Dan Ritter writes:
> [...]
> In particular, Debian has the mailfront package, which is Bruce
> Guenter's qmail-compatible set of tools. From the description:
>
> It contains complete SMTP, QMQP, QMTP, and POP3 front-ends as well as
> an authentication module for IMAP. The mail delivery front
On 2021-12-24 17:00+0200, Georgi Naplatanov wrote:
> On 12/24/21 14:58, 황병희 wrote:
> > Hi, there is no qmail package in bullseye. what's wrong?
> The software seems unmaintained for a long time [1]. According to
> wikipedia the last release is from 1998 and I think there was an
> incompatibility wi
황병희 wrote:
> > 3) Build and install qmail from your preferred source tree.
And I've seen your posts on the qmail list, so you should
definitely take their advice on which version to use.
> > 4) Set up the symlink from /usr/sbin/sendmail to /var/qmail/bin/sendmail
> >or wherever you placed th
On 12/24/21 14:58, 황병희 wrote:
> Hi, there is no qmail package in bullseye. what's wrong?
The software seems unmaintained for a long time [1]. According to
wikipedia the last release is from 1998 and I think there was an
incompatibility with the qmail's license and Debian. I've never seen
qmail's b
Dear Greg,
Greg Wooledge writes:
> On Fri, Dec 24, 2021 at 09:58:11PM +0900, 황병희 wrote:
>> Hi, there is no qmail package in bullseye. what's wrong?
>
> If you wish to use qmail, the recommended way to do it is:
>
> 1) Install equivs, and use it to build the "mta-local" package.
>There's an e
Andy Smith writes:
> Hello,
>
> On Fri, Dec 24, 2021 at 09:58:11PM +0900, 황병희 wrote:
>> Hi, there is no qmail package in bullseye. what's wrong?
>
> It was removed from Debian in May 2020 and hasn't been in a release
> since buster:
>
> https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=961289
On Fri, Dec 24, 2021 at 09:58:11PM +0900, 황병희 wrote:
> Hi, there is no qmail package in bullseye. what's wrong?
If you wish to use qmail, the recommended way to do it is:
1) Install equivs, and use it to build the "mta-local" package.
There's an example file for it:
/usr/share/doc/equivs/ex
Hello,
On Fri, Dec 24, 2021 at 09:58:11PM +0900, 황병희 wrote:
> Hi, there is no qmail package in bullseye. what's wrong?
It was removed from Debian in May 2020 and hasn't been in a release
since buster:
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=961289
If you still have interest, can m
It seems that netqmail (the package that provides qmail) was removed
last year:
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=961289
On Fri, Dec 24, 2021 at 09:58:11PM +0900, 황병희 wrote:
> Hi, there is no qmail package in bullseye. what's wrong?
> Bellow are my environments:
>
> -- System Info
A quick check from my house reports that I cannot connect to port 25 on
that IP address. I suspect that either your ISP is blocking inbound
connections to port 25 or your local firewall is doing the same. I run
a small isp and we do similar things for our residential customers to
prevent thin
On Mon, Apr 24, 2006 at 07:52:18AM -0400, Daniel D Jones wrote:
> Some troubleshooting revealed that checkpassword was complaining about
> errno. A bit of time on Google indicated that I should modify conf-cc
> to include the errno.h header and recompile checkpassword. I did and
> the errno er
Jay Zach wrote:
> Jay Zach wrote:
>
>>For some reason I keep getting multiple messages of the same message to my
>>inbox. Qmail redelivers all messages multiple times, like it thinks that it
>>doesn't deliver them, even though it does. I play around with it and change
>>permissions, and restart
Jay Zach wrote:
> For some reason I keep getting multiple messages of the same message to my
> inbox. Qmail redelivers all messages multiple times, like it thinks that it
> doesn't deliver them, even though it does. I play around with it and change
> permissions, and restart qmail, and it seems t
On Tue, Jun 28, 2005 at 12:29:18AM +0530, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I installed qmail-src and removed its patched qmail-1.03 folder.
> I unzipped its qmail_1.03.orig.tar.gz file and then patched it with the
> following patches from qmailrocks.org:
> qmail-1.03-forcetls-20040703.patch
> qm
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Does anyone know what the package name is for qmail on sarge? I have
> tried to do an apt-get install qmail but it did not work it said the
> package may not be available any more.
There is no binary package for qmail because of licensing. There is a
qmail-src source p
On Wed, May 26, 2004 at 02:27:14PM -0500 or thereabouts, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Does anyone know what the package name is for qmail on sarge? I have
> tried to do an apt-get install qmail but it did not work it said the
> package may not be available any more.
Perhaps it's in contrib, or no
Hi,
I don't know, but did you try
% apt-cache search
and
% apt-cache search | grep qmail
to find out?
hope this helps.
Sylvain.
On Wednesday 26 May 2004 21:27, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Da> Does anyone know what the package name is for qmail on sarge? I have
Da> tried to do an apt-get install qm
Daniel Guido wrote:
> I downloaded the qmail-src package from unstable and want to know how to
> get SMTP AUTH and TLS to work.
I don't know how to make it work with the Debian package, but if you
download the vanilla qmail sources (or even better - netqmail) from
www.qmail.org, there is also a l
David Fokkema wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 03, 2004 at 11:27:19AM +0200, Haim Ashkenazi wrote:
>> Paul Johnson wrote:
>>
>> > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>> > Hash: SHA1
>> >
>> > On Wed, Mar 03, 2004 at 02:38:02AM +0200, Haim Ashkenazi wrote:
>> >> The clamav is not a bad solution (although I wo
On Wed, Mar 03, 2004 at 11:27:19AM +0200, Haim Ashkenazi wrote:
> Paul Johnson wrote:
>
> > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> > Hash: SHA1
> >
> > On Wed, Mar 03, 2004 at 02:38:02AM +0200, Haim Ashkenazi wrote:
> >> The clamav is not a bad solution (although I wouldn't recommend it to a
> >> c
Paul Johnson wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On Wed, Mar 03, 2004 at 02:38:02AM +0200, Haim Ashkenazi wrote:
>> The clamav is not a bad solution (although I wouldn't recommend it to a
>> company).
>
> This intrigues me. Why wouldn't you recommend it to a company?
Be
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, Mar 03, 2004 at 02:38:02AM +0200, Haim Ashkenazi wrote:
> The clamav is not a bad solution (although I wouldn't recommend it to a
> company).
This intrigues me. Why wouldn't you recommend it to a company?
- --
.''`. Paul Johnson <[EMAI
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, Mar 02, 2004 at 02:14:41PM -0600, Rick Weinbender wrote:
> Can anyone recommend a good open source (email)
> anti-virus solution for Qmail running on Debian Stable.
I solved this for exim, if you figure it out for qmail, lemme know and
I'll up
Rick Weinbender wrote:
> Can anyone recommend a good open source (email)
> anti-virus solution for Qmail running on Debian Stable.
> Or even a reasonably priced commercial solution
> if it is good.
Bye
> *
> I see M$ has bought out RAV-anti-virus.
> I've been looking at Clam anti-virus
The clama
On Tue, Mar 02, 2004 at 02:14:41PM -0600, Rick Weinbender wrote:
> Can anyone recommend a good open source (email)
> anti-virus solution for Qmail running on Debian Stable.
> Or even a reasonably priced commercial solution
> if it is good.
> *
> I see M$ has bought out RAV-anti-virus.
> I've been l
On Tue, 2 Mar 2004, Rick Weinbender wrote:
> Can anyone recommend a good open source (email)
> anti-virus solution for Qmail running on Debian Stable.
> Or even a reasonably priced commercial solution
> if it is good.
> *
> I see M$ has bought out RAV-anti-virus.
> I've been looking at Clam anti-
On Mon, Dec 01, 2003 at 03:19:44AM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 30, 2003 at 10:19:28AM -0800, Deryk Barker wrote:
> > enough to contain the axioms of arithmetic, then there are statements
> > which can be made but not proved within that system. It is possible to
> > add further axi
On Sun, Nov 30, 2003 at 10:19:28AM -0800, Deryk Barker wrote:
> enough to contain the axioms of arithmetic, then there are statements
> which can be made but not proved within that system. It is possible to
> add further axioms to prove the statements, but then this richer
> axiomatic base will lea
On Sun, Nov 30, 2003 at 10:19:28AM -0800, Deryk Barker wrote:
> Thus spake Tom ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> ...
