>> ${dirname}/etc/ati/control file to /etc/ati/control. Reboot the xserver.
I tried the one you attached and also the one extracted, respectively.
reboot the computer twice, it's the same. icon still here.
It's okay. just at the bottom corner, we can put it aside and wait I guess.
Thanks again!
>
> Hi! Googling suggests that we need to find a suitable /etc/ati/control file.
>
> a) Can you confirm that the "problem" with your card is that it is too
> new, not too old?
Too new.
> b) Can you make sure that /etc/ati/control is the same as the one
> shipped in the 11-5 package? To do this, f
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 05/16/2011 03:30 PM, lina wrote:
> No. it's still at the right bottom. showing the same
> AMD
> Unsupported hardware.
Hi! Googling suggests that we need to find a suitable /etc/ati/control file.
a) Can you confirm that the "problem" with your card
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 05/16/2011 03:30 PM, lina wrote:
> On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 6:44 PM, Panayiotis Karabassis
> wrote:
> No. it's still at the right bottom. showing the same
> AMD
> Unsupported hardware.
Ok, so we are almost done. We just have to figure out how to g
On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 6:44 PM, Panayiotis Karabassis wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
> I suppose they are too small to be noticed on trivial inspection. Maybe
> performance?
>
> Some questions:
> a) I understand the 11-5 works now, correct?
YES. It works very well.
> b
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 05/16/2011 10:31 AM, lina wrote:
> Thanks for the new packages. I installed.
>
> How do I examine the differences between 11-5 and 11-3, seems there is
> none obvious differences (checked by eyes only).
I suppose they are too small to be noticed o
On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 3:04 PM, Panayiotis Karabassis wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Hi! This should fix the module issue:
Yes. very good news indeed.
>
> http://code.google.com/p/fglrx-squeeze/downloads/detail?name=11-5-0panayk2_amd64.tar.bz2&can=2&q=#makechanges
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi! This should fix the module issue:
http://code.google.com/p/fglrx-squeeze/downloads/detail?name=11-5-0panayk2_amd64.tar.bz2&can=2&q=#makechanges
glxinfo is in package mesa-utils.
- --
Best regards,
Panayiotis Karabassis
-BEGIN PGP SIGNAT
On Sun, May 15, 2011 at 3:46 AM, Panayiotis Karabassis wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 05/14/2011 09:04 PM, lina wrote:
>> Hi,
>
> Hi!
>
>> You may check another email I sent to u about the icon.
>
> I got the email, I'll try to find out how to get rid of the icon.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 05/14/2011 09:04 PM, lina wrote:
> Hi,
Hi!
> You may check another email I sent to u about the icon.
I got the email, I'll try to find out how to get rid of the icon.
> That's very nice of you. I wish you can tell me how to build a working .deb
On May 15, 2011, at 1:15, Panayiotis Karabassis wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Hi!
>
> On 05/14/2011 07:02 PM, lina wrote:
>> Yes. I can log in. and the driver works partially.
>
> What do you mean partially? Does 3D accelaration (direct rendering)
> work? What
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi!
On 05/14/2011 07:02 PM, lina wrote:
> Yes. I can log in. and the driver works partially.
What do you mean partially? Does 3D accelaration (direct rendering)
work? What doesn't work?
Are the GRUB problems gone?
Ok I think this is a good step, we
On Sat, May 14, 2011 at 11:41 PM, Panayiotis Karabassis
wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 05/14/2011 03:26 PM, lina wrote:
>> There is something totally unexpected happened.
>>
>> Two hours ago, I installed the 11-3 with xorg.conf
>>
>> after start the computer when
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 05/14/2011 03:26 PM, lina wrote:
> There is something totally unexpected happened.
>
> Two hours ago, I installed the 11-3 with xorg.conf
>
> after start the computer when I entered into the Linux, nothing showed
> up, even none the choice of ker
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 05/14/2011 11:54 AM, lina wrote:
> Yes. no problem.
> Just felt so sorry about poor hardware went through the "torturing" by
> poor me so often, sometimes it's involves lots of worry and
> frustration.
>
> Thanks again for your time,
You are welco
On Sat, May 14, 2011 at 4:11 PM, Panayiotis Karabassis wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> We are almost there...
>
> Due to upstream changes, the 11-5 package is broken. It is in fact
> missing the glx module.
>
> I will try to fix it, if necessary, even though I can only
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
We are almost there...
Due to upstream changes, the 11-5 package is broken. It is in fact
missing the glx module.
I will try to fix it, if necessary, even though I can only guess the
structure a video driver package has to have.
In the mean time, ca
I used this simple xorg.conf this time, it still showed me nothing.
Section "Device"
Identifier "ATI"
Driver "fglrx"
EndSection
Section "Screen"
Identifier "Default Screen"
DefaultDepth 24
EndSection
the Xorg.0.log something like:
Kernel command line: BOOT_IMAGE=/vmli
Thanks all,
It works.
The Xorg.0.log.old is empty.
lina
On Sat, May 14, 2011 at 2:41 AM, Panayiotis Karabassis wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 05/13/2011 06:40 PM, lina wrote:
>> after rebooting, I am in big trouble now. I can't enter into the
>> system. so I ca
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 05/13/2011 06:40 PM, lina wrote:
> after rebooting, I am in big trouble now. I can't enter into the
> system. so I can't remove the copied one.
>
> nothing I can do, all those function keys can't enter the command line.
No cause for worry.
During
after rebooting, I am in big trouble now. I can't enter into the
system. so I can't remove the copied one.
nothing I can do, all those function keys can't enter the command line.
Hi,
when grub start go to line that end with "(recovery mode)"
Something like:
Debian GNU/Linux, with Linux 2.6.38
On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 11:23 PM, Panayiotis Karabassis
wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 05/13/2011 06:11 PM, lina wrote:
>> also something like this: (the newly installed graphic driver does not
>> support openGL)
>
> Is this an issue only for the 11-5 driver, not 1
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 05/13/2011 06:11 PM, lina wrote:
> also something like this: (the newly installed graphic driver does not
> support openGL)
Is this an issue only for the 11-5 driver, not 11-3? Then I probably
packaged it wrongly, please revert to 11-3.
Or it coul
Further report:
also something like this: (the newly installed graphic driver does not
support openGL)
freeglut : OpenGL GLX extension not supported by display ':0.0'
ERROR) The X server does not support the OpenGL GLX extension. Exiting ...
Info) Unable to create OpenGL window.
Thanks,
On
Just wonder: How to examine it?
Thanks
On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 10:33 PM, lina wrote:
> # aticonfig --initial
> aticonfig: No supported adapters detected
>
> the same issue pop up.
>
> P.S Installation log:
> NOTE: the fglrx driver is not yet configued.
> Please consider /usr/bin/aticonfig to cre
# aticonfig --initial
aticonfig: No supported adapters detected
the same issue pop up.
P.S Installation log:
NOTE: the fglrx driver is not yet configued.
Please consider /usr/bin/aticonfig to create a
working xorg.conf configuration.
For example, 'sudo aticonfig --initial' should
be sufficient fo
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi, can you give this a try?
http://code.google.com/p/fglrx-squeeze/downloads/detail?name=11-5-0panayk1_amd64.tar.bz2&can=2&q=#makechanges
- --
Best regards,
Panayiotis Karabassis
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi!
Regarding the segmentation fault, if it is due to the ATI driver, this
is beyond me, you'll probably have to contact ATI.
Now about the aticonfig error:
(a) FGLRX driver version 11-5 was released a few days ago, and it
explicitly supports your ca
There is a
Segmentation fault
when I used some other software, so I removed the fglrx-* temporarily.
when do you want to re-install let me know.
4] removal log
The following pThe following packages will be REMOVED:
fglrx-atieventsd* fglrx-control* fglrx-driver* fglrx-glx* fglrx-glx-ia32
fgl
Thanks, really appreciated it. please check below:
On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 3:05 AM, Panayiotis Karabassis wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Hi!
>
> Regarding the error you got, did you use a command line tool such as
> wget? You may have not downloaded the packages at a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi!
Regarding the error you got, did you use a command line tool such as
wget? You may have not downloaded the packages at all, but the web
pages. Anyway the error message clearly suggests that the download was
corrupt.
Here is the second try. I hope
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 05/10/2011 03:39 PM, lina wrote:
> # dpkg -i fglrx-*.deb
> dpkg-deb: `fglrx-atieventsd_11-3-0panayk1_amd64.deb' is not a debian
> format archive
> dpkg: error processing fglrx-atieventsd_11-3-0panayk1_amd64.deb (--install):
> subprocess dpkg-deb --
# dpkg -i fglrx-*.deb
dpkg-deb: `fglrx-atieventsd_11-3-0panayk1_amd64.deb' is not a debian
format archive
dpkg: error processing fglrx-atieventsd_11-3-0panayk1_amd64.deb (--install):
subprocess dpkg-deb --control returned error exit status 2
dpkg-deb: `fglrx-control_11-3-0panayk1_amd64.deb' is not
Frankly speaking,
lots of emails just for receiving and deletin', not for readin'.
I might miss that email.
Thanks and I will try.
On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 6:50 PM, Panayiotis Karabassis wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 05/10/2011 11:57 AM, lina wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 05/10/2011 11:57 AM, lina wrote:
> Hi,
>
> just wanna ask, do you still remember this email.
>
> if not, don't worry, it's fine with me.
>
> Thanks,
>
> lina
Hey, didn't you get the reply? I made the .debs and sent them as
attachments to the li
On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 9:34 PM, Panayiotis Karabassis wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Just a quick question. What is your architecture amd64 or i386?
x86_64 GNU/Linux
Thanks for your time,
>
> - --
> Best regards,
> Panayiotis Karabassis
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNATU
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Just a quick question. What is your architecture amd64 or i386?
- --
Best regards,
Panayiotis Karabassis
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
iQEcBAEBAgA
On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 7:30 PM, Panayiotis Karabassis wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Hi again!
Hi,
Thanks.
>
> On 05/03/2011 11:06 AM, lina wrote:
>> How to modify the dependencies? you mean, modify the *.dsc? or
>
> No I mean the debian/control file. In there, is
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi again!
On 05/03/2011 11:06 AM, lina wrote:
> How to modify the dependencies? you mean, modify the *.dsc? or
No I mean the debian/control file. In there, is a list of runtime and
build dependencies. The .dsc file will be regenerated when you build
On Mon, May 2, 2011 at 2:51 PM, Panayiotis Karabassis wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 05/01/2011 02:52 PM, lina wrote:
>> fglrx-driver depends on xserver-xorg (>= 1:7.6+1)
>> fglrx-driver depends on xorg-video-abi-8
>> xorg-video-abi-8 does not appear to be availabl
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 05/01/2011 02:52 PM, lina wrote:
> fglrx-driver depends on xserver-xorg (>= 1:7.6+1)
> fglrx-driver depends on xorg-video-abi-8
> xorg-video-abi-8 does not appear to be available
Is this from aptitude? Don't install the binary package, just the
*so
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 05/01/2011 01:07 PM, lina wrote:
> # aptitude install devscripts
> The following NEW packages will be installed:
> dctrl-tools{a} devscripts dput{a} equivs{a} libapt-pkg-perl{a}
> libauthen-sasl-perl{a} libclass-accessor-perl{a}
> libclass-ins
fglrx-driver depends on xserver-xorg (>= 1:7.6+1)
fglrx-driver depends on xorg-video-abi-8
xorg-video-abi-8 does not appear to be available
for the wheezy version fglrx, it's also had the dependency problems.
Thanks and best regards,
lina
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.
# aptitude install devscripts
The following NEW packages will be installed:
dctrl-tools{a} devscripts dput{a} equivs{a} libapt-pkg-perl{a}
libauthen-sasl-perl{a} libclass-accessor-perl{a}
libclass-inspector-perl{a} libcommon-sense-perl{a}
libconvert-binhex-perl{a} libcrypt-ssleay-perl{a}
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 05/01/2011 09:22 AM, lina wrote:
> Thanks for providing me the links and information.
You are welcome!
> Part 1:
>
> last time I tried that one (install from squeeze one), it popped some
> errors like:
>
>
> $ more /usr/share/ati/fglrx-install.
Thanks for providing me the links and information.
Part 1:
last time I tried that one (install from squeeze one), it popped some
errors like:
$ more /usr/share/ati/fglrx-install.log
Creating symlink /var/lib/dkms/fglrx/8.831.2/source ->
/usr/src/fglrx-8.831.2
DKMS: add Comple
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 04/29/2011 11:23 AM, Panayiotis Karabassis wrote:
> Anyway that was just off the top of my head, you will getter better
> instructions from an official source.
Which is...
http://wiki.debian.org/ATIProprietary
- --
Regards,
Panayiotis Karaba
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 04/28/2011 09:05 PM, Camaleón wrote:
> On Thu, 28 Apr 2011 22:42:02 +0800, lina wrote:
>
>> what's the specification for the
>>
>> 01:00.0 VGA compatible controller [0300]: ATI Technologies Inc NI
>> Whistler [AMD Radeon HD 6600M Series] [1002:6741]
On Thu, 28 Apr 2011 22:42:02 +0800, lina wrote:
> what's the specification for the
>
> 01:00.0 VGA compatible controller [0300]: ATI Technologies Inc NI
> Whistler [AMD Radeon HD 6600M Series] [1002:6741]
Lina,
What's the specific problem you are facing with that card?
If it's not working at
Hi,
what's the specification for the
01:00.0 VGA compatible controller [0300]: ATI Technologies Inc NI
Whistler [AMD Radeon HD 6600M Series] [1002:6741]
Thanks ahead for any suggestion.
--
Best Regards,
lina
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject o
Hello,
I'm trying to compile a 2.6.38 kernel and I'd like to know what would
be the best choice in "processor family" for an intel core i5.
FWIW, linux-image-2.6.32-5 brings CONFIG_M686=y as default.
I'm just wondering if there would be a better suited option for this
cpu.
TIA.
--
Huella de cla
Hi,
A couple of kernel configuration options about which I can't find
sufficient documentation:
Device drivers/Real time clock - How can I determine which modules I
need and which chipset I have? My current kernel is only loading 'rtc';
I see the various modules have names
On Thu, Dec 28, 2006 at 12:57:07PM +0100, zxqv wrote:
> I wanted ask if it possible if you could please write a kernel compile
> how to for debian etch with encryption modules en capabilities modules
> enabled I have been at for 12 days now but I have not had any success
> yet.
>
There is a great
I wanted ask if it possible if you could please write a kernel compile
how to for debian etch with encryption modules en capabilities modules
enabled I have been at for 12 days now but I have not had any success
yet.
thanks in advance Jeffrey
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sat, Mar 18, 2006 at 01:30:27AM +0100, Joris Huizer wrote:
>
> Ah ok, I found I have a k8 machine (by the nx bit and the lspci K*
> lines) :-)
> I should've searched with more specific keywords I guess
less /proc/cpuinfo
is good.
--
Chris.
==
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTE
jlmb wrote:
Hi Joris,
Joris Huizer wrote:
Hello,
I have a simple question: I'm using an AMD Sempron machine, and I >build
my own kernels;
There seems to be 64bit and 32bit semprons.
I'm currently using the 386 configuration in the linux
kernel, as I didn't know what option would be best
Hi Joris,
Joris Huizer wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have a simple question: I'm using an AMD Sempron machine, and I >build
> my own kernels;
There seems to be 64bit and 32bit semprons.
>I'm currently using the 386 configuration in the linux
> kernel, as I didn't know what option would be best to choose.
Hello,
I have a simple question: I'm using an AMD Sempron machine, and I build
my own kernels; I'm currently using the 386 configuration in the linux
kernel, as I didn't know what option would be best to choose...
What is actually the best option for best performance? I was wondering
whether 6
Chinook wrote:
Chinook wrote:
AHA, I found kernel-source-2.4.27/arch/i386/defconfig in the bz2 and am
looking through for the appropriate lines.
Does this file reflect my "stable" instalation? Is there another way of
checking these settings?
Thank you,
Lee C
Never mind, Kelly answer
Kelly Clowers wrote:
On 12/28/05, Chinook <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'm trying to install mkcdrec
(http://mkcdrec.ota.be/project/introduction.html)
and in the instructions it says:
Check current kernel if the following items were compiled into the
kernel. Check file /usr/src/linux/.config :
CO
Chinook wrote:
I'm trying to install mkcdrec
(http://mkcdrec.ota.be/project/introduction.html)
and in the instructions it says:
Check current kernel if the following items were compiled into the
kernel. Check file /usr/src/linux/.config :
CONFIG_BLK_DEV_IDECD=y (or m)
CONFIG_BLK_DEV_LOOP=y (o
On 12/28/05, Chinook <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm trying to install mkcdrec
> (http://mkcdrec.ota.be/project/introduction.html)
> and in the instructions it says:
>
> Check current kernel if the following items were compiled into the
> kernel. Check file /usr/src/linux/.config :
> CONFIG_BLK_DE
I'm trying to install mkcdrec
(http://mkcdrec.ota.be/project/introduction.html)
and in the instructions it says:
Check current kernel if the following items were compiled into the
kernel. Check file /usr/src/linux/.config :
CONFIG_BLK_DEV_IDECD=y (or m)
CONFIG_BLK_DEV_LOOP=y (or m)
CONFIG_ISO9
Robert Kopp wrote:
You're not supposed to trifle with the kernel in
Debian, I guess. After installing, say, Fedora, typing
"xconfig" would pop the window right up, but that's
not the case here (Sarge). The kernel source was
missing, and that's easy to correct. But then "make
xconfig"
*
* Unable t
You're not supposed to trifle with the kernel in
Debian, I guess. After installing, say, Fedora, typing
"xconfig" would pop the window right up, but that's
not the case here (Sarge). The kernel source was
missing, and that's easy to correct. But then "make
xconfig"
*
* Unable to find the QT install
On Tue, Jul 12, 2005 at 08:59:04PM -0500, Benjamin Sher wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> >>I read everything on the Debian home page
> >
> >
> Dear CMetzner:
>
> Thanks for understanding and thanks for the kind words.
>
> My experience with Linux began with Red Hat 5.2 then followed Mand
Benjamin Sher wrote:
> Kent West wrote:
>
>>Benjamin Sher wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>>Dear friends:
>>>
>>>In the KDE Control Center, under System Admin, Linux Kernel, I read the
>>>following on the main screen to the right:
>>>
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I read everything on the Debian home page
before making my decision as to which version to install, etc. I found the
explanations good but not good enough. They are still written from the point
of view of the engineer, the programmer. What a new, prospective
On Tuesday 12 July 2005 09:33 pm, Kent West wrote:
> Benjamin Sher wrote:
> >Dear friends:
> >
> >In the KDE Control Center, under System Admin, Linux Kernel, I read the
> >following on the main screen to the right:
> >
> >----
Benjamin Sher wrote:
> Kent West wrote:
>
>>Benjamin Sher wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>>In the KDE Control Center, under System Admin, Linux Kernel, I read the
>>>following on the main screen to the right:
>>>
>>>---
(drat, got snared by a Reply-To:. Trying again.)
> I read everything on the Debian home page
> before making my decision as to which version to install, etc. I found the
> explanations good but not good enough. They are still written from the point
> of view of the engineer, the programmer. What
Kent West wrote:
Benjamin Sher wrote:
Dear friends:
In the KDE Control Center, under System Admin, Linux Kernel, I read the
following on the main screen to the right:
---
The kernel configuration could not be read
No hardware
On Tuesday 12 July 2005 08:13 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > What does this mean, please? Anything to worry about?
> >
> > Thank you.
> >
> > Benjamin
>
> I don't have an answer for the question that you're asking in this
> post to the list. I would like, nevertheless, to offer you a bit
> of ad
Benjamin Sher wrote:
>Dear friends:
>
>In the KDE Control Center, under System Admin, Linux Kernel, I read the
>following on the main screen to the right:
>
>-------
>
>The kernel configuration could not be read
>
>No hardw
> What does this mean, please? Anything to worry about?
>
> Thank you.
>
> Benjamin
I don't have an answer for the question that you're asking in this
post to the list. I would like, nevertheless, to offer you a bit
of advice. I promise you that I don't mean this as any kind of a
slam; if I
Dear friends:
In the KDE Control Center, under System Admin, Linux Kernel, I read the
following on the main screen to the right:
---
The kernel configuration could not be read
No hardware architecture was specified...
Either your kernel sources contain
On Friday 07 January 2005 06:54 pm, Sergio Basurto Juarez wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am recompiling the kernel in order to get a driver
> that does not come as default with debian,
> nevertheless I can configure the kernel with make
> config but no with
>
> make menuconfig
> here ask me for ncurses I al
On Fri, 7 Jan 2005 15:54:17 -0800 (PST), Sergio Basurto Juarez
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am recompiling the kernel in order to get a driver
> that does not come as default with debian,
> nevertheless I can configure the kernel with make
> config but no with
>
> make menuconfig
> h
Hello,
I am recompiling the kernel in order to get a driver
that does not come as default with debian,
nevertheless I can configure the kernel with make
config but no with
make menuconfig
here ask me for ncurses I already install all the
packages which apt-cache search ncurses return me,
but sti
On Thu, 2004-06-17 at 04:32, Joris Huizer wrote:
> I'm sorry, I obviously wasn't as clear here as I thought I was;
> I always use the great oldconfig trick - I often either put in new
> options as modules or disable (unless recommended from the help to use them)
> But my point was, if the original
something to make the kernel "guess" the minimal &
best kernel configuration for the running machine?
This is far from urgent ofcourse, but.. well it would be interesting
to hear what's available for this, andwhat could be learned from tools
to discover hardware details :-)
H
pt or something to make the kernel "guess" the minimal &
> best kernel configuration for the running machine?
>
> This is far from urgent ofcourse, but.. well it would be interesting
> to hear what's available for this, andwhat could be learned from tools
> to discov
ing to make the kernel
> "guess" the minimal & best kernel configuration for the running machine?
Can't you just "make oldconfig" then "make menuconfig" over top of it?
You'd have the old stuff, and could then toggle in new stuff (not to
mention, resurr
mal & best kernel configuration for the running machine?
This is far from urgent ofcourse, but.. well it would be interesting to
hear what's available for this, andwhat could be learned from tools to
discover hardware details :-)
Thanks for any suggestions,
Joris
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
I'd like to suggest somewhere that the standard Debian kernel images
be compiled with CONFIG_MAGIC_SYSRQ, especially since this option can
be turned on and off via sysctl and is therefore pretty harmless to
include. If this were an issue about an ordinary package, I'd just
file it as a wishlist b
FIG_VT and CONFIG_VT_CONSOLE depends
on in the kernel configuration?
Torquil Macdonald
Here is my .config:
#
# Automatically generated make config: don't edit
#
CONFIG_X86=y
CONFIG_MMU=y
CONFIG_SWAP=y
CONFIG_UID16=y
CONFIG_GENERIC_ISA_DMA=y
#
# Code maturity level options
#
CONFIG
On Sun, Feb 23, 2003 at 09:29:14AM -0700, Andreas J Guelzow wrote:
> does anybody know where I can find the kernel configuration for the
> debian kernels (the 2.4.18-smp to be exact)?
apt-get install kernel-source-2.4.18. Back up your
/boot/config-2.4.18-smp (or similar) before you do,
> Hi,
>
> does anybody know where I can find the kernel configuration for the
> debian kernels (the 2.4.18-smp to be exact)? I have to recompile the
> kernelafter changing a few settings and would like to start with the
> settings in the default kernel (since I know tha
On Sun, Feb 23, 2003 at 09:29:14AM -0700, Andreas J Guelzow wrote:
> does anybody know where I can find the kernel configuration for the
> debian kernels (the 2.4.18-smp to be exact)? I have to recompile the
> kernelafter changing a few settings and would like to start with the
>
On Sun, Feb 23, 2003 at 09:29:14AM -0700, Andreas J Guelzow wrote:
> does anybody know where I can find the kernel configuration for the
> debian kernels (the 2.4.18-smp to be exact)? I have to recompile the
> kernelafter changing a few settings and would like to start with the
>
hi andreas,
On Sun, Feb 23, 2003 at 09:29:14AM -0700, Andreas J Guelzow wrote:
> Hi,
>
> does anybody know where I can find the kernel configuration for the
> debian kernels (the 2.4.18-smp to be exact)? I have to recompile the
> kernelafter changing a few settings and would lik
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
The config file is installed along with the kernel image in /boot.
Andreas J Guelzow wrote:
| Hi,
|
| does anybody know where I can find the kernel configuration for the
| debian kernels (the 2.4.18-smp to be exact)? I have to recompile the
Hi,
does anybody know where I can find the kernel configuration for the
debian kernels (the 2.4.18-smp to be exact)? I have to recompile the
kernelafter changing a few settings and would like to start with the
settings in the default kernel (since I know that they are working,
except that
#include
Olivier ROLAND wrote on Wed Mar 27, 2002 um 07:58:13PM:
> There is no equivalent to the "UDMA 66" potato flavor for the woody.
bf2.4 is meant to be.
> Many users will need PDC202XX and N_HDLC support to install woody via
I doubt that there are _many_ users with such combination.
> It
I have a kernel that is compiled without this option and one that is
complied with it.
When installing and running update-modules for the kernel that does
have this option I get for each of the modules that
depmod: *** Unresolved symbols in /lib/modules/2.2.20/theModule
can I rest assured t
gt; > where, e.g., x=4,y=9, etc. (specify your installed
> kernel)
>
> Yep. It works for me. Thanks.
>
> But, what I mean is, let say I lost my
> /boot/config-2.x.y file, how do I know
> what kernel configuration exists?
>
&
ion I need to know
> > beside quota support.
>
> Hi,
>
> Try:
>
> grep CONFIG_QUOTA /boot/config-2.x.y
>
> where, e.g., x=4,y=9, etc. (specify your installed kernel)
Yep. It works for me. Thanks.
But, what I mean is, let say I lost my /boot/config-2.x.y file, how do
On Mon, Dec 03, 2001, Bambang Purnomosidi D. P. wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Is there any way to know that, for examples, my kernel-images have quota
> support enabled? In this case, consider I am using kernel-images from .deb,
> not compile it myself. Of course many configuration I need to know beside
Hi,
Is there any way to know that, for examples, my kernel-images have quota
support enabled? In this case, consider I am using kernel-images from .deb,
not compile it myself. Of course many configuration I need to know beside
quota support.
TIA
--
bpdp
The immediate problem I am trying to address is the following error reported
in /var/log/messages:
PCI_IDE: unknown IDE controller on PCI bus 00 device 40, VID=1095, DID=0643
I have downloaded and expanded my kernel source code (2.2.12), which did
include the desired driver source:
/usr/src/kern
1 - 100 of 126 matches
Mail list logo
