On Fri, 22 Dec 2023 12:39:21 -0700
Charles Curley wrote:
> On upgrading from bullseye to bookwork, my netatalk installation has
> been nuked. The bullseye package (3.1.12~ds-8+deb11u1) is still
> present but no daemon is running nor is my Mac making backups to the
> server.
>
>
On 12/26/23 21:13, Charles Curley wrote:
On Fri, 22 Dec 2023 16:25:11 -0700
Charles Curley wrote:
I was able to build from source per the instructions at
https://netatalk.sourceforge.io/3.1/htmldocs/intro.html et seq.,
starting with "git clone https://github.com/Netatalk/netatal
On Fri, 22 Dec 2023 16:25:11 -0700
Charles Curley wrote:
> I was able to build from source per the instructions at
> https://netatalk.sourceforge.io/3.1/htmldocs/intro.html et seq.,
> starting with "git clone https://github.com/Netatalk/netatalk.git";.
Well, that didn
On Fri, Dec 22, 2023 at 6:25 PM Charles Curley
wrote:
>
> On Fri, 22 Dec 2023 12:39:21 -0700
> Charles Curley wrote:
>
> > On upgrading from bullseye to bookwork, my netatalk installation has
> > been nuked. The bullseye package (3.1.12~ds-8+deb11u1) is still
> > pr
On Fri, 22 Dec 2023 12:39:21 -0700
Charles Curley wrote:
> On upgrading from bullseye to bookwork, my netatalk installation has
> been nuked. The bullseye package (3.1.12~ds-8+deb11u1) is still
> present but no daemon is running nor is my Mac making backups to the
> server.
>
>
On upgrading from bullseye to bookwork, my netatalk installation has
been nuked. The bullseye package (3.1.12~ds-8+deb11u1) is still present
but no daemon is running nor is my Mac making backups to the server.
Is there a known fix or workaround for this?
--
Does anybody read signatures any more
I used Netatalk a few releases ago when Debian offered it in the then
Stable release. I looked today at debian.org and there is a netatalk
package in Sid. My limited ability to interpret the package
information leads me to believe that it won't arrive in Testing
soon. But someone who has
On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 10:53 AM, Paul E Condon
wrote:
> On 20120509_012529, Tom H wrote:
>> On Tue, May 8, 2012 at 5:14 PM, Paul E Condon
>> wrote:
>>> On 20120506_230937, Paul E Condon wrote:
>>>>
>>>> I have a long and troubled relation to N
On 20120509_012529, Tom H wrote:
> On Tue, May 8, 2012 at 5:14 PM, Paul E Condon
> wrote:
> > On 20120506_230937, Paul E Condon wrote:
> >>
> >> I have a long and troubled relation to Netatalk. I live in a family
> >> where everyone else loves the Mac, and
On 20120508_210017, Gregory Seidman wrote:
> On Sun, May 06, 2012 at 11:09:37PM -0600, Paul E Condon wrote:
> [...]
> > Does anyone have netatalk 2.2.2-1 working under Wheezy? Can you point
> > me to some debugging instructions? Or, can you lead me through some
> > t
On Tue, May 8, 2012 at 5:14 PM, Paul E Condon wrote:
> On 20120506_230937, Paul E Condon wrote:
>>
>> I have a long and troubled relation to Netatalk. I live in a family
>> where everyone else loves the Mac, and I have a need to communicate
>> with them. I once had
On Tue, May 8, 2012 at 7:19 PM, Gilles Mocellin
wrote:
> Le 08/05/2012 23:14, Paul E Condon a écrit :
>>
>> I posted this, below, a couple of days ago. I'm hoping to find someone
>> who follows this list and who actually has netatalk v. 2.2.2-1
>> installed from
On Sun, May 06, 2012 at 11:09:37PM -0600, Paul E Condon wrote:
[...]
> Does anyone have netatalk 2.2.2-1 working under Wheezy? Can you point
> me to some debugging instructions? Or, can you lead me through some
> tests to discover what is going wrong?
I have netatalk that I built fr
Le 08/05/2012 23:14, Paul E Condon a écrit :
I posted this, below, a couple of days ago. I'm hoping to find someone
who follows this list and who actually has netatalk v. 2.2.2-1
installed from the Debian package in Wheezy. I would very much like to
get it working, but ... I can'
I posted this, below, a couple of days ago. I'm hoping to find someone
who follows this list and who actually has netatalk v. 2.2.2-1
installed from the Debian package in Wheezy. I would very much like to
get it working, but ... I can't. All the documentation that I can find
is two or
On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 1:09 AM, Paul E Condon wrote:
>
> I have a long and troubled relation to Netatalk. I live in a family
> where everyone else loves the Mac, and I have a need to communicate
> with them. I once had netatalk running on Debian back in 2004, I
> think, but lo
I have a long and troubled relation to Netatalk. I live in a family
where everyone else loves the Mac, and I have a need to communicate
with them. I once had netatalk running on Debian back in 2004, I
think, but lost that ability about the time my daughter bought her
first MacBook in 2006. I&#
On Sunday 14 November 2010 15:13:36 ghe wrote:
> I actually need netatalk (as opposed to the recent poster) in an office
> full of Macs.
>
> I've been trying for quite a while, so some stuff is already there. When
> asked to install, Aptitude says:
> > Setting up
I actually need netatalk (as opposed to the recent poster) in an office
full of Macs.
I've been trying for quite a while, so some stuff is already there. When
asked to install, Aptitude says:
Selecting previously deselected package netatalk.
(Reading database ... 63846 files and direct
In <4cdebf88.3030...@verizon.net>, Gary Roach wrote:
>I have meticulously removed netatalk from
>the system a piece at a time using the information in
>/var/lib/dpkg/info.
That was bad. Now your package system in broken; it's database doesn't
correspond to the running
to Squeeze. Everything worked fine (Using Aptitude) until the
installation
of netatalk started; a program that I really don't need. I get:
hostname: Unknown host
First /etc/hostname is filled in. When I attempt to reinstall I get the
same
type of error and the process aborts. When I try to remo
nny
>>> to Squeeze. Everything worked fine (Using Aptitude) until the
>>> installation
>>> of netatalk started; a program that I really don't need. I get:
>>>
>>> hostname: Unknown host
>>>
>>> First /etc/hostname is filled
Gary Roach wrote:
> >Take a look at the netatalk maintainer scripts in "/var/lib/dpkg/info"
> >to see why they are failing.
> The /bin/hostname is not returning the hostname. Is this a bug?
The hostname should be set during boot time. The actual script is
/etc/ini
On 01/-10/-28163 11:59 AM, Tom H wrote:
On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 7:29 PM, Gary Roach wrote:
I have a dual boot Toshiba Qosmio "laptop?" that I am upgrading from Lenny
to Squeeze. Everything worked fine (Using Aptitude) until the installation
of netatalk started; a program tha
On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 7:29 PM, Gary Roach wrote:
>
> I have a dual boot Toshiba Qosmio "laptop?" that I am upgrading from Lenny
> to Squeeze. Everything worked fine (Using Aptitude) until the installation
> of netatalk started; a program that I really don't need. I ge
I have a dual boot Toshiba Qosmio "laptop?" that I am upgrading from
Lenny to Squeeze. Everything worked fine (Using Aptitude) until the
installation of netatalk started; a program that I really don't need. I get:
Extracting templates from packages: 100%
Preconfi
On Wed, 5 Sep 2007, Peter Gutbrod wrote:
> Netatalk worked on my Debian box some times ago, but I didn't use it much.
> So I can't really say when it actually broke. This week I've updated Sid via
> aptitude and found Netatalk (2.3.0-6) to be broken.
>
> I get
Netatalk worked on my Debian box some times ago, but I didn't use it much.
So I can't really say when it actually broke. This week I've updated Sid via
aptitude and found Netatalk (2.3.0-6) to be broken.
I get the following in syslog of the debian box, when I try to contact
hi,
On 7/27/07, Gilles Mocellin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Le Friday 27 July 2007 18:45:13 Andrew Sackville-West, vous avez écrit:
> >
> > can't answer your question directly, but doesn't apple support nfs?
yes
>
> And SMB...
and yes (somewhat)
the reaso
) but I'm thinking
about adding netatalk so that mac users have a more native feeling
with all this (automagic share exploration, etc). My worries are
wether locking issues could occur. samba+nfs is working seamlessly
(nfs opened files are locked and samba das know about that) but does
afp
Le Friday 27 July 2007 18:45:13 Andrew Sackville-West, vous avez écrit :
> On Fri, Jul 27, 2007 at 02:59:05PM +0200, Martin Marcher wrote:
> > I know that samba+mac does work (to some extent) but I'm thinking
> > about adding netatalk so that mac users have a more native feeli
On Fri, Jul 27, 2007 at 02:59:05PM +0200, Martin Marcher wrote:
>
> I know that samba+mac does work (to some extent) but I'm thinking
> about adding netatalk so that mac users have a more native feeling
> with all this (automagic share exploration, etc). My worries are
> w
Hello,
in our company we have mac/linux/windows clients and I think about
adding the native service for each of those. the clients aren't under
my control but can be considered as trusted.
