On 12/19/21 18:12, Mark Allums wrote:
On 12/19/2021 2:30 AM, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
On Du, 19 dec 21, 07:24:56, Tim Woodall wrote:
On Sat, 18 Dec 2021, Mark Allums wrote:
Preparing to unpack .../libc6_2.33-1_amd64.deb ...
Unpacking libc6:amd64 (2.33-1) over (2.34-0experimental1) ...
dpkg
On 12/19/2021 2:30 AM, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
On Du, 19 dec 21, 07:24:56, Tim Woodall wrote:
On Sat, 18 Dec 2021, Mark Allums wrote:
Preparing to unpack .../libc6_2.33-1_amd64.deb ...
Unpacking libc6:amd64 (2.33-1) over (2.34-0experimental1) ...
dpkg: error processing archive
/var/cache/apt
On Du, 19 dec 21, 07:24:56, Tim Woodall wrote:
> On Sat, 18 Dec 2021, Mark Allums wrote:
>
>
> > Preparing to unpack .../libc6_2.33-1_amd64.deb ...
> > Unpacking libc6:amd64 (2.33-1) over (2.34-0experimental1) ...
> > dpkg: error processing archive
> > /var/cach
On Sat, 18 Dec 2021, Mark Allums wrote:
Preparing to unpack .../libc6_2.33-1_amd64.deb ...
Unpacking libc6:amd64 (2.33-1) over (2.34-0experimental1) ...
dpkg: error processing archive /var/cache/apt/archives/libc6_2.33-1_amd64.deb
(--unpack):
trying to overwrite shared '/usr/share/doc/
I messed up real good! I foolishly tried to upgrade my libc6 to the
version in experimental, and the i386 version wouldn't install,
something about lintian overrides. (Why lintian is even installed is a
mystery. I don't need it, and with the current state of the broken
lib
On Lu, 06 iul 20, 07:58:14, The Wanderer wrote:
>
> Have you enabled the i386 architecture?
>
> Try 'dpkg --add-architecture i386' (as root or via sudo, of
> course),
... followed by 'apt update' ;)
> and see if that changes anything.
Kind regards,
Andrei
--
http://wiki.debian.org/FAQsFromDe
> Have you read and followed these instructions?
> https://wiki.debian.org/Multiarch/HOWTO
Thanks guys, that's what I needed..
On Mon, Jul 06, 2020 at 09:52:58PM +1000, Zenaan Harkness wrote:
> This page https://developer.android.com/studio/install#linux says for Ubuntu
> that the Android Studio dependencies are:
>
> libc6:i386 libncurses5:i386 libstdc++6:i386 lib32z1 libbz2-1.0:i386
>
> which on sid
On 2020-07-06 at 07:52, Zenaan Harkness wrote:
> This page https://developer.android.com/studio/install#linux says for Ubuntu
> that the Android Studio dependencies are:
>
> libc6:i386 libncurses5:i386 libstdc++6:i386 lib32z1 libbz2-1.0:i386
>
> which on sid gives:
>
This page https://developer.android.com/studio/install#linux says for Ubuntu
that the Android Studio dependencies are:
libc6:i386 libncurses5:i386 libstdc++6:i386 lib32z1 libbz2-1.0:i386
which on sid gives:
# apt install libc6:i386 libncurses5:i386 libstdc++6:i386 lib32z1
libbz2-1.0:i386
> If you are working from remote machine, the problem might be restarting
> services which kills your connection.
The problem is that it did not behave this way on any of the other containers
on either of my hosts. These are all via ssh connections, the same as I have
been doing since 2002.
--b
>
On Mon, 1 Feb 2016 07:41:47 -0500
Brad Alexander wrote:
> I have an openvz container that I am having a hard time upgrading libc6.
> Whether I use dpkg -i, apt-get, or aptitude, I get the same result.
>
> (Reading database ... 56136 files and directories currently installed.)
&g
I have an openvz container that I am having a hard time upgrading libc6.
Whether I use dpkg -i, apt-get, or aptitude, I get the same result.
(Reading database ... 56136 files and directories currently installed.)
