On Thu, Mar 08, 2007 at 11:21:56AM -0800, John L Fjellstad wrote:
> Andrew Sackville-West <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > I always find that I need a folder *after* I've fired up my MUA, so I
> > just use it to make my folders. In mutt
> >
> > s=/
>
> If you want maildir folder, then you should
Andrew Sackville-West <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I always find that I need a folder *after* I've fired up my MUA, so I
> just use it to make my folders. In mutt
>
> s=/
If you want maildir folder, then you should probably set
mbox_type=Maildir, otherwise I think it defaults to mbox
--
John L
On Wed, Mar 07, 2007 at 03:18:00PM -0800, John L Fjellstad wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Chris Bannister) writes:
>
> > Folders are simply subdirectories inside the main maildir whose names
> > start with a period, and which are themselves maildirs. For example,
> > the command "maildirmake -f Draf
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Chris Bannister) writes:
> Folders are simply subdirectories inside the main maildir whose names
> start with a period, and which are themselves maildirs. For example,
> the command "maildirmake -f Drafts mail/Maildir" creates
> mail/Maildir/.Drafts, that has the usual tmp, new
On Mon, Mar 05, 2007 at 11:54:11PM +, Hans du Plooy wrote:
> On Mon, 2007-03-05 at 22:43 +1300, Chris Bannister wrote:
> > There is one(?) caveat though. Don't create your Maildir directory by
> > hand. USE the maildirmake program and then create your mailboxes using
> > the -f switch of maildi
On Mon, 2007-03-05 at 22:43 +1300, Chris Bannister wrote:
> There is one(?) caveat though. Don't create your Maildir directory by
> hand. USE the maildirmake program and then create your mailboxes using
> the -f switch of maildirmake. Believe me, it can save you lots of grief.
> Otherwise courier-i
On Sun, Mar 04, 2007 at 01:25:13AM +, Hans du Plooy wrote:
> On Wed, 2007-02-28 at 07:56 -0700, Kelly wrote:
> > Just a request for opinions here guys. I have read several articles
> > about Courier and Dovecot. What is your opinions about which to go
> > with.
>
> There's really very little
On Sun, Mar 04, 2007 at 01:25:13AM +, Hans du Plooy wrote:
>
> Haven't done Dovecot on Debian (do it all the time on RHEL tho). For
> Courier, just apt-get install courier-imap (I think that's the package
> name). There's nothing to configure unless you want to use virtual
> users/domains an
On Wed, 2007-02-28 at 07:56 -0700, Kelly wrote:
> Just a request for opinions here guys. I have read several articles
> about Courier and Dovecot. What is your opinions about which to go
> with.
There's really very little difference. Dovecot is supposedly a little
faster, but if you reached the
On Wed, 2007-02-28 at 11:17 -0500, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 28, 2007 at 05:29:22PM +0200, Nick Demou wrote:
> >
> > courier-IMAP was easy to install and setup
> >
> > works fine with many users accessing the same maildir about 20
> > maildirs in a low spec server. Hundreds of folde
We are looking at about 100 users connected at our office. There will
also be about 30 or so sites w/email hosted for our agents. in total
about 200 users or so.
Thanks
Kelly
Ron Johnson wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 02/28/07 08:56, Kelly wrote:
Just a request
On Wed, Feb 28, 2007 at 05:29:22PM +0200, Nick Demou wrote:
>
> courier-IMAP was easy to install and setup
>
> works fine with many users accessing the same maildir about 20
> maildirs in a low spec server. Hundreds of folders per maildir with
> some of them having up to 3 emails
>
> With ou
Kelly wrote:
Just a request for opinions here guys. I have read several articles
about Courier and Dovecot. What is your opinions about which to go
with.
I have no experience with Courier, but I use Dovecot on Maildirs here
with OpenLDAP for auth, talking to Squirrelmail and assorted IMAP(S)
On Wed, Feb 28, 2007 at 09:32:01AM -0600, Ron Johnson wrote:
> On 02/28/07 08:56, Kelly wrote:
> > Just a request for opinions here guys. I have read several articles
> > about Courier and Dovecot. What is your opinions about which to go
> > with.
>
> What is the purpose/scale of your proposed m
2007/2/28, Kelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Just a request for opinions here guys. I have read several articles
about Courier and Dovecot. What is your opinions about which to go
with.
Disclaimer:
- I have no experience with dovecot
- I have used only the basic functionality of courier-IMAP
courie
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 02/28/07 08:56, Kelly wrote:
> Just a request for opinions here guys. I have read several articles
> about Courier and Dovecot. What is your opinions about which to go
> with.
What is the purpose/scale of your proposed mail server?
Dovecot is su
Just a request for opinions here guys. I have read several articles
about Courier and Dovecot. What is your opinions about which to go
with.
Thanks
Kelly
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sun, Jul 01, 2001 at 08:45:44PM -0400, Richard A Nelson wrote:
> Hrm, I'd think about sending questions to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Oh,
> wait that'd be routed to me ;-}
>
> This is the configuration I run at home (fetchmail/sendmail/procmail) -
> I'll be happy to help in anyway I can.
>
> Send me
, or your class C IP banned.
- Original Message -
From: "Phil Brutsche" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Martin F. Krafft" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "Debian-users"
Sent: Sunday, July 01, 2001 9:39 AM
Subject: Re: [users] Re: mail server question
> -B
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
A long time ago, in a galaxy far, far way, someone said...
> and i propose postfix. then again, i would happily like to hear why
> exim is better (or not).
Exim (in my experience):
* is easier to configure
* is much more flexible
> it looks to me
also sprach Joost Kooij (on Sat, 30 Jun 2001 09:35:09PM +0200):
> Stick with exim, which is debian's default. Much easier to configure,
> larger debian userbase, so more likely that you get an answer on
> debian-user.
and i propose postfix. then again, i would happily like to hear why
exim is bet
On Sat, Jun 30, 2001 at 02:16:12PM -0500, Brad Cramer wrote:
[sendmail hassles]
Stick with exim, which is debian's default. Much easier to configure,
larger debian userbase, so more likely that you get an answer on
debian-user.
BTW, for smtp to work, your dns must make sense too. Figure that ou
I am running Debian Potato on a box that I want to use as a mail server for
my home network. I have a dsl connection and do not have a perm ip of domain
name. I just want the server to handle all the incoming and outgoing mail
for my network. anyway I am using sendmail but am having a hell of a ti
23 matches
Mail list logo
