
> Woody with kernel 2.2.20, newest KDE, updated apache, sendmail, webmin
> installed, other than that pretty basic.
from the rest of your comments i get the idea that you possibly compiled
your own 2.2.20 kernel. the smbfs is part of the kernel not part of
samba. smbfs in
mount -t smbfs -o username=me,password=foobar //server/share /dir/dir
ERROR: smbfs filesystem not supported by the kernel
Please refer to the smbmnt(8) manual page
smbmnt failed: 255
Woody with kernel 2.2.20, newest KDE, updated apache, sendmail, webmin
installed, other than that pretty basic
<-- snip -->
| If they are serious they have som kind of vpn or encryption that you can
| connect to. I use ssh myself. you can use fish protocol and browse
| through directories.
| Even better is lftp and fish you can then set eg. bandwidth control.
| Thats what I use when i do big copies for fil
Dayalan Manohar wrote:
> After getting disconnected from a mounted smbfs I find that I am
> not able to unmount it and df hangs when I try to check if it's
> still mounted.How to gracefully handle getting disconnected from a
> mounted smbfs?Is there any special mount option
After getting disconnected from a mounted smbfs I find that I am not
able to unmount it and df hangs when I try to check if it's still
mounted.How to gracefully handle getting disconnected from a mounted
smbfs?Is there any special mount option for this?IIRC nfs has one.
dayalan
Sunny Dubey wrote:
hey,
On a win2k machine, I have the "d drive" shared as a share called SEC.
However when I try to mount the drive on linux (using the following command)
it just says failed ...
bash-2.05# mount -t smbfs -o username=family,password=family //main/sec
/mnt/
On Sun, Sep 30, 2001 at 07:43:37PM -0400, Sunny Dubey wrote:
| hey,
|
| On a win2k machine, I have the "d drive" shared as a share called SEC.
| However when I try to mount the drive on linux (using the following command)
| it just says failed ...
|
| bash-2.05# mount -t smbfs -
hey,
On a win2k machine, I have the "d drive" shared as a share called SEC.
However when I try to mount the drive on linux (using the following command)
it just says failed ...
bash-2.05# mount -t smbfs -o username=family,password=family //main/sec
/mnt/smb/
1025: Connection to m
Quoth Bob Koss,
> I'm running 2.4.7.
>
> Mine works the "other way" also. I need it to work "this way" (;-)) to do a
> backup.
Having just re-looked at mine after a reboot, it seems to be working
again.
While I'm loathe to suggest rebooting a debian box, maybe samba makes a
real OS like windoze
>
> Quoth Michael Heldebrant,
> > On Mon, 2001-09-17 at 12:01, Bob Koss wrote:
> > >
> > > I attempt to mount my win98 box known as thinkpad-wired on my
> linux box:
> > >
> > > bear:~# mount -t smbfs //thinkpad-wired/E /mnt/thinkpad-winb
Quoth Michael Heldebrant,
> On Mon, 2001-09-17 at 12:01, Bob Koss wrote:
> >
> > I attempt to mount my win98 box known as thinkpad-wired on my linux box:
> >
> > bear:~# mount -t smbfs //thinkpad-wired/E /mnt/thinkpad-winblows
> > session request to THINKPAD-WI
On Mon, 2001-09-17 at 12:01, Bob Koss wrote:
>
> I attempt to mount my win98 box known as thinkpad-wired on my linux box:
>
> bear:~# mount -t smbfs //thinkpad-wired/E /mnt/thinkpad-winblows
> session request to THINKPAD-WIRED failed
> session request to *SMBSERVER failed
>
I attempt to mount my win98 box known as thinkpad-wired on my linux box:
bear:~# mount -t smbfs //thinkpad-wired/E /mnt/thinkpad-winblows
session request to THINKPAD-WIRED failed
session request to *SMBSERVER failed
SMB connection failed
bear:~#
thinkpad-wireless is in /etc/hosts and the /mnt
gt; make the mount point "/mnt/ntbox".
