On Mon, Feb 04, 2013 at 12:22:03PM +0100, Pierre Frenkiel wrote:
> On Mon, 4 Feb 2013, Chris Bannister wrote:
>
> >Just be aware that if you strike any bugs and any dmo packages are
> >involved, it will be closed without any further ado. The deb-multimedia
> >repository is toxic to a healthy wheez
On Mon, 4 Feb 2013, Chris Bannister wrote:
Just be aware that if you strike any bugs and any dmo packages are
involved, it will be closed without any further ado. The deb-multimedia
repository is toxic to a healthy wheezy system. Take it from me,
I spent ages cleaning up my system when I install
On Sun, Feb 03, 2013 at 07:04:27PM +, Tixy wrote:
> There seems to be a lots of packages in both repos, deb-multimedia has
> its own version of loads of the AV libraries and it uses a higher epoch
> in the version number to force them to be preferred over the official
> libraries.
Yeah, not ni
On Sun, Feb 03, 2013 at 02:49:22PM +0100, Pierre Frenkiel wrote:
> On Mon, 28 Jan 2013, Rob Owens wrote:
>
> >I recommend you use the third-party deb-multimedia repository for those
> >packages. I have them both installed from that repo and I've never had
> >any problems. In fact, that repo has
On Sun, 2013-02-03 at 13:05 -0500, Rob Owens wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 03, 2013 at 02:49:22PM +0100, Pierre Frenkiel wrote:
> > On Mon, 28 Jan 2013, Rob Owens wrote:
> >
> > >I recommend you use the third-party deb-multimedia repository for those
> > >packages. I have them both installed from that rep
On Sun, Feb 03, 2013 at 02:49:22PM +0100, Pierre Frenkiel wrote:
> On Mon, 28 Jan 2013, Rob Owens wrote:
>
> >I recommend you use the third-party deb-multimedia repository for those
> >packages. I have them both installed from that repo and I've never had
> >any problems. In fact, that repo has
On Sun, 3 Feb 2013 14:49:22 +0100 (CET)
Pierre Frenkiel wrote:
Hello Pierre,
> I was rather reluctant to use a repo relying on only one man, but
Christian is a very conscientious person. The DMO repo is very well
maintained. Of course, it's entirely up to you whether you use it or
not.
>
On Mon, 28 Jan 2013, Rob Owens wrote:
I recommend you use the third-party deb-multimedia repository for those
packages. I have them both installed from that repo and I've never had
any problems. In fact, that repo has never given me any problems. Of
course I'd prefer if I could get everything
On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 04:46:49PM +0100, Pierre Frenkiel wrote:
> hi,
> some important packages are missing in the Debian official repositories
> cinelerra, avidemux
> the offical recommendations say:
>
>Please do also consider to entirely remove unofficial third-party
>repositories fr
On Monday 28 January 2013 15:46:49 Pierre Frenkiel wrote:
> hi,
> some important packages are missing in the Debian official repositories
> cinelerra, avidemux
> the offical recommendations say:
>
> Please do also consider to entirely remove unofficial third-party
> repositories from
On 28/01/13 10:46 AM, Pierre Frenkiel wrote:
hi,
some important packages are missing in the Debian official repositories
cinelerra, avidemux
the offical recommendations say:
Please do also consider to entirely remove unofficial third-party
repositories from your /etc/apt/sources.list fi
On Mon, 28 Jan 2013 16:46:49 +0100, Pierre Frenkiel
wrote:
cinelerra
You are aware of Debian's policy?
;D
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/op.wrm
12 matches
Mail list logo