I know that samba+mac does work (to some extent) but I'm thinking
about adding netatalk so that
{} \;
> > And restart netatalk.
> >
> > We must do it too often here :-(
>
> That fixed the problem. Thanks! But what does 'CNID' stand for? I noticed
> when I restarted netatalk there was mention of cnid_metad in the list of
> appletalk deamons that I had no
On Sun, Dec 31, 2006 at 01:27:58AM +0100, Gilles Mocellin wrote:
> Le samedi 30 décembre 2006 21:00, Paul E Condon a écrit :
> > I've been using netatalk to connect several Macs to my Debian boxes for
> > several years. For the last few month, one box has been running Etch.
Le samedi 30 décembre 2006 21:00, Paul E Condon a écrit :
> I've been using netatalk to connect several Macs to my Debian boxes for
> several years. For the last few month, one box has been running Etch.
> All worked fine until two days ago. There was a power failure which forced
>
I've been using netatalk to connect several Macs to my Debian boxes for
several years. For the last few month, one box has been running Etch.
All worked fine until two days ago. There was a power failure which forced
a reboot of all computers. After the reboot, one of the netatalk shares
o
On Sun, 16 Jul 2006, Peter Teunissen wrote:
> I'm probably overlooking the obvious, but why is the authentication
> method uams_dhx_pam.so missing from /usr/lib/netatalk? Has this
> something to do with the gpl incompatability with openssl or should
> the file simply be co
Hi All,
I'm probably overlooking the obvious, but why is the authentication
method uams_dhx_pam.so missing from /usr/lib/netatalk? Has this
something to do with the gpl incompatability with openssl or should
the file simply be copied from another (undocumented) location? I'd
r
Hi,
Am Sonntag, den 11.12.2005, 21:59 -0500 schrieb mw:
> I'm considering using Debian and netatalk for our macintosh hard drive
> backup of files. This would be instead of windows2000 with services for
> macintosh.We have had some problem with resource forks getting messed up
&
On Sun, 2005-12-11 at 21:59 -0500, mw wrote:
> 1. Will netatalk treat resource fork better?
> 2. Is it troublefree from an admin stance?
I've used it for several years with RH, Gentoo, and Debian, and it's
worked flawlessly. It's always been completely passive -- just st
I'm considering using Debian and netatalk for our macintosh hard drive
backup of files. This would be instead of windows2000 with services for
macintosh.We have had some problem with resource forks getting messed up
copying files from windows 2003 server (using Xinet) to windows 2000
s
I am using lprng under sarge to drive a laserjet 5mp on my print
server. Also netatalk to provide print service to two old iMacs.
Recently something happened so that now every print job for an
iMac has a extra blank page at the end. I don't like the waste
of paper. I want to fix it. I think
Is there a netatalk 2 deb available? If so, where?
Failing that has anyone a working debian/rules file to build a deb?
Thanks
Don
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
age -
From: "Darik Horn" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Andrew Gilberto" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, March 23, 2004 5:17 PM
Subject: Re: Netatalk
Install a recent complete kernel package:
# apt-get install kernel-image-2.4.1
al Message -
From: "Darik Horn" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Andrew Gilberto" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, March 23, 2004 5:17 PM
Subject: Re: Netatalk
> Install a recent complete kernel package:
>
> # apt-get install kerne
Install a recent complete kernel package:
# apt-get install kernel-image-2.4.18-1-386
This kernel package has netatalk support. The netatalk deamons should
start without problems if you are running this kernel.
The BF kernels do not always have everything that you might need.
Andrew Gilberto
Hello,
I'm trying to setup a new machine with netatalk support. I've installed the
idepci flavour of Debian (or whichever the default is when you hit return at
the boot prompt on installation), and it doesn't seem to have netatalk built
in.
I've looked in:
/lib/modules/2.2.2
On Sun, Mar 21, 2004 at 12:30:41PM -0800, mike wrote:
> On Sun, 21 Mar 2004 10:23:02 -, Roland Dunn wrote
> > Hi,
> >
> > Anyone had any experience of installing netatalk on Debian (Woody)?