> Here is what I tried adding to fstab:
> "//ntbox/share/mnt/ntbox smbfs defaults,rw,user,noauto 0 0"
> (without the quotes, natch!)
>
> So I then open a terminal and try "mount /mnt/ntbox"; I
ve made the entry as best as I understand, but am having a peculiar
problem for which I ask everyone's help to solve.
I would like to have this behave the same way for all users so I've chosen to
make the mount point "/mnt/ntbox".
Here is what I tried adding to fstab:
"
, and quits
> with no messages, but when you try to remount the share it tells you
> that the share is already mounted. The only way to get the share back
> is to reboot the machine.
>
> Does anyone know why this is happening?
>
> Here's the command we use to mount the sh
es, but when you try to remount the share it tells you
that the share is already mounted. The only way to get the share back
is to reboot the machine.
Does anyone know why this is happening?
Here's the command we use to mount the share:
mount -t smbfs -o
username=,password=,rw,fmask=0777,dma
On Dec 03 2000, Francois Gouget wrote:
> On Sun, 3 Dec 2000, Nate Amsden wrote:
> > umount and remount ..
>
>It works!
It's a more or less well known work-around. But I've
unfortunetly had this very same problems with NFS between two
Debian boxes.
I haven't do
On Sun, 3 Dec 2000, Nate Amsden wrote:
> umount and remount ..
It works!
Why the hell is it that smbumount does not work while umount
works just fine?
> smbfs is VERY unstable i would never trust it to anything ...
I don't trust it very much either. I mostly use it to tra
umount and remount ..
smbfs is VERY unstable i would never trust it to anything ...
nate
Francois Gouget wrote:
>
>I had a Windows fs mounted on ~/smb via smbfs. The Windows machine
> got put in suspend mode, then woken up, but now I canot access the
> directory anymore:
>
I had a Windows fs mounted on ~/smb via smbfs. The Windows machine
got put in suspend mode, then woken up, but now I canot access the
directory anymore:
$ ls smb
ls: smb: Input/output error
$ smbumount smb
Could not open smb: Input/output error
When I do 'ls ~' I don'
what do i need to configure in my kernel to mount a NTFS folder to use with
sambaclient
thankx again list
Hi
I have a Debian box running Samba, and with smbfs support in the
kernel. It is connected to a home LAN with a Windows for Workgroups
3.11 (with the TCP/IP upgrade installed as the only protocol) box on the
same network. I recently installed Potato on the Samba machine, which
had previously
On Mon, 17 Jul 2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hiya
>
> i am trying to copy lots of image files from my Debian box to a shared ntfs
> drive on my NT box. look at what happens :
>
> lelouvre /home/cdcut/CDWed# cp -af 00 /win2k/images
> cp: /win2k/images/00/16/52/59/1652592a.tif: Operation not
Hiya
i am trying to copy lots of image files from my Debian box to a shared ntfs
drive on my NT box. look at what happens :
lelouvre /home/cdcut/CDWed# cp -af 00 /win2k/images
cp: /win2k/images/00/16/52/59/1652592a.tif: Operation not permitted
cp: /win2k/images/00/16/52/59/1652593a.tif: Operatio
Slink + smbfs packaged with slink. smbmounting a share from an NT
server works fine, but in large directories I only seem to see a
portion of the files! Note that this is NOT Samba FAQ 2.2 - the
missing files have names that are as valid as those I can see. In
fact, after deleting or moving
On Thu, Oct 21, 1999 at 06:41:58AM +, Stuart Ballard wrote:
> Hi,
>
> What package do I need to install to get the smbmount command? I have
> samba, samba-common and smbclient installed, but mount -t smbfs doesn't
> seem to do anything, and there is no smbmount man page.
Hello,
because I couldn't solve my ncpfs-problem to let users mount
their Novell-drives at request themselves via an /etc/fstab-entry
I wonder if this is possible with smbfs. Did I understand it
right that it is possible with smbfs to mount Novell and
Win drives. I didn't used Samba y
; >
> > i don't see why it wouldn't...
