Re: Find e-mail address based on first and last name

2025-05-24 Thread Rob van der Putten
Hi there On 23/05/2025 10:56, Joe wrote: On Thu, 22 May 2025 11:57:28 -0400 The Wanderer wrote: On 2025-05-22 at 10:53, Jan Claeys wrote: On Wed, 2025-05-21 at 15:16 +0100, Joe wrote: There was a time you could have emailed postmaster@ and asked that a message be forwarded to the per

Re: Find e-mail address based on first and last name

2025-05-23 Thread Joe
On Thu, 22 May 2025 11:57:28 -0400 The Wanderer wrote: > On 2025-05-22 at 10:53, Jan Claeys wrote: > > > On Wed, 2025-05-21 at 15:16 +0100, Joe wrote: > > > >> There was a time you could have emailed postmaster@ and > >> asked that a message be forwarded to the person, but I think now > >> fe

Re: Find e-mail address based on first and last name

2025-05-22 Thread Greg
On 2025-05-22, The Wanderer wrote: > > These days, I would be *surprised* if most mail-accepting domains *did* > have a postmaster address - and even more so if they actually had > someone monitoring it, or otherwise ensuring that mail sent to it didn't > just get dropped into the bit bucket. Cou

Re: Find e-mail address based on first and last name

2025-05-22 Thread The Wanderer
On 2025-05-22 at 10:53, Jan Claeys wrote: > On Wed, 2025-05-21 at 15:16 +0100, Joe wrote: > >> There was a time you could have emailed postmaster@ and >> asked that a message be forwarded to the person, but I think now >> few domains actually have a postmaster user or alias. > > Any mailserver a

Re: Find e-mail address based on first and last name

2025-05-22 Thread Jan Claeys
On Wed, 2025-05-21 at 15:16 +0100, Joe wrote: > There was a time you could have emailed postmaster@ and asked > that a message be forwarded to the person, but I think now few > domains actually have a postmaster user or alias. Any mailserver accepting mail for a particular domain without having a

Re: Find e-mail address based on first and last name

2025-05-21 Thread Jeffrey Walton
On Wed, May 21, 2025 at 12:26 PM john doe wrote: > > Is there a way to find the correct e-mail address if you only have the > first and last name and the domain ((jane doe domain.TLD)? > > I know that it is possible to send e-mails to that domain I'm just > missing the

Re: Find e-mail address based on first and last name

2025-05-21 Thread Joe
On Wed, 21 May 2025 15:21:15 +0200 john doe wrote: > Hello all, > > Is there a way to find the correct e-mail address if you only have > the first and last name and the domain ((jane doe domain.TLD)? > > I know that it is possible to send e-mails to that domain I'm just

Re: Find e-mail address based on first and last name

2025-05-21 Thread Hans
Am Mittwoch, 21. Mai 2025, 15:24:36 CEST schrieb Jonathan Dowland: > On Wed May 21, 2025 at 2:21 PM BST, john doe wrote: > > Is there a way to find the correct e-mail address if you only have the > > first and last name and the domain ((jane doe domain.TLD)? > > In general

Re: Find e-mail address based on first and last name

2025-05-21 Thread The Wanderer
On 2025-05-21 at 09:24, Jonathan Dowland wrote: > On Wed May 21, 2025 at 2:21 PM BST, john doe wrote: > >> Is there a way to find the correct e-mail address if you only have >> the first and last name and the domain ((jane doe domain.TLD)? > > In general, no. T

Re: Find e-mail address based on first and last name

2025-05-21 Thread Jonathan Dowland
On Wed May 21, 2025 at 2:21 PM BST, john doe wrote: Is there a way to find the correct e-mail address if you only have the first and last name and the domain ((jane doe domain.TLD)? In general, no. -- Please do not CC me for listmail. 👱🏻 Jonathan Dowland ✎j...@debian.org 🔗

Find e-mail address based on first and last name

2025-05-21 Thread john doe
Hello all, Is there a way to find the correct e-mail address if you only have the first and last name and the domain ((jane doe domain.TLD)? I know that it is possible to send e-mails to that domain I'm just missing the correct e-mail for that specific person and to directly message

Re: Monthly FAQ for Debian-user mailing list (last modified 20250404)

2025-05-01 Thread Andrew M.A. Cater
On Thu, May 01, 2025 at 12:37:04PM +0100, Jonathan Dowland wrote: > Thanks Andrew for continuing to send the Monthly FAQ. > > I'd like to request you make it clearer if/how people can contribute to the > evolution of the FAQ text. There's nothing in it as to how to do that. I > humbly suggest you

Re: Monthly FAQ for Debian-user mailing list (last modified 20250404)

