:: On Mon, 24 Jul 2000 16:28:46 + (UTC), Pollywog <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>>> Did you try 2.4.0test5-pre4?
>>
>> Is this a patch by Alan? Or where do you get these "pre" patches?
>>
> Would I apply the patch by going into /usr/src
> and then doing 'cat | patch -p0' ?
> I have not appli
:: On Mon, 24 Jul 2000 18:19:51 +0200, "Ralf G. R. Bergs" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
said:
> On Mon, 24 Jul 2000 11:03:45 -0300, Jeronimo Pellegrini wrote:
>> Did you try 2.4.0test5-pre4?
> Is this a patch by Alan?
No. It is the alpha series (the beta one is without the "pre").
The test5-pre4 is a p
On 24-Jul-2000 Ralf G. R. Bergs wrote:
> On Mon, 24 Jul 2000 11:03:45 -0300, Jeronimo Pellegrini wrote:
>
>>Did you try 2.4.0test5-pre4?
>
> Is this a patch by Alan? Or where do you get these "pre" patches?
>
Would I apply the patch by going into /usr/src
and then doing 'cat | patch -p0' ?
On Mon, 24 Jul 2000 11:03:45 -0300, Jeronimo Pellegrini wrote:
>Did you try 2.4.0test5-pre4?
Is this a patch by Alan? Or where do you get these "pre" patches?
Thanks,
Ralf
--
Sign the EU petition against SPAM: L I N U X .~.
http://www.politik-digital.de/spam/The Choic
On 24-Jul-2000 Ralf G. R. Bergs wrote:
>
> I simply can't live w/o running the latest, gratest kernel. ;-)
>
> Seriously, I thought since the test* kernels are already pretty(?) close to
> 2.4.0-release it would be a Good Thing(TM) to install one of them to be
> prepared for the things that ar
On 24-Jul-2000 Ralf G. R. Bergs wrote:
> Hi,
>
> since a few days I'm running kernel 2.4.0test4. Before I used to run test1
> and everything was fine.
>
> Now when I want to print I get
>
> lp: driver loaded but no devices found
>
I have the same problem wi
:: On Mon, 24 Jul 2000 23:37:24 +1000 (EST), Richard Lindner <[EMAIL
PROTECTED]> said:
Hii.
> Revert back to 2.4.0test2 - or if this is a desktop machine, back to
> 2.2.16 or thereabouts (with the reversed md patches if you use RAID)
Someone posted a message two weeks ago in this list saying th
On Mon, 24 Jul 2000 23:37:24 +1000 (EST), Richard Lindner wrote:
[...]
>> Any idea why I suddenly can't print anymore? I added the above line
>> "options lp parport=0,1" just now to make sure that an lp device is
>> created for both parallel ports even tho there isn't a device on lp0
>> most of th
On 24 Jul, Ralf G. R. Bergs wrote:
> Hi,
>
> since a few days I'm running kernel 2.4.0test4. Before I used to run
> test1 and everything was fine.
> Any idea why I suddenly can't print anymore? I added the above line
> "options lp parport=0,1" just now to make sure that an lp device is
> create
Hi,
since a few days I'm running kernel 2.4.0test4. Before I used to run test1
and everything was fine.
Now when I want to print I get
lp: driver loaded but no devices found
and lpq gives
waiting for lp to become ready (offline ?)
The printer IS of course ready, paper is available
On Wed, May 31, 2000 at 06:37:57PM -0700, Eric G . Miller wrote:
>
> Have you configured the parport_pc (io, irq, dma)? You may also want to
> fiddle with the BIOS configuration of the parport communication system.
>
> For instace, I have:
>
> options parport_pc io=0x378 irq=7 dma=5
Don't the
On Wed, May 31, 2000 at 06:37:57PM -0700, Eric G . Miller wrote:
> On Wed, May 31, 2000 at 05:23:56PM -0600, Art Lemasters wrote:
> > When I reboot and run dmesg, it says, "lp: driver loaded but no
> > devices found" If I try to print from mutt, the error message s
On Wed, May 31, 2000 at 05:23:56PM -0600, Art Lemasters wrote:
> When I reboot and run dmesg, it says, "lp: driver loaded but no
> devices found" If I try to print from mutt, the error message says,
> "jobs queued but cannot start daemon" This happens on a pot
When I reboot and run dmesg, it says, "lp: driver loaded but no
devices found" If I try to print from mutt, the error message says,
"jobs queued but cannot start daemon" This happens on a potato
system.
What's the answer? Is it in a config file related to kmod?
Art
which is how I made it work
before). But I can't get my printer back. "lp driver
loaded but no devices found." Very weird...
>
> Good luck
>
> Curt Daugaard
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> On Thu, Feb 18, 1999 at 09:33:25PM -0600, Steven J. Martin wrote:
> &g
lel port, and with the
> 2.0.33 kernel all I did was answer enable the [*] Parallel printer
> support option under `make menuconfig`.
>
> I see the following in /var/log/messages when the kernel boots:
> "lp: driver loaded but no devices found"
>
> Thanks!
>
>
option under `make menuconfig`.
>
> I see the following in /var/log/messages when the kernel boots:
> "lp: driver loaded but no devices found"
CONFIG_PARPORT=y
CONFIG_PARPORT_PC=y
Also, /dev/lp1 under 2.0.x becomes /dev/lp0 under 2.2.x. So check your
/etc/printcap and make sure
when the kernel boots:
"lp: driver loaded but no devices found"
Thanks!
--
Steven J. Martin
18 matches
Mail list logo
