RE: kernel 2.2.2 newbie question

L . Morris [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, August 29, 2000 2:19 AM > To: debian-user@lists.debian.org > Subject: kernel 2.2.2 newbie question > > I'm going to compile 2.2.2 kernel as an upgrade from 2.2.16. Since > this is evenly numbered does that mean it's

Re: kernel 2.2.2 newbie question

A long time ago, in a galaxy far, far way, someone said... > I'm going to compile 2.2.2 kernel as an upgrade from 2.2.16. Since > this is evenly numbered does that mean it's a stable kernel? Are there > any significant improvements over 2.2.16? As many others have indicated, you're thinking of th

Re: kernel 2.2.2 newbie question

On Mon, 28 Aug 2000, Dale L . Morris wrote: > Ok, I want to install kernel 2.2.17. I have done that with 2.2.16 and > I understand that part. I'm confused about the debian way to do > it. Before I just downloaded 2.2.16 from www.kernel.org, untarred it > to /usr/src and compiled it. But, going to w

Re: kernel 2.2.2 newbie question

2.2.17 is not released yet, but you can get a "pre release" patch ftp.kernel.org /pub/linux/kernel/people/alan i believe is the directory, in there is a directory called something like 2.2.17pre and inside there are the patches, im running 2.2.17pre18 on 2 machines and it runs well sofar. at leas

Re: kernel 2.2.2 newbie question

Ok, I want to install kernel 2.2.17. I have done that with 2.2.16 and I understand that part. I'm confused about the debian way to do it. Before I just downloaded 2.2.16 from www.kernel.org, untarred it to /usr/src and compiled it. But, going to www.kernel.org now, there is no 2.2.17 kernel to down

Re: kernel 2.2.2 newbie question-answered!

Ok, I understand now, guess I was thinking in decimals and overcomplicating it. Thanks for your replys > I'm going to compile 2.2.2 kernel as an upgrade from 2.2.16. Since > this is evenly numbered does that mean it's a stable kernel? Are there > any significant improvements over 2.2.16? > thanks

Re: kernel 2.2.2 newbie question

On Mon, Aug 28, 2000 at 12:01:12PM -0700, Dale L . Morris wrote: > That's what I'm confused about, I am thinking, perhaps in error that > 2.2.2 is a later version than 2.2.16. Is that wrong? Yes, 2 is smaller than 16. It's not ".20" versus ".16". Regards Sven -- Windows does *not* have bugs. It

Re: kernel 2.2.2 newbie question

On Mon, 28 Aug 2000, Dale L . Morris wrote: > I'm going to compile 2.2.2 kernel as an upgrade from 2.2.16. Since > this is evenly numbered does that mean it's a stable kernel? Are there > any significant improvements over 2.2.16? > thanks > -- dale > > > "Know thyself.." > > > -- > Unsubscribe

Re: kernel 2.2.2 newbie question

2.2.16 is still the newest released "Stable" kernel 2.2.2 is more then a year old! nate "Dale L . Morris" wrote: > > I'm going to compile 2.2.2 kernel as an upgrade from 2.2.16. Since > this is evenly numbered does that mean it's a stable kernel? Are th

Re: kernel 2.2.2 newbie question

Hi Dan, That's what I'm confused about, I am thinking, perhaps in error that 2.2.2 is a later version than 2.2.16. Is that wrong? Daniel E. Baumann ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > On Mon, 28 Aug 2000, Dale L . Morris wrote: > > I'm going to compile 2.2.2 kernel as an upgrade from 2.2.16. Since > > th

kernel 2.2.2 newbie question

I'm going to compile 2.2.2 kernel as an upgrade from 2.2.16. Since this is evenly numbered does that mean it's a stable kernel? Are there any significant improvements over 2.2.16? thanks -- dale "Know thyself.."

Re: Diald & kernel 2.2.2 [SOLVED]

Jens B. Jorgensen wrote: > > Oh, you don't want to forget to put: > > # enable forwarding > echo "1" > /proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_forward > > into /etc/init.d/network. Hi. The problem was on the forward chain that deny everything. THANK YOU very much.

Re: Diald & kernel 2.2.2

Oh, you don't want to forget to put: # enable forwarding echo "1" > /proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_forward into /etc/init.d/network. Guido Bozzetto wrote: > Jens B. Jorgensen wrote: > > > > Make sure you have debugging turned on and take a look at /var/log/ppp.log. > > Messages > > there should

Re: Diald & kernel 2.2.2

Jens B. Jorgensen wrote: > > Make sure you have debugging turned on and take a look at /var/log/ppp.log. > Messages > there should give a better indication of what's going wrong. I use diald > 0.16.5-3 also Nothing, on the ppp.log there is nothing :-( When I fire-up line with: echo up > /var/

Re: Diald & kernel 2.2.2

wrote: > Hi, > using diald with kernel 2.2.2 connections don't start (while with 'up > request ' line goes up). > Everything works correctly using kernel 2.0.36. > > Diald .deb version is 0.16.5-3. > Netbase package is 3.12-2 > > With the 2.2.2 kernel g

Diald & kernel 2.2.2

Hi, using diald with kernel 2.2.2 connections don't start (while with 'up request ' line goes up). Everything works correctly using kernel 2.0.36. Diald .deb version is 0.16.5-3. Netbase package is 3.12-2 With the 2.2.2 kernel giving a 'route -n' I got: Kernel IP

kernel 2.2.2

Hi, I am getting some strange kernel messages. I did not happen before. If I run a dmesg, the following is what I get, anyone know what it is?? Thx. bmap of 3a2,block 155 is 6fe6 super 200 bmap 156 result 6fe7 bmap of 3a2,block 156 is 6fe7 super 200 bmap 157 result 6fe8 bmap of 3a2,block 1

Help, I can only download ~< 120M chunks over PPP on kernel 2.2.2

I am running slink with the 2.2.2 kernel and I can't seem to download more than about 120M of data at once. Downloads just stop and do not start up again. If I abort and resume then things pick up where I left off but only for another chunk and it stops again. An example is when I am trying to