> > I thought it was neither complete (the doesn't capture all truths thing)
> > nor consistent (may contain both a statement and its complement)[1].
> > But I can look that up.
> >
> > The S
Thus spake Tom ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
...
> I thought it was neither complete (the doesn't capture all truths thing)
> nor consistent (may contain both a statement and its complement)[1].
> But I can look that up.
>
> The Stanford prof told me the Lambda calculus (Lisp-ish stuff) almost
> proved o
On Sun, Nov 30, 2003 at 07:07:18AM -0800, Tom wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 30, 2003 at 07:01:16AM -0800, Tom wrote:
> > On Sun, Nov 30, 2003 at 09:27:37AM -0500, Carl Fink wrote:
> > > On Sun, Nov 30, 2003 at 12:00:05AM -0800, Tom wrote:
> > >
> > > > ... that in any sufficiently complex formal system the
On Sun, Nov 30, 2003 at 07:01:16AM -0800, Tom wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 30, 2003 at 09:27:37AM -0500, Carl Fink wrote:
> > On Sun, Nov 30, 2003 at 12:00:05AM -0800, Tom wrote:
> >
> > > ... that in any sufficiently complex formal system there are no guarantees
> > > it won't grind out falsehoods ...
>
On Sun, Nov 30, 2003 at 09:27:37AM -0500, Carl Fink wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 30, 2003 at 12:00:05AM -0800, Tom wrote:
>
> > ... that in any sufficiently complex formal system there are no guarantees
> > it won't grind out falsehoods ...
>
> But Goedel's Theorem actually says that in any formal system
On Sun, Nov 30, 2003 at 12:00:05AM -0800, Tom wrote:
> ... that in any sufficiently complex formal system there are no guarantees
> it won't grind out falsehoods ...
But Goedel's Theorem actually says that in any formal system, there will be
true propositions that cannot be proved (without going
On Sat, Nov 29, 2003 at 11:19:37PM -0800, Alvin Oga wrote:
> and you weren't in it for the $$$ ??
> (just that bugs and exploits exists? )
When I learned about Godel's work I really freaked out.
When I learned there are certain true statements which are not
expressible by manipulation of symbo
On Wed, Feb 12, 2003 at 08:30:16AM -, Kevin Smith wrote:
> I've had a look at the SpamAssassin which for some reason does not start
> using the init.d scripts that come with DEB package using apt-get
> install spamassassin.
You need to enable it. See /usr/share/doc/spamassassin/README.Debian,
Derrick 'dman' Hudson declaimed:
> On Sun, Jan 26, 2003 at 09:03:58AM -0900, Andy wrote:
snip...
> Personally I am opposed to qmail, mainly for reasons outlined here :
> http://www-dt.e-technik.uni-dortmund.de/~ma/qmail-bugs.html
> http://cr.yp.to/qmail/dist.html
> however if you want to
On Fri, Oct 25, 2002 at 09:18:21AM +0800, david hong wrote:
> All services running fine.
> when i test to send a local mail, i can see the mail sent out
> successfuly at the mail.log file.
> However, i can find the mail at /var/spool/mail.
>
> anyone knows where the mail store?
Qmail normally de
On Wed, 23 Oct 2002 15:04:29 -0500 Steve Waterman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> I don't disagree with you. However, after a bunch of work trying to use
> the Debian packages, I went with the Life With Qmail way and have a
> wonderfully working system.
I had just the opposite experience. I've d
I don't disagree with you. However, after a bunch of work trying to use the
Debian packages, I went with the Life With Qmail way and have a wonderfully
working system. Just my $0.02. Good luck.
Steve
On Wednesday 23 October 2002 11:43, Jamin W.Collins wrote:
> On Wed, 23 Oct 2002 10:52:30
Title: RE: Qmail - Maildir, Resolved
I don't know why but it works with the new users I have created but not with the user I was working with.
I'm already on qmail mailing list but since this install is specific to debian I choosed to ask here, thanx anyway.
Ps: yes some this
On Wed, 23 Oct 2002 10:52:30 -0500 Steve Waterman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> I would assume you could get more help from the qmail site - even though
> you are installing it on Debian, the config really isn't platform
> specific as much as qmail specific.
Actually, the Debian installation of qm
On Wed, 23 Oct 2002 14:31:27 +0100 Mikael Jirari <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I went into /etc/init.d/qmail and changed
> alias_empty="|/usr/sbin/qmail-procmail"
> into
> alias_empty="./Maildir/"
> I previously created a Maildir directory with maildirmake
> But when I send an email, it doesn't g
On Wed, Oct 23, 2002 at 02:31:27PM +0100, Mikael Jirari wrote:
> Hi I'm setting up Qmail on a debian machine.
> I want my mails ton be stored in the Maildir format.
> I went into /etc/init.d/qmail and changed
> alias_empty="|/usr/sbin/qmail-procmail"
> into
> alias_empty="./Maildir/"
> I previous
I would assume you could get more help from the qmail site - even though you
are installing it on Debian, the config really isn't platform specific as
much as qmail specific.
Start here:
http://www.qmail.org/
Steve
On Wednesday 23 October 2002 08:31, Mikael Jirari wrote:
> Hi I'm setting up
On Tue, Oct 22, 2002 at 07:24:47PM +0100, Mikael Jirari wrote:
> But it's always very difficult(to me) to uninstall exim !!!
> What would you do if you want to remove exim without removing apache for
> instance ?
Install another MTA in packaged form, or a dummy MTA package. If you're
using apt-get
Title: RE: Qmail installation RESOLVED !
But it's always very difficult(to me) to uninstall exim !!!
What would you do if you want to remove exim without removing apache for instance ?
I don't know equivs, what is it ? where can I find a short or good documentation about it ?
On Tue, 22 Oct 2002 18:06:31 +0100 mike moon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> With that experience I arrive to the conclusion that
> - Removing exim is difficult.
I didn't have much of a problem replacing exim with qmail, but I did do it
all at one time. I had the qmail deb ready and installed it an
On Tue, Oct 22, 2002 at 06:06:31PM +0100, mike moon wrote:
> With that experience I arrive to the conclusion that
> - Removing exim is difficult.
> - A lot of packages which are using mail i.e apache are too strongly
> attached to exim, because we should be able to set up a webserver without
> havi
Title: RE: Qmail installation RESOLVED !
I deleted every single file related with exim, I removed procmail and mailx and reinstalled them then reinstall qmail.
The biggest problem was with mailx, then I did the same with procmail and everything went ok.
With that experience I arrive to the
Title: RE: Qmail installation
Ok I restarted the installation from scratch, script has created qmail users.
To remove exim I did "dpkg -r --force-all exim"
When the installation unpacks exim it complains
Do you want to install qmail_1.03-24_i386.deb now? [Yn] Y
dpkg: regarding
Configfiles are stored in
/etc/qmail, which is linked to /var/qmail/control
starting and stopping is done with
/etc/init.d/qmail start
/etc/init.d/qmail stop
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Title: RE: Qmail installation
apt-get --force-depends --purge remove exim doesn't work actually it answers
E: Command line option --force-depends is not understood
But to remove exim I did dpkg -r --force-all exim
I did
apt-get install qmail-src
apt-get install ucspi-tcp-src
You could do it like that :)
apt-get install qmail-src
apt-get install ucspi-tcp-src
build-qmail
build-ucspi-tcp
apt-get --force-depends --purge remove exim
dpkg -i ucspi-tcp.deb qmail.deb
Eric Böse-Wolf
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Co
me)...are your DNS server working fine?
>
> NN
> - Original Message -
> From: "Michiel Quellhorst" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Wednesday, September 04, 2002 4:30 PM
> Subject: Re: qmail
>
>
>> port nr. 25 is op
port nr. 25 is open.
If I send an email to my own account its delivered but when I send an to
another adres it isn't delivered.
/var/log/qmail/smtpd/current says:
QMAILDUID, NOFILESGID, MAXSMTPD, or LOCAL is unset in
/var/qmail/supervise/qmail-smtpd/run
Here is the /var/qmail/supervise/qmail/sm
On Wed, 4 Sep 2002 13:38:32 +0200 (CEST)
"Michiel Quellhorst" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I just installed qmail following life with qmail.
> Now I tested it by doing: echo To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] |
> /var/qmail/bin/qmail-inject
> This failed!!
>
> Please help.
This is really more pertinent to t
On Thu, Apr 11, 2002 at 10:51:22AM +, Joakim Friberg wrote:
> Hello!
