Hi all!
Yesterday I had to restart a host with Wheezy which I have installed
Bacula. After booting, I saw that the process bacula-dir had not
started. I tried to start it manually and I had no problem with that.
Researching the problem, I found that the symbolic links in different
runleves had n
ChadDavis wrote:
> 'dude' ? is that me? I do know what runlevels, sudo and su are. As
< snip >
>>
>> The first thing 'dude' needs to do is figure out what runlevels,
>> single-user mode, and 'sudo' or 'su to root' are!
>>
> # /etc/init.d/kdm stop
>
> or so, adjust on you own needs ;-)
>
> Kees
>
The first thing 'dude' needs to do is figure out what runlevels,
single-user mode, and 'sudo' or 'su to root' are!
Michael
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, ChadDavis wrote:
> Yo. I'm installing a nvidia driver, and the script says you must
> turn off the xserver. In order to this, since I didn't know how, I
> rebooted into runlevel one. Then the script complains about runlevel
> one not being enough. Is runlevel on
On Sun, 5 Nov 2006 10:21:29 -0700
ChadDavis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Yo. I'm installing a nvidia driver, and the script says you must
> turn off the xserver. In order to this, since I didn't know how, I
> rebooted into runlevel one. Then the script complains about runlevel
> one not being
Yo. I'm installing a nvidia driver, and the script says you must
turn off the xserver. In order to this, since I didn't know how, I
rebooted into runlevel one. Then the script complains about runlevel
one not being enough. Is runlevel one more of a rescure mode than
just a non-graphical mode?
Am 2005-11-15 13:31:00, schrieb Scott:
> I've gathered Debian starts in run level 2 and from there X is started.
>
> How do I change the setting so that when I log in I don't go any further
> than a shell and if I want ex I just type "startx" and enter?
apt-get --pruge remove kdm | gdm |wdm | xd
Kent West wrote:
> Or edit the actual script /etc/init.d/?dm and put "exit 0" as the first
> non-comment line in the file, which is one of my favorite methods of
> quickly disabling a script.
>
Thanks. I took your suggestion and it worked perfectly.
--
Scott
www.angrykeyboarder.com
© 2005 ang
Scott Denlinger wrote:
>
> Quoting Mitch Wiedemann [and others]
>
>>>
>>> As a general rule, if you don't want X to start automatically on
>>> boot-up, you can either disable, or uninstall, the relevant login
>>> manager (xdm, kdm, gdm, or wdm).
>>>
>> Or, instead of removing the display manager
Debian has a nice way to do this without worrying about symlinks. It's
update-rc.d
This is a very versatile utility to administer what gets stopped and
started in
the various run levels. The man page for this command will get you started.
Scott Denlinger
Quoting Mitch Wiedemann [and others]
I don't know why but Debian seems to be more cryptic when it comes to
this and it's run levels are odd compared with other linux distros.
I was browsing through /etc/inittab and found
"# Runlevel 0 is halt.
# Runlevel 1 is single-user.
# Runlevels 2-5 are multi-user.
# Runlevel 6
enter?
>>
>> I don't know why but Debian seems to be more cryptic when it comes to
>> this and it's run levels are odd compared with other linux distros.
>>
>> I was browsing through /etc/inittab and found
>>
>> "# Runlevel 0 is halt.
>
cryptic when it comes to
this and it's run levels are odd compared with other linux distros.
I was browsing through /etc/inittab and found
"# Runlevel 0 is halt.
# Runlevel 1 is single-user.
# Runlevels 2-5 are multi-user.
# Runlevel 6 is reboot."
So 2-5 are multi-user and I'v
omes to
this and it's run levels are odd compared with other linux distros.
I was browsing through /etc/inittab and found
"# Runlevel 0 is halt.
# Runlevel 1 is single-user.
# Runlevels 2-5 are multi-user.
# Runlevel 6 is reboot."
So 2-5 are multi-user and I've gathered 2 is
--- Floris Bruynooghe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm not sure if Sun does anything with runlevel 5 or leaves that to the
> sysadmin. But that's again besides the point, this is Debian.
My point was more about leaving a blank run-level. And as far as runlevels
4/5 go,
On Tue, Jul 13, 2004 at 01:34:40PM +0100, Thomas Adam wrote:
> --- Floris Bruynooghe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I was changing my default runlevels the other day as I wanted runlevel 2
> > to be console only. But that's next to the point really.