2025-05-01 Thread Jonathan Dowland
Thanks Andrew for continuing to send the Monthly FAQ. I'd like to request you make it clearer if/how people can contribute to the evolution of the FAQ text. There's nothing in it as to how to do that. I humbly suggest you maintain the text in a public VCS or a page on the Debian Wiki. This w

Monthly FAQ for Debian-user mailing list (last modified 20250404)

2025-04-30 Thread Andrew M.A. Cater
- if so, you should not reply simply in order to get the last word in, only reply if you can add useful information. * Don't feed the trolls: it's not necessary to reply to every post. If someone is trolling/misbehaving - don't amplify it by commenting on the list and giving the

Re: Monthly FAQ for the Debian-user mailing list (last modified 20250404)

2025-04-06 Thread Charles Curley
On Sun, 6 Apr 2025 10:54:48 -0700 Will Mengarini wrote: > >> * If you are replying to a post, please … cut out extra text that > >> is not relevant to your point. > >> While you are commenting on Mr. Cater's FAQ, it would be nice to pay attention to it. -- Does anybody read signatures any more

Re: Monthly FAQ for the Debian-user mailing list (last modified 20250404)

2025-04-06 Thread Will Mengarini
ferent opinions or answers provided. >> >> * It is not necessary to answer every post on the mailing list. >> >> * Be constructive in your responses. It may be that somebody else answers >> a question before you - if so, you should not reply simply in order to get >&

Re: Monthly FAQ for the Debian-user mailing list (last modified 20250404)

2025-04-05 Thread Greg
On 2025-04-05, Jeffrey Walton wrote: > Still missing a topic or discussion of "SOLVED" in the subject. > We're all waiting for Gene to put "SOLVED" on his never-ending network of threads. But what would it would mean or communicate to future anthropologists remains yet another puzzle left to the

Re: Monthly FAQ for the Debian-user mailing list (last modified 20250404)

2025-04-04 Thread Jeffrey Walton
list is provided by volunteers in their own time. > It is common for there to be different opinions or answers provided. > > * It is not necessary to answer every post on the mailing list. > > * Be constructive in your responses. It may be that somebody else answers >

Monthly FAQ for the Debian-user mailing list (last modified 20250404)

2025-04-04 Thread Andrew M.A. Cater
- if so, you should not reply simply in order to get the last word in, only reply if you can add useful information. * Don't feed the trolls: it's not necessary to reply to every post. If someone is trolling/misbehaving - don't amplify it by commenting on the list and giving the

Re: Monthly FAQ for the Debian-user mailing list (last modified 20250301)

2025-04-01 Thread Jeffrey Walton
time to explain long threads. > > > > > This might also be a good indicator that a [SOLVED] Problem ABC would > make a good final entry in a long thread. That sounds more theoretical than practical. "SOLVED" threads continue to run-on. "SOLVED" does not act as t

Re: Monthly FAQ for the Debian-user mailing list (last modified 20250301)

2025-04-01 Thread Jeffrey Walton
ctive in your responses. It may be that somebody else answers > a question before you - if so, you should not reply simply in order to get > the last word in, only reply if you can add useful information. > > * Don't feed the trolls: it's not necessary to reply to ev

Re: Monthly FAQ for the Debian-user mailing list (last modified 20250301)

2025-04-01 Thread Andrew M.A. Cater
On Tue, Apr 01, 2025 at 06:17:38PM -0400, Jeffrey Walton wrote: > I see the changing of title or subject to add things like "SOLVED" is > not included in the FAQ. > > Can we infer it is frowned upon or unwanted? > Good evening Jeffrey, No, I don't think you can. > > Off-topic arguments also

Monthly FAQ for the Debian-user mailing list (last modified 20250301)

2025-04-01 Thread Andrew M.A. Cater
- if so, you should not reply simply in order to get the last word in, only reply if you can add useful information. * Don't feed the trolls: it's not necessary to reply to every post. If someone is trolling/misbehaving - don't amplify it by commenting on the list and giving the

Re: Monthly FAQ for the Debian-user mailing list (last modified 20250301)

2025-03-05 Thread Anssi Saari
David writes: > Given that this infrastructure exists and is being used by most people > involved with producing Debian, it surprises me to hear talk of posting > diffs to the mailing list, which requires too much effort by both writers > and readers IMHO. Too much effort? I don't understand. Su

Re: Monthly FAQ for the Debian-user mailing list (last modified 20250301)

2025-03-04 Thread David
e to do. The wiki would suit if the FAQ authors would like community input/assistance to write the FAQ. Or if the FAQ authors wish to restrict changes to authorised editors only, then hosting on salsa would be more suitable. As an example of diff/change history for a document on the wiki, https:

Re: Monthly FAQ for the Debian-user mailing list (last modified 20250301)

