Sorry for the sort of OT, but does Mozilla (or NS6 for that matter)
have the stupidly left out Open button from the later Netscape
releases?
-Ken
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]AIM: ScopusFest
On Sun, Dec 10, 2000, Randy Edwards wrote:
> > IE has simply become a better browser.
>
>Sad, but probably true.
Definitely. I use NT more than anything, and IE is a pleasure next to
Netscape. I have played with Mozilla, but as many say, it is slower
than Netscape, which is turn is slower t
On Sun, Dec 10, 2000 at 10:06:41AM -0500, Randy Edwards wrote:
-|> I am no fan of Microsoft, but I have come to hate Netscape.
-|
-| I'm quite sure you're not the only one... :-(
-|
-|> IE has simply become a better browser.
-|
-| Sad, but probably true.
-|
-|> I hope I am wrong, but there real
> I am no fan of Microsoft, but I have come to hate Netscape.
I'm quite sure you're not the only one... :-(
> IE has simply become a better browser.
Sad, but probably true.
> I hope I am wrong, but there really is no alternative, is there?
I'm hoping that Mozilla saves us. The latest
> I am no fan of Microsoft, but I have come to hate Netscape. Since 3.0
> I think it is has gotten worse and worse and these days is a total
> piece of shit. IE has simply become a better browser. I think it
> sucks, too, that Netscape is the only browser you can use under Linux.
> I hope I am w
On Fri, Dec 08, 2000 at 04:50:30PM -0800, Lazar Fleysher wrote:
>
> 2. Actually, I have 2 similar machines running Linux on both of them
> 99.99% of the time. I have noticed that if I try to run netscape from my
> other machine via network, it actually starts on my local machine. I am
> not crazy!
On Fri, Dec 8, 2000, Lazar Fleysher wrote:
>
> > Ken writes:
> > > I think it sucks, too, that Netscape is the only browser you can use
> > > under Linux. I hope I am wrong, but there really is no alternative, is
> > > there?
> >
> > I've got five installed...
>
> And? "Installed" is not cons
> Ken writes:
> > I think it sucks, too, that Netscape is the only browser you can use
> > under Linux. I hope I am wrong, but there really is no alternative, is
> > there?
>
> I've got five installed...
And? "Installed" is not constructive info, sorry... does it work? how
does it perform?
Ken writes:
> I think it sucks, too, that Netscape is the only browser you can use
> under Linux. I hope I am wrong, but there really is no alternative, is
> there?
I've got five installed...
--
John Hasler
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Dancing Horse Hill
Elmwood, Wisconsin
On Fri, Dec 8, 2000, Lazar Fleysher wrote:
> I have 2 strange problems with netscape communicator 4.73
>
> 1. It renders some web pages 50 to 100 times slower than Internet exploer
> on win 98 on the same machine! (I have Pentium-75). I am not sure that
> it is configuratio
Hello everybody
I have 2 strange problems with netscape communicator 4.73
1. It renders some web pages 50 to 100 times slower than Internet exploer
on win 98 on the same machine! (I have Pentium-75). I am not sure that
it is configuration problem, I am afraid it is a feature of netscape. I
You probably have the libc6 version of xpm - you'll need to get the libc5
version.
-Jay
Hi everybody,
being new to debian (but not to linux at all), I installed netscape's
communicator (v. 4.05) on my machine. Last Debian >>slink<< version (
preselected packages"dial_in" ) is used.
Installation of the communicator was done not by using the
debian-installation tool 'dselect', but by u
I recently bought Debian 2.0 cd, because I couldn't afford Red Hat
and I was bored in using Slackware, and I didn't have any problems
until now. I installed Netscape 4.5 and when I run it, it claims that
'cannot load libXpm.so.4'. Now, I have the file in /usr/X11R6/lib, and
other programs use it
14 matches
Mail list logo