Preparing to unpack .../archives/libc6_2.21-7_i386.deb ...
Checking for services
On 2 December 2014 at 04:31, Curt wrote:
> On 2014-12-01, Scott Ferguson wrote:
>>
>> .deb... ?
>>
>> Ross - are you trying to install JN Net Connect Java client for SA?
>>
>
> I thought he was trying to install this:
>
> http://www.scc.kit.edu/scc/net/juniper-vpn/linux/
Install or "follow guide
Apologies - accidentally sent to Ross only
-- Forwarded message --
From: Scott Ferguson
Date: 2 December 2014 at 08:07
Subject: Re: libc6-i386 vs libc6:i386 (for vpn client)
To: Ross Boylan
On 2 December 2014 at 06:41, Ross Boylan wrote:
> Thanks Andrei, Scott and Curt
Thanks Andrei, Scott and Curt for your help. I was only expecting
help on the general 32/64 bit issues, but since you asked, here are
some details about my particular goal.
I am trying to install Juniper's client 8.0 software from an rpm;
apparently they don't have a deb (there is a deb for the 7
On 2014-12-01, Scott Ferguson wrote:
>
> .deb... ?
>
> Ross - are you trying to install JN Net Connect Java client for SA?
>
I thought he was trying to install this:
http://www.scc.kit.edu/scc/net/juniper-vpn/linux/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a sub
ort i386 I should expect to get packages like
>> libc6:i386. There are a number of other packages that seem to have
>> versions for 32 bit without needing to specify an architecture suffix,
>> e.g. lib32z1 (32 bit version of zlib1g I think).
>>
>> Further, I have those
On Vi, 28 nov 14, 12:50:56, Ross Boylan wrote:
> Judging from https://wiki.debian.org/Multiarch/HOWTO, which doesn't
> seem current but is all I could find, if I'm on the amd64 architecture
> and want to support i386 I should expect to get packages like
> libc6:i386. There
Judging from https://wiki.debian.org/Multiarch/HOWTO, which doesn't
seem current but is all I could find, if I'm on the amd64 architecture
and want to support i386 I should expect to get packages like
libc6:i386. There are a number of other packages that seem to have
versions for 32 b
Le 31.03.2014 10:30, berenger.mo...@neutralite.org a écrit :
Hello.
I am trying to recompile, and build a package, libpqxx-4.0.
It does have a package in testing, but it depends on libc6 2.14 at
least, where debian stable is only at 2.13.
Compiling went fine, but when building the package
On Sat, Feb 22, 2014 at 01:52:27AM +, Robin wrote:
> **This of course may apply only to my PC but just in case it is not**:
>
> Just done dist-upgrade 01:30 22/02/2014 and upgrade fails whilst
> updating libc6. Applications that were open are still functioning but
> everything
On 22 February 2014 01:52, Robin wrote:
> **This of course may apply only to my PC but just in case it is not**:
>
> Just done dist-upgrade 01:30 22/02/2014 and upgrade fails whilst
> updating libc6. Applications that were open are still functioning but
> everything else segfaults.
On 22 February 2014 07:59, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
> On Sb, 22 feb 14, 01:52:27, Robin wrote:
>> **This of course may apply only to my PC but just in case it is not**:
>>
>> Just done dist-upgrade 01:30 22/02/2014 and upgrade fails whilst
>> updating libc6. Applicatio
On Sb, 22 feb 14, 01:52:27, Robin wrote:
> **This of course may apply only to my PC but just in case it is not**:
>
> Just done dist-upgrade 01:30 22/02/2014 and upgrade fails whilst
> updating libc6. Applications that were open are still functioning but
> everything else segfault
**This of course may apply only to my PC but just in case it is not**:
Just done dist-upgrade 01:30 22/02/2014 and upgrade fails whilst
updating libc6. Applications that were open are still functioning but
everything else segfaults.
Looks like a reinstall
--
rob
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
-linux-x86-64.so.2
> /snip
> The package you need to install is called On Debian, Ubuntu:
> libc6-dbg
>
> I have installed various versions of valgrind from snapshot.debian
> going back to early 2013, plus built valgrind from source, all of
> which have the same error.