>
> I am trying to set up a Qmail-server on a GNU/Linux Debian
> 2.2 system. And has it setup to delivery to ./Maildir/
>
> I've got it to send messages through smtp to a remote host.
> The problem i when I try to sen a mes
On Sunday 03 March 2002 07:32 am, David Gardi pronounced:
> Hi,
> anyone know how to change postmaster password using qmail?
> David.
david:
i am not sure what you mean by "change postmaster password using qmail" as
there are no passwords "within" qmail.
please let me know what you are trying t
On Sun, Mar 03, 2002 at 04:32:35PM +0100, David Gardi wrote:
> Hi,
> anyone know how to change postmaster password using qmail?
qmail can't do that.
What's wrong with "sudo passwd postmaster" ?
-dsr-
On Mar 04 2002, Eamon Roque wrote:
> Any hints? RTFMs welcome, but which one?!
You have to enable (selective) relaying from localhost. See
/var/qmail/doc/FAQ, question 5.4.
Hope this helps, Roger...
--
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've installed QMail,Vpopmail and Courier-IMAP (.deb Packages) on my
> "woody" System.
>
> POP Mail download works fine:
> user: "username%domain.com"
> pass: "xyz"
>
> IMAP Mail download doesn't work with "username%domain.de" (username)
> and "xyz" (password). W
also sprach Américo Rocha <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002.01.04.2340 +0100]:
> My ~/.qmail states:
>
> ./Maildir/
> |preline /usr/bin/procmail
it should just be the procmail line, not the Maildir line. procmail
isn't even invoked that way afaik.
--
martin; (greetings from the heart of th
Dragos wrote:
have you done it as the user in question, or as a root? (just to be sure,
many times I did it as root, and qmail couldn't write to it)
good luck
dragos
Root of course!
I got that to work. But I'm slowing slogging my way through the bad log
entries and the RTM's. Progr
On Wednesday 05 December 2001 02:26 pm, Tom Allison wrote:
> Dragos wrote:
> > On Wednesday 05 December 2001 01:54 pm, Tom Allison wrote:
> >>When I compiled my DNS - it ran an error that the DNS wasn't properly
> >>configured (it wasn't) and so I couldn't complete the configuration of
> >>some fil
Dragos wrote:
On Wednesday 05 December 2001 01:54 pm, Tom Allison wrote:
When I compiled my DNS - it ran an error that the DNS wasn't properly
configured (it wasn't) and so I couldn't complete the configuration of
some file called 'me'
How do I do that now? (DNS is fixed)
put in ../qmail/c
On Wednesday 05 December 2001 01:54 pm, Tom Allison wrote:
> When I compiled my DNS - it ran an error that the DNS wasn't properly
> configured (it wasn't) and so I couldn't complete the configuration of
> some file called 'me'
> How do I do that now? (DNS is fixed)
put in ../qmail/control/me you
Quoth [EMAIL PROTECTED],
> On Fri, Nov 30, 2001 at 05:28:15PM +0100, MH wrote:
> >
> > 2) But the debian package is quiet OK and you avoid the hassle of
> >fulfilling mta-dependencies otherwise.
>
> I let Deban install exim, and then disabled it from running.
You're better of install the eq
On Fri, Nov 30, 2001 at 04:58:22PM -0500, Tom Allison wrote:
> MH wrote:
>
> OK, I'm working on that, but I didn't think I would need it until I had
> passed the Debian installation path.
>
> > 2) But the debian package is quiet OK and you avoid the hassle of
> >fulfilling mta-dependencies o
MH wrote:
"dsr" == dsr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Still struggling with this installation.
dsr> Debian is great; Debian is wonderful.
dsr> Don't bother trying to get Debian to install qmail. Follow
dsr> the Life With qmail instructions at: www.lifewithqmail.org
> "dsr" == dsr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> 3) Don't know what's the purpose of your qmail-installation; I
>> installed it just for fun/masochistic experience and knew that
>> I was just wasting another 2 days of my lifetime ...
dsr> It's my primary mail server.
OK, dsr,
On Fri, Nov 30, 2001 at 05:28:15PM +0100, MH wrote:
>
> 2) But the debian package is quiet OK and you avoid the hassle of
>fulfilling mta-dependencies otherwise.
I let Deban install exim, and then disabled it from running.
