On Thu, Dec 28, 2000 at 01:35:50PM +0400, Rino Mardo wrote: > On Wed, Dec 27, 2000 at 03:57:27PM -0800 or thereabouts, Nate Amsden wrote:
[ 21 lines deleted ] > > not to discourage youb ut its pretty well known chroot() is not > > an ultimate solution for security, it has been in the past > > rather easy to break out of it, from what i remember you > > may be better off running freebsd and it's jail() (??) > > function which is a suped up chroot(). all im trying to say > > what about OpenBSD (OAMP)? What about it? If OpenBSD has jail() I expect the same reasoning applies. [ 19 lines deleted + 9 for sig ] Do you realise you quoted 40 lines of the original message and added 1 meaningful line? What a waste of bandwidth. -- Nathan Norman - Staff Engineer | A good plan today is better Micromuse Inc. | than a perfect plan tomorrow. mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] | -- Patton
pgpzzwWoVUwh9.pgp
Description: PGP signature
