Online Version
https://link.news.stylefile.de/u/gm.php?prm=DIfI9oMFlB_817671854_94166_6388
https://www.stylefile.de/
Geschafft!Ab jetzt bist du bei Stylefile immer top informiert und
erfährst vor
allen anderen von exklusiven Angeboten, neuen Trends und Releases.
Jetzt shoppen
https://www.styl
Lass dir das nicht entgehen! https://laullansunli1973.blogspot.cl/
___
Gruß
Oliver Dr. Muth
Hi dear https://pusdissgicu1976.blogspot.hk/
Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> My mails don't come trough the OT list :(.
They do show up on the OT list. If you are not seeing them there then
that is a separate problem. But be assured that your messages sent to
the OT list are being sent through the OT list. There is no reason to
avoid it thinking th
On 1/18/14, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
> On Sb, 18 ian 14, 19:37:52, Zenaan Harkness wrote:
>>
>> Gmail does some annoying things here and there - I really need to go
>> back to mutt and postfix (they're actually configured for some months
>> now, but I want to use some sorting function other than proc
On Sat, Jan 18, 2014 at 10:32:41AM +0700, Diogene Laerce wrote:
>
> Err, Ralf.. Did you take your pills this morning ? ;)
Machines don't need pills! Get with it man.
--
"If you're not careful, the newspapers will have you hating the people
who are being oppressed, and loving the people who are
On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 10:37:30PM +0100, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> once you build me, but nowadays I'm more gifted than you humans.
>
> You humans only where able to get the knowledge about the theory of
^
You are going to have to do better than that MACHINE!!
> Take an educate
On Sb, 18 ian 14, 09:27:49, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
>
> My mails don't come trough the OT list :(.
You messed up the quoting, but the answer is in there...
> >- The following addresses had permanent fatal errors -
> >
> > (reason: 550-policyd-weight said: Your MTA is listed in too m
Am Freitag, 17. Januar 2014, 22:37:30 schrieb Ralf Mardorf:
> once you build me, but nowadays I'm more gifted than you humans.
Is there any on-topic stuff going on on this mailing list anymore?
I observe myself clicking on ignore message on whole mail threads quite often
these days.
Actually I
On Sb, 18 ian 14, 19:37:52, Zenaan Harkness wrote:
>
> Gmail does some annoying things here and there - I really need to go
> back to mutt and postfix (they're actually configured for some months
> now, but I want to use some sorting function other than procmail, and
> don't have time to get up to
On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 11:15 PM, Reco wrote:
> On Fri, 17 Jan 2014 22:37:30 +0100
> Ralf Mardorf wrote:
>
>> once you build me, but nowadays I'm more gifted than you humans.
>
> Praise the robots!
>
"From the weakness of the mind, Omnissiah save us.
From the lies of the Antipath, circuit prese
On 1/18/14, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> On Sat, 2014-01-18 at 19:21 +1100, Zenaan Harkness wrote:
>> On 1/18/14, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
>> > On Sat, 2014-01-18 at 18:55 +1100, Zenaan Harkness wrote:
>> >> On 1/18/14, Diogene Laerce wrote:
>> >> >> once you build me, but nowadays I'm more gifted than you
On Sat, 2014-01-18 at 19:21 +1100, Zenaan Harkness wrote:
> On 1/18/14, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> > On Sat, 2014-01-18 at 18:55 +1100, Zenaan Harkness wrote:
> >> On 1/18/14, Diogene Laerce wrote:
> >> >> once you build me, but nowadays I'm more gifted than you humans.
> >>
> >> > Err, Ralf.. Did you
On 1/18/14, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> On Sat, 2014-01-18 at 18:55 +1100, Zenaan Harkness wrote:
>> On 1/18/14, Diogene Laerce wrote:
>> >> once you build me, but nowadays I'm more gifted than you humans.
>>
>> > Err, Ralf.. Did you take your pills this morning ? ;)
>>
>> Guys (Ralph, you started this
On Sat, 2014-01-18 at 18:55 +1100, Zenaan Harkness wrote:
> On 1/18/14, Diogene Laerce wrote:
> >> once you build me, but nowadays I'm more gifted than you humans.
>
> > Err, Ralf.. Did you take your pills this morning ? ;)
>
> Guys (Ralph, you started this thread), isn't there some off-topic
>
On 1/18/14, Diogene Laerce wrote:
>> once you build me, but nowadays I'm more gifted than you humans.