>
, Ubuntu:
libc6-dbg
I have installed various versions of valgrind from snapshot.debian
going back to early 2013, plus built valgrind from source, all of
which have the same error.
This would suggest something has changed with libc6-dbg?
Any one know where to go from here?
Thanks
--
rob
I noticed if you set this to upgrade in Synaptic it will require you to
pretty much remove your entire Debian install package by package.
On Jun 21, 2013 3:40 AM, "David Baron" wrote:
>
> These packages are "held back" right now because of a changeover from
package:arch to package-arch, it seems.
These packages are "held back" right
now because of a changeover from
package:arch to package-arch, it seems.
Ready to play, or should be back off for
a while?
e specific to that, but not all.
I needed some updated libraries from Jessie, so I enabled that repository
and tried to get just a few libraries. However, the dependency list was
pretty large. When synaptic tried to update libc6, it paused with the
warning that said xscreensaver or xlockmore is r
Andrei POPESCU wrote:
> Bob Proulx wrote:
> > You realize that skype is one of those evil applications! A kitten
> > dies every time another user signs up for it. :-)
>
> I'd be very happy to know of any real alternative that can do:
>
> - sound + video
> - NAT traversal
> - support for Linux,
On Jo, 23 feb 12, 18:33:13, Bob Proulx wrote:
>
> You realize that skype is one of those evil applications! A kitten
> dies every time another user signs up for it. :-)
I'd be very happy to know of any real alternative that can do:
- sound + video
- NAT traversal
- support for Linux, Windows a
evil. I just googled it, but I'd be
interested in hearing why you think skype is evil.
Thanks for your take on multiarch, I will keep an eye on it :-)
-Chris
On Feb 23, 2012, at 5:33 PM, Bob Proulx wrote:
> Chris Hiestand wrote:
>> Bob Proulx wrote:
>>> Out of curiosity, w
Chris Hiestand wrote:
> Bob Proulx wrote:
> > Out of curiosity, what are you using libc6-i386 for on your amd64
> > machine?
>
> To run 32-bit apps. When I need to build a 32-bit app I just switch to a
> 32-bit machine or VM. I've had to support several 32-bit a
On Feb 23, 2012, at 1:43 PM, Bob Proulx wrote:
>> That's because you're running i386 arch. I was on an amd64 machine.
>
> That makes a large difference!
>
> Out of curiosity, what are you using libc6-i386 for on your amd64
> machine?
To run 32-bit apps. When
gt; That shouldn't happen but depends upon the mirror you are using.
The problem turned out to be caused by my missing the squeeze-updates
entries in sources.list. It was just never noticeable until this update.
>>> root@test:/etc# apt-get install libc6-i386
>>> ...
>&
of being updated?
> > That shouldn't happen but depends upon the mirror you are using.
>
> The problem turned out to be caused by my missing the squeeze-updates
> entries in sources.list. It was just never noticeable until this update.
Interesting. Yes for whatever reason tha
t; > root@test:/usr/share/doc# dpkg -l |grep 2.11.3-3
> > ii libc-bin 2.11.3-3 Embedded GNU C Library: Binaries
> > ii libc6 2.11.3-3 Embedded GNU C Library: Shared libraries
> > ii locales 2.11.3-3 Embedded GNU C Library: National Language (locale)
> > data
It seems that during a preseeded installation today my squeeze VM installed a
proposed update when it shouldn't have:
> root@test:/usr/share/doc# dpkg -l |grep 2.11.3-3
> ii libc-bin2.11.3-3 Embedded
> GNU C Library: Binari
On Tue, 14 Feb 2012 12:41:49 +0530, Harshad Joshi wrote:
> i have installed debian 6 on a dell vostro 1550.
>
>
> while updating software through synaptic or apt-get, i get this error
>
>
> Could not perform immediate configuration on 'libc6'. Please see man 5
i have installed debian 6 on a dell vostro 1550.
while updating software through synaptic or apt-get, i get this error
Could not perform immediate configuration on 'libc6'. Please see man 5
apt.conf under APT::Immediate-Configure for details. (2)
i am using amd 64 kernel. details o
ystem?
