On Thu, 2 Jul 2015, Doug wrote:
And, I have a nice 200MHz Tektronix analog scope!
<--green
But if I don't have to hook it up, fine!
Sounds to me, sir, that your motivation to gaze at
waveforms may leave a lot to be desired! Either hook
up the gosh-darn thing or put it on a UPS truck
ad
On 07/01/2015 11:31 PM, Bob Bernstein wrote:
On Wed, 1 Jul 2015, Joe wrote:
...it could be used if there was nothing better, and it may offer features
which the OP 'didn't know he needed'.
Speaking of the OP, has he been seen in these here parts since the thread
began? I've been wanting t
On Wed, 1 Jul 2015, Joe wrote:
...it could be used if there was nothing better, and
it may offer features which the OP 'didn't know he
needed'.
Speaking of the OP, has he been seen in these here
parts since the thread began? I've been wanting to ask
him why he wants to view sound waveforms.
On Wed, 1 Jul 2015 08:27:20 +0100
Lisi Reisz wrote:
> On Wednesday 01 July 2015 01:28:15 David Wright wrote:
> >
> > Why do "typical audio files" fail your "sound" check?
> > Or are you philosophising? :)
> > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/If_a_tree_falls_in_a_forest
>
> They don't. scilab does
On Wednesday 01 July 2015 01:28:15 David Wright wrote:
> Quoting Lisi Reisz (lisi.re...@gmail.com):
> > On Tuesday 30 June 2015 22:20:12 David Wright wrote:
> > > Quoting Lisi Reisz (lisi.re...@gmail.com):
> > > > On Tuesday 30 June 2015 21:42:16 David Wright wrote:
> > > > > Quoting Lisi Reisz (li
Quoting Lisi Reisz (lisi.re...@gmail.com):
> On Tuesday 30 June 2015 22:20:12 David Wright wrote:
> > Quoting Lisi Reisz (lisi.re...@gmail.com):
> > > On Tuesday 30 June 2015 21:42:16 David Wright wrote:
> > > > Quoting Lisi Reisz (lisi.re...@gmail.com):
> > > > > On Monday 29 June 2015 02:28:20 Ri
On Tuesday 30 June 2015 22:20:12 David Wright wrote:
> Quoting Lisi Reisz (lisi.re...@gmail.com):
> > On Tuesday 30 June 2015 21:42:16 David Wright wrote:
> > > Quoting Lisi Reisz (lisi.re...@gmail.com):
> > > > On Monday 29 June 2015 02:28:20 Richard Owlett wrote:
> > > > > Dan Hitt wrote:
> > > >
Quoting Lisi Reisz (lisi.re...@gmail.com):
> On Tuesday 30 June 2015 21:42:16 David Wright wrote:
> > Quoting Lisi Reisz (lisi.re...@gmail.com):
> > > On Monday 29 June 2015 02:28:20 Richard Owlett wrote:
> > > > Dan Hitt wrote:
> > > > > Hi,
> > > > >
> > > > > Could somebody please point me to a
On Tuesday 30 June 2015 21:42:16 David Wright wrote:
> Quoting Lisi Reisz (lisi.re...@gmail.com):
> > On Monday 29 June 2015 02:28:20 Richard Owlett wrote:
> > > Dan Hitt wrote:
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > Could somebody please point me to a sound waveform viewer?
> > > >
> > > > I'm aware of audac
Quoting Lisi Reisz (lisi.re...@gmail.com):
> On Monday 29 June 2015 02:28:20 Richard Owlett wrote:
> > Dan Hitt wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > Could somebody please point me to a sound waveform viewer?
> > >
> > > I'm aware of audacity, which is of course a very fine piece of
> > > software. But its
On Monday 29 June 2015 02:28:20 Richard Owlett wrote:
> Dan Hitt wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Could somebody please point me to a sound waveform viewer?
> >
> > I'm aware of audacity, which is of course a very fine piece of
> > software. But its function is more to edit than just to view. So,
> > e.g.,
On Sun, 28 Jun 2015, Dan Hitt wrote:
I'm aware of audacity, which is of course a very fine piece of
software. But its function is more to edit than just to view. So,
e.g., if you open a sound file, then it wants to create a project, and
when you want to exit you have to tell it not to save the
Le primidi 11 messidor, an CCXXIII, Reco a écrit :
> What about ffmpeg + gnuplot approach?
>
> https://trac.ffmpeg.org/wiki/Create%20a%20Waveform%20Image%20from%20an%20Audio%20Stream
FFmpeg (the real one) can plot waves by itself. I would have mentioned it
sooner, but the OP seems to be looking f
Hi.
On Sun, Jun 28, 2015 at 05:24:25PM -0700, Dan Hitt wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Could somebody please point me to a sound waveform viewer?
>
> I'm aware of audacity, which is of course a very fine piece of
> software. But its function is more to edit than just to view. So,
> e.g., if you open a sound
On Sun, Jun 28, 2015 at 05:24:25PM -0700, Dan Hitt wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Could somebody please point me to a sound waveform viewer?
>
> I'm aware of audacity, which is of course a very fine piece of
> software. But its function is more to edit than just to view. So,
> e.g., if you open a sound file
On 06/28/2015 08:24 PM, Dan Hitt wrote:
Hi,
Could somebody please point me to a sound waveform viewer?
I'm aware of audacity, which is of course a very fine piece of
software. But its function is more to edit than just to view. So,
e.g., if you open a sound file, then it wants to create a pro
On 06/28/2015 08:24 PM, Dan Hitt wrote:
Hi,
Could somebody please point me to a sound waveform viewer?
I'm aware of audacity, which is of course a very fine piece of
software. But its function is more to edit than just to view. So,
e.g., if you open a sound file, then it wants to create a pro
Dan Hitt wrote:
Hi,
Could somebody please point me to a sound waveform viewer?
I'm aware of audacity, which is of course a very fine piece of
software. But its function is more to edit than just to view. So,
e.g., if you open a sound file, then it wants to create a project, and
when you want
On 28/06/15 08:24 PM, Dan Hitt wrote:
Hi,
Could somebody please point me to a sound waveform viewer?
I'm aware of audacity, which is of course a very fine piece of
software. But its function is more to edit than just to view. So,
e.g., if you open a sound file, then it wants to create a proje
Hi,
Could somebody please point me to a sound waveform viewer?
I'm aware of audacity, which is of course a very fine piece of
software. But its function is more to edit than just to view. So,
e.g., if you open a sound file, then it wants to create a project, and
when you want to exit you have t
20 matches
Mail list logo
