Re: [a bit OT] Automate a (G o o g l e) search from a list of strings

2023-09-20 Thread Tamas Sohamar
Using another search engine is not an option? On Thu, 21 Sept 2023, 05:55 The Wanderer, wrote: > On 2023-09-20 at 16:50, Tom Browder wrote: > > > On Wed, Sep 20, 2023 at 13:36 Nicolas George > > wrote: > > > >> Tom Browder (12023-09-20): > >> > >>> What if you used an equilavent script but incr

Re: [a bit OT] Automate a (G o o g l e) search from a list of strings

2023-09-20 Thread The Wanderer
On 2023-09-20 at 16:50, Tom Browder wrote: > On Wed, Sep 20, 2023 at 13:36 Nicolas George > wrote: > >> Tom Browder (12023-09-20): >> >>> What if you used an equilavent script but increased and >>> randomized time > > ... > >> We can try to exercise some common sense, in particular by >> comp

Re: [a bit OT] Automate a (G o o g l e) search from a list of strings

2023-09-20 Thread Tom Browder
On Wed, Sep 20, 2023 at 13:36 Nicolas George wrote: > Tom Browder (12023-09-20): > > What if you used an equilavent script but increased and randomized time ... We can try to exercise some common sense, in particular by comparing to > similar situations. For example, if you take something that

Re: [a bit OT] Automate a (G o o g l e) search from a list of strings

2023-09-20 Thread tomas
On Wed, Sep 20, 2023 at 08:35:54PM +0200, Nicolas George wrote: > Tom Browder (12023-09-20): > > What if you used an equilavent script but increased and randomized time > > between each search string? Or do you think just the single search is > > enough to trigger them? > > We can try to exercise

Re: [a bit OT] Automate a (G o o g l e) search from a list of strings

2023-09-20 Thread Nicolas George
Tom Browder (12023-09-20): > What if you used an equilavent script but increased and randomized time > between each search string? Or do you think just the single search is > enough to trigger them? We can try to exercise some common sense, in particular by comparing to similar situations. For ex

Re: [a bit OT] Automate a (G o o g l e) search from a list of strings

2023-09-20 Thread Tom Browder
On Wed, Sep 20, 2023 at 09:35 Andy Smith wrote: > Hello, > > On Wed, Sep 20, 2023 at 08:13:43AM +0200, steve wrote: > > Le 19-09-2023, à 16:52:24 +0200, Nicolas George a écrit : > > > what you intend is completely forbidden by Google's terms and > > > service. And they have detection: please only

Re: [a bit OT] Automate a (G o o g l e) search from a list of strings

2023-09-20 Thread steve
Le 20-09-2023, à 08:46:06 +, Andy Smith a écrit : Hello, On Wed, Sep 20, 2023 at 08:13:43AM +0200, steve wrote: Le 19-09-2023, à 16:52:24 +0200, Nicolas George a écrit : > what you intend is completely forbidden by Google's terms and > service. And they have detection: please only do this

Re: [a bit OT] Automate a (G o o g l e) search from a list of strings

2023-09-20 Thread Andy Smith
Hello, On Wed, Sep 20, 2023 at 08:13:43AM +0200, steve wrote: > Le 19-09-2023, à 16:52:24 +0200, Nicolas George a écrit : > > what you intend is completely forbidden by Google's terms and > > service. And they have detection: please only do this on a > > computer and network access when you will b

Re: [a bit OT] Automate a (G o o g l e) search from a list of strings

2023-09-19 Thread steve
Dear all, Thank you for your answers, unfortunately they don't help me much (provided code is too complicated for me). Le 19-09-2023, à 16:52:24 +0200, Nicolas George a écrit : steve (12023-09-19): I have a list of 200 keywords and would like for every one to launch a search on a specific we

Re: [a bit OT] Automate a (G o o g l e) search from a list of strings

2023-09-19 Thread Greg Wooledge
[:space:]" "+" < keywords | > sed -e 's/ /+OR+/g' -e 's/+$//' -e 's/+/+OR+/g') > > curl -s -L -o pirate.htm "https://www.google.com/search?q=${query}"; > ls -l pirate.htm > exit 0 Joining a list (array) of

Re: [a bit OT] Automate a (G o o g l e) search from a list of strings

2023-09-19 Thread Karl Vogel
; "+" < keywords | sed -e 's/ /+OR+/g' -e 's/+$//' -e 's/+/+OR+/g') curl -s -L -o pirate.htm "https://www.google.com/search?q=${query}"; ls -l pirate.htm exit 0 Results: me% ./search -rw-r--r-- 1 vogelke 220

Re: [a bit OT] Automate a (G o o g l e) search from a list of strings

2023-09-19 Thread Jason
On 19.09.23 16:52, Nicolas George wrote: If not, then what you intend is completely forbidden by Google's terms and service. And they have detection: please only do this on a computer and network access when you will be the only one inconvenienced when they block your access. It happened on a com