>
> Because before I posted to this list I searched the web and the mail
> archives and etc and somewhere in all that I read that samba (or smbfs,
> I forget) wouldn't work across routers and that it needed to be on the
> sam
> HOLD IT! STOP THE PRESSES!
>
> Oh, that's too weird...
>
> I just up-arrowed to recall the last time I tried it, and this time it
> worked!
> I had been trying it as root all this time because of the mount point
> not being mountable by westk. So as another test I tried mounting it
> using /ho
up
> > connection? The dial-up connection is provided by my university, and
> > that's where the server is located. My local IP (provided by the dial-up
> > connection) has the same first two octets (150.252.x.x) as the rest of
> > campus, but the third octet (and probabl
questions are these:
> 1) Do I need both the smbfs and the smbfsx packages? Or just one or the
> other? DOes it hurt to have both installed?
Just smbfsx. i don't know if it will cause problems or not having both
installed.
> 2) Where can I find the smbclient so that I can do some
here's been some syntax change between smbfs and smbfsx,
but the man page apparently doesn't match reality (the man says
"smbmount" but the program I find on my system is "smbmount-2.2.x",
etc), so I don't know whether my problems are because I'm following
ou
Alan Su wrote:
>
> when i was about 8, i think i used dos. =) mostly just to launch
> whatever game it was that i was interested in at the time...
>
> so, do those work? i'm also not sure how this applies to my
> situation. thanks.
> "R. Brock Lynn" wrote (Sat, 17 Apr 1999 12:35:29 -0500 ):
>
> so, now i have a question for the list. i guess i can accept this
> behavior, but now i'm curious: what does /bin/mv do when the target
> file already exists (and isn't a directory). it must do something
> other than unlink the target file and relink the source file to that
> name, right? o
As I told Alan in private mail, this is a Windows "feature" which prevents
users from copying over their own files. smbfs must stick to this.
"R. Brock Lynn" wrote (Sat, 17 Apr 1999 12:16:27 -0500 ):
|>
|>Well here's a simple thing to check:
|>
|>Do you have write permission on the SMB share? In windows you can have two
|>passwords... one for read and one for write.
|>
Brock-
thanks for the idea. actually, i'm quite sure i have the co
VS
> wants to perform when updating a working directory.
>
> has anyone encountered this problem and know of a solution? i could
> be way off here, but it seems like a problem in the implmentation of
> smbfs.
Well here's a simple thing to check:
Do you have write permission on t
solution? i could
be way off here, but it seems like a problem in the implmentation of
smbfs.
anyway, thanks!
-alan
On Mon, 12 Apr 1999, Alec Smith wrote:
> From: Alec Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: smbfs on kernel 2.2.5
>
> I'm getting the error need mount version 6 in my dmesg output when using
> kernel 2.2.5. I just built the util-linux-2.9i sources from
> metalab.unc.edu
I'm getting the error need mount version 6 in my dmesg output when using
kernel 2.2.5. I just built the util-linux-2.9i sources from
metalab.unc.edu and that didn't help. I have the smbfsx package installed.
How do I go about solving this error without going to potato from slink?
On 15-Mar-99 Patrick wrote:
>
> does someone has succeeded in mounting remote smb shares with automount ?
>
> i have a debian 2.1 with smbfsx and samba
> but when trying i have in my log only:
> automount[25275]: cannot find mount method for filesystem smbfs
>
> what am
art --quiet --oknodo --exec
/usr/bin/smbmount //GOD_SERVER/C_GV2 /GodServer -- -I 192.168.0.1 -P password
echo "."
;;
*)
echo "Usage: /etc/init.d/samba {start|stop|restart}"
exit 1
;;
esac
does someone has succeeded in mounting remote smb shares with automount ?
i have a debian 2.1 with smbfsx and samba
but when trying i have in my log only:
automount[25275]: cannot find mount method for filesystem smbfs
what am i missing ?
thanks for your help.
Patrick
1 - 100 of 122 matches
Mail list logo