>
> T
--- Floris Bruynooghe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi
>
> I was changing my default runlevels the other day as I wanted runlevel 2
> to be console only. But that's next to the point really.
Then you don't understand how the runlevels are organised in Debian. I
hav
Hi
I was changing my default runlevels the other day as I wanted runlevel 2
to be console only. But that's next to the point really.
What I was wondering about is that in /etc/inittab there are only
getty's started (per system default) on all 6 VC's for runlevel 2 & 3,
not
monique writes:
> Well, update-rc.d doesn't seem to be designed for tweaking settings once
> a package is installed, so what would you suggest?
Invoke-rc.d comes closer, but it isn't quite adequate either. Until it has
the necessary features added you pretty much have to do it all yourself.
Take
On 2004-06-03, Miquel van Smoorenburg penned:
> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Sebastian
> Kügler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> It's probably easier to use `ln -s` than to get update-rc.d working
>>> as you would like.
>>
>>I am now using symlinking rather than update-rc.d, and it seems to
>>wor
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Sebastian Kügler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> It's probably easier to use `ln -s` than to get update-rc.d working as
>> you would like.
>
>I am now using symlinking rather than update-rc.d, and it seems to work fine.
Sure, until policy changes, the internal implem
On Wednesday 02 June 2004 21:40, Monique Y. Mudama wrote:
> On 2004-06-01, Sebastian Kügler penned:
> > 1) What would you recommend to create the symlinks in the various
> > runlevels, what is the preferred way of manipulating the runlevel stuff?
> > a)ln -s
> > b)upda
On 2004-06-01, Sebastian Kügler penned:
> Hi,
>
> I am in the course of writing a graphical runlevel editor, and I happen to
> have the following questions:
>
> 1) What would you recommend to create the symlinks in the various runlevels,
> what is the preferred way of mani
On Wed, Jun 02, 2004 at 01:16:08AM +0200, Sebastian Kügler wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am in the course of writing a graphical runlevel editor, and I happen to
> have the following questions:
>
> 2) If I remove all symlinks in all runlevels (basically "update-rc.d -f
>
Hi,
I am in the course of writing a graphical runlevel editor, and I happen to
have the following questions:
1) What would you recommend to create the symlinks in the various runlevels,
what is the preferred way of manipulating the runlevel stuff?
a) ln -s
b) update-rc.d
My
initdefault:
>
> at top and it does not work the same way..
Well, by default, the runlevels are all identical unless you change
them.
http://ursine.ca/cgi-bin/dwww?type=file&location=/usr/share/doc/sysv-rc/README.runlevels.gz
(also located in /usr/share/doc/sysv-rc/README.runlevels.gz on
Hello!
I have installed Debian Linux 3.0r1 and a
home-compiled 2.4.18 kernel (no additional patches)
with NFS-kernel-server (compiled in).
Everything seems to work, but when I change the
runlevel to 1 and to 2 after doing something or simply
typing CNTRL-D the system hangs at this point:
Starti
On Thu, 29 May 2003 19:48:32 -0400
Vikki Roemer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thanks for your help, everyone.
>
> My mom asked me about the problem, so I explained it in as much detail
> as I could (she's the only person in the family who's not a computer
> person, though), and she's convinced t
Thanks for your help, everyone.
My mom asked me about the problem, so I explained it in as much detail
as I could (she's the only person in the family who's not a computer
person, though), and she's convinced that there's something physically
wrong with the HD (I dunno why, but that's her belie
On Wed, May 28, 2003 at 10:43:25PM -0400, Vikki Roemer wrote:
> Pigeon wrote:
> >You can use pwck to verify the integrity of your password files. If
> >they're OK it appears that login depends on libpam-modules, libpam0g
> >and libc6, giving you four things to check / reinstall...
>
> They're ok.
On Wed, May 28, 2003 at 10:34:46AM -0400, Vikki Roemer wrote:
>
> Well, I would, but I can't log in. I have it booting up now, I get a
> login prompt, it'll accept my username, but it hangs trying to
> authenticate my password. Do you think this is a problem with login (I
> think that's the p
Vikki Roemer wrote:
Kent West wrote:
Try "apt-get --reinstall install anacron".
Well, I would, but I can't log in. I have it booting up now, I get a
login prompt, it'll accept my username, but it hangs trying to
authenticate my password. Do you think this is a problem with login
(I think
Kent West wrote:
Vikki Roemer wrote:
Did that, got a couple of weird errors, and found out anacron is
what's freezing up the system.
The errors are:
starting blinkenlights: nice: start-stop-daemon: no such file or
directory.
gdnc unable to make connection to 127.0.0.1:538 -- network is
unrea
Vikki Roemer wrote:
< snip re: bootscripts freezing the computer >
BTW, what do I do once I find the problem script? Just remove the
symlink and then use apt to reinstall it after I get the box back up
on its feet? (Hopefully apt and dpkg didn't get fried)
Depends on what the problem scr
ones are causing you grief.
Phew, ok. As I'm booted now, can I manually get to runlevel 3 and
run the scripts? I had to manually run the /etc/rcS.d scripts, but
I'm not sure about changing runlevels. Is there anything special
about runlevels that I can't tweak manually? Or do I ju
On Mon, Jan 27, 2003 at 05:20:20PM -0600, will trillich wrote:
> update-rc.d is a good way to keep the debian package system
> up-to-date on your intentions. (sure, you may manually rename or
> remove enough files to stop the service from auto-starting, but a
> future `apt-get upgrade` may -- or ma
On Sat, Jan 25, 2003 at 08:09:29AM -0600, Jeff Hahn wrote:
> One quick question to get me going a little better... How do
> you install services (apache, samba, whatever) and NOT have
> them start on system startup?
when i finally figured out HOW to figure this out, i can't tell
you how many ligh
On Wed, 19 Sep 2001 12:31:54 -0700 (PDT)
"'cduck' Chris Grierson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 19 Sep 2001, Alexander Poslavsky wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> > speaking of runlevels, is there a tool like ntsysv on debian (except for
> > ksysv w
On Tue, 18 Sep 2001, Dave Sherohman wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 18, 2001 at 11:22:30AM -0700, 'cduck' Chris Grierson wrote:
> > with the systems we have here at work, telinit'ing to 1 then 5
> > hangs the system at the nfs-kernel-server rc script (nfsd),
> > presumably because the portmapper is stopped,
Hi,
speaking of runlevels, is there a tool like ntsysv on debian (except for ksysv
which
I do not really like, I prefer st console-based)
AP
--
Back when I was a boy, we carved our own IC's out of wood.
On Tue, Sep 18, 2001 at 04:11:10PM -0500, Colin Watson wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 18, 2001 at 11:22:30AM -0700, 'cduck' Chris Grierson wrote:
> > with the systems we have here at work, telinit'ing to 1 then 5
> > hangs the system at the nfs-kernel-server rc script (nfsd),
> > presumably because the portm
On Tue, Sep 18, 2001 at 11:22:30AM -0700, 'cduck' Chris Grierson wrote:
> i am curious as to what the 'norm' is for *debian* regarding
> runlevels. that is, is it not a safe method of shutting down
> services to switch to runlevel 1, then back to a 'norma
Chris Grierson writes:
CG> i am curious as to what the 'norm' is for *debian* regarding
CG> runlevels.
Runlevels 2-5 are all the same (except, possibly, for the number of
getty's started). From what I can tell, runlevels 0 (halt), 1
(single-user), and 6 (reboot) stop mos
On Tue, Sep 18, 2001 at 11:22:30AM -0700, 'cduck' Chris Grierson wrote:
> with the systems we have here at work, telinit'ing to 1 then 5
> hangs the system at the nfs-kernel-server rc script (nfsd),
> presumably because the portmapper is stopped, and not restarted
That should work. It doesn't, th
hello all,
i am curious as to what the 'norm' is for *debian* regarding
runlevels. that is, is it not a safe method of shutting down
services to switch to runlevel 1, then back to a 'normal'
runlevel (2-5)? basically, a coworker uses redhat, and he does
this often to clean u
>
> Then I booted again. X still doesn't work on my laptop.
>
> Mario
>
>
> Gergely Nagy wrote:
>
> > Hi!
> >
> > I want to be able to eather boot to the console or xdm (gdm). Under Redhat I
> > could do that with runlevels out of t
installed) is started at each runlevel.