2025-03-04 Thread Lee
On Tue, Mar 4, 2025 at 3:24 AM Anssi Saari wrote: > > David writes: > > > It would assist everyone to follow changes to this "Monthly FAQ" > > document if it can be hosted somewhere that provides diffs, such > > as salsa.debian.org, or wiki.debian.org. > > I don't see a problem with just posting th

Re: Monthly FAQ for the Debian-user mailing list (last modified 20250301)

2025-03-04 Thread The Wanderer
7;t see a problem with just posting the diffs. Preferably in > unified format. Speaking as the person whose request originally prompted the "last modified" information to be added: * My original intent on that was to have it in the *body* of the message, near the top, not in the Sub

Re: Monthly FAQ for the Debian-user mailing list (last modified 20250301)

2025-03-04 Thread Anssi Saari
David writes: > It would assist everyone to follow changes to this "Monthly FAQ" > document if it can be hosted somewhere that provides diffs, such > as salsa.debian.org, or wiki.debian.org. I don't see a problem with just posting the diffs. Preferably in unified format.

Re: Monthly FAQ for the Debian-user mailing list (last modified 20250301)

2025-03-03 Thread David
On Mon, 3 Mar 2025 at 16:57, Will Mengarini wrote: > This kind of information > > popos/pts/4 bash ~ 08:54 0$diff -b debfaq--2025-0{2,3}-01 > 88c88,90 > < world. Off-topic arguments also have a habit of derailing useful > discussion. > --- > > world. > > > >

Re: Monthly FAQ for the Debian-user mailing list (last modified 20250301)

2025-03-03 Thread Will Mengarini
This kind of information popos/pts/4 bash ~ 08:54 0$diff -b debfaq--2025-0{2,3}-01 88c88,90 < world. Off-topic arguments also have a habit of derailing useful discussion. --- > world. > > Off-topic arguments also have a habit of derailing useful discussion. 15

Re: Monthly FAQ for the Debian-user mailing list (last modified 20250301)

2025-03-01 Thread Patrick Wiseman
; > * Help and advice on this list is provided by volunteers in their own > time. > > It is common for there to be different opinions or answers provided. > > > > * It is not necessary to answer every post on the mailing list. > > > > * Be constructive in your re

Re: Monthly FAQ for the Debian-user mailing list (last modified 20250301)

2025-03-01 Thread Andy Smith
Hi, On Sun, Mar 02, 2025 at 12:18:36AM +, Andrew M.A. Cater wrote: > [SOLVED] "Can't configure network on Debian - please advise" > > would make it a lot easier to find answers on some of the longer > threads concerning problems. As ever, opinions may vary and i'd like > to know what others f

Re: Monthly FAQ for the Debian-user mailing list (last modified 20250301)

2025-03-01 Thread Roberto C . Sánchez
On Sun, Mar 02, 2025 at 12:18:36AM +, Andrew M.A. Cater wrote: > > There is something to be said for it if you have a long thread > where the topic or subject is initially imprecise - a hypothetical > example follows: > > "Can't configure network on Debian - please advise" might attract > twe

Re: Monthly FAQ for the Debian-user mailing list (last modified 20250301)

2025-03-01 Thread Andrew M.A. Cater
On Sat, Mar 01, 2025 at 06:05:41PM -0500, Jeffrey Walton wrote: > You might want to add a bullet point addressing folks adding "SOLVED" > and similar to titles. Either allow it or forbid it. But write it down > so everyone knows what the policy is. > Hi Jeff, I thought I had addressed it by sugg

Re: Monthly FAQ for the Debian-user mailing list (last modified 20250301)

2025-03-01 Thread Jeffrey Walton
s or answers provided. > > * It is not necessary to answer every post on the mailing list. > > * Be constructive in your responses. It may be that somebody else answers > a question before you - if so, you should not reply simply in order to get > the last word in, only reply if

Monthly FAQ for the Debian-user mailing list (last modified 20250301)

2025-03-01 Thread Andrew M.A. Cater
- if so, you should not reply simply in order to get the last word in, only reply if you can add useful information. * Don't feed the trolls: it's not necessary to reply to every post. If someone is trolling/misbehaving - don't amplify it by commenting on the list and giving the

Debian-user monthly FAQ (last modified 20250201)

2025-02-01 Thread Andrew M.A. Cater
- if so, you should not reply simply in order to get the last word in, only reply if you can add useful information. * Don't feed the trolls: it's not necessary to reply to every post. If someone is trolling/misbehaving - don't amplify it by commenting on the list and giving the

Monthly FAQ for Debian-user mailing list (last modified 20250101)

