On Sunday 07 May 2006 15:16, Steve Lamb wrote:
> Paul Johnson wrote:
> > Accept it, only deliver to the negative user would be the sane way of
> > handling it.  Either that, or 550 it and say "Delivered to ..., not
> > delivered to ..."
>
>     You're not understanding the problem.  Think of it at the SMTP level,
> we're filtering there, right?  Ok.
>
> rcpt to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> rcpt to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> data
> blah blah blah....
> .
> FILTERING HERE.
>
>     Who's settings do you use?

Both.

>     Even worse, which Bayesian database do you 
> use?

Both.

>     Regardless, SMTP time checks are system wide, not user specific.  If
> users want their own filters it will have to be after your system has
> accepted the message.  At that point it is no longer SMTP time checking and
> outside the scope of both sa-exim and exiscan.  At that point you're onto
> the MDA which is either Exim's own internal routines controlled by a
> specially formatted .forward file, procmail or what have you.

Has nothing been done to fix this?

-- 
Paul Johnson
Email and IM (XMPP & Google Talk): [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Jabber: Because it's time to move forward  http://ursine.ca/Ursine:Jabber

Attachment: pgp78jrluC1WJ.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to