It looks like I've got to DL kernel source >= 2.6.18, build a custom
kernel (am I going to have a problem here as I've already upgraded
most system tools?), boot from the new kernel, then run the libc6
upgrade. Could I build a custom kernel using latest sources and that
> David Baron:
> > Luckily, using the live-CD, I was able to download and re-install the
> > "testing" packages for libc6 and friends and finally get my system
> > working again.
>
> What problem are you referring to? The breakage from the missing
>
David Baron:
>
> Luckily, using the live-CD, I was able to download and re-install the
> "testing" packages for libc6 and friends and finally get my system working
> again.
What problem are you referring to? The breakage from the missing
symlinks on amd64? That issue has
Luckily, using the live-CD, I was able to download and re-install the
"testing" packages for libc6 and friends and finally get my system working
again.
OK:
1. Unstable can sometimes get broken. I accept that.
2. However, libc6 stuff is so critical that any upgrade posted must be
i
Don't use prelink from Lenny with libc6 from testing or Sid. Once the newer
libc libraries are processed by the old prelink, they are still loadable, but
will crash.
The first time this happened on my system, most new processes quickly received
a SIGSEGV. The second time this happened
On 5/13/2010 1:51 AM, Sven Joachim wrote:
On 2010-05-12 23:24 +0200, Chris Austin wrote:
I've learned today that when there are circular conflicts while upgrading, e.g.
libcairo2 has to be upgraded to install xulrunner-1.9.1, but upgrading
libcairo2 breaks xulrunner-1.9, it helps to use the dpk
On 2010-05-12 23:24 +0200, Chris Austin wrote:
>> On 2010-05-11 22:11 +0200, Chris Austin wrote:
>
>>> I was required to upgrade libc6 from lenny to squeeze in order to meet
>>> dependencies to install a package from unstable, but the libc6 upgrade
>>> faile
On 5/12/2010 4:24 PM, Chris Austin wrote:
I've learned today that when there are circular conflicts while upgrading, e.g.
libcairo2 has to be upgraded to install xulrunner-1.9.1, but upgrading
libcairo2 breaks xulrunner-1.9, it helps to use the dpkg --auto-deconfigure
option before the -i action
Hi,
> On 2010-05-11 22:11 +0200, Chris Austin wrote:
>> I was required to upgrade libc6 from lenny to squeeze in order to meet
>> dependencies to install a package from unstable, but the libc6 upgrade
>> failed because libc-bin was not installed.
> How could this
chris/.kpackage# dpkg -i libc-bin_2.10.2-6_i386.deb
and this time it worked. I was then able to install the squeeze libc6 from
KPackage, and to carry on installing other new packages from KPackage.
* Are there any other important packages in Squeeze one should be careful
with in this kind of "
Hi,
I was required to upgrade libc6 from lenny to squeeze in order to meet
dependencies to install a package from unstable, but the libc6 upgrade
failed because libc-bin was not installed. Now dpkg is broken. I tried a
manual reinstall of the lenny libc6, as suggested in another thread on
this
On Tuesday 11 May 2010 16:05:04 Jordan Metzmeier wrote:
> > How can this be fixed? And shouldn't there be a big warning that trying
> > to upgrade libc6 can break dpkg, on the Debian website page for libc6?
> >
> > Best regards,
> > Chris Austin.
>
> W
On 2010-05-11 22:11 +0200, Chris Austin wrote:
> I was required to upgrade libc6 from lenny to squeeze in order to meet
> dependencies to install a package from unstable, but the libc6 upgrade
> failed because libc-bin was not installed.
How could this happen, given that libc6 depend
>
>
> How can this be fixed? And shouldn't there be a big warning that trying to
> upgrade libc6 can break dpkg, on the Debian website page for libc6?
>
> Best regards,
> Chris Austin.
>
>
>
What should really be the "big warning" is mixing releases...
Hi,
I was required to upgrade libc6 from lenny to squeeze in order to meet
dependencies to install a package from unstable, but the libc6 upgrade failed
because libc-bin was not installed. Now dpkg is broken. I tried a manual
reinstall of the lenny libc6, as suggested in another thread on
On Fri, Mar 05, 2010 at 14:47:34 -0800, John Magolske wrote:
> When trying to `aptitude install xserver-xorg-video-vesa` I see:
>
> The following packages will be upgraded:
> ... libc6 ...
> ...
> critical bugs of libc6 (2.9-6 -> 2.10.2-6)
> #
On 2010-03-05 16:47, John Magolske wrote:
When trying to `aptitude install xserver-xorg-video-vesa` I see:
The following packages will be upgraded:
... libc6 ...
...
critical bugs of libc6 (2.9-6 -> 2.10.2-6)
#555205 - libc6: segfault when upgrading from 2.9
On 03/06/2010 12:47 AM, John Magolske wrote:
When trying to `aptitude install xserver-xorg-video-vesa` I see:
The following packages will be upgraded:
... libc6 ...
...
critical bugs of libc6 (2.9-6 -> 2.10.2-6)
#555205 - libc6: segfault when upgrading from
When trying to `aptitude install xserver-xorg-video-vesa` I see:
The following packages will be upgraded:
... libc6 ...
...
critical bugs of libc6 (2.9-6 -> 2.10.2-6)
#555205 - libc6: segfault when upgrading from 2.9-25 -> 2.10.1-5
on squeeze renders
On Thu, 24 Dec 2009 11:26:08 +0100, Sven Joachim wrote:
> On 2009-12-24 11:19 +0100, Julien Vehent wrote:
>
>> I'm trying to upgrade a Xen Hosted system from lenny to squeeze, but
the
>> upgrade broke on the following :
>> [...]
>> WARNING: The following packages cannot be authenticated!
On Thu,24.Dec.09, 11:19:31, Julien Vehent wrote:
> hi there,
>
> I'm trying to upgrade a Xen Hosted system from lenny to squeeze, but the
> upgrade broke on the following :
[...]
> dpkg: regarding .../libc-bin_2.10.2-2_i386.deb containing libc-bin:
>
On 2009-12-24 11:19 +0100, Julien Vehent wrote:
> I'm trying to upgrade a Xen Hosted system from lenny to squeeze, but the
> upgrade broke on the following :
> [...]
> WARNING: The following packages cannot be authenticated!
You should fix this first, possibly by upgrading the
d
installed:
libc-bin libc6 libc6-xen
Suggested packages:
I have been holding up the upgrade because of this. Meanwhile, several new
versions have been on Sid. Other grave bugs have been closed.
Is it safe to upgrade libc6 stuff?
Is this bug still current?
An amd-64 version bug?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with
Hi all,
I am running into this issue, there is the solution.
Just for archival purpose.
http://sidux.com/PNphpBB2-viewtopic-t-18679-view-previous.html
--
Architecte Informatique chez Blueline/Gulfsat:
Administration Systeme, Recherche & Developpement
+
Mike Atkins wrote:
> When I originally installed lenny, I think I updated all packages with
> unstable inadvertantly enabled. I imagine this is the root of all evil. In
> order to force libc6 to revert to the stable version (through synaptic), I
> need to reinstall most of the syste
Mike Atkins wrote:
> I am trying to install gfortan, but I get a dependency issue with
> libc6-dev. I then tried to install libc6-dev by itself, but libc6-dev
> requires libc6 = 2.7-18, but I have libc6 = 2.9-4. Any ideas?
>
> Mike
Please post the contents of /etc/apt/sou
On 05/09/2009 13:16, Sven Joachim wrote:
You can set LD_LIBRARY_PATH so that the dynamic linker searches in /lib
before /usr/local/lib:
# LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/usr/lib:/lib rm -f /usr/local/lib/tls/libc.so.6
Thanks
This made it.which is a really good news since this machine is
located about
On 2009-09-05 12:27 +0200, Laurent CARON wrote:
> I did just upgrade some packages (one of them is libc6) on a server
> running etch.
>
> It seems (from what I can see in the backups of this server) that an
> old version of libc6 is lying in /usr/local/lib/tls (maybe a lefto
Hi,
I did just upgrade some packages (one of them is libc6) on a server
running etch.
It seems (from what I can see in the backups of this server) that an old
version of libc6 is lying in /usr/local/lib/tls (maybe a leftover from
some previous install).
As a matter of fact, i'm unab
nse
from the html archive.
>
> On 2009-09-01 09:28, Mike Atkins wrote:
>
>> On 2009-08-31 18:59, Mike Atkins wrote:
>>
>> I am trying to install gfortan, but I get a dependency issue with
>> libc6-dev.
>> I then tried to install libc6-dev by itself, but
Something (the gmu email software??) is mangling the email replies
and threading.)
On 2009-09-01 09:28, Mike Atkins wrote:
On 2009-08-31 18:59, Mike Atkins wrote:
I am trying to install gfortan, but I get a dependency issue with libc6-dev.
I then tried to install libc6-dev by itself, but
On 2009-08-31 18:59, Mike Atkins wrote:
I am trying to install gfortan, but I get a dependency issue with libc6-dev.
I then tried to install libc6-dev by itself, but libc6-dev requires libc6 =
2.7-18, but I have libc6 = 2.9-4. Any ideas?
Are you running a mixed-branch system?
Not 100% what you
On 2009-08-31 18:59, Mike Atkins wrote:
I am trying to install gfortan, but I get a dependency issue with
libc6-dev. I then tried to install libc6-dev by itself, but libc6-dev
requires libc6 = 2.7-18, but I have libc6 = 2.9-4. Any ideas?
Are you running a mixed-branch system?
--
Brawndo&#
I am trying to install gfortan, but I get a dependency issue with libc6-dev.
I then tried to install libc6-dev by itself, but libc6-dev requires libc6 =
2.7-18, but I have libc6 = 2.9-4. Any ideas?
Mike
On 8/20/2009 7:25 PM, Emanoil Kotsev wrote:
Micha Feigin wrote:
On Tue, 18 Aug 2009 21:30:06 +0100
Chris Davies wrote:
Γιώργος Πάλλας wrote:
After returning from vacation I updated my testing, amd64 system.
By the way, does anybody know why they had to break things first? I did
not expe
Micha Feigin wrote:
> On Tue, 18 Aug 2009 21:30:06 +0100
> Chris Davies wrote:
>
>> Γιώργος Πάλλας wrote:
>> >>> After returning from vacation I updated my testing, amd64 system.
>>
>> > By the way, does anybody know why they had to break things first? I did
>> > not expect that from debian!
>
On Tue, 18 Aug 2009 21:30:06 +0100
Chris Davies wrote:
> Γιώργος Πάλλας wrote:
> >>> After returning from vacation I updated my testing, amd64 system.
>
> > By the way, does anybody know why they had to break things first? I did
> > not expect that from debian!
>
> I rather think that the nam
Chris Davies wrote:
Γιώργος Πάλλας wrote:
After returning from vacation I updated my testing, amd64 system.
By the way, does anybody know why they had to break things first? I did
not expect that from debian!
I rather think that the name of the version you're running an
Γιώργος Πάλλας skrev:
Michael Ekstrand wrote:
The current ia32-libs package in unstable [...]
fixes the problem. [...] So either update to the Sid version or wait until it
trickles to testing.
By the way, does anybody know why they had to break things first? I did
not expect that from debi
Γιώργος Πάλλας wrote:
>>> After returning from vacation I updated my testing, amd64 system.
> By the way, does anybody know why they had to break things first? I did
> not expect that from debian!
I rather think that the name of the version you're running answers that
question. If you don't wan
Michael Ekstrand wrote:
Γιώργος Πάλλας wrote:
After returning from vacation I updated my testing, amd64 system.
After that, skype was no longer working...
I understand that this has something to do with bug
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=535645
At the present time
Γιώργος Πάλλας wrote:
> After returning from vacation I updated my testing, amd64 system.
> After that, skype was no longer working...
> I understand that this has something to do with bug
> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=535645
> At the present time, I there something I can do t
After returning from vacation I updated my testing, amd64 system.