2025-01-01 Thread Andrew M.A. Cater
- if so, you should not reply simply in order to get the last word in, only reply if you can add useful information. * Don't feed the trolls: it's not necessary to reply to every post. If someone is trolling/misbehaving - don't amplify it by commenting on the list and giving the

Monthly FAQ for Debian-user mailing list (Last modified 20241201)

2024-12-01 Thread Andrew M.A. Cater
- if so, you should not reply simply in order to get the last word in, only reply if you can add useful information. * Don't feed the trolls: it's not necessary to reply to every post. If someone is trolling/misbehaving - don't amplify it by commenting on the list and giving the

Re: absent last login report on vtty login

2024-11-06 Thread Felix Miata
og2-2. > Now > in /etc/pam.d/common-session I have the session optional pam_lastlog.so that > Greg > pointed to, but after systemctl daemon-reload, no change, and also no change > after > reboot. systemctl list-unit-files | grep last returns null. There's no man > page

Re: absent last login report on vtty login

2024-11-05 Thread Charles Curley
On Tue, 5 Nov 2024 13:37:26 -0500 Jeffrey Walton wrote: > I believe the message in SSH is due to /etc/ssh/sshd_config. Search > for "banner." I think not. My sshd_config files on both bookworm and trixie have banner commented out. According to the man page for that file, the default is no banner

Re: absent last login report on vtty login

2024-11-05 Thread Jeffrey Walton
a > vtty. I made the statement above after logging in via SSH. So I logged > in to the same VM via a virtual console. No last login message there. I > confirm that the message is present in a Bookworm virtual console. I believe the message in SSH is due to /etc/ssh/sshd_config. Search for "banner." Jeff

Re: absent last login report on vtty login

2024-11-05 Thread Felix Miata
inted to, but after systemctl daemon-reload, no change, and also no change after reboot. systemctl list-unit-files | grep last returns null. There's no man page for common-session. pam-auth-update common-session has (and had), "Maintain lastlog2 database" enabled, yet still no l

Re: absent last login report on vtty login

2024-11-05 Thread Charles Curley
stalled using a recent weekly > build, "testing _Trixie_ - Official Snapshot amd64 NETINST with > firmware 20241028-03:22]". Odder. Felix Miata specifically mentioned a vtty. I made the statement above after logging in via SSH. So I logged in to the same VM via a virtual console. No la

Re: absent last login report on vtty login

2024-11-05 Thread Max Nikulin
On 05/11/2024 20:17, Felix Miata wrote: This used to be a normal announcement on vtty login. On Trixie it's missing. Transition to 64bit time_t? https://www.thkukuk.de/blog/Y2038_glibc_utmp_64bit/

Re: absent last login report on vtty login

2024-11-05 Thread tomas
;> missing. > >> What's responsible for it? > > > I think it's part of /etc/pam.d/login . On Debian 12, that file > > includes this bit: > > > # Prints the last login info upon successful login > > # (Replaces the `LASTLOG_ENAB' option

Re: absent last login report on vtty login

2024-11-05 Thread Felix Miata
/login . On Debian 12, that file > includes this bit: > # Prints the last login info upon successful login > # (Replaces the `LASTLOG_ENAB' option from login.defs) > sessionoptional pam_lastlog.so String lastlog is absent from that file here, same as the file's

Re: absent last login report on vtty login

2024-11-05 Thread Felix Miata
y > build, "testing _Trixie_ - Official Snapshot amd64 NETINST with > firmware 20241028-03:22]". I have a dozen installations, all upgrades from Bookworm, most if not all done last year. I haven't tracked whether all have the problem, but I do think that's the case. Kerne

Re: absent last login report on vtty login

2024-11-05 Thread Charles Curley
On Tue, 5 Nov 2024 08:17:57 -0500 Felix Miata wrote: > This used to be a normal announcement on vtty login. On Trixie it's > missing. Odd. It's present on the VM I recently installed using a recent weekly build, "testing _Trixie_ - Official Snapshot amd64 NETINST with firmware 20241028-03:22]".

Re: absent last login report on vtty login

2024-11-05 Thread Greg Wooledge
On Tue, Nov 05, 2024 at 08:17:57 -0500, Felix Miata wrote: > This used to be a normal announcement on vtty login. On Trixie it's missing. > What's responsible for it? I think it's part of /etc/pam.d/login . On Debian 12, that file includes this bit: # Prints the last login

absent last login report on vtty login

2024-11-05 Thread Felix Miata
This used to be a normal announcement on vtty login. On Trixie it's missing. What's responsible for it? Is it different on Trixie? On Tumbleweed it's a separate package lastlog or something like that. Search for similar for Trixie comes up empty. :( -- Evolution as taught in public schools is, lik

Monthly FAQ for the Debian-user mailing list (last modified 20240901)

