On Thu, 2004-06-17 at 04:32, Joris Huizer wrote: > I'm sorry, I obviously wasn't as clear here as I thought I was; > I always use the great oldconfig trick - I often either put in new > options as modules or disable (unless recommended from the help to use them) > But my point was, if the original .config file I base it on > configuration has loads of stuff I'll never need, then that might be a > waste. (it started as a 2.4.18-bf2.4 and is now heavily adapted for the > many changes between 2.4 and 2.6) > > I know I can look at dmesg, /var/log/boot, /var/log/syslog - just don't > know wether there are tools I might have missed - other tools to learn > more of details I've probably missed about this machine;
So, what you are saying is: You want a Kernel with all modules compiled in to make your machine work without inserting any external modules. BUT, still have modules available for any device you might put in later. Or not? Personally, it comes down to experience. Yes, that is the only way I can figure it. I am not sure you can get "everything" needed without understanding the whole of what the kernel is doing with your machine. Say for instance you have a Hard drive controller the is a PROMISE controller. Do you put in the old or new driver or even the fasttrack. Anyway, this is all moot, unless you have a real need to compile a kernel as Stock Debian ones do not worK period... Then a kernel compiled for your Architecture (386, 386-smp, 686, 686-smp, k7, k7-smp, hppa hppa-smp, etc...) with widespread module support should do the trick anyway. -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] REMEMBER ED CURRY! http://www.iwethey.org/ed_curry Novell's Directory Services is a competitive product to Microsoft's Active Directory in much the same way that the Saturn V is a competitive product to those dinky little model rockets that kids light off down at the playfield. -- Thane Walkup
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
