On Tue Sep 11 2007 at 10:37 PM -0700, Bill Brelsford wrote:
> After a recent update to sid, incoming rlogin and rsh connections
> ignore /etc/hosts.equiv (and ~/.rhosts) and ask for a password or
> fail with "permission denied". The rsh-server (and -client)
> packages were n
On Thu, Sep 13, 2007 at 11:01:26AM -0400, Lewis, James M. wrote:
> I have the same problem and have not been able to pick
> through it yet. Like you, I suspect a change in a pam
> module. There are only a few to check but I have not
> had time to do it yet. Look in /etc/pam.d/rsh...
I have the same problem and have not been able to pick
through it yet. Like you, I suspect a change in a pam
module. There are only a few to check but I have not
had time to do it yet. Look in /etc/pam.d/rsh...
jim
After a recent update to sid, incoming rlogin and rsh connections
ignore /etc/hosts.equiv (and ~/.rhosts) and ask for a password or
fail with "permission denied". The rsh-server (and -client)
packages were not updated, but libpam-modules, libpam-runtime and
libpam0g were upgraded to
Sadegh Ismael Nattaj wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I am working with a clustered software that needs to rsh as "root" into
> every nodes of cluster (before advising on ssh or something else, I must
> say that all machines are in an isolated network and there is no
> securit
Hi all,
I am working with a clustered software that needs to rsh as "root" into
every nodes of cluster (before advising on ssh or something else, I must
say that all machines are in an isolated network and there is no
security risk at all).
I added "machine-name root" strin
Hi
We have one router with Debian(Woody) that masquerades(iptables) a
192.168.1.0/24 network. If we log into this router with (rsh/telnet/ssh) and
then log into one computer (mostly with rsh) in the masqueraded network, we
encounter problems:
1.)Very often the connection seems to hang, but after
forgive me for asking but you do have an rsh server package
installed?
Paul
->>In response to your message<<-
--received from Hai Nguyen--
>
>
> Dear [EMAIL PROTECTED] I asked about "RSH on Linux" but it still has not OK yet.>
> Some messages occur whe
Dear [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I asked about "RSH on Linux" but it still has not OK yet.
> Some messages occur when I type as following:
> #ps -ax| grep portmap
> 355 ? S 0:00 portmap
> 766 tty1 S 0:00 grep portmap
> I have inserted 2 lines into /etc/hosts.allow file
On Wed, 21 Jul 2004 22:41:42 -0700 (PDT)
Hai Nguyen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Dear [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> What can I do to corect this problem?
> (My machine is an ALPHASERVER with 6 node, the Linux version is
> Red Had Linux reales 6.2 (Zoot) - Kernel 2.2.14-6.0 on an alpha).
humm, this lis
Dear [EMAIL PROTECTED]<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Dear AlphaLinux!
I tried doing as you told me about "RSH on Linux" but it still has not OK yet.
Some messages occur when I type as following:#ps -ax| grep portmap 355 ? S 0:00 portmap766 tty1 S 0:00 grep portmap
I have inserted 2
Hai Nguyen wrote:
Dear [EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
I have an alphaserver with 6 node in which I have installed Linux but I
have a problem with "rsh" command. When I type:
#rsh node5
it tell me that the conection refused...
Mean while, "ping" command r
Hai Nguyen wrote:
Dear [EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
I have an alphaserver with 6 node in which I have installed Linux but I
have a problem with "rsh" command. When I type:
#rsh node5
it tell me that the conection refused...
Mean while, "ping" command r
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hai Nguyen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Can you tell me what can I do to overcome this problem and Where I can find the
> information of "RSH on Linux" or Who can tell me the answer? Thank you very
> much.
ssh has pretty m
Dear [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I have an alphaserver with 6 node in which I have installed Linux but I have a problem with "rsh" command. When I type:
#rsh node5
it tell me that the conection refused...
Mean while, "ping" command run ok
#ping node5 - run OK
#ping node2 - run OK
Can yo
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> I am trying to rsh to my server. I am using kerberos authentication. I
> believe I have configured everything correctly, but rsh simply
> complains: "hostname: Connection refused".