2024-11-03 Thread Andrew M.A. Cater
, you should not reply simply in order to get the last word in, only reply if you can add useful information. * Don't feed the trolls: it's not necessary to reply to every post. If someone is trolling/misbehaving - don't amplify it by commenting on the list and giving the

Monthly FAQ for Debian-user mailing list (last modified 20240901)

2024-10-01 Thread Andrew M.A. Cater
- if so, you should not reply simply in order to get the last word in, only reply if you can add useful information. * Don't feed the trolls: it's not necessary to reply to every post. If someone is trolling/misbehaving - don't amplify it by commenting on the list and giving the

Monthly FAQ for Debian-user mailing list (last modified 20240901)

2024-09-01 Thread Andrew M.A. Cater
- if so, you should not reply simply in order to get the last word in, only reply if you can add useful information. * Don't feed the trolls: it's not necessary to reply to every post. If someone is trolling/misbehaving - don't amplify it by commenting on the list and giving the

Re: LAST 32 bit release WITH installer?

2024-08-20 Thread Richard Owlett
On 08/20/2024 02:39 PM, Andrew M.A. Cater wrote: On Tue, Aug 20, 2024 at 12:39:30PM -0500, Richard Owlett wrote: I'm confused. I have 2 old-fashioned 32 bit i386 machines. What is/will be last release with installer? TIA Richard, The last point release of Debian 12 - probably 12.11 or

Re: LAST 32 bit release WITH installer?

2024-08-20 Thread Andrew M.A. Cater
On Tue, Aug 20, 2024 at 12:39:30PM -0500, Richard Owlett wrote: > I'm confused. > I have 2 old-fashioned 32 bit i386 machines. > What is/will be last release with installer? > TIA > Richard, The last point release of Debian 12 - probably 12.11 or 12.12 if we keep up the r

Re: LAST 32 bit release WITH installer?

2024-08-20 Thread Charles Curley
On Tue, 20 Aug 2024 12:39:30 -0500 Richard Owlett wrote: > I have 2 old-fashioned 32 bit i386 machines. > What is/will be last release with installer? The 32 bit installer is no longer part of the weekly build in preparation for trixie. -- Does anybody read signatures any more?

LAST 32 bit release WITH installer?

2024-08-20 Thread Richard Owlett
I'm confused. I have 2 old-fashioned 32 bit i386 machines. What is/will be last release with installer? TIA

Monthly FAQ for Debian-user mailing list (last modified 20240701)

2024-07-31 Thread Andrew M.A. Cater
- if so, you should not reply simply in order to get the last word in, only reply if you can add useful information. * Don't feed the trolls: it's not necessary to reply to every post. If someone is trolling/misbehaving - don't amplify it by commenting on the list and giving the

Re: hplip: hp-check error in line 630 since last update

2024-07-17 Thread Brad Rogers
On Wed, 17 Jul 2024 13:55:55 +0200 Daniel Schröter wrote: Hello Daniel, >thanks for this information. Sounds more then similar ;-) :-) Thought so. I implemented the fix here, and can confirm hplip is up and running again. Good luck. -- Regards _ "Valid sig separator is {dash}{das

Re: hplip: hp-check error in line 630 since last update

2024-07-17 Thread Daniel Schröter
Hello Brad, thanks for this information. Sounds more then similar ;-) I'm going to close my bug report Bye

Re: hplip: hp-check error in line 630 since last update

2024-07-16 Thread Brad Rogers
On Tue, 16 Jul 2024 11:01:30 +0200 Daniel Schröter wrote: Hello Daniel, > >I opened a bug report but didn't get an answer. >https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1076210 > >Someone has a workaround? See; https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1075760 Which is very simil

hplip: hp-check error in line 630 since last update

2024-07-16 Thread Daniel Schröter
Hello, someone else has the problem with hp-check since last update? $ hp-check /usr/bin/hp-check:630: SyntaxWarning: invalid escape sequence '\s' lsusb_pat = re.compile("""^Bus\s([0-9a-fA-F]{3,3})\sDevice\s([0-9a-fA-F]{3,3}):\sID\s([0-9a-fA-F]{4,4}):([0-9a-fA-F]{4,

Re: Automatic creation of last-known-good boot configuration

2024-07-10 Thread songbird
tramfs >> maintenance. > > Are you using grub as your bootloader? Normally apt upgrade > leaves the last N (N=5?) kernels and initramfs in /boot, and > configures grub to make them available. apt dist-upgrade, on the > other hand, tries to remove the oldest unused kernel and &g

Re: Automatic creation of last-known-good boot configuration

2024-07-10 Thread Nicolas George
pport snapshots have their own set of problems. On the other hand, I can say it is a feature of NixOS, I saw it last week when somebody asked me “I made a mistake, our VM doesn't boot anymore, can I access the GRUB console?” and they just rebooted on the previous configuration. But NixOS is not Debian, it is barely Unix as far as I can see. Regards, -- Nicolas George