>^^ ^^^ ^^
>
> This has been puzzling me. Why is there so little (if any) difference
> between the runlevels 2-5 on debian? Are they intended
installed) is started at each runlevel.
>^^ ^^^ ^^
>
>
> This has been puzzling me. Why is there so little (if any) difference
> between the runlevels 2-5 on debian? Are they intend
is started at each runlevel.
^^ ^^^ ^^
This has been puzzling me. Why is there so little (if any) difference
between the runlevels 2-5 on debian? Are they intended as templates
for the user to customize from?
Thanks,
Bill
installed) is started at each runlevel.
>^^ ^^^ ^^
>
>
> This has been puzzling me. Why is there so little (if any) difference
> between the runlevels 2-5 on deb
or xdm (gdm). Under Redhat I
> could do that with runlevels out of the box. How can I set this up under
> Debian?
>
> Greg
>
> --
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
on Wed, Mar 14, 2001 at 09:45:49PM +0100, Gergely Nagy ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I want to be able to eather boot to the console or xdm (gdm). Under Redhat I
> could do that with runlevels out of the box. How can I set this up under
> Debian?
runlevels, inittab, update
Hi!
I want to be able to eather boot to the console or xdm (gdm). Under Redhat I
could do that with runlevels out of the box. How can I set this up under
Debian?
Greg
--- Mark Blunier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Previously Xucaen ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
>
> > During the last few weeks, there have been
> > discussions about how to keep X from
> > automatically starting upon booting the
> system.
> > Most replys leaned towards disabling xdm in
> the
> > runlevel d
I find it much easier to mess with the initscript with the
update-rc.d script.
To remove for example xdm from the initscript you enter:
'update-rc.d xdm remove'
If do do that, then xdm wont start from init any more.
I dont know the exact command but you can do it the other way to, that is,
you ca
--- "Eric G . Miller" wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 06, 2001 at 07:57:57PM -0800,
> Xucaen wrote:
> >
> > --- "Eric G . Miller" wrote:
> > > On Sat, Jan 06, 2001 at 07:12:56PM -0800,
> > > Xucaen wrote:
> > > > in /etc/rc3.d I canged the symlink of
> S99xdm
> > > from
> > > > ../init.d/xdm to /dev/null
On Sat, Jan 06, 2001 at 07:57:57PM -0800, Xucaen wrote:
>
> --- "Eric G . Miller" wrote:
> > On Sat, Jan 06, 2001 at 07:12:56PM -0800,
> > Xucaen wrote:
> > > in /etc/rc3.d I canged the symlink of S99xdm
> > from
> > > ../init.d/xdm to /dev/null
> >
> > Aargh! Don't do that. Just remove the sym
--- "Eric G . Miller" wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 06, 2001 at 07:12:56PM -0800,
> Xucaen wrote:
> > in /etc/rc3.d I canged the symlink of S99xdm
> from
> > ../init.d/xdm to /dev/null
>
> Aargh! Don't do that. Just remove the symlink
> S99xdm and XDM will not
> be run at boot for the given runlevel. A
On Sat, Jan 06, 2001 at 07:12:56PM -0800, Xucaen wrote:
> Hi all!!!
>
> During the last few weeks, there have been
> discussions about how to keep X from
> automatically starting upon booting the system.
> Most replys leaned towards disabling xdm in the
> runlevel directory. This does work. Howeve
Hi all!!!
During the last few weeks, there have been
discussions about how to keep X from
automatically starting upon booting the system.
Most replys leaned towards disabling xdm in the
runlevel directory. This does work. However, I
came upon something strange. Here's what I did.
My default runle
To quote [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Miquel van Smoorenburg),
# You could have just pasted /usr/share/doc/sysvinit/README.runlevels.gz
# here ..
Does it matter? I was bored, and I think it was helpful. Anyone care to
disagree?
Dave
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
David B. Harris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>To quote "M.B.Midden" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
># Im looking for some info about runlevels. Is there a howto for it?
>What is
># the best runlevel for a server en when should u switch
To quote Ethan Benson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
# On Fri, Jan 05, 2001 at 07:37:25PM -0500, David B. Harris wrote:
#
# > /etc/rcS.d/* : General not used manually, it's used to put the
system
# > into single-user mode right after the kernel has been started.
Usually
# > entered by typing "linux single"
ng, rcS.d is run once at boot, regardless of what runlevel your
entering. single AND multiuser mode. (unless you enter single user
mode with the -b switch at boot, this stops ALL initscripts from
running which is more in line with BSD single user mode.)