Re: [a bit OT] Automate a (G o o g l e) search from a list of strings

2023-09-19 Thread DdB
Am 19.09.2023 um 16:41 schrieb steve: > I guess I could code a Python script to do that but if something already > exists I'd rather use it. Really, your wording is very vague and thus, i donno, if i even understand, what your trying to accomplish. But from what my phantasies entice, i would maybe

Re: [a bit OT] Automate a (G o o g l e) search from a list of strings

2023-09-19 Thread Nicolas George
steve (12023-09-19): > I have a list of 200 keywords and would like for every one to launch a > search on a specific website and put the result(s) in a file, something > like: > > search keyword website: example.com >> file.csv > > I guess I could code a Python script to do that but if something

Re: [a bit OT] Automate a (G o o g l e) search from a list of strings

2023-09-19 Thread Michael Kjörling
On 19 Sep 2023 16:41 +0200, from dl...@bluewin.ch (steve): > I have a list of 200 keywords and would like for every one to launch a > search on a specific website and put the result(s) in a file, something > like: > > search keyword website: example.com >> file.csv > > I guess I could code a Pyth

[a bit OT] Automate a (G o o g l e) search from a list of strings

2023-09-19 Thread steve
Hello, I'm sorry if this question is a bit OT but since the answer will be implemented from a Debian machine, it's not completely OT :) I have a list of 200 keywords and would like for every one to launch a search on a specific website and put the result(s) in a file, something like: search key

Re: Looking for a good "default" font (small 'L' vs. capital 'i' problem)

2023-08-24 Thread Christoph K.
an almost identical glyph for the capital 'i' and the small 'L'. It's just a straight line and as such doesn't solve my problem. Christoph

Re: Looking for a good "default" font (small 'L' vs. capital 'i' problem)

2023-08-22 Thread Marco Möller
On 19.08.23 21:19, Christoph K. wrote: Could you please recommend a "suitable" sans-serif font that a) (...) b) (...) c) (...) d) (...) Thanks, Christoph Having had the same problem to solve for myself I ended up to use: Noto sans for all my GUI Liberation Mono for coding

Re: Looking for a good "default" font (small 'L' vs. capital 'i' problem)

2023-08-22 Thread Michael Stone
On Sat, Aug 19, 2023 at 09:19:48PM +0200, Christoph K. wrote: Could you please recommend a "suitable" sans-serif font that A lot of your criteria are rather subjective. For packaged fonts you might look at "hack" (https://source-foundry.github.io/Hack/font-specimen.html) or "go" (https://go.

Re: Looking for a good "default" font (small 'L' vs. capital 'i' problem)

2023-08-21 Thread Charlie Gibbs
On Mon Aug 21 16:23:25 2023 "Christoph K." wrote: > Am Sun, 20 Aug 2023 21:41:04 + > schrieb "Russell L. Harris" : > >> On the 3, 5, 6, and 9, open the end of the loops, and shorten the >> horizontal stroke on top of the 5 so the 5 is not mistaken f

Re: Looking for a good "default" font (small 'L' vs. capital 'i' problem)

2023-08-21 Thread Richmond
scription for >> fonts-anonymous-pro specifically references both 0 v. O and I v. l v. >> 1: "Description-en: fixed width font designed for coders This package >> contains two Font Families. - Anonymous Pro - Anonomous Pro Minus . >> 'Anonymous Pro' is a fa

Re: Looking for a good "default" font (small 'L' vs. capital 'i' problem)

2023-08-21 Thread Christoph K.
Am Sun, 20 Aug 2023 21:41:04 + schrieb "Russell L. Harris" : > On the 3, 5, 6, and 9, open the end of the loops, and shorten the > horizontal stroke on top of the 5 so the 5 is not mistaken for an S. > Always put horizontal strokes on I. Make the 1 with a flag on the &g

Re: Looking for a good "default" font (small 'L' vs. capital 'i' problem)

2023-08-20 Thread Tom Browder
On Sun, Aug 20, 2023 at 15:45 James H. H. Lampert wrote: > What Herr Rönnquist said. > And given that I actually *do* set type with some regularity, ... > (And for the record, my "go-to fonts" are all versions of Garamond.) Wow, another Garamond lover! I do, too, love it (and bought a copy of

Re: Looking for a good "default" font (small 'L' vs. capital 'i' problem)

2023-08-20 Thread Russell L. Harris
On Sun, Aug 20, 2023 at 10:14:20PM +0200, Christoph K. wrote: And I loathe fonts in which the numerals 3, 5, 6, and 9 are not radically different. Interesting point. Didn't pay much attention to these numerals, yet. Back in the 1970's, I ran across a detailed study of character shape with res