I got:
The following packages are BROKEN:
libc6-i386
The following NEW packages will be installed:
...
...
The following packages will be
REMOVED
In the mean time apt-get install libc6-i386 (which is basically an
upgrade) solved the problem. The other issues are
non-mission-critical.
--
() ascii-rubanda kampajno - kontraŭ html-a retpoŝto
/\ ascii ribbon campaign - against html e-mail
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ
(I'm using amd64 unstable, current kernel 2.6.30-1-amd64)
I assume this is a 32bit package which i'll (pobably) only need if i
want to compile stuff for i386, right? I have these:
dpkg -l |grep libc6
ii libc6 2.9-18
ii libc6-dev 2.9-18
ii libc6-dev-i386 2.9-18
ii libc6-i386 2.9
Hi,
When issuing:
# apt-get update; apt-get dist-upgrade
i get the following error:
Fetched 11.3MB in 15s (741kB/s)
E: Couldn't configure pre-depend libc6-i386 for lib32stdc++6, probably
a dependency cycle.
I found this recent bug that seems to be the problem, but it's set as
clos
produces
> *** glibc detected *** python: free(): invalid next size (fast):
> 0x01407890 ***
>
> In squeeze, I reinstalled python-numpy and upgraded libc6 to
> unstable, but I still get the same error.
Here's what I see on an up to date squeeze box:
% python
Python 2.5.4 (
, I reinstalled python-numpy and upgraded libc6 to unstable,
but I still get the same error.
Thanks in advance for any help on how to diagnose this.
/ johan
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Conta
Svenn Are Bjerkem wrote:
2009/7/19 MRH :
I'm pretty confused with the latest changes in sid on amd64. Do ia32-*
packages replace -i386 packages or they are alternatives? After 'upgrading'
to ia32-apt-get I lost wine (however I found there is ia32-wine, which
unfortunately is not displayed in syn
2009/7/19 MRH :
> I'm pretty confused with the latest changes in sid on amd64. Do ia32-*
> packages replace -i386 packages or they are alternatives? After 'upgrading'
> to ia32-apt-get I lost wine (however I found there is ia32-wine, which
> unfortunately is not displayed in synaptic and I'm not su
On Sun, Jul 19, 2009 at 14:09, MRH wrote:
> I'm pretty confused with the latest changes in sid on amd64. Do ia32-*
> packages replace -i386 packages or they are alternatives? After 'upgrading'
> to ia32-apt-get I lost wine (however I found there is ia32-wine, which
> unfortunately is not displayed
I'm pretty confused with the latest changes in sid on amd64. Do ia32-*
packages replace -i386 packages or they are alternatives? After
'upgrading' to ia32-apt-get I lost wine (however I found there is
ia32-wine, which unfortunately is not displayed in synaptic and I'm not
sure if it replaces wi
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=533503
--
BOFH excuse #361:
Communist revolutionaries taking over the server room and demanding all the
computers in the building or they shoot the sysadmin. Poor misguided fools.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
uname -a
Linux cai-debian 2.6.29-2-amd64 #1 SMP Sun May 17 17:15:47 UTC 2009 x86_64
GNU/Linux
sudo apt-get install libc6
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree
Reading state information... Done
The following packages were automatically installed and are no longer
required:
ttf
and for those, we'd rather
upgrade them individually, and make sure they're all behaving correctly,
before upgrading the entire system. The primary thing is avoiding
having to be debugging one or more applications simultaneously on a
production server.
I need to do some checking,
On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 05:10:43PM -0700, NFN Smith wrote:
> As long as I don't reboot the server, backing out of the problem is
> doable -- all I have to do is revert to the previous libc6, using:
>
> aptitude -t oldstable install libc6
>
> and things are back to w
On Mon, 16 Mar 2009 09:42:54 -0700, NFN Smith wrote:
[...]
>
> Following this downgrade, libc6 (and related dependencies) are all still
> at etch versions.
>
>
This from Chapter 4 of the Lenny release notes may be of interest to you,
especially the part at the bottom sinc
1 - 100 of 1478 matches
Mail list logo