> 3) Don't know what's the purpose of your qmail-installation; I
>
> "dsr" == dsr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Still struggling with this installation.
dsr> Debian is great; Debian is wonderful.
dsr> Don't bother trying to get Debian to install qmail. Follow
dsr> the Life With qmail instructions at: www.lifewithqmail.org
dsr> -dsr-
On Fri, Nov 30, 2001 at 07:09:23AM -0500, Tom Allison wrote:
> Paolo Falcone wrote:
>
> > Tom Allison wrote:
> >
> >
> >>So, how do I Purge exim and Install qmail without getting all these
> >>files screwed up?
> >>
> >
>
> Still struggling with this installation.
Debian is great; Debian is
Paolo Falcone wrote:
Tom Allison wrote:
So, how do I Purge exim and Install qmail without getting all these
files screwed up?
Still struggling with this installation.
Is ucspi-tcp-src REQUIRED or RECOMMENDED?
It seems that the package won't install without it, but it's not a
required
> "Tom" == Tom Allison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Tom> I tried to do the qmail install. did the build-qmail thing
Tom> and then tried to install the .deb package.
Tom> didn't work.
Tom> qmail conflicts with mail-transport-agent exim provides
Tom> mail-transport-agent an
Tom Allison wrote:
>So, how do I Purge exim and Install qmail without getting all these
>files screwed up?
Use dselect. When you try to purge a package that provides an MTA,
a dependency alert will be prompted. You'll see again that it would
also remove packages dependent on an MTA, but this ti
On Thu, Nov 29, 2001 at 06:34:43AM -0500, Tom Allison wrote:
> Colin Watson wrote:
> >Pretty much everything that depends on exim accepts mail-transport-agent
> >as an alternative, unless it has very specialized requirements. If it
> >doesn't, it's a bug. Since the qmail packages built from qmail-s
Colin Watson wrote:
On Wed, Nov 28, 2001 at 04:37:19PM -0500, Tom Allison wrote:
I know that the default installation is to use exim.
But I would like to use qmail in it's place on at least one server.
My question is this:
Are the dependencies for various email needing packages going to be ab
On Thu, Nov 29, 2001 at 06:10:47AM -0500, Tom Allison wrote:
> Colin Watson wrote:
> >Pretty much everything that depends on exim accepts mail-transport-agent
> >as an alternative, unless it has very specialized requirements. If it
> >doesn't, it's a bug. Since the qmail packages built from qmail-s
Colin Watson wrote:
Pretty much everything that depends on exim accepts mail-transport-agent
as an alternative, unless it has very specialized requirements. If it
doesn't, it's a bug. Since the qmail packages built from qmail-src
provide mail-transport-agent, you should be OK.
That's great!
On Wed, Nov 28, 2001 at 04:37:19PM -0500, Tom Allison wrote:
> I know that the default installation is to use exim.
> But I would like to use qmail in it's place on at least one server.
>
> My question is this:
> Are the dependencies for various email needing packages going to be able
> to unders
Ben Hartshorne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi everyone,
> I am experiencing a problem mentioned many many times on various
> mailing lists (a google search turned up several), but I have not been
> able to find a resolution anywhere.
> I followed the instructions in the qmail HOWTO v2 (posted m
my resolution:
apt-get --purge --force-yes remove qmail* ucspi-tcp* dot-forward fast-forward
apt-get install postfix
vi /etc/postfix/main.cf
postfix reload
-ben
On Sat, Oct 27, 2001 at 09:20:29AM -0700, Ben Hartshorne wrote:
> Hi everyone,
> I am experiencing a problem mentioned many many times
On Fri, 12 Oct 2001, Daniel Jones wrote:
> I have a file called S30qmail in /etc/rc2.d:
>
> /usr/local/bin/tcpserver 0 110 /var/qmail/bin/qmail-popup
> corwin.riddlemaster.org \
> /bin/checkpassword /var/qmail/bin/qmail-pop3d Maildir &
>
> smtp stream tcp nowait qmaild /var/qmail/bin/tcp-env t
On Fri, May 04, 2001 at 04:15:39PM +0100, john gennard wrote:
> I'm back again!
>
> Still trying to get qmail installed so that I can have a look at it.
