Re: mutt seg faults on wheezy

2013-06-03 Thread Alan Schwartz
Tony Baldwin tonybaldwin.info> writes: > > On Mon, May 20, 2013 at 11:28:00PM +0300, Andrei POPESCU wrote: > > On Lu, 20 mai 13, 12:12:58, Tony Baldwin wrote: > > > > > > 0kay, I found it (~/.mutt/cache/headers). > > > Deleted it, and not seeing the segfaults. > > > > I also confirm this. For

Re: mutt seg faults on wheezy

2013-05-20 Thread Tony Baldwin
On Mon, May 20, 2013 at 11:28:00PM +0300, Andrei POPESCU wrote: > On Lu, 20 mai 13, 12:12:58, Tony Baldwin wrote: > > > > 0kay, I found it (~/.mutt/cache/headers). > > Deleted it, and not seeing the segfaults. > > I also confirm this. For me it happens sometimes when I access the 'All > Mail' fo

Re: mutt seg faults on wheezy

2013-05-20 Thread Andrei POPESCU
On Lu, 20 mai 13, 12:12:58, Tony Baldwin wrote: > > 0kay, I found it (~/.mutt/cache/headers). > Deleted it, and not seeing the segfaults. I also confirm this. For me it happens sometimes when I access the 'All Mail' folder on my Gmail account. When it does I delete its header cache and the it w

Re: mutt seg faults on wheezy

2013-05-20 Thread Tony Baldwin
On Mon, May 20, 2013 at 12:06:40PM -0400, Tony Baldwin wrote: > On Mon, May 20, 2013 at 11:24:39AM -0400, Rob Owens wrote: > > - Original Message - > > From: "Tony Baldwin" > > To: "debian en" > > Sent: Monday, May 20, 2013 10:

Re: mutt seg faults on wheezy

2013-05-20 Thread Tony Baldwin
On Mon, May 20, 2013 at 11:24:39AM -0400, Rob Owens wrote: > - Original Message - > From: "Tony Baldwin" > To: "debian en" > Sent: Monday, May 20, 2013 10:37:42 AM > Subject: mutt seg faults on wheezy > > Since upgrading to wheezy, mutt is

Re: mutt seg faults on wheezy

2013-05-20 Thread Tony Baldwin
On Mon, May 20, 2013 at 05:59:13PM +0300, Klearchos-Angelos Gkountras wrote: > i am on my server and I am running debian wheezy and mutt with gmail's > imap works fine Yes, I can access both gmail and gmx.com mail with my mutt without problem, which is why I did mention my server, in case that w

Re: mutt seg faults on wheezy

2013-05-20 Thread Tony Baldwin
On Mon, May 20, 2013 at 10:44:10AM -0400, John L. Cunningham wrote: > On Mon, May 20, 2013 at 10:37:42AM -0400, Tony Baldwin wrote: > > Since upgrading to wheezy, mutt is occasionally giving me seg faults > > when picking up mail from my mail server. > > The client machine running mutt is wheezy on

Re: mutt seg faults on wheezy

2013-05-20 Thread John L. Cunningham
On Mon, May 20, 2013 at 11:24:39AM -0400, Rob Owens wrote: > - Original Message - > From: "Tony Baldwin" > To: "debian en" > Sent: Monday, May 20, 2013 10:37:42 AM > Subject: mutt seg faults on wheezy > > Since upgrading to wheezy, mutt is

Re: mutt seg faults on wheezy

2013-05-20 Thread Rob Owens
- Original Message - From: "Tony Baldwin" To: "debian en" Sent: Monday, May 20, 2013 10:37:42 AM Subject: mutt seg faults on wheezy Since upgrading to wheezy, mutt is occasionally giving me seg faults when picking up mail from my mail server. The client machine runni

Re: mutt seg faults on wheezy

2013-05-20 Thread Klearchos-Angelos Gkountras
i am on my server and I am running debian wheezy and mutt with gmail's imap works fine On Mon, May 20, 2013 at 10:44:10AM -0400, John L. Cunningham wrote: > On Mon, May 20, 2013 at 10:37:42AM -0400, Tony Baldwin wrote: > > Since upgrading to wheezy, mutt is occasionally giving me seg faults > > w

Re: mutt seg faults on wheezy

2013-05-20 Thread John L. Cunningham
On Mon, May 20, 2013 at 10:37:42AM -0400, Tony Baldwin wrote: > Since upgrading to wheezy, mutt is occasionally giving me seg faults > when picking up mail from my mail server. > The client machine running mutt is wheezy on amd64. > The server is squeeze on 32bit intel celeron, running postfix and

mutt seg faults on wheezy

2013-05-20 Thread Tony Baldwin
Since upgrading to wheezy, mutt is occasionally giving me seg faults when picking up mail from my mail server. The client machine running mutt is wheezy on amd64. The server is squeeze on 32bit intel celeron, running postfix and dovecot. When the desktop was running squeeze, I did not see this, so