> > I have read that it requires a kernel recompile but wondered
> &g
On Sun, 21 Mar 2004 10:23:02 -, Roland Dunn wrote
> Hi,
>
> Anyone had any experience of installing netatalk on Debian (Woody)?
> I have read that it requires a kernel recompile but wondered
> whether this is truly the case? Is it not possibly as simple as apt-
> ge
Hi,
Anyone had any experience of installing netatalk on Debian (Woody)? I have
read that it requires a kernel recompile but wondered whether this is truly
the case? Is it not possibly as simple as apt-get netatalk?
I've installed the idepci version of DEBIAN (Woody) - anyone know if
net
Hi,
I have problems with the behaviour of lpr (woody). When I try to print something, the
system
sends (sometimes) an email, that the job could not be printed, but it is printed up to
five times.
I am using netatalk, but I do not know if it is part of the problem.
I have found a problem
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I have a very small private LAN with only two machines:
>
> * a Debian box running netatalk 1.5.5 server
>
> * a TiBook running Mac OS X Jaguar
>
> and connected via Ethernet crossover cable. The network seems to work
> fine for other networ
> Have you checked the system logs on the Linux machine? I don't know
> which logfile the Debian package uses (I use netatalk on a non-Debian
> machine), but when I was having some problems the syslog messages were
> more useful than the generic error message I got on the c
> Have you checked the system logs on the Linux machine? I don't know
> which logfile the Debian package uses (I use netatalk on a non-Debian
> machine), but when I was having some problems the syslog messages were
> more useful than the generic error message I got on the c
After quite a
> while, authentication fails and I get an error message
Have you checked the system logs on the Linux machine? I don't know
which logfile the Debian package uses (I use netatalk on a non-Debian
machine), but when I was having some problems the syslog messages were
more useful th
I have a very small private LAN with only two machines:
* a Debian box running netatalk 1.5.5 server
* a TiBook running Mac OS X Jaguar
and connected via Ethernet crossover cable. The network seems to work
fine for other network functions (for example, ping and ssh), but I am
unable to login
quot;Your password cannot be changed,
> contact your admin".
>
> The syslog on the netatalk server reports this:
>
> ASIP session:548(2) from 10.0.0.144:49191(0)
> Sep 24 11:35:07 hlndlx afpd[16087]: dhx login: tech
> Sep 24 11:35:07 hlndlx afpd[16087]: PAM unable to
> dlopen(/
Hi All,
I upgraded my potato to woody and now I can't
change passwords via the chooser.
An error occurs:
"Your password cannot be changed,
contact your admin".
The syslog on the netatalk server reports this:
ASIP session:548(2) from 10.0.0.144:49191(0)
Sep 24 11:35:07 hlndlx a
Hi All,
I have woody running netatalk with
-setpassword in afpd.conf
I'm trying to use the chooser from OS9.2 to change the users password
but it won't allow it.
The syslog reports that the uams_dhx_pam.c was successful,
then reports that the password change failed.
Any help troub
that means. I didn't use it. Perhaps a more
> security conscious debian-security list lurker might know.
Well, I'm no security guru, and I haven't set up netatalk in ages, so
take this with a cc of salt.
My guess would be that this would be something like specifying the
lowest
t; > Mac 8500 running OS 8.6. One of the Linux boxes operates a diald/ppp
> > > connection to the outside, and netatalk for file sharing.
> > >
> > > I decided for no good reason to upgrade the ppp connection box from
> > > Potato to
> > >
On Thu, 2002-06-20 at 17:04, Paul E Condon wrote:
> I have a small home LAN, two Linux i386 boxes, an iMac running OS 9.2, and a
> Mac 8500 running OS 8.6. One of the Linux boxes operates a diald/ppp
> connection to the outside, and netatalk for file sharing.
>
> I decided for no
I have a small home LAN, two Linux i386 boxes, an iMac running OS 9.2, and a
Mac 8500 running OS 8.6. One of the Linux boxes operates a diald/ppp
connection to the outside, and netatalk for file sharing.
I decided for no good reason to upgrade the ppp connection box from Potato to
Woody. Now I
Greetings. I am a fairly experienced Debian user
(for those of you who wish to get technical) with a
question relating to Netatalk. I maintain a low
security mac lab and it, for the most part, has been
working fine as a file server for me. However, I have
run into one large hitch; I, for
I'm running this distro http://www.e-smith.org/ on a box for my
colleagues. The only feature that I use is the "Ibay", this lets me
create a directory that is accessible through samba (windows), netatalk
(apple), www and ftp. It will also let me treat user home directories as
Ibays
I have a small LAN; two Linux boxes and two Macs. One of the Linux boxes
is used as a workstation, and one is used to provide common services.
The services are ppp, printing, backup, etc. I have had it working for
about a year.
Now I am working on converting the Linux boxes from Red Hat to Debian.
Hi all,
To establish a netatalk server (Woody) with encrypted passwords,
would I do this:
apt-get install netatalk
apt-get install libssl09
or is there more to setup?
The workstations are OS 9 or higher.
Thanks in advance!!
Mike
-- my apologies if this is a duplicate message, it doesn't seem to have gone
-- through the first time though...unless there's a 24 hour lag...
Hello all --
I'm attempting to build netatalk from its source package, due to the
fact that the binary package doesn't seem
Hello all --
I'm attempting to build netatalk from its source package, due to the
fact that the binary package doesn't seem to support encrypted passwords. I
keep getting an error after doing:
debian/rules binary
debian/rules build works fine and completes without any noticeable er
pening folders. Then I read about
> all these alias problems and so on. Now I've tried netatalk from potato
> several months ago and when it didn't work just out of the box I gave up
> and thought it's not worth it. Maybe I should try again I don't know.
>
>
box suddenly froze up every few files/opening folders. Then I read about
all these alias problems and so on. Now I've tried netatalk from potato
several months ago and when it didn't work just out of the box I gave up
and thought it's not worth it. Maybe I should try again I don't
Hi,
What problems are you having with 1.4?
I don't very much with rebuilding packages and developing and all that.
I just downloaded the newer netatalk .deb package,
then tried to install it. when it said I was missing stuff,
I just downloaded those debs to make everything happy.
I'
Hello
After having had various problems with netatalk 1.4 (with asun patches)
(mostly under other distributions) I thought I'd try with a newer
version. netatalk-1.5pre7 binaries from testing require newer c
libraries, so I'm trying to rebuild the package but without success.
Like w
andrew morgan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >I believe Potato uses LPRng for the printer system. You'll need to change
> >your papd.conf file to:
> >
> >Deskjet:\
> >:pr=|/usr/bin/lpr -Plp0:\
> >:op=susan:\
> >
. You'll need to change
>your papd.conf file to:
>
>Deskjet:\
>:pr=|/usr/bin/lpr -Plp0:\
>:op=susan:\
>:pd=/etc/netatalk/ppds/HPDJ1200C.ppd:
>
>This tells papd to pipe the printjob to the lpr program (you may need to
>change the path
I have set up netatalk on my stable machine so that I can print from a Mac
IIsi. "Deskjet" is a HP Deskjet 694C that resides on my debian machine at
lp0.
Here is the papd.conf file:
Deskjet:\
:pr=lp0:\
:op=susan:\
:pd=/etc/netatalk/ppds/HPDJ1200C.ppd
I
Hi...
Does the latest netatalk .deb package contain
support for encryption over afpd?
If not.. is there an easy way to get it?
thanks
Mike
i just specify it, in my example above replace hostname with
your machines real hostname.
> output:
>
> /etc/init.d/netatalk start
> Starting AppleTalk Daemons (this will take a while):bind: Cannot assign
> requested address
> bind: Cannot assign requested address
> afpd pa
On Wed, May 02, 2001 at 08:45:19AM -0700, Eric Richardson wrote:
> Even though my atalkd starts fine I thought this sounded like a good
> idea.
>
> I did this by commenting out the following in /etc/init.d/netatalk.
> /usr/sbin/atalkd
> echo -n " atalkd"
&g
Ethan Benson wrote:
>
> On Tue, May 01, 2001 at 09:07:00PM -0500, will trillich wrote:
> > trying to install netatalk for macintosh file serving capabilities, and the
> > setup script goes all fuxnored(tm). is this something i caused? or can
> > cure?
> >
> &
ult?
well whatever you do don't enable root login! afp passwords are
plaintext.
edit /etc/netatalk/AppleVolumes.default
i have for example:
# don't export $HOME as macos dribbles hfs crap all over the place
# instead put it in a playpen where the mess can be contained.
~/afp/
On Tue, May 01, 2001 at 08:21:25PM -0800, Ethan Benson wrote:
> On Tue, May 01, 2001 at 09:07:00PM -0500, will trillich wrote:
> > trying to install netatalk for macintosh file serving capabilities, and the
> > setup script goes all fuxnored(tm). is this something i caused?
