m, so I went ahead and just installed
> the unstable libc6-dev.
>
You could have done something like
sudo apt-get install libc6-dev=2.7-18 gfortran=4:4.3.2-2
(I think) That will downgrade your libc6-dev, gfortran as necessary.
raju
--
Kamaraju S Kusumanchi
http://malayamaarutham.blog
Mike Atkins wrote:
> I am trying to install gfortan, but I get a dependency issue with
> libc6-dev. I then tried to install libc6-dev by itself, but libc6-dev
> requires libc6 = 2.7-18, but I have libc6 = 2.9-4. Any ideas?
>
> Mike
Please post the contents of /etc/apt/sou
nse
from the html archive.
>
> On 2009-09-01 09:28, Mike Atkins wrote:
>
>> On 2009-08-31 18:59, Mike Atkins wrote:
>>
>> I am trying to install gfortan, but I get a dependency issue with
>> libc6-dev.
>> I then tried to install libc6-dev by itself, but
Something (the gmu email software??) is mangling the email replies
and threading.)
On 2009-09-01 09:28, Mike Atkins wrote:
On 2009-08-31 18:59, Mike Atkins wrote:
I am trying to install gfortan, but I get a dependency issue with libc6-dev.
I then tried to install libc6-dev by itself, but
On 2009-08-31 18:59, Mike Atkins wrote:
I am trying to install gfortan, but I get a dependency issue with libc6-dev.
I then tried to install libc6-dev by itself, but libc6-dev requires libc6 =
2.7-18, but I have libc6 = 2.9-4. Any ideas?
Are you running a mixed-branch system?
Not 100% what you
On 2009-08-31 18:59, Mike Atkins wrote:
I am trying to install gfortan, but I get a dependency issue with
libc6-dev. I then tried to install libc6-dev by itself, but libc6-dev
requires libc6 = 2.7-18, but I have libc6 = 2.9-4. Any ideas?
Are you running a mixed-branch system?
--
Brawndo&#
I am trying to install gfortan, but I get a dependency issue with libc6-dev.
I then tried to install libc6-dev by itself, but libc6-dev requires libc6 =
2.7-18, but I have libc6 = 2.9-4. Any ideas?
Mike
"Michael M." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> But I think you did not hear from most of the legions of Sid users for
> whom the Xorg upgrade proceeded without a single issue.
As far as I could tell, the most annoying problems happened only if you had
customized xorg.conf, which I suppose the bulk of
Michael M. wrote:
Sumo Wrestler (or just ate too much) wrote:
Yes, I know this is not Sid, but I read with interest the many posts
covering the Xorg upgrade. I could practically hear the yelping.
But I think you did not hear from most of the legions of Sid users for
whom the Xorg upgrade
Sumo Wrestler (or just ate too much) wrote:
Yes, I know this is not Sid, but I read with interest the many posts
covering the Xorg upgrade. I could practically hear the yelping.
But I think you did not hear from most of the legions of Sid users for
whom the Xorg upgrade proceeded without a
On Tue, Apr 25, 2006 at 09:40:48AM -0700, Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 25, 2006 at 11:06:42AM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > On Mon, Apr 24, 2006 at 09:41:09PM +0300, Andrei Popescu wrote:
> > >
> > > If the filename doesn't change (of the kernel image) i think neither
> > > gru
On Tue, Apr 25, 2006 at 04:33:51PM -0400, Matthias Julius wrote:
> Andrew Sackville-West <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Isn't that the purpose of symlinks to kernel images? so you don't have
> > to rerun for new kernels with same name?
>
> This is so that the lilo.conf doesn't need to be chang
Andrew Sackville-West <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Isn't that the purpose of symlinks to kernel images? so you don't have
> to rerun for new kernels with same name?