Re: Looking for a good "default" font (small 'L' vs. capital 'i' problem)

2023-08-20 Thread Christoph K.
Am Sat, 19 Aug 2023 20:16:25 + schrieb "Russell L. Harris" : > I am concerned primarily with the distinction between numeral 1 and > lower case L. Of course, 'l' and 'I' was just the most prominent example. Usually I look at 1lI| (numeral one, small &#x

Re: REeLooking for a good "default" font (small 'L' vs. capital 'i' problem)

2023-08-20 Thread James H. H. Lampert
Hmm. IBM Plex. Not bad-looking, and it does solve the stated problem. I will note that like Bistream Swiss Monospaced, it's only *nominally* sans-serif, in that it has slab-serifs (Stymie-style, rather than Clarendon-style) on the capital I, and one small slab-serif on the lowerc

Re: REeLooking for a good "default" font (small 'L' vs. capital 'i' problem)

2023-08-20 Thread Christoph K.
> Have a look at: https://github.com/IBM/plex > it is very readable. > Rolf > Thank you, that's something I've been looking for. There's even a debian package ... apt-get install fonts-ibm-plex ... did do the job. Best regards, Christoph

Re: Looking for a good "default" font (small 'L' vs. capital 'i' problem)

2023-08-20 Thread James H. H. Lampert
What Herr Rönnquist said. And given that I actually *do* set type with some regularity, I can say from experience that, with the exception of some monospaced examples that are only *nominally* sans-serif (e.g., Bitstream Swiss Monospaced), sans-serif fonts in which uppercase I and lowercase l

Re: Looking for a good "default" font (small 'L' vs. capital 'i' problem)

2023-08-20 Thread Frank
for ages and I have never mistaken an l for an I or vice versa. Regards, Frank

Re: Looking for a good "default" font (small 'L' vs. capital 'i' problem)

2023-08-20 Thread Karl Vogel
On Sat, Aug 19, 2023 at 03:29:22PM -0400, Christoph K. wrote: > > I'm unsatisfied with the default sans font in debian for use in the > graphical user interface (in my case XFCE). I use BSD and Linux, and my eyesight sucks. For console work (23" monitor that's about 2 feet away) I use an Xterm w

Re: Looking for a good "default" font (small 'L' vs. capital 'i' problem)

2023-08-19 Thread Nate Bargmann
For a proportional font, Verdana, Regular seems to come close with, it seems to me, good differentiation between l, I, and 1. O and 0 are a bit problematic as 0 is not dotted or slashed but is more of an ellipse. On this GNOME desktop the interface is set to Cantarell, Regular, and while it has

Re: Looking for a good "default" font (small 'L' vs. capital 'i' problem)

2023-08-19 Thread Tom Browder
On Sat, Aug 19, 2023 at 16:15 Russell L. Harris wrote: > bumper sticker: DYSLEXICS UNTIE! I concur on sans comments. You might take a look at the Free* fonts family (Debian packages “fonts-freefont-ttf” and “fonts-freefont-otf”). -Tom

REeLooking for a good "default" font (small 'L' vs. capital 'i' problem)

2023-08-19 Thread Rolf Blum
Have a look at: https://github.com/IBM/plex it is very readable. Rolf

Re: Looking for a good "default" font (small 'L' vs. capital 'i' problem)

2023-08-19 Thread Russell L. Harris
bumper sticker: DYSLEXICS UNTIE!

Re: Looking for a good "default" font (small 'L' vs. capital 'i' problem)

2023-08-19 Thread debian-user
fonts-anonymous-pro for whatever applications will accept it. Found it > accidentally a few years ago. Its differences are noticeable enough > that I instantly miss it on new operating system installs. > > The "apt-cache show" description for fonts-anonymous-pro specific

Re: Looking for a good "default" font (small 'L' vs. capital 'i' problem)

2023-08-19 Thread Cindy Sue Causey
ult sans font (I guess it's Bitsream Vera, >>but that doesn't really matter) is the the small 'L' and the capital 'i' >>look the same (mostly). >> >>Everyone who has tried to read unknown characters (e.g. a password >>generated automatically ode

Re: Looking for a good "default" font (small 'L' vs. capital 'i' problem)

2023-08-19 Thread Russell L. Harris
I am a XFCE user with a similar taste in fonts, but I have no need for umlaut. I am concerned primarily with the distinction between numeral 1 and lower case L. And I loathe fonts in which the numerals 3, 5, 6, and 9 are not radically different. Back in the 1970's, I ran across a det

Re: Looking for a good "default" font (small 'L' vs. capital 'i' problem)