Re: Automatic creation of last-known-good boot configuration

2024-07-10 Thread Dan Ritter
lower then M > minutes each time (and if some other conditions are fulfilled), > then consider that kernel and initramfs good and save them away > where they will not be overwritten by regular kernel/initramfs > maintenance. Are you using grub as your bootloader? Normally apt

Re: Automatic creation of last-known-good boot configuration

2024-07-10 Thread Michel Verdier
On 2024-07-10, Jens Schmidt wrote: > So I thought that there might be some automatism like this: > > If the currently used kernel and initramfs have been in use > already N times and if the boot time has been lower then M > minutes each time (and if some other conditions are fulfilled), >

Automatic creation of last-known-good boot configuration

2024-07-10 Thread Jens Schmidt
On Debian testing I've been bitten by the systemd upgrade and the systemd package split recently, rendering my dracut-LUKS-based system unbootable. I know that my warranty is void since I'm on testing, but both these issues would have been much easier to cope with if there had been some good backu

Monthly FAQ for Debian-user mailing list (last modified 20240701)

2024-07-01 Thread Andrew M.A. Cater
- if so, you should not reply simply in order to get the last word in, only reply if you can add useful information. * Don't feed the trolls: it's not necessary to reply to every post. If someone is trolling/misbehaving - don't amplify it by commenting on the list and giving the

Re: last(1) missing after upgrade from 12.5 to sid (util-linux 2.38.1 to 2.40.1-4)

2024-06-04 Thread songbird
e...@gmx.us wrote: > On 6/4/24 10:59, songbird wrote: >> t...@tommiller.us wrote: >> >>> Hello! >>> >>> last(1) seems to have disappeared following an upgrade from 12.5 to sid. >> ... >> >>i've been using the "more" com

Re: last(1) missing after upgrade from 12.5 to sid (util-linux 2.38.1 to 2.40.1-4)

2024-06-04 Thread songbird
Ash Joubert wrote: > On 2024-06-05 02:59, songbird wrote: >> t...@tommiller.us wrote: >>> last(1) seems to have disappeared following an upgrade from 12.5 to sid. >>i've been using the "more" command provided by the util-linux >> package. > >

Re: last(1) missing after upgrade from 12.5 to sid (util-linux 2.38.1 to 2.40.1-4)

2024-06-04 Thread Ash Joubert
On 2024-06-05 02:59, songbird wrote: t...@tommiller.us wrote: last(1) seems to have disappeared following an upgrade from 12.5 to sid. i've been using the "more" command provided by the util-linux package. You might be thinking of less(1), a program similar to more(1). The

Re: last(1) missing after upgrade from 12.5 to sid (util-linux 2.38.1 to 2.40.1-4)

2024-06-04 Thread eben
On 6/4/24 10:59, songbird wrote: t...@tommiller.us wrote: Hello! last(1) seems to have disappeared following an upgrade from 12.5 to sid. ... i've been using the "more" command provided by the util-linux package. How do you use "more" to do what "last&quo

Re: last(1) missing after upgrade from 12.5 to sid (util-linux 2.38.1 to 2.40.1-4)

2024-06-04 Thread songbird
t...@tommiller.us wrote: > Hello! > > last(1) seems to have disappeared following an upgrade from 12.5 to sid. ... i've been using the "more" command provided by the util-linux package. songbird

Re: last(1) missing after upgrade from 12.5 to sid (util-linux 2.38.1 to 2.40.1-4)

2024-06-03 Thread tom
June 3, 2024 at 9:09 PM, t...@tommiller.us wrote: > > Hello! > > last(1) seems to have disappeared following an upgrade from 12.5 to sid. > > More info is shown below. What is my mistake? Or, could it be a bug? > > Please send me copies of replies since I am not

Re: last(1) missing after upgrade from 12.5 to sid (util-linux 2.38.1 to 2.40.1-4)

2024-06-03 Thread Ash Joubert
On 2024-06-04 16:09, t...@tommiller.us wrote: last(1) seems to have disappeared following an upgrade from 12.5 to sid. I remember seeing in the NEWS for util-linux that last(1) was moved to the wtmpdb package: $ zcat /usr/share/doc/util-linux/NEWS.Debian.gz util-linux (2.40.1-2) unstable

last(1) missing after upgrade from 12.5 to sid (util-linux 2.38.1 to 2.40.1-4)

2024-06-03 Thread tom
Hello! last(1) seems to have disappeared following an upgrade from 12.5 to sid. More info is shown below. What is my mistake? Or, could it be a bug? Please send me copies of replies since I am not subscribed to this list. Thanks for your help! Best! Tom <8> # Pr