This is so that the lilo.conf doesn't need to be changed. The lilo
bootloader doesn't know anything about filesystems. And it doe
On Tue, Apr 25, 2006 at 11:06:42AM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 24, 2006 at 09:41:09PM +0300, Andrei Popescu wrote:
> >
> > If the filename doesn't change (of the kernel image) i think neither
> > grub nor lilo need the update. But it doesn't hurt. Unless you changed
> > menu.lst
On Mon, Apr 24, 2006 at 09:41:09PM +0300, Andrei Popescu wrote:
>
> If the filename doesn't change (of the kernel image) i think neither
> grub nor lilo need the update. But it doesn't hurt. Unless you changed
> menu.lst without reading/understanding the instructions inside.
lilo has to be called
Andreas Rippl wrote:
On Sun, Apr 23, 2006 at 04:46:56PM -0500, Sumo Wrestler (or just ate too much)
wrote:
[...]
Hi Sumo,
Hi Andreas,
I have gone through the update (without giving much thought I have to
admit) and there was no trouble here. I guess I didn't give a second
thought because
Andreas Rippl wrote:
On Sun, Apr 23, 2006 at 04:46:56PM -0500, Sumo Wrestler (or just ate too much)
wrote:
Joris Huizer wrote:
I don't know exactly why libc6 is upgraded, but the upgrade seems to be
part of the 3.1r2 update (see http://release.debian.org/stable/3.1/3.1r2/)
I got it too, just
Andrei Popescu wrote:
Hugo Vanwoerkom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
John Hasler wrote:
Sumo Wrestler writes:
As Joris Huizer says, it's the new point release. I'll get it sometime,
but not now :)
There is no reason not to get it now. Point releases always go smoothly.
If you have been doing sec
Andrei writes:
> If the filename doesn't change (of the kernel image) i think neither grub
> nor lilo need the update.
Lilo does.
--
John Hasler
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sun, Apr 23, 2006 at 04:46:56PM -0500, Sumo Wrestler (or just ate too much)
wrote:
> Joris Huizer wrote:
> >
> >I don't know exactly why libc6 is upgraded, but the upgrade seems to be
> >part of the 3.1r2 update (see http://release.debian.org/stable/3.1/3.1r2/)
> >I got it too, just tracking s
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 24, 2006 at 07:26:38PM +0300, Andrei Popescu wrote:
> > Joris Huizer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > Andrei Popescu wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Do you need to reboot after this upgrade? I'm asking because I did the
> > > > upgrade on a remote machine with s
On Mon, Apr 24, 2006 at 01:14:41PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> And if you use lilo to set up bootablility, you'd better run it *before*
> you reboot; otherwise it will not be able to find the new kernel. And
> the old one will have been replaced, if it's really just a bugfix of the
>
On Mon, Apr 24, 2006 at 07:26:38PM +0300, Andrei Popescu wrote:
> Joris Huizer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Andrei Popescu wrote:
> > >
> > > Do you need to reboot after this upgrade? I'm asking because I did the
> > > upgrade on a remote machine with some hardware troubles and I am afraid
>
Joris Huizer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Andrei Popescu wrote:
> >
> > Do you need to reboot after this upgrade? I'm asking because I did the
> > upgrade on a remote machine with some hardware troubles and I am afraid
> > to reboot it.
> >
>
> Hmm... if you got a new kernel image you need to r
Andrei Popescu wrote:
Do you need to reboot after this upgrade? I'm asking because I did the
upgrade on a remote machine with some hardware troubles and I am afraid
to reboot it.
Hmm... if you got a new kernel image you need to restart the machine to
use it (untill then it's running with the
Andrei Popescu wrote:
Do you need to reboot after this upgrade? I'm asking because I did the
upgrade on a remote machine with some hardware troubles and I am afraid
to reboot it.
There shouldn't be a need to do so; if some service needs to be
restarted, just do the `/etc/init.d/ restart`, th
Hugo Vanwoerkom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> John Hasler wrote:
> > Sumo Wrestler writes:
> >> As Joris Huizer says, it's the new point release. I'll get it sometime,
> >> but not now :)
> >
> > There is no reason not to get it now. Point releases always go smoothly.
> > If you have been doing se
John Hasler wrote:
Sumo Wrestler writes:
As Joris Huizer says, it's the new point release. I'll get it sometime,
but not now :)
There is no reason not to get it now. Point releases always go smoothly.
If you have been doing security updates you already have most of it.
I got it without any p
Sumo Wrestler writes:
> As Joris Huizer says, it's the new point release. I'll get it sometime,
> but not now :)
There is no reason not to get it now. Point releases always go smoothly.
If you have been doing security updates you already have most of it.
--
John Hasler
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
Christopher Nelson wrote:
On Sun, Apr 23, 2006 at 10:31:23AM -0500, Sumo Wrestler (or just ate too much)
wrote:
I just did an "aptitude update," and now when I attempt to upgrade,
aptitude says that it wants to upgrade libc6 and libc6-dev.
[...]
Again if it's the stable versio
Joris Huizer wrote:
I don't know exactly why libc6 is upgraded, but the upgrade seems to be
part of the 3.1r2 update (see http://release.debian.org/stable/3.1/3.1r2/)
I got it too, just tracking sarge too
HTH,
Thanks Joris, it does help.
Wow, we're going to get another point release. This
Florian Kulzer wrote:
You can use
aptitude changelog libc6 libc6-dev
Thanks, this'll be useful to me. I know it's in the man-page, but I
didn't think about it.
to see the changelogs for the new packages. Maybe that will tell you
what is up. If that does not work (I ofte
Joris Huizer wrote:
>
> I don't know exactly why libc6 is upgraded, but the upgrade seems to be
> part of the 3.1r2 update (see http://release.debian.org/stable/3.1/3.1r2/)
> I got it too, just tracking sarge too
>
It has to do with the recent changes in daylight savings time in certain
parts of
Sumo Wrestler wrote:
> My question is "why are libc6 and libc6-dev being upgraded?"
IIRC, because of time zone changes.
--
John Hasler
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
libc6 is updated in the point release to update timezone information and
fix a bug on the amd64 architecture. This is documented in the release
announcement under "Miscellaneous Bugfixes".
If you install apt-listchanges, it will show you the changelogs
before upgrading the packages, which is usefu
Sumo Wrestler (or just ate too much) wrote:
I'm using Sarge.
I just did an "aptitude update," and now when I attempt to upgrade,
aptitude says that it wants to upgrade libc6 and libc6-dev.
I know that those are pretty critical to the functioning of the system,
so I've tem
On Sun, Apr 23, 2006 at 10:31:23 -0500, Sumo Wrestler (or just ate too much)
wrote:
> I'm using Sarge.
>
> I just did an "aptitude update," and now when I attempt to upgrade,
> aptitude says that it wants to upgrade libc6 and libc6-dev.
>
> I know that
On Sun, Apr 23, 2006 at 10:31:23AM -0500, Sumo Wrestler (or just ate too much)
wrote:
> I'm using Sarge.
>
> I just did an "aptitude update," and now when I attempt to upgrade,
> aptitude says that it wants to upgrade libc6 and libc6-dev.
>
> I know that
I'm using Sarge.
I just did an "aptitude update," and now when I attempt to upgrade,
aptitude says that it wants to upgrade libc6 and libc6-dev.
I know that those are pretty critical to the functioning of the system,
so I've temporarily put them on hold, and I'm not up
Hello!
On Sat, Dec 18, 2004 at 03:50:25PM -0800, damon fasching wrote:
> dpkg: dependency problems prevent configuration of
> libc6-dev:
> libc6-dev depends on libc6 (=
> 2.3.2.ds1-19.0.0.1.pure64); however:
> Version of libc6 on system is 2.3.2.ds1-19.
> dpkg: error pr
error I got while attempting to 'install'
after 'update' in dselect.