>
> On ftp.debian, I found qmail-src_1.03-14.deb ( and also the
> dependency ucspi-tcp-src_0.84-1.deb). The ucspi package installs
> without pro
On Tue, Mar 13, 2001 at 09:33:30PM -0800, Nate Amsden wrote:
>
> sounds like they are not. while i haven't tried qmail on debian i would check
> to be sure the directories are writable by the group qmail and just to
> be safe the user qmailq(assuming your using normal qmail usernames ..). in
> sit
On Tue, Mar 13, 2001 at 09:33:30PM -0800, Nate Amsden wrote:
>
> sounds like they are not. while i haven't tried qmail on debian i would check
> to be sure the directories are writable by the group qmail and just to
> be safe the user qmailq(assuming your using normal qmail usernames ..). in
> sit
"Matteo S." wrote:
>
> hello! i have a problem with qmail+vpopmail:°
>
> after a lot of trouble, i discovered that new version of vpopmail wants in
> /var/qmail a bin directory and it is necessary make a link with /usr/sbin...
>
> now, i have added a domain and a user.I'am been able to login wi
On Tue, Mar 13, 2001 at 08:35:44AM -0500, Arcady Genkin wrote:
> Having replaced exim with qmail yesterday, I'd like to deal with the
> loggin issues, since qmail's logging is quite verbose. I notice that
> it logs seemingly identical information to all of the:
>
> /var/log/syslog
> /var/log/mail
The file /etc/qmail/control/me should contain the FQDN of your machine as it
wants to be known to other machines on the internet, e.g.:
exchange.tallan.com
I am surprised to hear you say that you have exim and that it's starting. dpkg
should prevent you from having two MTAs installed since it d
Quoth Hung Hin Lik, Shell,
> My system are using qmail w/ Maildir, how can I tell emacs to read the
> Maildir ? thank you..
I don't use emacs for mail myself, but if you check out www.qmail.org I
seem to recall there being mention of such things. One emacs mail system
that should work is ME
On Wednesday 29 November 2000 09:51, Erik Steffl wrote:
> you might want to check the glibc changes, maybe the interface to the
> xrealloc (is it standard function or some qmail derivative?) changed.
>
realloc() in glibc 2.1.3 sucks.
I don't know if it's fixed in 2.2.
- Davide
you might want to check the glibc changes, maybe the interface to the
xrealloc (is it standard function or some qmail derivative?) changed.
erik
Trey Nolen wrote:
>
> I have posted this question to the Qmail lists and newsgroups, but haven't
> gotten any replies at all. The only thing
On Wed, Jun 07, 2000 at 07:48:58AM -0700, Jay Kelly wrote:
> I thinking of switching over to qmail from sendmail and wanted to know if I
> install it with apt-get install?
You need to slow down, and you need to do the following:
1) Realize that this list is not a help-desk. All you do is post q
Hmm, it's lists.debian.org
--^
Perhaps this is just a typo in the mail or it could be the problem!
Ron Rademaker
On Wed, 7 Jun 2000, Jay Kelly wrote:
> I thinking of switching over to qmail from sendmail and wanted to know if I
> install it with apt-get install? when I use sendmail
On Wed, 7 Jun 2000, Jay Kelly wrote:
> I thinking of switching over to qmail from sendmail and wanted to know if I
> install it with apt-get install? when I use sendmail I am able to mail some
> addresses but not others. For example when I try to mail
You need to install qmail-src and ucspi-tcp
Jay Kelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> addresses but not others. For example when I try to mail
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] I receive an error "Host not found" but I can
> mail other email addresses.
> any thoughts will help
It's @lists.debian.org (note the `s' in the end of `lists').
--
Arcady Genkin
On Fri, 07 Apr 2000, john smith wrote:
> hi,
> when I try to install qmail after building it I get the error:
>
> green:/tmp/qmail# dpkg -i qmail_1.03-12_i386.deb
> (Reading database ... 28966 files and directories currently installed.)
> Unpacking qmail (from qmail_1.03-12_i386.deb) ...
> Perform
On Fri, 7 Apr 2000, john smith wrote:
> hi,
> when I try to install qmail after building it I get the error:
>
> green:/tmp/qmail# dpkg -i qmail_1.03-12_i386.deb
> (Reading database ... 28966 files and directories currently installed.)
> Unpacking qmail (from qmail_1.03-12_i386.deb) ...
> Perfo
1 - 100 of 178 matches
Mail list logo