> Runlevels 0, 1, 6, and S generally arn&#x
Hello,
* M.B.Midden ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> hi
>
> Im looking for some info about runlevels. Is there a howto for it? What is
> the best runlevel for a server en when should u switch ( how can you switch)
> ( i tried man runlevel ofcourse ) etc
man inittab ?
B
To quote "M.B.Midden" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
# Im looking for some info about runlevels. Is there a howto for it?
What is
# the best runlevel for a server en when should u switch ( how can you
switch)
# ( i tried man runlevel ofcourse ) etc
I'm sort of bored, so here's
hi
Im looking for some info about runlevels. Is there a howto for it? What is
the best runlevel for a server en when should u switch ( how can you switch)
( i tried man runlevel ofcourse ) etc
thanks
dunki
On Tue, Jan 02, 2001 at 08:23:04AM -0500, David B . Harris wrote:
> To quote will trillich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> # please run your eyeballs over them -- and any of the other
> # documents we've got there -- and feel free to post some feedback
> # to the newbieDoc project at
> #
> # http://www
27;ve got another newbieDoc that scratches the surface of
> > Debian runlevels...
> >
> > http://www.eGroups.com/files/newbieDoc/runlevels-intro.html
we're not related to debian -- aside from some serious
affinity, that is. we just had a hard time finding
documentation that we
Are these docs going to be included somewhere in the distro when complete,
or live permanently on the web? They look handy.
Britton Kerin
On Tue, 2 Jan 2001, will trillich wrote:
> i've got another newbieDoc that scratches the surface of
> Debian runlevels...
>
> http:
To quote will trillich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
# please run your eyeballs over them -- and any of the other
# documents we've got there -- and feel free to post some feedback
# to the newbieDoc project at
#
# http://www.eGroups.com/messages/newbieDoc
Well, I must admit I don't like this phrase
i've got another newbieDoc that scratches the surface of
Debian runlevels...
http://www.eGroups.com/files/newbieDoc/runlevels-intro.html
also updated the apt-get introduction at
http://www.eGroups.com/files/newbieDoc/apt-get-intro.html
please run your eyeballs over them -
On Thu, 8 Jun 2000, Mark wrote:
> 1. Runlevels. ?
> Everywhere I read about runlevels in Debian it says the same...
>
> runlevels 2 through 5 are various multiuser runlevels.
>
> But... which are which ?.
All runlevels are created equal by Debian, until you s
On 08/06/00 at 14:02 Mark spake the following magic words:
++>Hello All.
++>
++>Sorry to overload this message but I have a few doubts with my (shiny)
new
++>installed Debian (potato).
++>
++>1. Runlevels. ?
++>Everywhere I read about runlevels in De
Hello All.
Sorry to overload this message but I have a few doubts with my (shiny) new
installed Debian (potato).
1. Runlevels. ?
Everywhere I read about runlevels in Debian it says the same...
runlevels 2 through 5 are various multiuser runlevels.
But... which are which ?.
2
On Sat, May 13, 2000 at 07:49:37PM -0400, Daniel Barclay wrote:
>
> > From: kmself@ix.netcom.com
>
>
> > Reasonable rational. Though one preference of mine has been to prepend
> > a '_' (eg: _S99foo _K99foo). Makes clear what's been changed. More
> > recently, I modify through update-rc.d.
>
> From: kmself@ix.netcom.com
> Reasonable rational. Though one preference of mine has been to prepend
> a '_' (eg: _S99foo _K99foo). Makes clear what's been changed. More
> recently, I modify through update-rc.d.
>
Does that work? (Doesn't that break if the control script uses glob
patter
>> > > If so, what _is_ the proper way to do this with Debian?
>>
>> You can just delete the links you don't want
>
>I've always felt that it's better to change the link from S to K,
>instead of just deleting it.
>
>Say for example you d
I agree, besides that, if you regretted changing it from S -> K,
you can undo the sequence ;)
Eugene ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
- Original Message -
From: "Brad" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Friday, April 28, 2000 11:52
Subject: Re: more real runlevels?
