Okay, I may about to be giving a really stupid answer, but you'd be surprised at how many people make mistakes like this each day and get "stumped" over them... Now then, did you check to see that "ls" points to /bin/ls (I mean, you might have made an alias like /bin/ls -y or something)... That could be giving you the error... just check to make sure that 'ls' inst' aliased, or if it is, it's set to /bin/ls with no options.
On Sun, 8 Feb 1998, Ralph Winslow wrote: > I've recently had to replace my hard disk and re-load bo. I'm > working once again, but when I tried to build a new kernel I got > the message attached. I ignored that, but lately reloaded source > for 2.0.32 from the Cheapbytes disks and re-tried with the same > results so I guess it's time to solicit your aid. I find only > one reference to ls in the makefile and it uses niether switches > nor variable args. I'm stumped! TIA for any help forthcoming. > > Ralph > > -- > ----------------------------------------- > Ralph Winslow [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Mary bought a pair of skates > upon the ice to frisk > now wasn't that a crazy way > her sweet young *? > -- TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to [EMAIL PROTECTED] . Trouble? e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .