On Thu, Oct 14, 1999 at 12:43:12PM -0600, Alexis Maldonado wrote:
> Hello.
> It is possible. I have a Promise Ultra/66 board running with a Western
> Digital Expert 27.3GB, at UDMA/66.
> I'm using kernel 2.2.12, with patches that can be found on your local kernel
> mirror under people/hedrick.
Hi
Hello.
On Wed, Oct 13, 1999 at 08:15:12PM -0700, aphro wrote:
> i read in the kernel mailing list that UDMA66 isn't possible in the linux
> kernel yet. even with a patch its bound to cause lockups.
It is possible. I have a Promise Ultra/66 board running with a Western
Digital Expert 27.3GB, at
On Wed, Oct 13, 1999 at 08:15:12PM -0700, aphro wrote:
> i read in the kernel mailing list that UDMA66 isn't possible in the linux
> kernel yet. even with a patch its bound to cause lockups.
>
> http://kt.linuxcare.com/kt19990927_36.html#12
>
> "You can not currently use the second ATA-66 chann
i read in the kernel mailing list that UDMA66 isn't possible in the linux
kernel yet. even with a patch its bound to cause lockups.
http://kt.linuxcare.com/kt19990927_36.html#12
"You can not currently use the second ATA-66 channel under Linux. Unless
you have a rabbit in the hat to register/ser
I have a Stallion Brumby Multiport intelligent serial card. 4 port model. I
had this card working fine under 2.0.x series of kernels, and had it
compiled in as part of the kernel. I followed the info in the readme's for
the card, and edited /usr/src/linux-`kernel version`\char\istallion.c to
point
Only 6 days ago on the list...
On Wed, Aug 04, 1999 at 21:59:26 -0400, Timothy Burt wrote:
> Could it be some other motherboard problem? Or even the cpu?
http://www.bitwizard.nl/sig11 lists a whole list of problems that have
resulted in signal11 and related unpredicatable behaviours.
On Tue,
*- On 10 Aug, Guilherme Soares Zahn wrote about "Kernel 2.2.10 make error
(internal compiler error)"
> Hi there,
>
> I was trying to compile and install the 2.2.10 kernel, but something
> didn't come out so well as I expected...
>
> I did it the ¨general linux way¨, so I did:
>
> ma
Perhaps the "form factory" kernel-image-2.2.10 does not contain
'msdos' support? If so, you can probably use the 'vfat' filesystem
(which is backwards compatible) instead. Or, yes, build your own
image (the best way to do that would be via 'make-kpkg').
As for going back to an older kernel-imag
Jonas Steverud wrote:
> Used OS/2's fdisk and boot manager if that matters.
Fair enough. I don't know anything about OS/2's fdisk. Your /dev/hda2
may be different.
Matthew
Jonas,
I don't think that your dos partition would be on /dev/hda2. Dos fdisk
only lets you have two primary partions, and the second one is an
extended partion, which cant be mounted itself as it is only a container
for logical partitions, which appear in linux as /dev/hda[5678].
Check your parti
On 01-Aug-1999, Jonas Steverud <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I've just built a 2.2.10 kernel on my own (banging my own chest like
> Tarzan[1]) and compiled fat-fs-support as a module (and nls_cp437,
> vfat, hpfs, msdos, ...) but modprobe (or whatever reads
> /etc/conf.modules) complains when I bo
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Jonas Steverud) writes:
>
> I've just built a 2.2.10 kernel on my own (banging my own chest like
> Tarzan[1]) and compiled fat-fs-support as a module (and nls_cp437,
> vfat, hpfs, msdos, ...) but modprobe (or whatever reads
> /etc/conf.mod
Jonas Steverud <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I've just upgraded to the 2.2.10-kernel (using the
> kernel-image-package), I used 2.0.33 before and it worked without any
> problem.
>
> root% mount -t msdos /dev/hda2 /msdos -o noexec,ro,nosuid,blocksize=1024,auto
> mount: wrong fs type, bad option,
>
> I've just upgraded to the 2.2.10-kernel (using the
> kernel-image-package), I used 2.0.33 before and it worked without any
> problem.
>
> root% mount -t msdos /dev/hda2 /msdos -o noexec,ro,nosuid,blocksize=1024,auto
> mount: wrong fs type, bad option, bad superblock on /dev/hda2,
>or
o the
kernel.
Should I ditch the card?
-Original Message-
From: Matt Chambers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: debian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thursday, 17 June 1999 2:04
Subject: Re: Kernel 2.2.10
>Did you have to update any other packages before you could use the 2.2
kernel
I run Debian, I am running on 2.0.36 and have my Stallion Brumby 4 card
working (Intelligent ISA Multiport Serial Card)
Anyway, I installed 2.2.10 source, and edited
/usr/src/linux-2.2.10/drivers/char/istallion.c to show my cards io port and
address range.
Compiled in the support for the card, in
16 matches
Mail list logo
