Re: make-kpkg failure - UTS release version problem

2008-05-08 Thread NN_il_Confusionario
On Thu, May 08, 2008 at 03:55:22AM -0700, Bill wrote: > Should there be a include/linux/version.h file in the > 2.6.25 directory? if you follow the documentation of kernel-package then make-kpkg will create it. If no commands were executed in the 2.6.25 directory tree after creating it by u

Re: make-kpkg failure - UTS release version problem

2008-05-08 Thread Bill
On Thu, 2008-08-05 at 06:44 +0200, NN_il_Confusionario wrote: > > On Wed, May 07, 2008 at 03:05:37PM -0700, Bill wrote: > > The UTS Release version in include/linux/version.h > > "" > > does not match current version: > > "2.6.25" > > Please correct this. > > > Any pointers here would

Re: make-kpkg failure - UTS release version problem

2008-05-07 Thread NN_il_Confusionario
On Wed, May 07, 2008 at 03:05:37PM -0700, Bill wrote: > The UTS Release version in include/linux/version.h > "" > does not match current version: > "2.6.25" > Please correct this. > Any pointers here would be helpful. It might be a faq about kernel-package, and its documentation in /u

make-kpkg failure - UTS release version problem

2008-05-07 Thread Bill
Hi folks, I'm trying to compile 2.6.25 using fakeroot make-kpkg clean fakeroot make-kpkg modules-clean The second command terminates with an error as follows: echo "The UTS Release version in include/linux/version.h"; echo " \"\" "; echo "does not match current version:"; echo " \"2.6.25\"