Carey Evans wrote:
>
> Ralph Winslow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > I've recently had to replace my hard disk and re-load bo. I'm
> > working once again, but when I tried to build a new kernel I got
> > the message attached.
>
> Is it possible you've gotten a file named "-y.o" or something l
Ralph Winslow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I've recently had to replace my hard disk and re-load bo. I'm
> working once again, but when I tried to build a new kernel I got
> the message attached.
Is it possible you've gotten a file named "-y.o" or something like
that in the modules/ directory s
Jeremy Tregunna wrote:
>
> Okay, I may about to be giving a really stupid answer, but you'd be
> surprised at how many people make mistakes like this each day and get
> "stumped" over them... Now then, did you check to see that "ls" points to
> /bin/ls (I mean, you might have made an alias like /b
Okay, I may about to be giving a really stupid answer, but you'd be
surprised at how many people make mistakes like this each day and get
"stumped" over them... Now then, did you check to see that "ls" points to
/bin/ls (I mean, you might have made an alias like /bin/ls -y or
something)... That co
I've recently had to replace my hard disk and re-load bo. I'm
working once again, but when I tried to build a new kernel I got
the message attached. I ignored that, but lately reloaded source
for 2.0.32 from the Cheapbytes disks and re-tried with the same
results so I guess it's time to solicit y
5 matches
Mail list logo
