On Sun, Dec 31, 2000 at 12:01:48AM -0800, Nate Amsden wrote:
> Nathan E Norman wrote:
>
> > Do you realise you quoted 40 lines of the original message and added 1
> > meaningful line? What a waste of bandwidth.
>
> hah. my 1meg dsl line runs average at 2.8% for the past week,
> i got plenty of b
Nathan E Norman wrote:
> Do you realise you quoted 40 lines of the original message and added 1
> meaningful line? What a waste of bandwidth.
hah. my 1meg dsl line runs average at 2.8% for the past week,
i got plenty of bandwidth to spare :P
http://portal.aphroland.org/mrtg/
nate
--
:::
ICQ:
From what I've been able to gather,
chroot can be secure,
but only if the user can never get root.
FreeBSD's jail had a recent problem.
Mounting /proc inside the chroot is not a good idea.
In a message dated 12/27/00 7:01:21 PM Eastern Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
not to dis
Subject: Re: putting Apache into chroot()-prison
Date: Thu, Dec 28, 2000 at 03:19:53PM -0600
In reply to:Nathan E Norman
Quoting Nathan E Norman([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
>
> No, it's a company as demonstrated by the "Micromuse Inc.". `whois
> micromuse.
On Thu, Dec 28, 2000 at 04:02:03PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> Hey Norman,
The name's Nathan ... I realize it's a difficult name to parse.
>As an unbiased observer I will comment on your
> comment concerning the quote/content ratio of the other
> poster. You have your preference
On Thu, Dec 28, 2000 at 01:35:50PM +0400, Rino Mardo wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 27, 2000 at 03:57:27PM -0800 or thereabouts, Nate Amsden wrote:
[ 21 lines deleted ]
> > not to discourage youb ut its pretty well known chroot() is not
> > an ultimate solution for security, it has been in the past
> > rat
On Wed, Dec 27, 2000 at 03:57:27PM -0800 or thereabouts, Nate Amsden wrote:
> "R. M. Lampert" wrote:
> >
> > Hi, folks!
> >
> > Due to some very unpleasant experience in the company
> > I'm working at (rootshell attack due to a buffer overflow
> > intrusion in httpd...) there's a great need with
"R. M. Lampert" wrote:
>
> Hi, folks!
>
> Due to some very unpleasant experience in the company
> I'm working at (rootshell attack due to a buffer overflow
> intrusion in httpd...) there's a great need with us
> to inform thoroughly about changing to a safer environment,
> that is LAMP or even
Here are a couple links which should help you get on your way.
(Thanks to Stas Bekman, just another mod_perl hacker)
http://www.securityfocus.com/focus/sun/articles/apache-inst.html
http://forum.swarthmore.edu/epigone/modperl/stimlorthen
Hi, folks!
Due to some very unpleasant experience in the company
I'm working at (rootshell attack due to a buffer overflow
intrusion in httpd...) there's a great need with us
to inform thoroughly about changing to a safer environment,
that is LAMP or even better NAMP (NetBSD, Apache ... there
a
10 matches
Mail list logo
