Hello *,
I my DNS-Master run a xfer/update with the owner of the
files are changed to "root:bind" with permission "644" and can not more
threated by admin scripts which does NOT run as root.
The files should stay "bind:adm" and the permission "664"
How can this be done?
Thanks, Greetings
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Lorenzo Beretta writes:
> Merciadri Luca ha scritto:
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>> Merciadri Luca writes:
>>
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> On my Debian Lenny, I am unabl
Merciadri Luca ha scritto:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Merciadri Luca writes:
Hello,
On my Debian Lenny, I am unable to empty the trash because of
permission problems. For example, I have a .jar file, and when I
choose to "Empty Trash," I receive:
"Error
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
green writes:
> Merciadri Luca wrote at 2009-10-11 09:31 -0500:
>> Where is the trash folder located in my /home/?
>
> It might be at: /home/user/.local/share/Trash/files
> Or: /home/user/.Trash
>
Thanks for all your answers.
merciadriluca-eee:/home
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Merciadri Luca writes:
> Hello,
>
> On my Debian Lenny, I am unable to empty the trash because of
> permission problems. For example, I have a .jar file, and when I
> choose to "Empty Trash," I receive:
>
> "Erro
On 20091011_163117, Merciadri Luca wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Hello,
>
> On my Debian Lenny, I am unable to empty the trash because of
> permission problems. For example, I have a .jar file, and when I
> choose to "Empty Trash,&
Merciadri Luca wrote at 2009-10-11 09:31 -0500:
> Where is the trash folder located in my /home/?
It might be at: /home/user/.local/share/Trash/files
Or: /home/user/.Trash
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello,
On my Debian Lenny, I am unable to empty the trash because of
permission problems. For example, I have a .jar file, and when I
choose to "Empty Trash," I receive:
"Error while deleting.
"/home/merci...4-1131.jar" cann
Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2004 20:20:25 +0200
From: Josef Oswald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: CDROM permission problems Gnome 2.6
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (david abernethy's me
Hi,
On Sat, 28 Aug 2004 22:44:29 +1200, david abernethy
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> My problem is that I can't rip audio cd's logged in as an ordinary user
> using sound-juicer, but I can logged in as root. I also can't write CDs
> using nautilus CD burner
>
> here is the output of the id comma
My problem is that I can't rip audio cd's logged in as an ordinary user
using sound-juicer, but I can logged in as root. I also can't write CDs
using nautilus CD burner
here is the output of the id command for user david
uid=1000(david) gid=100(users)
groups=24(cdrom),25(floppy),29(audio),100(use
I have recently encountered a problem that when a regular user logs on to a
workstation (these are the workstations I just migrated from RH9 to Sid), that
they get errors about permission problems with /dev/dsp (symlink to /dev/dsp0)
and /dev/cdrom (symlink to /dev/scd0). To correct the problem I
I have been trying to get a script to run on
a server which runs potato. I've checked the
script using perl -cw and it checks
out okay.
The script has been put in /usr/local/bin and
to test it out I have created a user called
testuser. In this user's home directory I have
made a forward file con
Dear People,
I am taking the liberty of asking this here though it is not strictly
about Debian, but I know very many Debian people do use rsync.
I have just started using rsync for backups. I have had a couple of
issues. Note I'm trying to use rsync as user using ssh between two
machines both r
Problem solved!
Some combination of chmod a+rw and using the umask=0 option when
mounting solved it.
Now I can open my checkbook records on my wife's computer.
Unfortunately, now I know for a fact that I don't have enough to pay
the bills ;-)
--
Robert Koss, Ph.D. | Training, Mentorin
> "P" == P Kirk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
P> Hey Bob. Puzzling one this. You should cc the group on all
P> mail as athere are way more skilled players than me.
Sorry. I thought I was. I have to remember to hit 'F' instead of 'R'
when replying.
P> soemting is very odd here.
> I've been struggling for the last few days trying to get my wife's
> Win95 laptop to access her Quicken files that I have on a fat16
> partition on my linux machine. There is something about 'mount' that
> is eluding me.
it's been eluding me a couple of times too...
vfat just doesn't have the pl
Hey Bob.
Puzzling one this. You should cc the group on all mail as athere are
way more skilled players than me.
soemting is very odd here. As root you can go to / and command rm -rf
/* and watch the whole OS disappear. So I don't understand why you
* can't chown the contents of the partition.
On Fri, Aug 10, 2001 at 02:45:42PM +0100, P Kirk wrote:
> #! On Fri, Aug 10, 2001, Bob Koss wrote:
>
> >Mounting worked. By repeating the command I assume you meant
> >'chown -R sue /mnt/dosE'. If so, that failed as it traversed the
> >subdirectories of the partition.