Parenthesis or square brackets and "was" (was: Re: Monthly FAQ for Debian-user mailing list (last modified 20240501))

2024-06-02 Thread eben
On 6/1/24 23:02, Max Nikulin wrote: On 02/06/2024 02:59, Andrew M.A. Cater wrote: If you change subject or emphasis in mid-thread, please change the subject line on your email accordingly so that this can be clearly seen. For example: New question [WAS Old topic] Are square brackets intention

Re: Parenthesis or square brackets and "was" (was: Re: Monthly FAQ for Debian-user mailing list (last modified 20240501))

2024-06-02 Thread Andrew M.A. Cater
On Sun, Jun 02, 2024 at 10:02:58AM +0700, Max Nikulin wrote: > On 02/06/2024 02:59, Andrew M.A. Cater wrote: > > If you change subject > > or emphasis in mid-thread, please change the subject line on your email > > accordingly so that this can be clearly seen. > > > > For example: New question [WA

Re: Parenthesis or square brackets and "was" (was: Re: Monthly FAQ for Debian-user mailing list (last modified 20240501))

2024-06-01 Thread Greg Wooledge
On Sun, Jun 02, 2024 at 10:02:58AM +0700, Max Nikulin wrote: > On 02/06/2024 02:59, Andrew M.A. Cater wrote: > > If you change subject > > or emphasis in mid-thread, please change the subject line on your email > > accordingly so that this can be clearly seen. > > > > For example: New question [WA

Parenthesis or square brackets and "was" (was: Re: Monthly FAQ for Debian-user mailing list (last modified 20240501))

2024-06-01 Thread Max Nikulin
On 02/06/2024 02:59, Andrew M.A. Cater wrote: If you change subject or emphasis in mid-thread, please change the subject line on your email accordingly so that this can be clearly seen. For example: New question [WAS Old topic] Are square brackets intentional here? E.g. thunderbird strips "(wa

Monthly FAQ for Debian-user mailing list (last modified 20240501)

2024-06-01 Thread Andrew M.A. Cater
- if so, you should not reply simply in order to get the last word in, only reply if you can add useful information. Off-topic posts === * Please try to stay on topic. * Off-topic posts will happen occasionally as threads wander. Don't reply to them to make them carry on. * I

Last line [was: Re: [SOLVED] Trouble/bug with initramfs-tools adding encrypted swap partition]

2024-04-26 Thread Max Nikulin
On 26/04/2024 10:56, David Wright wrote: Editor examples: a windowed emacs buffer has a ≣ decoration at the extreme left edge after the last line of text, so that you can distinguish an absence of lines from empty lines. Perhaps that decoration should be explicitly enabled. However it

Re: Correction to last message for Debian 11 and Debian 12

2024-01-18 Thread Max Nikulin
On 17/01/2024 15:28, Andrew M.A. Cater wrote: On Tue, Jan 16, 2024 at 10:31:40PM +, Jeff Jennings wrote: Recently, I decided to download Debian 12.4 and was alarmed to notice that Debian 12 downloads are no longer through https connections. [...] That's served via https from cdimage.debian

Re: Correction to last message for Debian 11 and Debian 12

2024-01-17 Thread Andrew M.A. Cater
On Tue, Jan 16, 2024 at 10:31:40PM +, Jeff Jennings wrote: > Greetings, > > After a couple of decades of using various Linux distributions, I've been on > Debian 10 for some years. I like it a lot! > > Recently, I decided to download Debian 12.4 and was alarmed to notice that > Debian 12 do

Correction to last message for Debian 11 and Debian 12

2024-01-16 Thread Jeff Jennings
Greetings, After a couple of decades of using various Linux distributions, I've been on Debian 10 for some years. I like it a lot! Recently, I decided to download Debian 12.4 and was alarmed to notice that Debian 12 downloads are no longer through https connections. In addition, I installed 12

Re: Strange application menus (File, Edit…) behaviour since last update

2023-03-14 Thread Yvan Masson
Le 09/03/2023 à 12:11, Vincent Lefevre a écrit : On 2023-03-09 08:33:08 +0100, Yvan Masson wrote: I might be the same issue indeed. A temporary workaround I have just found is to run KDE on Wayland. But I suppose it is not possible with FVWM. In any case, I sometimes need to run remote X appli

Re: Strange application menus (File, Edit…) behaviour since last update

2023-03-14 Thread Vincent Lefevre
On 2023-03-09 04:19:22 +0100, Vincent Lefevre wrote: > FYI, my bug reports for Firefox 110, with some details on the > behavior I get: > https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1820542 > https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1032428 Now it appears that this bug is actually a F