-> When will Debian follow the Linux Standard Base with respect to init
-> runlevels? The current scheme (still in potato, I haven't checked
-> woody) basically has just 2 distinct levels - single user and fully
-> operational. This throws away most of the power of sysvinit (
On Thu, Apr 27, 2000 at 10:52:49PM -0500, Brad wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 27, 2000 at 01:17:42PM -0700, brian moore wrote:
> >
> > > > If so, what _is_ the proper way to do this with Debian?
> >
> > You can just delete the links you don't want
>
> I've always felt that it's better to change the link f
deleting it.
Say for example you delete the xdm link from runlevels 2, 3, and 4. So
you change to 5, xdm starts. You change back to 2, and xdm stays
running. To me the desired behavior would be that xdm is killed...
Anyway, at worst this post might prevent people from deleting links and
wondering why t
mee too. i must admit, that this is a point, where suse and redhat are
> better than debian. :'-(
>
> > I can make my own runlevels
> > from among 3-5 by removing some of the links from /etc/rc[345].d, but
> > will the next upgrade of the relevant packages re-create the li
On Thu, 27 Apr 2000, Oswald Buddenhagen wrote:
> > I would like to run the system without xdm most of the time, but there
> > are times when I need it. Also sometimes I want to switch off network
> > services but still allow local logins.
> >
> mee too. i must admit, that this is a point, where
'-(
> I can make my own runlevels
> from among 3-5 by removing some of the links from /etc/rc[345].d, but
> will the next upgrade of the relevant packages re-create the links?
i'm not sure, if i didn't overlook something, but my netbase update did
not re-install my deleted port
When will Debian follow the Linux Standard Base with respect to init
runlevels? The current scheme (still in potato, I haven't checked
woody) basically has just 2 distinct levels - single user and fully
operational. This throws away most of the power of sysvinit (which
comes at the co
Chad Walstrom writes:
> Well, I can't site any reason w/xdm other than possibly using
> something like kdm or gdm periodically. However, I do know run
> levels come in handy. Let's say, for example, you'd like to work on
> your web pages at home, perhaps running mysql and apache with php.
> Yet,
d NN is the number sequence in which you want
the app killed.
Eric G . Miller wrote:
"Yes, but this begs the question, why? I don't know of any good reason to
go around changing runlevels midstream. The only time that makes any
sense to me, is when you want to do maintainence, and don&#x
Where and I find this program
Mark Wagnon wrote:
> This is to keep this thread active, and to pose another question:
>
> I downloaded a program called gRunlevels, but it looked for my rcN.d and
> init.d stuff in /etc/rc.d.
>
> I created a /etc/rc.d directory and symlinked the above files to it. N
This is to keep this thread active, and to pose another question:
I downloaded a program called gRunlevels, but it looked for my rcN.d and
init.d stuff in /etc/rc.d.
I created a /etc/rc.d directory and symlinked the above files to it. Now
gRunlevels works and all my services are displayed.
Is th
I just got a cable modem and I'm loving it, but I am concerned about
security. I was instructed to comment out many lines in my
/etc/inetd.conf file, especially the ones that I didn't know how to
configure or what they were. In addition, I was told to turn off any
services that I didn't want to mak
omething that I've never had to do before. Debian
>2.0 doesn't install any default runlevels - just /etc/init.d. I've always
Huh? Do you mean you have no /etc/rc2.d ? Something must have
gone very wrong in the installation then. I've never seen this.
Wait .. perhaps you installe
I've just installed Debian 2.0 for the first time (in fact it is the first
time I've installed Debian). I'm well experienced with Linux and UNIX in
general, but I've hit something that I've never had to do before. Debian
2.0 doesn't install any default runlevels -
On Sun, 19 Jan 1997, Jonas Bofjall wrote:
> I have two small questions today ;) :
>
> a) where can I find information about what the
>different debian run-levels are used for?
>0 is halt, 6 is reboot, 1 is singleuser, but
>what about the rest? Are there an multiuser with
>X and on
I have two small questions today ;) :
a) where can I find information about what the
different debian run-levels are used for?
0 is halt, 6 is reboot, 1 is singleuser, but
what about the rest? Are there an multiuser with
X and one without X?
b) when I do an 'lsmod' it says that applet
95 matches
Mail list logo