That message generally implies that nothing at all is listening fo
On Sat, Jan 17, 2004 at 03:42:34AM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I am trying to rsh to my server. I am using kerberos authentication. I
> believe I have configured everything correctly, but rsh simply
> complains: "hostname: Connection refused". I checked my "inetd.co
I am trying to rsh to my server. I am using kerberos authentication. I
believe I have configured everything correctly, but rsh simply
complains: "hostname: Connection refused". I checked my "inetd.conf".
Unfortunately, I can't figure out how to debug rsh. Even using the
On Sat, 11 Oct 2003 18:13:34 + (UTC), Faheem Mitha
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Dear People,
>
> I am trying to enable rsa authentication for use with mpich. However,
> I am having some problems.
Sorry. That should have been
* Victory ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [030908 14:03]:
> I know that BUT one of the Old install program using rsh-server
> and the programmer refused to change it. Sorry
>
> BTW . I put entry in to /etc/host.allow ALL: ALL: ALLOW
> but when i try "rlogin temp1 -l root" it still w
I know that BUT one of the Old install program using rsh-server
and the programmer refused to change it. Sorry
BTW . I put entry in to /etc/host.allow ALL: ALL: ALLOW
but when i try "rlogin temp1 -l root" it still won't let me in.
OR "rsh temp1 uname -a" it came ba
"Victory" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I just installed rsh-server and don't know how to set it up so that
> I can do "rlogin temp1 -l root" from remote machine.
You almost certainly don't want to, unless you *want* your root
password passing acr
Victory wrote:
[...]
I just installed rsh-server and don't know how to set it up so that
I can do "rlogin temp1 -l root" from remote machine.
rsh (along with the other r-commands) should not be used for security
reasons. (Except rsync over a ssh-connection)
Why don't y
Hi all,
I just installed rsh-server and don't know how to set it up so that
I can do "rlogin temp1 -l root" from remote machine.
Regards,
Victor,
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wed, Sep 03, 2003 at 10:58:39AM +0530, Anand Raman wrote:
| Shouldnt the socket connections be closed the moment rsh completes
| the command execution
No.
| [EMAIL PROTECTED] root]# netstat
| Active Internet connections (w/o servers)
| Proto Recv-Q Send-Q Local Address Foreign
Hi guys
I am using rsh to execute a command on a remote machine. The command execution happens
fine and the method returns perfectly.
However when I use netstat to view the socket connections on the remote machine I see
multiple connections opened from the source machine.
Why does this
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/usr/src/newer/ss7box$ update-alternatives --display rsh
> > bash: update-alternatives: command not found
>
> Stupidity sets in. Permission problem.
No, the mistake was mine. I assume by this statement that you ran it
as root or with sudo. As another
On Wednesday 02 April 2003 09:49, Mike M wrote:
> On Wednesday 02 April 2003 00:56, Bob Proulx wrote:
> > Noah Meyerhans wrote:
> > > ls -l `which rsh` /etc/alternatives/rsh
> > > should answer your question.
> >
> > That shows the details. But
Mike M wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/usr/src/newer/ss7box$ update-alternatives --display rsh
> bash: update-alternatives: command not found
It's in /usr/sbin, which probably isn't in your PATH.
Craig
pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Wednesday 02 April 2003 00:56, Bob Proulx wrote:
> Noah Meyerhans wrote:
> > ls -l `which rsh` /etc/alternatives/rsh
> > should answer your question.
>
> That shows the details. But this seems more in the spirit of things.
>
> update-alternatives --display rs
Noah Meyerhans wrote:
> ls -l `which rsh` /etc/alternatives/rsh
> should answer your question.
That shows the details. But this seems more in the spirit of things.
update-alternatives --display rsh
Bob
pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Tuesday 01 April 2003 18:09, Noah Meyerhans wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 01, 2003 at 05:57:33PM -0500, Mike M wrote:
> > On my Debian 3 sparc machine there is no rshd running and there is no
> > shell or login entry in /etc/inetd.conf. There is an sshd process. I am
> > still
On Tue, Apr 01, 2003 at 05:57:33PM -0500, Mike M wrote:
[snipped description of magic rsh talking to sshd]
Well, at my sid system here, rsh is a symlink to ssh via the
alternatives system.
01:26 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ which rsh
/usr/bin/rsh
01:26 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ file /usr/bin/rsh
/usr/bin/rsh
Mike M wrote:
> On my Debian 3 sparc machine there is no rshd running and there is no shell
> or login entry in /etc/inetd.conf. There is an sshd process. I am still
> able to rsh in from a Debian 3 i386 machine. From a RH6.1 I get connection
> refused when I try to rsh to
On Tue, Apr 01, 2003 at 05:57:33PM -0500, Mike M wrote:
> On my Debian 3 sparc machine there is no rshd running and there is no shell
> or login entry in /etc/inetd.conf. There is an sshd process. I am still
> able to rsh in from a Debian 3 i386 machine. From a RH6.1 I get c
On Tue, Apr 01, 2003 at 05:57:33PM -0500, Mike M wrote:
> On my Debian 3 sparc machine there is no rshd running and there is no shell
> or login entry in /etc/inetd.conf. There is an sshd process. I am still
> able to rsh in from a Debian 3 i386 machine. From a RH6.1 I get c
On my Debian 3 sparc machine there is no rshd running and there is no shell
or login entry in /etc/inetd.conf. There is an sshd process. I am still
able to rsh in from a Debian 3 i386 machine. From a RH6.1 I get connection
refused when I try to rsh to the Debian 3 sparc machine.
On the
On Thu, Dec 05, 2002 at 12:38:07PM -0800, Vineet Kumar wrote:
> * sean finney ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [021205 11:06]:
> > wow, i didn't know they had that option! i remember discussing this
> > with some folks on the netbsd mailing list a while back, and the general
> > consensus was that "it would be
* sean finney ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [021205 11:06]:
> wow, i didn't know they had that option! i remember discussing this
> with some folks on the netbsd mailing list a while back, and the general
> consensus was that "it would be really cool if ssh had that option". how
> long has this been availa
esses outright, which is as convenient
> as .rhosts (no user keys to manage) but not so easy to spoof. IMHO, rsh
> is dead. ssh's authentication options are light years ahead, and the
> encryption overhead is small if you use blowfish, and nothing if you
> compile wi
ng IP addresses outright, which is as convenient
as .rhosts (no user keys to manage) but not so easy to spoof. IMHO, rsh
is dead. ssh's authentication options are light years ahead, and the
encryption overhead is small if you use blowfish, and nothing if you
compile with -cnone support.
good
On Thu, Dec 05, 2002 at 09:40:50AM -0500, sean finney wrote:
> of course if the entire cluster is locked in another room and on
> a completely private net, you might not be gaining that much security,
> and i'll bet performance is a bit faster without all that encryption.
A halfway solution might
2002 at 01:02:59PM +0100, Hannes Loeffler wrote:
> Hi,
>
> our cluster configuration has a master node with two NICs: one connected to the
> outside world, one for a private network. The software we use is parallelized
> via MIPCH, hence either rsh or ssh will be used to make conn
Hi,
our cluster configuration has a master node with two NICs: one connected to the
outside world, one for a private network. The software we use is parallelized
via MIPCH, hence either rsh or ssh will be used to make connections. Every user
on the cluster needs to access all the machines
On Fri, Nov 01, 2002 at 08:47:00AM -0800, Craig Dickson wrote:
> Colin Watson wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 31, 2002 at 01:38:38PM -0800, Craig Dickson wrote:
> > > Do a Google search for "PuTTY SSH Windows". PuTTY is a nice, free
> > > terminal emulator for Windows
> >
> > ... and soon Unix. :) (pterm i
Colin Watson wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 31, 2002 at 01:38:38PM -0800, Craig Dickson wrote:
> > R Ransbottom wrote:
> > > My first concern is what to run on win98se that will handle
> > > ssl and provide good terminal emulation, and samba. (I don't
> > > know much about windows or its culture.) What to
On Thu, Oct 31, 2002 at 01:38:38PM -0800, Craig Dickson wrote:
> R Ransbottom wrote:
> > My first concern is what to run on win98se that will handle
> > ssl and provide good terminal emulation, and samba. (I don't
> > know much about windows or its culture.) What to run?
>
> Do a Google search f
On Thu, Oct 31, 2002 at 01:38:38PM -0800, Craig Dickson wrote:
> R Ransbottom wrote:
> > My first concern is what to run on win98se that will handle
> > ssl and provide good terminal emulation, and samba. (I don't
> > know much about windows or its culture.) What to run?
> Do a Google search fo
R Ransbottom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-10-31 16:39:09 -0500]:
> The default installation of ssh seems to want to replace rlogin
> outright. I want to run ssh/ssl beside rlogin and then phase rlogin out.
> How to?
rlogin and rsh can be 'alternative' programs. Short answe
R Ransbottom wrote:
> My first concern is what to run on win98se that will handle
> ssl and provide good terminal emulation, and samba. (I don't
> know much about windows or its culture.) What to run?
Do a Google search for "PuTTY SSH Windows". PuTTY is a nice, free terminal
emulator for Window
At work we've been running a linux network for the past six years.
This is a isolated network.
Everything is linux except for three machines.
One dual boots win98se to run a payroll program.
One mostly runs in win98se to run a credit card processing program.
One runs SCO to handle a
* FU ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [020228 12:10]:
> Setting up exim (3.33-1.1) ...
> Error: system's FQDN hostname
> (pa1_2.mildred.cpsc.ucalgary.ca) doesn't
> match
> RFC1035 syntax; cannot configure the mail system.
> dpkg: error processing exim (--configure):
> subprocess post-installation script retur
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> While I was installing the rsh-server, I encountered
> the following problems.
> Setting up exim (3.33-1.1) ...
> Error: system's FQDN hostname (pa1_2.mildred.cpsc.ucalgary.ca) doesn't match
> RFC1035 syntax; cannot configure the m
Hi,
While I was installing the rsh-server, I encountered
the following problems.
Reading Package Lists... Done
Building Dependency Tree... Done
0 packages upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove
and 1 not
upgraded.
4 packages not fully installed or removed.
Need to get 0B of archives
On Sun, Oct 21, 2001 at 01:20:28PM +0200, Raffaele Sandrini wrote:
> I'd like to use rsh. Yes my network is 100% secure cause its not
> connected to anything insecure.
> But i think there is no rsh in Debian. If i type "man rsh" i get the
> manpage of ssh. If i execute
Hi,
I'd like to use rsh. Yes my network is 100% secure
cause its not connected to anything insecure.
But i think there is no rsh in Debian. If i type
"man rsh" i get the manpage of ssh. If i execute "rsh" i get ssh...
Is it forbidden to use rsh? :-))
cheers,
Raffaele
on Thu, Oct 11, 2001 at 10:05:44AM -0400, Walter Tautz ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
wrote:
> I am allowing rsh access from a select client list
> by adding them to .rhosts file which only read permission
> and this works. Yeah I know this is inherent insecure but
> it is required f
On Thu, 2001-10-11 at 09:05, Walter Tautz wrote:
> I am allowing rsh access from a select client list
> by adding them to .rhosts file which only read permission
> and this works. Yeah I know this is inherent insecure but
> it is required for what I am trying to do.
>
I am allowing rsh access from a select client list
by adding them to .rhosts file which only read permission
and this works. Yeah I know this is inherent insecure but
it is required for what I am trying to do.
Currently inetd.conf has tcpd wrappers
which runs in.rshd. Strangely enough
After apt-get upgrading a server and rebooting ssh and rsh no loger will
work to hosts in /etc/hosts giving these errors
rsh server1
rcmd: getaddrinfo: Name or service not known
Does anyone know which package has caused this (so I can stop it
happening on my other 40 servers!) or better still a
By default, rcp is linked (in /etc/alternatives) to scp which is (in my limited
understanding) a secure version based on openssh.
When I try to do a rcp with a computer without openssh I obtain "Secure
connection to mypc refused"
What can I do (on my computer) ?
Is is possible
specifically (as ROOT) works as non root user
i run rsh mydebianhost
and it prompt me for a password. I type the correct password and
it still doesn't let me in.
However,
rsh mydebianhost
works
this is from a solaris host to debian as root. Is there someplace
I have to allow root a
> From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Oct 20 15:00:13 PDT 2000
...
> I use rsh routinely on potato you did get the appropriate packages?
> rsh-client and rsh-server? They are not installed by default.
>
You are right, Jeff. I somehow missed the rsh-server package the first time
around.
Tom
I use rsh routinely on potato you did get the appropriate packages?
rsh-client and rsh-server? They are not installed by default.
Jeff
Tom Kuiper wrote:
>
> I just installed potato (2.2) on a new server and tried unsuccessfully to set
> up a daily rdist to it from an old machine runnin
Hello,
On the remote machine, you have to put an entry in the /etc/hosts.equiv file
containing the name of your machine (locale !) and your user name. Then you
should be able to use rlogin and rsh. There is an rsh client and server package
in potato, although ssh is prefered.
Greetings
I just installed potato (2.2) on a new server and tried unsuccessfully to set
up a daily rdist to it from an old machine running bo (2.0). After rdist
failed, I discovered that rsh, which rdist uses by default, (and rlogin) are
seriously disabled under potato. I guess it's a security fe
I found out about the "-h" option. Stupid me for not seeing that
earlier. :-)
Sven
Hi list
I am unable to do an rsync as root as client. As regular user I had to
set up a ~/.rhosts file on the server, that was all.
Now, for root I too set up that file on the rsync server, but rshd still
won't let me have my rsh?! What's wrong here? Here some infos:
Server log:
-
> Greetings. Just upgraded from slink to potato; rlogin, rlogind and rsh
> seem to be missing. They were there before the upgrade, so something
> during the process hosed them. Anyone know which package(s) I need to
> restore to retrieve these programs? Thanks...
>
rsh-client
Greetings. Just upgraded from slink to potato; rlogin, rlogind and rsh
seem to be missing. They were there before the upgrade, so something
during the process hosed them. Anyone know which package(s) I need to
restore to retrieve these programs? Thanks...
Regards
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
"Ralf G. R. Bergs" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I need to rsh into a different account on another local host, but keep
> my original environment. The user should NOT be prompted for a
> password (this is easy, using
That is awfully insecureouch.
- Original Message -
From: "Ralf G. R. Bergs" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Debian GNU/Linux User Mailing List"
Sent: Wednesday, May 10, 2000 6:54 PM
Subject: How to "rsh" but keep original user's environment?
>
Hi there,
by no means am I a shell guru, so I'm stuck with a (presumably) quite simple
problem.
I need to rsh into a different account on another local host, but keep my
original environment. The user should NOT be prompted for a password (this is
easy, using .rhost).
The problem I
>>>>> "Paul" == Paul McAvoy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Paul> Don't know too much about rsh, but you would probably be
Paul> better off with SSH as it is (more) secure and offers the
Paul> same functionality.
... or the Kerberos ve
"Christopher S. Swingley" wrote:
>
> > rsh a redhat linux server from my debian server...and i have no idea how to
> > get it to work.
>
> To do this you need four things on your Red Hat system (or any UNIX for
> that matter):
>
> * The user's h
Don't know too much about rsh, but you would probably be better off with SSH
as it is (more) secure and offers the same functionality.
- Paul
On Thu, Jan 13, 2000 at 04:07:10PM +1300, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> hi
>
> i asked this question before but no one answered... not too
> rsh a redhat linux server from my debian server...and i have no idea how to
> get it to work.
To do this you need four things on your Red Hat system (or any UNIX for
that matter):
* The user's home directory on the remote machine must have a
~/.rhosts file with the add
hi
i asked this question before but no one answered... not too sure why as it
is not a cryptic question. So, i will ask again.
To rsh a Unix host from Debian i have to put the Debain server address in
the .Rhosts file on the Unix Server and that works great. I now want to
rsh a redhat linux
hiya
what are the files needed to be updated to allow rsh (remote shell) to
another linux server? is it hosts.equiv/hosts.allow? I use .rhosts for
Unix servers but .rhosts seems not to work for Linux.
thanx
Hi
I have added the machines name into .rhosts file but i still get a
"permission denied" mesage when trying to rsh -l It's just strange
that this particular PC is having problems whereas rsh works fine on the
rest. Is there any other validation file that i need to change apa
George Bonser wrote:
> I am wondering if there might be some giant delay in resolving the
> hostname (so a .rhosts lookup might work). A test of this would be ...
> does the total real time stay about the same if you double the transaction
> size.
since installing ssh, i found that simple r* co
George Bonser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> so my guess is that whatever the problem is, it is fixed in a newer
> version of one of the following:
>
> linux kernel
> netstd package
One thing I forgot to mention is that the machine is running slink &
2.0.36. I was considering an upgrade to potato,
I posted previously about slow rdump times from linux to solaris. I
later tried dumping a local partition to another partition on the same
linux box, and it was blazing fast with no errors. So then I just
tried sending packets from linux to (a pipe to rsh to) solaris and
timing it. In this
p nowait root/usr/sbin/tcpd in.rshd -hlL
> ^^
>
> This disables the use of ~/.rhosts *except for root* (-l) and allows
> root's rsh (-h). See man 8 in.rshd and man 3 ruserok.
&g
allows
root's rsh (-h). See man 8 in.rshd and man 3 ruserok.
Hope this helps.
Cheers. Bye.
Ph. A.
--
//\\
\\//
///\\\
S
Hi there !
I would like to do a rsh from one machine to another being root.
Debian said Permission denied
Yes it is dangerous but i would like to do it.
thanks
of course .rhosts is positionned
machine1 root
Xavier
__
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
rs cassiel.localdomain;
to do this). If your client doesn't pick this up, you could always
set up /etc/resolv.conf yourself.
> The lam daemon requires the ability to rsh into the other nodes. But I need
> a password to access the other systems. We are on a token-ring network.
On Fri, 9 Apr 1999 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> OK, but if the addresses change occasionally, then it would still be a mess
> even with setting up a DNS, yes? (given that the hosts file needs IP
> addresses?)
The suggestion of dynamic dns is probably the best one. Check out
dhis.org.
> Out of
On Fri, 9 Apr 1999 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, on
> 04/09/99
>at 08:52 AM, Jonathan Guthrie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> >Of course it is! If the LAN was mostly static, then I'd suggest using the
> >/etc/hosts files on each computer, but if things are going to change w
In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, on
04/09/99
at 08:52 AM, Jonathan Guthrie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>Of course it is! If the LAN was mostly static, then I'd suggest using the
>/etc/hosts files on each computer, but if things are going to change with
>any frequency at all, then you'd probably want to
On Thu, 8 Apr 1999 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I'm trying to set up 2-4 Debian boxes at school to run in parallel
> under lam (MPI) and have several problems frustrating me. The
> machines are currently Not recognized by their names (eg.
> dasher.myschool.edu ) but rather only by IP address.
> Is
e ISC dhclient running.
The lam daemon requires the ability to rsh into the other nodes. But I need
a password to access the other systems. We are on a token-ring network.
Is it possible to get the systems recognized by their names? IP addresses
change under this system at times, so names make it e
I found the answer to my earlier question about why I could
use rsh from my own account but not from root even though
.rhosts and hosts.equiv were set. In inetd.conf it's necessary
to add the -h option to rshd. I don't know how big a security
risk that is, or if there's a goo
ows
Mar 19 13:02:19 frankie rshd[779]: rsh denied to [EMAIL PROTECTED] as root:
cmd='rsync --server -vunlWogDtpr --delete --force . /backupa1';
Permission denied.
/root/.rhosts on each system names the other system.
So does /etc/hosts.equiv
I'm copying from a hamm system to a slink system.
I have a linux cluster (a beowulf), and I want to be able to use rsh with
root to the nodes. I found the "CONSOLE" line in /etc/login.defs and
commented it out. Now root is allowed to rsh in to the machines, but I
can't, for the life of me, figure out how to allow root to r
Andreas Rapp wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> How can I allow other hosts to rcp or run rsh on my host ?
>
> I've set all permissions in hosts.allow, so rlogin, telnet works;
> only for rcp and rsh the permission is denied.
rsh and rcp have also other authentication files.
see man
Hi,
How can I allow other hosts to rcp or run rsh on my host ?
I've set all permissions in hosts.allow, so rlogin, telnet works;
only for rcp and rsh the permission is denied.
thanks,
Andreas Rapp
I am trying to use rdist to distribute system files from
one Debian host to nine Debian desktop hosts.
How/Where does one set up in.rshd so that root can rsh in as rdist attempts?
In /etc/inetd.conf, as below? Or what?
# /etc/inetd.conf: see inetd(8) for further informations.
#:BSD: Shell
Pat Kennedy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Just from the point of view of a typical user, eg, me just doing
> a quick scan of the debian-user archives doesn't take all that long.
> They're very up-to-date, usually just a day or so behind. Browsing
> the archives with navigator presents a nice thr
He who wonders discovers that this in itself is wonder.
-- M.C. Escher
On Wed, 15 Jul 1998, Raul Miller wrote:
> Dale Scheetz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > Well, I disagree with this point of view. Yes, Debian wishes to support
> > > newcomers to Linux. That is why we have
1 - 100 of 147 matches
Mail list logo