Re: Strange application menus (File, Edit…) behaviour since last update

2023-03-09 Thread tomas
Interesting. I don't use `apt` but "full-upgrade" is what I've been > >> using with testing for the last 20 years, first with `apt-get` then with > >> `aptitude`. > > > > It's just a tad riskier -- you allow apt to change versions and > &g

Re: Strange application menus (File, Edit…) behaviour since last update

2023-03-09 Thread Vincent Lefevre
resting. I don't use `apt` but "full-upgrade" is what I've been > >> using with testing for the last 20 years, first with `apt-get` then with > >> `aptitude`. > > > > It's just a tad riskier -- you allow apt to change versions and > > potentia

Re: Strange application menus (File, Edit…) behaviour since last update

2023-03-09 Thread Stefan Monnier
>> > AFAIK, "apt full-upgrade" is for stable to the next stable, >> > not for testing and unstable (one typically resolves conflicts >> > interactively). >> >> Interesting. I don't use `apt` but "full-upgrade" is what I've

Re: Strange application menus (File, Edit…) behaviour since last update

2023-03-09 Thread tomas
quot;full-upgrade" is what I've been > using with testing for the last 20 years, first with `apt-get` then with > `aptitude`. It's just a tad riskier -- you allow apt to change versions and potentially remove packages. If you keep a small cross section you won't get hit often :) Cheers -- t signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: Strange application menus (File, Edit…) behaviour since last update

2023-03-09 Thread Brad Rogers
On Thu, 9 Mar 2023 17:57:12 +0100 Yvan Masson wrote: Hello Yvan, >Yes, I did that, but thanks for the suggestion. NP. Shame it didn't help. > >As I do not always use X11, I am thinking that maybe my issue has begun >on a previous update… Always a possibility. Another possibility is that, so

Re: Strange application menus (File, Edit…) behaviour since last update

2023-03-09 Thread Yvan Masson
Le 09/03/2023 à 12:40, Brad Rogers a écrit : On Wed, 8 Mar 2023 18:02:42 +0100 Yvan Masson wrote: Hello Yvan, Thanks for your insights, You have a lot of Plasma related updates there. Have you; Logged out and back in? or Rebooted? Yes, I did that, but thanks for the suggestion. As I do

Re: Strange application menus (File, Edit…) behaviour since last update

2023-03-09 Thread Stefan Monnier
> AFAIK, "apt full-upgrade" is for stable to the next stable, > not for testing and unstable (one typically resolves conflicts > interactively). Interesting. I don't use `apt` but "full-upgrade" is what I've been using with testing for the last 20 years, f

Re: Strange application menus (File, Edit…) behaviour since last update

2023-03-09 Thread Brad Rogers
On Wed, 8 Mar 2023 18:02:42 +0100 Yvan Masson wrote: Hello Yvan, >Thanks for your insights, You have a lot of Plasma related updates there. Have you; Logged out and back in? or Rebooted? I found I had a few issues after the upgrade from 5.26 to 5.27. A reboot solved some of them (update coi

Re: Strange application menus (File, Edit…) behaviour since last update

2023-03-09 Thread Vincent Lefevre
On 2023-03-09 04:32:05 -0500, Timothy M Butterworth wrote: > On Thu, Mar 9, 2023 at 4:06 AM Timothy Butterworth < > timothy.m.butterwo...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Try running apt fully upgrade > > > `sudo apt full-upgrade` sorry about that my tablet auto-corrected. AFAIK, "apt full-upgrade" is for

Re: Strange application menus (File, Edit…) behaviour since last update

2023-03-09 Thread Vincent Lefevre
On 2023-03-09 08:33:08 +0100, Yvan Masson wrote: > I might be the same issue indeed. A temporary workaround I have just found > is to run KDE on Wayland. But I suppose it is not possible with FVWM. In any case, I sometimes need to run remote X applications transparently, so Wayland is not an optio

Re: Strange application menus (File, Edit…) behaviour since last update

2023-03-09 Thread Tixy
On Thu, 2023-03-09 at 04:32 -0500, Timothy M Butterworth wrote: > On Thu, Mar 9, 2023 at 4:06 AM Timothy Butterworth < > timothy.m.butterwo...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Try running apt fully upgrade > > > `sudo apt full-upgrade` sorry about that my tablet auto-corrected. And it broke threading. -

Re: Strange application menus (File, Edit…) behaviour since last update

2023-03-09 Thread Timothy M Butterworth
/2023 à 04:19, Vincent Lefevre a écrit : > > On 2023-03-08 18:02:42 +0100, Yvan Masson wrote: > >> Using testing with KDE, I have an issue since last update: for many QT > >> applications and some GTK applications, menus (File, Edit…) or even > >> drop-down li

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >