Paul Johnson wrote:
>> Who's settings do you use?
> Both.
>> Even worse, which Bayesian database do you
>> use?
> Both.
How?
> Has nothing been done to fix this?
Again, how? You're not grasping that it is not possible with how mail
works. And that's not even getting into ho
On Sunday 07 May 2006 15:16, Steve Lamb wrote:
> Paul Johnson wrote:
> > Accept it, only deliver to the negative user would be the sane way of
> > handling it. Either that, or 550 it and say "Delivered to ..., not
> > delivered to ..."
>
> You're not understanding the problem. Think of it at
On Sun, May 07, 2006 at 03:15:50PM -0700, Steve Lamb wrote:
> Regardless, SMTP time checks are system wide, not user specific.
Does Exim allow an arbitrary executable to be configured as the
system-wide filter? If so, couldn't that executable iterate over each
recipient's user-specific filterin
Paul Johnson wrote:
> Accept it, only deliver to the negative user would be the sane way of
> handling it. Either that, or 550 it and say "Delivered to ..., not
> delivered to ..."
You're not understanding the problem. Think of it at the SMTP level,
we're filtering there, right? Ok.
rcpt t
On Sunday 07 May 2006 13:38, Steve Lamb wrote:
> First off, sa-exim is not depreciated. The last update was in January.
>
> Secondly, sa-exim can do things exiscan can't. Two different ways of
> approaching the problem.
>
> Martin A. Brooks wrote:
> > I'd be pretty surprised if per-user s
First off, sa-exim is not depreciated. The last update was in January.
Secondly, sa-exim can do things exiscan can't. Two different ways of
approaching the problem.
Martin A. Brooks wrote:
> I'd be pretty surprised if per-user settings weren't possible. I've
> never tried to do this my
Paul Johnson wrote:
In that case, do you have pointers to better alternative configurations that
accomplish the same thing as sa-exim?
The exiscan docs will help you get started:
http://duncanthrax.net/exiscan-acl/exiscan-acl-spec.txt
http://duncanthrax.net/exiscan-acl/exiscan-acl-examples.
On Sunday 07 May 2006 01:13, Martin A. Brooks wrote:
> Paul Johnson wrote:
> > Is there a good way to get sa-exim (or exim itself if it can wait on
> > spamc to come back with a result at SMTP-time like sa-exim does) to call
> > spamc with -u for the receiving user? I seem to recall I used to have
Paul Johnson wrote:
Is there a good way to get sa-exim (or exim itself if it can wait on spamc to
come back with a result at SMTP-time like sa-exim does) to call spamc with -u
for the receiving user? I seem to recall I used to have this set up, but
cannot find any of my old notes on this..
s
Is there a good way to get sa-exim (or exim itself if it can wait on spamc to
come back with a result at SMTP-time like sa-exim does) to call spamc with -u
for the receiving user? I seem to recall I used to have this set up, but
cannot find any of my old notes on this...
--
Paul Johnson
Email
10 matches
Mail list logo