On Tue, May 01, 2001 at 09:07:00PM -0500, will trillich wrote:
> trying to install netatalk for macintosh file serving capabilities, and the
> setup script goes all fuxnored(tm). is this something i caused? or can
> cure?
>
> # apt-get install netatalk
> ...
trying to install netatalk for macintosh file serving capabilities, and the
setup script goes all fuxnored(tm). is this something i caused? or can
cure?
# apt-get install netatalk
...
Setting up netatalk (1.4b2+asun2.1.3-6) ...
Starting AppleTalk Daemons (this will
hanson
Web Systems Administrator
Fuller Theological Seminary
On Fri, 27 Apr 2001, Pietro Cagnoni wrote:
> Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2001 12:41:07 +0200
> From: Pietro Cagnoni <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: debian-user mailing list
> Subject: Re: samba + netatalk
>
> Liam Ward wrote:
&
utting Debian on it and setting
> up shared disk space using Samba and Appletalk (netatalk)
> simultaneously.
>
> If anyone knows of any pitfalls before I start into this I'd
> appreciate some pointers.
i found a nice one when i had to do the same thing:
if you connect your mac to
ek of
reading and studying, i got both SAMBA and netatalk up and
running with no problems as of yet. i think the big thing
is configuring both services. the previous gentleman
referred to the sync writing error which could be a
headache...and i do believe he's right about the netatalk
thinking of getting an old PC, putting Debian on it and setting
> up shared disk space using Samba and Appletalk (netatalk)
> simultaneously.
>
> If anyone knows of any pitfalls before I start into this I'd
> appreciate some pointers.
this will work, you use samba for th
space using Samba and Appletalk (netatalk)
simultaneously.
If anyone knows of any pitfalls before I start into this I'd
appreciate some pointers.
Thanks,
Liam
Liam Ward
DV4
t: +353 1 672 7250
e: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
w: www.dv4.com
At 22:17 Uhr +0100 13.03.2001, Frank Joerdens wrote:
What I'm wondering is: Isn't the whole issue becoming somewhat moot with
Mac OS X which has NFS support, and a flat filesystem to boot?
Just about when the last "Classic" MacOS machine leaves the shop.
I.e.: "Not yet."
And, while NFS may
On Tue, Mar 13, 2001 at 03:56:23PM -0500, Kevin M. Myer wrote:
[ . . . ]
>
> If anyone has an update on anything I've listed, I'd really like to hear
> about it (i.e. if you are working on implimenting samba/netatalk
> interoperability or if you have more info on locking pr
On Tue, 13 Mar 2001, Daniel E. Lautenschleger wrote:
> This is the type of information many of us have been looking for with
> respect to Netatalk and Samba coexisting in a "friendly" matter. Many of
> the replies I received when originally asking whether the two behaved
&
This is the type of information many of us have been looking for with
respect to Netatalk and Samba coexisting in a "friendly" matter. Many of
the replies I received when originally asking whether the two behaved
together basically stated that the biggest problem was a Windows user and
you are seeing. Neither Netatalk
> or Samba have any idea that the file is locked by the other.
>
> One of the new features of Samba 2.2 is the mapping of oplocks to POSIX
> locks. From the release notes:-
I have disabled oplocks, and kernel oplocks. Oplocks aren't the proble
ther has the same file open. The information
> isn't transferring between samba and netatalk. Locking works within samba and
> within netatalk, meaning mac-mac locking conflicts are reported and smb-smb
> locking conflicts are too. But if you have the same file open in windows and
&
tween samba and netatalk. Locking works within samba and
within netatalk, meaning mac-mac locking conflicts are reported and smb-smb
locking conflicts are too. But if you have the same file open in windows and
mac, there isn't any warning!
I've turned off oplocks, level 2 oplocks, ker
On Wed, Oct 11, 2000 at 11:08:28AM +0200, EMMETROP wrote:
> Hello,
> i tried apt-get install netatalk and the downloading seems OK but i got
> several error messages after, what can i do now ?
>
Be more precise : What kind of errors do you have ?
Francois
>
> --
>
On Wed, Oct 11, 2000 at 11:08:28AM +0200, EMMETROP wrote:
> Hello,
> i tried apt-get install netatalk and the downloading seems OK but i got
> several error messages after, what can i do now ?
things like invalid argument or such from the kernel?
those would be caused if you don't
Hello,
i tried apt-get install netatalk and the downloading seems OK but i got
several error messages after, what can i do now ?
1 - 100 of 152 matches
Mail list logo