2023-08-19 Thread Andreas Rönnquist
t doesn't really matter) is the the small 'L' and the capital 'i' >look the same (mostly). > >Everyone who has tried to read unknown characters (e.g. a password >generated automatically oder base64 encoded data) knows what pain it is to >distinguish these char

Looking for a good "default" font (small 'L' vs. capital 'i' problem)

2023-08-19 Thread Christoph K.
Hi all, I'm unsatisfied with the default sans font in debian for use in the graphical user interface (in my case XFCE). My main concern with the default sans font (I guess it's Bitsream Vera, but that doesn't really matter) is the the small 'L' and the capital

Fwd: namd-l: Fwd: nvidia issue with namd12 Debian 11

2022-01-18 Thread Francesco Pietra
l mem access" is a software not hardware problem. What could I do? Perhaps running something else than NAMD, may be a game involving the GPUs? Thanks for advice francesco -- Forwarded message - From: Francesco Pietra Date: Mon, Jan 17, 2022 at 3:50 PM Subject: Re: namd-

Re: namd-l: Fwd: nvidia issue with namd12 Debian 11

2022-01-17 Thread Francesco Pietra
ndar...@gmail.com> > *Date: *Monday, January 17, 2022 at 4:40 AM > *To: *NAMD , debian-users < > debian-user@lists.debian.org> > *Subject: *namd-l: Fwd: nvidia issue with namd12 Debian 11 > > > > I forgot to add that commands 'nvidia-detect' and 'nvidia-

Re: Question on dpkg -l output.

2018-12-24 Thread aprekates
which look normal and the only relation i think found (reason to display it) is because libstd++6 depends on it. Also listed packages like 'wink' not in the repos any more. dpkg -l may show packages which are not installed but are mentionned in installed packages dependencies (

Re: Question on dpkg -l output.

2018-12-23 Thread Pascal Hambourg
kages like 'wink' not in the repos any more. dpkg -l may show packages which are not installed but are mentionned in installed packages dependencies (Recommends, Suggests, Conflicts...) or were installed and removed but not purged (leaving config files).

Re: Question on dpkg -l output.

2018-12-22 Thread aprekates
2018 20:24, aprekates wrote: In a new installed system with Debian 9.6 $ dpkg -l will list only packages with 'ii' state and a couple of 'rc'. But if i  run: $ dpkg -l w* i will get a dozen also of 'un' packages. So i dont understand the logic of altering the o

Re: Question on dpkg -l output.

2018-12-22 Thread Joe Pfeiffer
Dan Ritter writes: > Eduardo M KALINOWSKI wrote: >> On 21 de dezembro de 2018 20:24, aprekates wrote: >> > In a new installed system with Debian 9.6 >> > >> > $ dpkg -l >> > >> > will list only packages with 'ii' state and a

Re: Question on dpkg -l output.

2018-12-21 Thread aprekates
any more. On 22/12/18 2:18 π.μ., Oliver Schoede wrote: On Sat, 22 Dec 2018 01:10:34 +0200 aprekates wrote: In my case both: $ dpkg -l w* and $ dpkg -l 'w*' will report the same list Hi! I'm getting the same sort of output and it seems to me these are packages, dpkg

Re: Question on dpkg -l output.

2018-12-21 Thread Oliver Schoede
On Sat, 22 Dec 2018 01:10:34 +0200 aprekates wrote: > In my case both: > > $ dpkg -l w* > > and > > $ dpkg -l 'w*' > > will report the same list > Hi! I'm getting the same sort of output and it seems to me these are packages, dpkg know

Re: Question on dpkg -l output.

2018-12-21 Thread aprekates
In my case both: $ dpkg -l w* and $ dpkg -l 'w*' will report the same list # dpkg -l w* Desired=Unknown/Install/Remove/Purge/Hold | Status=Not/Inst/Conf-files/Unpacked/halF-conf/Half-inst/trig-aWait/Trig-pend |/ Err?=(none)/Reinst-required (Status,Err: uppercase=bad

Re: Question on dpkg -l output.

2018-12-21 Thread Dan Ritter
Eduardo M KALINOWSKI wrote: > On 21 de dezembro de 2018 20:24, aprekates wrote: > > In a new installed system with Debian 9.6 > > > > $ dpkg -l > > > > will list only packages with 'ii' state and a couple of 'rc'. > > > > But if

Re: Question on dpkg -l output.

2018-12-21 Thread Eduardo M KALINOWSKI
On 21 de dezembro de 2018 20:24, aprekates wrote: > In a new installed system with Debian 9.6 > > $ dpkg -l > > will list only packages with 'ii' state and a couple of 'rc'. > > But if i  run: > > $ dpkg -l w* > > i will get a dozen also

Question on dpkg -l output.

