Re: procps held back

2000-01-10 Thread John Pearson
On Sun, Jan 09, 2000 at 10:45:24AM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote > regarding my query about packages held back in the upgrade, they were > flwm kbd kdelibs2g moonlight procps > Are there problems with these? > Not necessarily at all. Sometimes upgrading packages requires installing new pack

Re: procps held back

2000-01-09 Thread John Hasler
Kenward writes: > Are there problems with these? It may be that you have something installed that depends on the slink versions. You should not have ended up without /bin/kill, though. -- John Hasler [EMAIL PROTECTED] (John Hasler) Dancing Horse Hill Elmwood, WI

Re: procps held back

2000-01-09 Thread kaynjay
regarding my query about packages held back in the upgrade, they were flwm kbd kdelibs2g moonlight procps Are there problems with these? Kenward

procps held back.. was Re: poff does not work

2000-01-09 Thread kaynjay
People have suggested the installation of procps to bring /bin/kill back into my system. Sounds good. I ran dpkg -l procps to see what its status was, and found "hi" returned, so it has been installed (2.0.3-3) but was apparently held back when I upgraded last week. ?? Why was it held back (some