Csanyi Pal wrote:
> Bob Proulx writes:
> > You can purge and re-install packages. But that may not be the same
> > as a clean installation. It is much easier to simply create a clean
> > chroot and install there.
>
> I created a clean chroot by running the following commands in a
> directory cal
gt;
>> I want to follow advice of Michael Gilbert:
>>
>> "You have a mix of deb-multimedia packages, which often leads to
>> problems. Please try to reproduce this on a clean installation."
>>
>> So I change my sources.list:
>>
>> deb
t;>
> >>>> So how can I know now which debian packages are installed from these
> >>>> deb-multimedia repositories abowe?
> >>>
> >>> aptitude search '~i ~O"Unofficial Multimedia Packages"'
> >>
> >> So I
. Unless you take special care by
pinning your system is a Sid system.
> I have installed vuze but I can't to use it. I reported a bug here:
> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=%23700090
>
> I want to follow advice of Michael Gilbert:
>
> "You have a mix of
search '~i ~O"Unofficial Multimedia Packages"'
So I guess the search term finds installed packages that are available
from the specified origin,
You are right.
aptitude search '~S ~i ~O"Unofficial Multimedia Packages"'
/ Johan
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
dia repositories abowe?
>>
>> aptitude search '~i ~O"Unofficial Multimedia Packages"'
>
> So I guess the search term finds installed packages that are available
> from the specified origin, not those that were actually installed from
> that origin.
>
On Sun, 2013-02-24 at 21:51 +0100, Slavko wrote:
> Hi
>
> Dňa 24.02.2013 21:20:35 Csanyi Pal napísal(a):
>
> > So how can I know now which debian packages are installed from these
> > deb-multimedia repositories abowe?
>
> aptitude search '~i ~O"Unof
Hi
Dňa 24.02.2013 21:20:35 Csanyi Pal napísal(a):
> So how can I know now which debian packages are installed from these
> deb-multimedia repositories abowe?
aptitude search '~i ~O"Unofficial Multimedia Packages"'
regards
--
Slavko
http://slavino.sk
signatur
x27;t to use it. I reported a bug here:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=%23700090
I want to follow advice of Michael Gilbert:
"You have a mix of deb-multimedia packages, which often leads to
problems. Please try to reproduce this on a clean installation."
So I change
ter?
Dunno, but check which Debian packages will be removed and replaced by
the deb-multimedia packages, and take note if you decide to go ahead.
You may strike problems later, e.g I found the Debian devede package
wouldn't work. (It would mean using dmo's devede package, and I wasn't
On Mon, 4 Feb 2013, Chris Bannister wrote:
Just be aware that if you strike any bugs and any dmo packages are
involved, it will be closed without any further ado. The deb-multimedia
repository is toxic to a healthy wheezy system. Take it from me,
I spent ages cleaning up my system when I install
On Sun, Feb 03, 2013 at 07:04:27PM +, Tixy wrote:
> There seems to be a lots of packages in both repos, deb-multimedia has
> its own version of loads of the AV libraries and it uses a higher epoch
> in the version number to force them to be preferred over the official
> libraries.
Yeah, not ni
On Sun, Feb 03, 2013 at 02:49:22PM +0100, Pierre Frenkiel wrote:
> On Mon, 28 Jan 2013, Rob Owens wrote:
>
> >I recommend you use the third-party deb-multimedia repository for those
> >packages. I have them both installed from that repo and I've never had
> >any problems. In fact, that repo has
the AV libraries and it uses a higher epoch
in the version number to force them to be preferred over the official
libraries.
Basically, without using pinning to stop apt pulling in deb-multimedia
packages you will get quite a few unofficial packages. (On my fairly
minimal LXDE install 19 package
On Sun, Feb 03, 2013 at 02:49:22PM +0100, Pierre Frenkiel wrote:
> On Mon, 28 Jan 2013, Rob Owens wrote:
>
> >I recommend you use the third-party deb-multimedia repository for those
> >packages. I have them both installed from that repo and I've never had
> >any problems. In fact, that repo has
On Sun, 3 Feb 2013 14:49:22 +0100 (CET)
Pierre Frenkiel wrote:
Hello Pierre,
> I was rather reluctant to use a repo relying on only one man, but
Christian is a very conscientious person. The DMO repo is very well
maintained. Of course, it's entirely up to you whether you use it or
not.
>
On Mon, 28 Jan 2013, Rob Owens wrote:
I recommend you use the third-party deb-multimedia repository for those
packages. I have them both installed from that repo and I've never had
any problems. In fact, that repo has never given me any problems. Of
course I'd prefer if I could get everything
On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 04:46:49PM +0100, Pierre Frenkiel wrote:
> hi,
> some important packages are missing in the Debian official repositories
> cinelerra, avidemux
> the offical recommendations say:
>
>Please do also consider to entirely remove unofficial third-party
>repositories fr
On Monday 28 January 2013 15:46:49 Pierre Frenkiel wrote:
> hi,
> some important packages are missing in the Debian official repositories
> cinelerra, avidemux
> the offical recommendations say:
>
> Please do also consider to entirely remove unofficial third-party
> repositories from
On 28/01/13 10:46 AM, Pierre Frenkiel wrote:
hi,
some important packages are missing in the Debian official repositories
cinelerra, avidemux
the offical recommendations say:
Please do also consider to entirely remove unofficial third-party
repositories from your /etc/apt/sources.list fi
On Mon, 28 Jan 2013 16:46:49 +0100, Pierre Frenkiel
wrote:
cinelerra
You are aware of Debian's policy?
;D
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/op.wrm
Hi,
I use debian unstable, and as such I never worried much about
/etc/apt/preferences (well /etc/apt/preferences.d/* are not recognized
by aptitude as of now), so I always had a misxture of official debian
packages, the ones coming from debian-multimedia, and debian
unofficial ones.
Yesterday, a
On Sun, 20 Jun 2004 11:25:12 -0400
Tom Allison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Where might I find packages for more extensive multimedia support?
More extensive media support than what? What is it that you're looking
for, or having problems with? Come on; you have to be willing to help
people hel
Where might I find packages for more extensive multimedia support?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
24 matches
Mail list logo