2018-12-21 Thread aprekates
In a new installed system with Debian 9.6 $ dpkg -l will list only packages with 'ii' state and a couple of 'rc'. But if i  run: $ dpkg -l w* i will get a dozen also of 'un' packages. So i dont understand the logic of altering the output when i use a pattern .

Re: Super (Mod4) + L behavior for MATE

2018-02-23 Thread Matt Zagrabelny
On Thu, Feb 22, 2018 at 5:01 PM, Matt Zagrabelny wrote: > Greetings, > > Just upgraded to MATE 1.20.0 (Debian Sid) and I'm noticing something that > I had not before... > > If I hit Super + L, I get a screen lock. However, screen lock is bound to > Ctrl + Alt + L. &

Super (Mod4) + L behavior for MATE

2018-02-22 Thread Matt Zagrabelny
Greetings, Just upgraded to MATE 1.20.0 (Debian Sid) and I'm noticing something that I had not before... If I hit Super + L, I get a screen lock. However, screen lock is bound to Ctrl + Alt + L. Anyone have ideas as to what is up? Thanks! -m

Re: prevent "dpkg -l" from showing nonexisting packages

2017-03-13 Thread Cindy-Sue Causey
On 3/13/17, Vincent Lefevre wrote: > On 2017-03-13 00:23:54 -0400, kamaraju kusumanchi wrote: >> Let me rephrase my question. If "dpkg -l" cannot do it, is there some >> other command that will only show packages from the current >> repositories? > > Perha

Re: prevent "dpkg -l" from showing nonexisting packages

2017-03-13 Thread Vincent Lefevre
packages that are available in repositories? > > > > Impossible. 'dpkg -l' only shows packages which have files on the system. > > > > Perhaps you would like to reframe your query? > > Let me rephrase my question. If "dpkg -l" cannot do it

Re: prevent "dpkg -l" from showing nonexisting packages

2017-03-12 Thread kamaraju kusumanchi
On Sat, Mar 11, 2017 at 12:08 PM, Brian wrote: > On Sat 11 Mar 2017 at 10:21:13 -0500, kamaraju kusumanchi wrote: > >> The output from "dpkg -l" is showing some packages that are not >> present in the repositories I track. > > You are referring to the repositori

Re: prevent "dpkg -l" from showing nonexisting packages

2017-03-11 Thread Brian
On Sat 11 Mar 2017 at 10:21:13 -0500, kamaraju kusumanchi wrote: > The output from "dpkg -l" is showing some packages that are not > present in the repositories I track. You are referring to the repositories you track now. What about those repositories you no longer track. (Doe

prevent "dpkg -l" from showing nonexisting packages

2017-03-11 Thread kamaraju kusumanchi
The output from "dpkg -l" is showing some packages that are not present in the repositories I track. How to change this behaviour so it only shows packages that are available in repositories? Consider for example % dpkg -l \*flash\* Desired=Unknown/Install/Remove/Purge/Hold | Statu

Re: No. ,,l

2017-02-13 Thread Tony Baldwin
Cat? My cat once kept #tcl on freenode entertained while I was making a sandwich. The channel enjoyed him (Flaquito RIP) so much, when I got back on and explained the garbled gibberish, they suggested I go take a bath and let him have the computer for a while... On 02/13/2017 07:27 PM, Imara

No. ,,l

2017-02-13 Thread Imara Ramirez
Vggbbhb💅🏿💅 Sent from my iPad

Re: ls -l / question in jessie

2016-11-28 Thread Brian
On Mon 28 Nov 2016 at 11:40:55 -0500, Greg Wooledge wrote: > On Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 08:10:04AM -0800, emetib wrote: > > why do the sym links in ls -l / point to /boot/ and boot/ > > > > lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root31 Jun 3 10:34 initrd.img -> > > /boot/initrd.img

Re: ls -l / question in jessie

2016-11-28 Thread Greg Wooledge
On Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 08:10:04AM -0800, emetib wrote: > why do the sym links in ls -l / point to /boot/ and boot/ > > lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root31 Jun 3 10:34 initrd.img -> > /boot/initrd.img-3.16.0-4-amd64 > lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root27 Jun 3 10:34 vmlinuz -> &g

ls -l / question in jessie

2016-11-28 Thread emetib
why do the sym links in ls -l / point to /boot/ and boot/ lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root31 Jun 3 10:34 initrd.img -> /boot/initrd.img-3.16.0-4-amd64 lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root27 Jun 3 10:34 vmlinuz -> boot/vmlinuz-3.16.0-4-amd64 is this just a fluke in the way that the two of them wer

Actual problem resolution - was [Re: [Probable resolutuio] Re: How to diagnose an "apt-get instal"l problem]

2016-09-11 Thread Richard Owlett
On 9/10/2016 9:50 AM, Richard Owlett wrote: [snip] Made multiple further tries installing various packages. Got inconsistent results. The pattern leads me to believe the drive is becoming flaky. I will create an ISO from the DVD for use on a flash drive. 50+ years of trouble shooting in diverse e

Re: [Probable resolutuio] How to diagnose an "apt-get instal"l problem

2016-09-10 Thread Gene Heskett
On Saturday 10 September 2016 11:17:28 Felix Miata wrote: > Richard Owlett composed on 2016-09-10 09:50 (UTC-0500): > > Made multiple further tries installing various packages. Got > > inconsistent results. The pattern leads me to believe the drive > > is becoming flaky. I will create an ISO from

Re: [Probable resolutuio] How to diagnose an "apt-get instal"l problem

2016-09-10 Thread Richard Owlett
On 9/10/2016 10:17 AM, Felix Miata wrote: Richard Owlett composed on 2016-09-10 09:50 (UTC-0500): Made multiple further tries installing various packages. Got inconsistent results. The pattern leads me to believe the drive is becoming flaky. I will create an ISO from the DVD for use on a flash

Re: [Probable resolutuio] How to diagnose an "apt-get instal"l problem

2016-09-10 Thread Felix Miata
Richard Owlett composed on 2016-09-10 09:50 (UTC-0500): Made multiple further tries installing various packages. Got inconsistent results. The pattern leads me to believe the drive is becoming flaky. I will create an ISO from the DVD for use on a flash drive. 50+ years of trouble shooting in div

[Probable resolutuio] Re: How to diagnose an "apt-get instal"l problem

2016-09-10 Thread Richard Owlett
On 9/9/2016 10:18 AM, Richard Owlett wrote: I was experimenting with a custom minimal install. [ALL installs are from purchased DVDs as I have minimal connectivity.] I installed Jessie (8.0.0) using expert mode on a machine set aside for experiments. I explicitly chose no desktop environment. The

Re: How to diagnose an "apt-get instal"l problem

2016-09-09 Thread Greg Wooledge
On Fri, Sep 09, 2016 at 10:18:22AM -0500, Richard Owlett wrote: > As root I attempted to do > apt-get install mate-desktop-environment-core > It began normally but terminated with a file not found message > before coming to the confirm installation step. And the error message said...? > To nar

How to diagnose an "apt-get instal"l problem

2016-09-09 Thread Richard Owlett
I was experimenting with a custom minimal install. [ALL installs are from purchased DVDs as I have minimal connectivity.] I installed Jessie (8.0.0) using expert mode on a machine set aside for experiments. I explicitly chose no desktop environment. The install proceeded normally. From the De

Re: Subject: I can't get 1920x1080 resolution on my monitor: How find the name of the output for a "default" setup? (New Jessie install) Why does xrandr use the word "default" instead of something l

2016-08-15 Thread rhkramer
Update: Ok, problem solved--I found the page "AMD/ATI Open Source Drivers (radeon, r128, mach64)" (https://wiki.debian.org/AtiHowTo), followed the instructions there, rebooted, and voila. I guess the package that was missing was the "firmware-linux-nonfree". I'm still curious about some of the

Silkylux mosógél megapack hihetetlen áron, 4 x 4L színes vagy fehér különböző variációkban. Válaszd ki a háztartásodnak megfelelőt, és még ajándék 0,5 L öblítőt és szappant is kapsz hozzá.

2016-07-01 Thread Gruppi
Mai ajánlat: Fedezd fel! 4x4L Silkylux mosógél pack Ajándék 0,5L öblítő + 0,5L szappan Eredeti ár: 13 170 Ft Kedvezményes ár: 3

Re: what is ri in dpkg -l about?

2015-11-30 Thread Darac Marjal
On Sat, Nov 28, 2015 at 01:02:58PM +0100, alberto fuentes wrote: desired = remove, status = install I dont remember marking this packages in anyway, nor are they removed on a full-upgrade or autoremove. So what are these packages about? Luckily, "dpkg -l" gives you a nice header

what is ri in dpkg -l about?

2015-11-28 Thread alberto fuentes
desired = remove, status = install I dont remember marking this packages in anyway, nor are they removed on a full-upgrade or autoremove. So what are these packages about? $ dpkg -l |grep -vE ^ii Desired=Unknown/Install/Remove/Purge/Hold | Status=Not/Inst/Conf-files/Unpacked/halF-conf/Half-inst

Strange errors from SELinux when long listing directory (ls -l)

2015-03-23 Thread Marko Randjelovic
After I issue command "ls -l" in terminal, as normal user, one or more of this messages appear in syslog: mcstransd: Failed to get context of client process (pid=5390) mcstransd: Servicing of request failed for fd (5) When issue as root, nothing is logged. I notice nothing else re

Re: IBM ServeRAID 8k-l driver

2014-06-10 Thread basti
Reco, aacraid does not support my controller. https://wiki.debian.org/LinuxRaidForAdmins#aacraid Convert the RPM to deb is also no solution. There are kernel modules, and they musst have the same (kernel) version. (I think so). Am 10.06.2014 16:55, schrieb Reco: > Hi. > > On Tue, 10 Jun 2014 1

Re: IBM ServeRAID 8k-l driver

2014-06-10 Thread Reco
Hi. On Tue, 10 Jun 2014 15:44:31 +0200 basti wrote: > Hello, > this driver is build-in. The kernel module you're looking for should be called aacraid. > Where can I find somethink for the IBM Raid controller? http://www-947.ibm.com/support/entry/portal/docdisplay?lndocid=MIGR-61707 > How

Re: IBM ServeRAID 8k-l driver

2014-06-10 Thread basti
ted in /dev and mounted on your filesystem Am 10.06.2014 14:04, schrieb Marko Randjelovic: > On Tue, 10 Jun 2014 12:34:22 +0200 > basti wrote: > >> Hello, >> >> I have a IBM System X3550 with a IBM ServeRAID 8k-l RAID Controller. >> First of all I have build a RAID wit

Re: IBM ServeRAID 8k-l driver

2014-06-10 Thread Marko Randjelovic
On Tue, 10 Jun 2014 12:34:22 +0200 basti wrote: > Hello, > > I have a IBM System X3550 with a IBM ServeRAID 8k-l RAID Controller. > First of all I have build a RAID with the "BIOS" Raid-config and > installed Debian. > > Now I need a management system to ch

IBM ServeRAID 8k-l driver

2014-06-10 Thread basti
Hello, I have a IBM System X3550 with a IBM ServeRAID 8k-l RAID Controller. First of all I have build a RAID with the "BIOS" Raid-config and installed Debian. Now I need a management system to check if the raid is clean. For Software raid it's called mdadm. Where can I find so

Re: systemd hanging on ls -l /media/

2014-01-26 Thread Zenaan Harkness
SOLVED, I think: On 12/15/13, Zenaan Harkness wrote: > When I run ls -l /media/, the command hangs. Ctrl-C breaks the hang. The hang appears to be due to the following combination, in my case: the -F option to ls, with a directory in the directory being listed, which directory is a mo

systemd hanging on ls -l /media/

2013-12-14 Thread Zenaan Harkness
When I run ls -l /media/, the command hangs. Ctrl-C breaks the hang. For a minute or two, I get this: $ ls -l /media/ ^Cls: cannot access /media/SNAP01: Interrupted system call Now I get just this when I Ctrl-C: $ ls /media/ -l ^C Also (with artificial newlines added by me, to compensate

Re: [MediaWiki-l] Pure TeX extension wanted

2013-09-18 Thread John W. Foster
tricted Maths extension ? > >> > >> Many thanks in advance, > >> > >> Aaron > >> > >> ___ > >> MediaWiki-l mailing list > >> mediawik...@lists.wikimedia.org > >> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/mediawiki-l > &

Re: please read i am not getting satisfaction from mytablet l got it in april i dont download anything on it and it is slow take long to load so what should i do please tell me thank you.

2013-09-04 Thread Joe Pfeiffer
phillip johnson writes: When your subject line is three lines long (on my display, anyway) maybe you should move it to the body of your post. When the body of your post is empty, you should *definitely* move something in there. Does your table run Debian Linux? If not, why are you asking here?

Re: please read i am not getting satisfaction from mytablet l got it in april i dont download anything on it and it is slow take long to load so what should i do please tell me thank you.

2013-09-04 Thread Gregory Nowak
On Wed, Sep 04, 2013 at 04:42:23PM -0400, phillip johnson wrote: > Contact the manufacturer. I wasn't aware they made tablets with debian. Also, please don't put your entire message in the subject field. Greg -- web site: http://www.gregn..net gpg public key: http://www.gregn..net/pubkey.asc s

please read i am not getting satisfaction from mytablet l got it in april i dont download anything on it and it is slow take long to load so what should i do please tell me thank you.

2013-09-04 Thread phillip johnson

Re: why would fdisk -l take so long?

2012-09-29 Thread Albretch Mueller
On 9/29/12, Martin Steigerwald wrote: > Hi Albrecht! > > Am Samstag, 29. September 2012 schrieb Albretch Mueller: > > Two ideas: > > 1) floppy device activated in BIOS while no floppy device present > > 2) floppy emulation for USB mass storage activated in BIOS ~ that was it! Reset, checked and s

Re: why would fdisk -l take so long?

2012-09-29 Thread Albretch Mueller
On 9/29/12, Jude DaShiell wrote: > run d-ban on the disk and do a thorough cleaning of the disk then try ~ The only "data erasure" I know of is shredding your hard drives to pieces, smashing them to dust and melting them. This is by the way what US gov does with their hard drives and monitors ~

Re: why would fdisk -l take so long?

2012-09-29 Thread Martin Steigerwald
Hi Albrecht! Am Samstag, 29. September 2012 schrieb Albretch Mueller: […] > [11750.572197] ata2: SATA link down (SStatus 0 SControl 300) > [11750.572245] ata1: SATA link down (SStatus 0 SControl 300) > [11750.676244] ata3.00: ACPI cmd ef/03:0c:00:00:00:a0 (SET FEATURES) > filtered out > [11750.676

Re: why would fdisk -l take so long?

2012-09-28 Thread Albretch Mueller
> Or (from hdparm's man page: Disable the automatic power-saving > function of certain Seagate drives...): > hdparm -Z /dev/sda # hdparm -Z /dev/sda /dev/sda: disabling Seagate auto powersaving mode HDIO_DRIVE_CMD(seagatepwrsave) failed: Input/output error lbrtchx -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, e

Re: why would fdisk -l take so long?

2012-09-28 Thread Albretch Mueller
~ I think there may be a number of things going on here. Let me first answer Neal's questions: ~ > Have you tried "fdisk -l /dev/sda"? ~ Well, there are no disk attached whatsoever to my box. I am using a bear live CD (knoppix 7.0.2) right off the DVD drive ~ > How about:

Re: why would fdisk -l take so long?

2012-09-28 Thread Neal Murphy
r_Rate should be zero, or very > > > low. > > > > Not necessarily. At least one disk mfr (Seagate?) puts large values in > > these fields. Cause me a few moments' consternation the first time I saw > > it on my own drives > > ~ > Indeed! Somethin

Re: why would fdisk -l take so long?

2012-09-28 Thread Albretch Mueller
ate?) puts large values in these > fields. Cause me a few moments' consternation the first time I saw it on my > own drives ~ Indeed! Something "spooky" may be going on. After taking the drive out in order to back it up, I have run "fdisk -l" with no disk

Re: why would fdisk -l take so long?

2012-09-28 Thread Neal Murphy
On Friday, September 28, 2012 08:23:59 AM Dom wrote: > >1 Raw_Read_Error_Rate 0x000f 115 082 006Pre-fail > > > > Always - 96695847 > > Ok, your disk is dying. The Raw_Read_Error_Rate should be zero, or very > low. Not necessarily. At least one disk mfr (Seagate?) p

Re: why would fdisk -l take so long?

2012-09-28 Thread Albretch Mueller
in a box in which I use the fromhd stanza using a disk which smartclt reports as being fine the results before and after suspending are the same ~ this is what the dying disk reports ~ $ date; X=`(time fdisk -l) 2>&1 | grep real`; echo $X Fri Sep 28 10:52:58 UTC 2012 real 0m0.191s $

Re: why would fdisk -l take so long?

2012-09-28 Thread Dom
On 28/09/12 13:52, Jon Dowland wrote: On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 01:23:59PM +0100, Dom wrote: It *is* possible that smartctl is mis-interpretting the status of your disk, but given your slow fdisk command I suspect not. Time to backup, backup, backup, buy a new disk and transfer the data over asap

Re: why would fdisk -l take so long?

2012-09-28 Thread Albretch Mueller
throughout its running time? ~ See bellow the fdisk -l timings when I run knoppix from the dvd ~ lbrtchx // __ fdisk -l $ date; X=`(time fdisk -l) 2>&1 | grep real`; echo $X Fri Sep 28 10:20:26 UTC 2012 real 0m0.014s $ date; X=`(time fdisk -l) 2>&1 | grep real`; echo $X Fri Sep 28 10:

Re: why would fdisk -l take so long?

2012-09-28 Thread lee
t;awaken" all harddrive/partitions you are using? fdisk -l seems to do that. However, it's difficult to reasonably put to sleep a disk which has partitions on it that are mounted, and it's very questionable if it's reasonable to do so (unless it's an SSD maybe, if those can be

Re: why would fdisk -l take so long?

2012-09-28 Thread Jon Dowland
On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 01:23:59PM +0100, Dom wrote: > It *is* possible that smartctl is mis-interpretting the status of > your disk, but given your slow fdisk command I suspect not. > > Time to backup, backup, backup, buy a new disk and transfer the data > over asap. YES to backup, but it's wort

Re: why would fdisk -l take so long?

2012-09-28 Thread Dom
On 28/09/12 12:27, Albretch Mueller wrote: Failing boot sector? Some other sector it has to read is failing? Check the logs. Try (from smartmontools): ~ I don't know exactly which of your questions/suggestions running: ~ smartctl -A /dev/sda | egrep -i "sector|realloc" ~ relates to, but it

  1   2   3   4   5   >