On Wed, 01 Apr 1998 15:11:41 PST, David Stern wrote:
>
> I didn't mean to imply that it was that important, but according to that READ
> ME (see "Debian's libc6 method"), it looks like that should've been changed b
> eginning with kernel-[headers,source]-2.0.32 . That seems like such a minor
> issue to upload all four kernel-[headers,source]-2.0.[32,33]. I think I'll s
> et the hold in dselect.
The dreaded self-correction.
Apparently, headers is alright, so I meant two packages, not four
(kernel-source-2.0.[32,33]).
There's also a reference to libc5-dev in the description field of both
headers packages (kernel-headers-2.0.[32,33]) which looks suspicious.
(Should it be libc6-dev?)
--
David Stern
------------------------------------------------------------------
http://weber.u.washington.edu/~kotsya
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
