> This set of objects is the very heart of our linux.
No, the GNU C Library (libc6) is at the very heart of GNU.
Linux is the name of a kernel.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thursday 26 April 2007, Marc-Olivier Barre wrote:
> On 4/26/07, Fons Adriaensen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 26, 2007 at 03:23:58PM +0300, David Baron wrote:
> > > A while back, jackd audio users were recommended to place a
> > > LD_ASSUME_KERNEL=2.4.19 in their /etc/profile or env
On 4/26/07, Fons Adriaensen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Thu, Apr 26, 2007 at 03:23:58PM +0300, David Baron wrote:
> A while back, jackd audio users were recommended to place a
> LD_ASSUME_KERNEL=2.4.19 in their /etc/profile or environment setup.
This was necessary because early NPTL implement
Fons Adriaensen wrote:
On Thu, Apr 26, 2007 at 03:23:58PM +0300, David Baron wrote:
>> A while back, jackd audio users were recommended to place a
>> LD_ASSUME_KERNEL=2.4.19 in their /etc/profile or environment setup.
>
> This was necessary because early NPTL implementations were completely
> br
On Thu, Apr 26, 2007 at 03:23:58PM +0300, David Baron wrote:
> A while back, jackd audio users were recommended to place a
> LD_ASSUME_KERNEL=2.4.19 in their /etc/profile or environment setup.
This was necessary because early NPTL implementations were completely
broken. I can't remember the last
Libc6 is upgraded on Debian Sid and other distro updates. This set of objects
is the very heart of our linux. If it ails, well heart failure can be fatal.
The new libc6 is fine. It requires newer 2.6 kernels but I assume we are all
onto these kernels already so no problem here. Or is there?
A w
On Fri, Mar 21, 2003 at 17:16:58 +0200, Barak Korren wrote:
> When I updated my system a few days ago, and got my libc6 updated to
> version 2.3.1-14, I noticed that php4 and all dependent packages were
> removed from my system,
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2003/debian-devel-ann
Hi!
On Fri, Mar 21, 2003 at 05:16:58PM +0200, Barak Korren wrote:
[lib6 php4 conflicts snipped]
> Did anyone else encounter this problem?
Yes, it was announced in some Debian MLs.
> Is there a workaround for this?
I used the new libc6 package from unstable. It doesn't conflict with
php4 anymor
Hello
I am running the Debian Testing distribution.
When I updated my system a few days ago, and got my libc6 updated to
version 2.3.1-14, I noticed that php4 and all dependent packages were
removed from my system, while looking into this I found out that the new
libc6 package was marked as con
Usually I do that too. However, in this case I get the "no
candidate" message:
perrin:/tmp# apt-get install libc6 libc6-dev locales
Reading Package Lists... Done
Building Dependency Tree... Done
Package libc6 has no available version, but exists in the database.
This typically means that the pac
On Fri, 11 Oct 2002, Osamu Aoki wrote:
> Hi,
>
> You need to be more clear on your system configuration (distribution,
> preferences, ...) but let bme try help you.
Sorry. It's a woody machine, upgraded when woody was testing. Nothing all
that special about it; it's got a custom-compiled kern
%% Osamu Aoki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
oa> On Fri, Oct 11, 2002 at 03:09:02PM -0400, Andrew Perrin wrote:
>> I fear I've done something very wrong here. I'm trying to stay up to date,
>> so I run apt-get update; apt-get upgrade on a regular basis.
>> This time I paid attention; quite
Hi,
You need to be more clear on your system configuration (distribution,
preferences, ...) but let bme try help you.
On Fri, Oct 11, 2002 at 03:09:02PM -0400, Andrew Perrin wrote:
> I fear I've done something very wrong here. I'm trying to stay up to date,
> so I run apt-get update; apt-get up
perrin:/tmp# apt-get dist-upgrade
Reading Package Lists... Done
Building Dependency Tree... Done
Calculating Upgrade... Done
The following packages have been kept back
libc6 libc6-dev locales
0 packages upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 3 not upgraded.
On Fri, Oct 11, 2002 at 03:09:02PM -0400, Andrew Perrin wrote:
> I fear I've done something very wrong here. I'm trying to stay up to date,
> so I run apt-get update; apt-get upgrade on a regular basis.
>
> This time I paid attention; quite a vew packages were held back, so I
> tried to install t
I fear I've done something very wrong here. I'm trying to stay up to date,
so I run apt-get update; apt-get upgrade on a regular basis.
This time I paid attention; quite a vew packages were held back, so I
tried to install them. I found that libc6 was old:
ii libc6 2.2.4-5GNU C
Hi,
I've gone crazy trying to figure this out:
gcc -o test test.c
as: error while loading shared libraries: as: symbol __libc_start_maan,
version GLIBC_2.0 not defined in file libc.so.6 with link time reference
g++ -o test test.C
as: error while loading shared libraries: as: symbol __libc_start_m
On Wed, Dec 09, 1998 at 15:21:33 -0800, Curt Howland wrote:
[libstdc++2.8 upgraded, dselect still breaks]
You don't mention what version of dpkg you have installed. The current
version of dpkg in frozen is linked against libstdc++2.9, not 2.8, so
it's quite likely that upgrading your libstdc++2.9
Here's something for those for whom the patched libc6 solved
that bad register frame thing
--
ian# dir
13026aaalibstdc++2.8_2.90.29-2.deb textsw_shelf
/tmp
ian# dpkg -i libstdc++2.8_2.90.29-2.deb
(Reading database ... 24524 files and directories currently
19 matches
Mail list logo