> >
> ? Its meant to get all
> "P" == P Kirk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
P> #! On Fri, Aug 10, 2001, Bob Koss wrote:
>> Mounting worked. By repeating the command I assume you meant
>> 'chown -R sue /mnt/dosE'. If so, that failed as it traversed
>> the subdirectories of the partition.
>>
P> ? Its m
#! On Fri, Aug 10, 2001, Bob Koss wrote:
>Mounting worked. By repeating the command I assume you meant
>'chown -R sue /mnt/dosE'. If so, that failed as it traversed the
>subdirectories of the partition.
>
? Its meant to get all the subdirectories.
As root do this:
Make sure the partition /is/ cor
#! On Fri, Aug 10, 2001, Bob Koss wrote:
This is goung nucleur but on the assumption you don't have many other
users, do it and then subtract permissions afterwards.
chown -R wife /mnt/dosE
Mount the FAT partition and repeat the command.
Log in as your wife and enter:
cp /etc/lilo.conf /mnt/do
> "Patrick" == P Kirk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Patrick> Hi, There are a few diagnostic steps you need. First, if
Patrick> you login to the Debian box under your wife's ID, can you
Patrick> access the files? If yes, its a SAMBA problem. If not,
Patrick> we need to look at
Hi,
There are a few diagnostic steps you need. First, if you login to the
Debian box under your wife's ID, can you access the files? If yes, its
a SAMBA problem. If not, we need to look at permissions again.
On the assumption that it is a SAMBA problem, here's a link that will
take you through
I've been struggling for the last few days trying to get my wife's
Win95 laptop to access her Quicken files that I have on a fat16
partition on my linux machine. There is something about 'mount' that
is eluding me.
This was working fine in RH for years. When I changed to Debian last
week, it stop
On Thu, Apr 26, 2001 at 11:10:23AM -0500, Hanasaki JiJi wrote:
> I have created a new file and checked it into CVS. It's mode comes
> out as 444 in the CVSROOT subdir. Noone else can check it out. Could
> someone please explain this to me?
>
> Since I checked it in and left it unlocked, I would
I have created a new file and checked it into CVS. It's mode comes out as 444
in the CVSROOT subdir. Noone else can check it out. Could someone please
explain this to me?
Since I checked it in and left it unlocked, I would like others to be able to
check it out add read it with no problems.
on Sun, Dec 10, 2000 at 04:52:20AM +0700, Umum Wijoyo ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Hi!
>
> After I do an upgrade, I always experience users being able to do a
> "wall" (quite annoying!), and other programs there not supposed to.
> Why is this? How come the permissions get screwed up? How can I
>
Hi!
After I do an upgrade, I always experience users being able to do a
"wall" (quite annoying!), and other programs there not supposed to.
Why is this? How come the permissions get screwed up? How can I
handle/prevent this? Should I check every program/binary and do a chmod
accordingly?
TIA
U
On 27 Oct 2000 19:22:56 +1100, Brian May writes:
>> "Robert" == Robert Waldner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>Robert> Of yourse, the sshd processs has to be able to read the
>Robert> files, so ~, ~/ .ssh and ~/.ssh/authorized_keys have to
>Robert> accessible for world.
>
>sshd runs
On Fri, Oct 27, 2000 at 07:22:56PM +1100, Brian May wrote:
> > "Robert" == Robert Waldner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Robert> Of yourse, the sshd processs has to be able to read the
> Robert> files, so ~, ~/ .ssh and ~/.ssh/authorized_keys have to
> Robert> accessible for world
> "S" == S Salman Ahmed <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
S> drwxr-sr-x 20 ssahmed ssahmed 4096 Oct 26 18:02 /home/ssahmed/
Perhaps it is getting confused with the s bit? If so, file a bug
report (I don't think the s bit matters security wise).
--
Brian May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> "Robert" == Robert Waldner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Robert> Of yourse, the sshd processs has to be able to read the
Robert> files, so ~, ~/ .ssh and ~/.ssh/authorized_keys have to
Robert> accessible for world.
sshd runs as root...
--
Brian May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On Fri, Oct 27, 2000 at 07:38:36AM +0200, Robert Waldner wrote:
> Of yourse, the sshd processs has to be able to read the files, so ~, ~/
> .ssh and ~/.ssh/authorized_keys have to accessible for world.
>
> A "chmod goa+r ~/.ssh" should do the trick, someone correct me if I´m
> wrong.
wrong, fi
Of yourse, the sshd processs has to be able to read the files, so ~, ~/
.ssh and ~/.ssh/authorized_keys have to accessible for world.
A "chmod goa+r ~/.ssh" should do the trick, someone correct me if I´m
wrong.
hth,
&rw
On Thu, 26 Oct 2000 18:28:26 EDT, "S.Salman Ahmed" writes:
>
>I accidenta
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
A long time ago, in a galaxy far, far way, someone said...
>
> I accidentally did a chmod -R on my home directory and messed up the
> permissions in my home directory (/home/ssahmed). Now, I am unable to
> SSH from work into my home system.
>
> Init
On a potato system after upgarding xterm to 3.3.6 I am unable to start
xterm as a regular user (starting as root works). The "~/.xsession-errors"
file says:
xterm: Error 14, errno 13: Permission denied
The xterm binary is:
-rwxr-sr-x1 root utmp 161680 Jan 15 03:53 /usr/bin/X11/x
Something, it seems that efax is the culprit, keeps changing the
permissions on /dev/ttyS1. The following illustrates the problem (alias
l="ls -la --color=tty"):
-
$groups
jhspies adm mail news dialout fax floppy audio dip cdskrywers
jhspies-22:45:24-~$l /de
On Sun, Nov 30, 1997 at 10:27:47PM -0800, michael wrote:
> The pon command works from the root account but not from the 'michael'
> user account (mine's a single user system). Michael is a member of
> group pid and dialout.
>
> When michael executes pon the system issues the following complaint:
I'm having problems with setting the correct umask for files.
All my users belong to the groups users. I am using hamm.
I need their files to be 644 and directories 755.
Their home directories are in /var/www and are serving virtual domains.
Here's what I know:
A. /var/www is umask 022
B. /var/w
I've set up one machine in a lab of identical machines with Debian. I
then create a tar
file from that set up and transfer the tar file to CD. I then untar on
the other machines.
The procedure works nice (I can set up a machine in about 15 minutes)
but I'm having
trouble with a lot of
michael wrote:
> PPS. I installed the jdk stuff via dpkg as well. It took a while to
> figure out why Netscape was exiting by itself. I thought Java was
> included with it, why isn't it and why does it crash without it (because
> I've got Java module support installed in the kernel?)?
Eh, Commu
On Sun, Nov 30, 1997 at 10:27:47PM -0800, michael wrote:
> The pon command works from the root account but not from the 'michael'
> user account (mine's a single user system). Michael is a member of
> group pid and dialout.
>
> When michael executes pon the system issues the following complaint:
The pon command works from the root account but not from the 'michael'
user account (mine's a single user system). Michael is a member of
group pid and dialout.
When michael executes pon the system issues the following complaint:
You do not have permissions to access /etc/ppp.chatscript or
/etc/
> > rlogin to another host gives "rmcd: socket: permission denied"
> > Works fine for root.
> >
> > On starting X, I get the grey background, but no windows;
> > I kill it, and it's been trying to connect to a socket
> > and getting connection refused, errno = 13.
> > Again, works fine for root.
>
> > rlogin to another host gives "rmcd: socket: permission denied"
> > Works fine for root.
> >
> > On starting X, I get the grey background, but no windows;
> > I kill it, and it's been trying to connect to a socket
> > and getting connection refused, errno = 13.
> > Again, works fine for root.
>
Hi,
> rlogin to another host gives "rmcd: socket: permission denied"
> Works fine for root.
>
> On starting X, I get the grey background, but no windows;
> I kill it, and it's been trying to connect to a socket
> and getting connection refused, errno = 13.
> Again, works fine for root.
is /usr/b
> G'day. I'm a bit behind, but since I just got Debian 1.1.11
> on November's Linux Monthly, I did a bit of an upgrade from it.
> rlogin to another host gives "rmcd: socket: permission denied"
> Works fine for root.
Still unable to place this one. Downgraded base to -13;
no change. Downgraded net
G'day. I'm a bit behind, but since I just got Debian 1.1.11
on November's Linux Monthly, I did a bit of an upgrade from it.
I've been running some bits of rex as well, but hadn't upgraded
everything, so quite a few things got updated from 1.1.11,
such as netstd, base etc. Anyway a couple of problem
On Sat, 26 Oct 1996, Stephen Pitts wrote:
> I just repartitioned one of my drives to give Linux more space and Winbloze
> less. Now I have four partitions: swap, /, /usr, and /usr/local instead of
> three (/, /usr, swap) The system appeared to work OK when I tested it, but
> (conveniantly :-) afte
I just repartitioned one of my drives to give Linux more space and Winbloze
less. Now I have four partitions: swap, /, /usr, and /usr/local instead of
three (/, /usr, swap) The system appeared to work OK when I tested it, but
(conveniantly :-) after I turned the usr partition into the usr/local
pa
51 matches
Mail list logo