---
dpkg: dependency problems prevent configuration of
libc6-dev:
libc6-dev depends on libc6 (=
2.3.2.ds1-19.0.0.1.pure64); however:
Version of libc6 on system is 2.3.2.ds1-19.
dp
Oops. "usr/include/db1/ndbm.h" is not part of libc6-dev/stable, so at
least I know why mod_rewrite.h couldn't include it! But what to do now?
On Thu, Jun 24, 2004 at 10:43:24AM -0400, Mark Copper wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am trying to build mod_perl from source on this machine
Hi,
I am trying to build mod_perl from source on this machine:
Linux 2.4.25-vs1.26 #2 Fri Feb 20 22:48:22 PST 2004 i686 unknown
My first problem was installing libc6-dev in stable. This appears not
to work currently. There is a related (broken) thread from April:
http://lists.debian.org
@ Jan Minar, Colin Watson, Andreas Janssen:
I installed them from a ftp site, and after some struggle with version.h
finally it worked...
No idea why they have not been on the DVD
Thanks for help !
Axel
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Troub
On Fri, Jan 02, 2004 at 05:45:03PM +0100, Axel Burwitz wrote:
> Colin Watson wrote:
> > Testing definitely has a linux-kernel-headers package (that exact name).
>
> Hmm. I tried to install, but:
>
> "debian-sarge:/home/axel# apt-get install linux-kernel-headers
> Reading Package Lists... Done
> B
Jan Minar wrote:
> This is a dependency problem. So try to do
>
> apt-get install kernel-headers
>
> so you'll know whether apt really thinks kernel-headers are not
> available.
It gave:
"debian-sarge:/home/axel# apt-get install linux-kernel-headers
Reading Package Lists... Done
Building De
Colin Watson wrote:
>
> Testing definitely has a linux-kernel-headers package (that exact name).
>
Hmm. I tried to install, but:
"debian-sarge:/home/axel# apt-get install linux-kernel-headers
Reading Package Lists... Done
Building Dependency Tree... Done
Package linux-kernel-headers has no av
On Thu, Jan 01, 2004 at 12:11:50PM +0100, Axel Burwitz wrote:
> I am using Sarge/testing, and all I can find from my install DVD is a
> "kernel-headers-2.4.22-bf2.4" that fits to my kernel version. I have
> installed that, but still that message appears..
Hi, Axel!
As it seems you're not going to
On Thu, Jan 01, 2004 at 12:11:50PM +0100, Axel Burwitz wrote:
> Andreas Janssen wrote:
> > If I remember correctly, the headers were part of the libc6-dev package
> > (and still are, if you use Woody), but some time ago the package was
> > split and they are now in their own p
Hello
Axel Burwitz (<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>) wrote:
> Andreas Janssen wrote:
>
>> If I remember correctly, the headers were part of the libc6-dev
>> package (and still are, if you use Woody), but some time ago the
>> package was split and they are now in their own pa
Andreas Janssen wrote:
>
> If I remember correctly, the headers were part of the libc6-dev package
> (and still are, if you use Woody), but some time ago the package was
> split and they are now in their own package. So you should try to get
> them from the same source you got
Hello
Axel Burwitz (<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>) wrote:
> I have following problem and can't find resolution in books, doc, and
> google:
>
> When I want to install libc6-dev with apt-get, I get the message:
>
> "The following packages have unmet dependencies:
&g
Hi,
I have following problem and can't find resolution in books, doc, and
google:
When I want to install libc6-dev with apt-get, I get the message:
"The following packages have unmet dependencies:
libc6-dev: Depends: linux-kernel-headers but it is not installable
E: Broken packag
+0x11): In function `_start':
: undefined reference to `__libc_csu_init'
since /usr/lib/crt1.o is from the libc6-dev package, I have a problem.
Is there a way to create a static-executable from a Debian/Stable machine to perform this link ?
Is there another way to work around this proble
as with some definitions from
> > libc6-dev under asm/... and linux/... The problem is that some of the
> > symbols are duplicated and, what is worse, with different definitions.
> > What would be a solution for this?
>
> Set the include path for your compiler to explicit
Bruno Diniz de Paula <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I'm writting a program that deals with some kernel structures (defined
> on the kernel source includes), as well as with some definitions from
> libc6-dev under asm/... and linux/... The problem is that some of the
> sym
Hi guys,
I'm writting a program that deals with some kernel structures (defined
on the kernel source includes), as well as with some definitions from
libc6-dev under asm/... and linux/... The problem is that some of the
symbols are duplicated and, what is worse, with different definitions.
Well, I swapped out the RAM for some other RAM that I know is good. Ended
up with the same problem, but different packages. Now, it's some gmc and
gnome packages. This is driving me nuts. One of the reasons I went with
Debian was for it's package system, and it's failing me... :(
Any ot
If the RAM were flaking out, why would it just fail on one package and the
same package every time? I would think it would fail more frequently and
randomly. I'm not saying that can't be it, just not the behavior I would
expect in that situation. I'll try swapping out the RAM tomorrow just to
On Sat, 24 Feb 2001, Jason N. Price wrote:
> as there are a lot of dependencies on it. Without it installed, I can't
> install a lot of other things. I have tried getting it from the cd as well
> as via HTTP, but the error is the same either way. The error is:
Sounds like you might have fla
I am trying to install Debian (this has been pure hell so far) for about
the 10th time and am suddenly having a problem apt-getting lib6c-dev. I
don't know what this program is, but it seems to be a system-vital thing,
as there are a lot of dependencies on it. Without it installed, I can't
in
Hi!
I have noticed that after upgrading potatos libc6 and libc6-dev package a few
days ago I cannot compile nor openssl nor openssh on that machine, but I have
compiled it from the same packages a day before the update. Can I fix this in
any way?
Thx in advance!
Bostjan
--
Boštjan Müller
Pascal Hos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>When trying to compile a kernel on a woody box, I figured out that there
>are no files in /usr/include/asm/ . When checking on one of my potato
>boxes it seems that they are part of the libc6-dev package, however this
>is not the c
lude/asm/ . When
> Pascal> checking on one of my potato boxes it seems that they are
> Pascal> part of the libc6-dev package, however this is not the
> Pascal> case for woody. The package does contain the asm directory
> Pascal> but no files.
>
> Pa
t they are
Pascal> part of the libc6-dev package, however this is not the
Pascal> case for woody. The package does contain the asm directory
Pascal> but no files.
Pascal> Any suggestions?
Get the new libc6-dev. This is a known bug that is fixed by now.
When trying to compile a kernel on a woody box, I figured out that there
are no files in /usr/include/asm/ . When checking on one of my potato
boxes it seems that they are part of the libc6-dev package, however this
is not the case for woody. The package does contain the asm directory
but no
On Tue, Mar 28, 2000 at 11:24:44 -0600, matthschulz wrote:
> When I try to install g++ with dselect then I get following dependancy
> problems:
>
> libc6-dev conflicts with libstdc++2.9-dev
> libstdc++2.9-dev depends on libc6-dev
For potato, you need libstdc++2.10-dev rather th
When I try to install g++ with dselect then I get following
dependancy problems:
libc6-dev conflicts with libstdc++2.9-dev
libstdc++2.9-dev depends on libc6-dev
What am I missing here?
Matth
experienced with
> > linux, but it worked fine.
> >
> > Now I wanna compile me a kernel. So I got me all the needed packages
> > (gcc,...).
> > As I wanna use "make menuconfig" I tried to install the package
> > libncurses4-dev
> > (with
*- On 4 Nov, Ulrich Hansmair wrote about "libc6-dev versus libncurses4-dev"
> hi debian-freaks,
>
> currently I installed potato with downloaded install-disks. Then I got me a
> few tiny things like less, with apt-get. I´ m not very experienced with
> linux, but i
; Now I wanna compile me a kernel. So I got me all the needed packages
> (gcc,...).
> As I wanna use "make menuconfig" I tried to install the package
> libncurses4-dev
> (with dpkg -i). This resulted in a dependency error with package libc6-dev.
> This dependency problem
"make menuconfig" I tried to install the package libncurses4-dev
(with dpkg -i). This resulted in a dependency error with package libc6-dev.
This dependency problem exists also the other way round.
What I m doing wrong? Even the --force-depends option of dpkg brought no
solution. Can anybody
any pointers as to where to go with this? Why does
> libc6-dev_2.1.2-0pre7.deb conflict with libstdc++2.9-dev_2.91.60-5.deb?
> But then when I try to remove libc6-dev first, and install libstdc++-dev,
> it says it depends on libc6-dev! Ack.
The newest g++ (from gcc2.95) requires libstd
ct with libstdc++2.9-dev_2.91.60-5.deb?
But then when I try to remove libc6-dev first, and install libstdc++-dev,
it says it depends on libc6-dev! Ack.
Please cc replies to me,
Thanks for your time,
-emile
---
ESR: I want to live i
> But I just installed libc6_2.0.7.19981211-6.deb
I also installed the newest libc6-dev
This solved the problem.
Stef
>> "DM" == Debian Mail <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
DM> Sorry, but the following packages are broken - this means they have unmet
DM> dependencies:
DM> libc6-dev: Depends:libc6
DM> But I just installed libc6_2.0.7.19981211-6.deb
DM> So why does apt-get cl
Doing apt-get update I get the following error:
Checking system integrity...dependency error
You might want to run `apt-get -f install' to correct these.
Sorry, but the following packages are broken - this means they have unmet
dependencies:
libc6-dev: Depends:libc6
But I just inst
o I was getting
version conflicts.
Chris
On Fri, 30 Apr 1999, Santiago Vila Doncel wrote:
> On Mon, 26 Apr 1999, Chris Gray wrote:
>
> > I've been having a problem installing Debian standard packages.
> >
> > The version of libc6 installed from the base diskettes w
On Mon, 26 Apr 1999, Chris Gray wrote:
> I've been having a problem installing Debian standard packages.
>
> The version of libc6 installed from the base diskettes was 2.0.7v-1 but
> the version of libc6-dev listed as available from the ftp site is 2.0.7t-1
This is strange.
In
I've been having a problem installing Debian standard packages.
The version of libc6 installed from the base diskettes was 2.0.7v-1 but
the version of libc6-dev listed as available from the ftp site is 2.0.7t-1
and it won't install insisting on the corresponding version of libc6.
(I&
libc6 and
> libncurses4, and libc6 depended on apt.
>
> We also included libc6-dev, because we didn't think that we could compile
> the kernel without it.
The kernel doesn't use the C library; you shouldn't need libc6-dev to
compile the kernel.
> Finally, we got the kernel
e new kernel.
>
> To use the new kernel within the framework of the stable distribution,
> I had to upgrade certain specific packages to the unstable, primarily
> netbase and sysutils. Netbase and sysutils depended on libc6 and
> libncurses4, and libc6 depended on apt.
>
certain specific packages to the unstable, primarily
netbase and sysutils. Netbase and sysutils depended on libc6 and
libncurses4, and libc6 depended on apt.
We also included libc6-dev, because we didn't think that we could
compile the kernel without it. Finally, we got the kernel sourc
I did an apt-get update and I got a package error with libc6-dev anyone
else get this?
-jeff
a reference to libc5-dev in the description field of both
headers packages (kernel-headers-2.0.[32,33]) which looks suspicious.
(Should it be libc6-dev?)
--
David Stern
--
he hold in dselect.
I'd read that README previously, but didn't find it consistent. Now it makes
sense. Thanks.
There is still one outstanding issue: dselect won't live
e/Linux/Kernel/
This package contains the Linux kernel header files.
Kernel Headers and libc6-dev package
Need for kernel include files
lso need to install
kernel-headers-2.0.33.
--8<-----
I still don't understand why libc6-dev depends on kernel-headers-2.0.32.
I realize I'm almost certainly showing off my ignorance, but this
seems highly counter-intuitive. Would someone please briefly explain
how
Hi,
The kernel is delibrately independent of any kernel related
header files you may have installed (or that libc6 uses). It is OK to
compile 2.0.33 on your machine.
The newer kernel-source packages do not provide kernel-headers
anymore, since the kernel-source package is archi
Hi,
The 2.0.32 kernel did wonderful things for my adaptec 2940-uw, but
2.0.33 has been out for quite a while now, and I was thinking about
compiling a new kernel. I'm not at all sure how libc6-dev 's
dependency on "stable" 2.0.32 kernel-headers pertains to compiling a
Someone else will correct me if I have not really understood this
correctly. As I understand it, the issue is that the kernel header
files are pretty volatile but that the overwhelming majority of
applications written deal with pretty 'standard' kernel functions.
The header files were 'breaking'
Why does libc6-dev depend specifically on kernel-headers 2.0.32? Why
won't 2.0.33 suffice, or kernel-source-2.0.33? It seems that I should
only have to have one of any of the kernel headers/source packages
installed at any one time.
Thanks,
Matt
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROT
Hi,
>>"Bob" == Bob Hilliard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Bob> I have had kernel-source-2.0.32 installed, and have just
Bob> installed kernel-source-2.0.33. libc6-dev can not be configured
Bob> because it wants kernel-headers-2.0.32. I want to keep
Bob> ker
I have had kernel-source-2.0.32 installed, and have just
installed kernel-source-2.0.33. libc6-dev can not be configured
because it wants kernel-headers-2.0.32. I want to keep
kernel-source-2.0.32 installed; is it really necessary to install the
headers as well?
In /usr/src, linux and
On Sun, Jan 04, 1998 at 01:29:20PM -0500, Jim Foltz wrote:
> libc6-dev depends on either >= kernel-source-2.0.32-2 or
> >= kernel-headers-2.0.32-2 or greater, neither of which are
> available. But, I have the Linux kernel sources for 2.0.33. So, I made
> a kernel-source-2.0.33
Hello,
After looking around in the unstable distribution I decided
here were a few packages that I just couldn't do without. I managed to
install libc6, ldso, and a few other new packages with little problem
using the helpful libc6 HOWTO.
libc6-dev depends on either >= kerne
Þann 02-Jan-98 skrifar Tim Bell:
> Okay, I read the libc6 mini-HOWTO (thanks Scott), and it's worked until
> I got to installing libc6-dev 2.0.6-2, which depends on kernel-headers
> (or kernel-source) 2.0.32-2 or greater, which I can't seem to find
> anywhere. (ftp.debian
Okay, I read the libc6 mini-HOWTO (thanks Scott), and it's worked until
I got to installing libc6-dev 2.0.6-2, which depends on kernel-headers
(or kernel-source) 2.0.32-2 or greater, which I can't seem to find
anywhere. (ftp.debian.org only has 2.0.32-1, dated Dec 9.)
Any ideas he
Okay - I bet this has been asked before and, if so, my apologies...
I just finished my upgrade to hamm and have a few pkgs that will not
configure due to dependance on libc6-dev which refuses to configure due
to dependance on the kernel-headers (or kernel-source) package version
2.0.32-2 that
: `WNOHANG' redefined
/usr/include/waitflags.h:25: warning: this is the location of the previous
definition
/usr/include/linux/wait.h:5: warning: `WUNTRACED' redefined
/usr/include/waitflags.h:26: warning: this is the location of the previous
definition
Both wait.h and waitflags.h are from
1 - 100 of 109 matches
Mail list logo