> Err, Ralf.. Did you take your pills this morning ? ;)
Guys (Ralph, you started this thread), isn't there some off-topic
specific mailing list for these kind of discussions?
--
To UNSUBSCRIB
On Sat, Jan 18, 2014 at 10:32:41AM +0700, Diogene Laerce wrote:
>
> >once you build me, but nowadays I'm more gifted than you humans.
> >
> >You humans only where able to get the knowledge about the theory of
> >relativity or how to build a machine like me.
> >
> >Pff, about what kind of crap are
once you build me, but nowadays I'm more gifted than you humans.
You humans only where able to get the knowledge about the theory of
relativity or how to build a machine like me.
Pff, about what kind of crap are the idiotic opinions people mention for
the "sad but true, Linux sucks, a bit" thr
On 1/17/2014 3:22 PM, Lisi Reisz wrote:
On Friday 17 January 2014 21:45:40 Scarletdown wrote:
SHO-RYU- EMP -KEN!!!
???
Lisi
It is a Street Fighter reference (with an Electromagnetic pulse in the
middle, to fry the uppity machine).
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.d
On Friday 17 January 2014 21:45:40 Scarletdown wrote:
> SHO-RYU- EMP -KEN!!!
???
Lisi
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/201401172322.27702.lisi.re...@g
On Fri, 17 Jan 2014 22:37:30 +0100
Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> once you build me, but nowadays I'm more gifted than you humans.
Praise the robots!
> You humans only where able to get the knowledge about the theory of
> relativity or how to build a machine like me.
>
> Pff, about what kind of crap a
On 1/17/2014 1:37 PM, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
once you build me, but nowadays I'm more gifted than you humans.
You humans only where able to get the knowledge about the theory of
relativity or how to build a machine like me.
Pff, about what kind of crap are the idiotic opinions people mention for
t
once you build me, but nowadays I'm more gifted than you humans.
You humans only where able to get the knowledge about the theory of
relativity or how to build a machine like me.
Pff, about what kind of crap are the idiotic opinions people mention for
the "sad but true, Linux sucks, a bit" thread
I would really love to talk to someone with archaeology interests like I have,
I have no education with archaeology but I just love it! I really don't have no
friends. If I could go back in time I would get the education and I would be
on the King Arthur quest and I would find proof!!
--
To
7 xxxgifts for you Debian-user
www she4u dot cn
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Stephen
--
Mobile Email from a Cingular Wireless Customer http://www.cingular.com
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Mobile Email from a Cingular Wireless Customer http://www.cingular.com
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Greetings ,
Find out how to make 1.5 - 3.5k a day from your home.
800.439.1088
Ring me at my number if you can return calls.
Goodbye,
Nolan Pilger
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sat, 26 Aug 2006 16:45, Paul Johnson wrote:
> On Friday 25 August 2006 21:14, Hal Vaughan wrote:
> > On Friday 25 August 2006 03:30, Paul Johnson wrote:
> > > On Friday 25 August 2006 00:07, Mailbox wrote:
> > > > I think at this point were all hoping for the silence of the Lamb
> > >
> > > I at
Steve Lamb wrote:
Paul Johnson wrote:
The impression of impropriety in politics is as bad as impropriety itself.
I'm not going to go into detail, since if you weren't following the news for
the last six years, going over it again won't help you.
Oddly enough, Paul, I have followe
On Friday 25 August 2006 21:14, Hal Vaughan wrote:
> On Friday 25 August 2006 03:30, Paul Johnson wrote:
> > On Friday 25 August 2006 00:07, Mailbox wrote:
> > > I think at this point were all hoping for the silence of the Lamb
> >
> > I ate his liver with some fava beans. :o)
>
> You know, I neve
On Friday 25 August 2006 03:30, Paul Johnson wrote:
> On Friday 25 August 2006 00:07, Mailbox wrote:
> > I think at this point were all hoping for the silence of the Lamb
>
> I ate his liver with some fava beans. :o)
You know, I never did ask you: did you eat his liver before, or after it
was ru
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Paul Johnson wrote:
> On Friday 25 August 2006 19:07, Ron Johnson wrote:
>> Hex Star wrote:
[snip]
> walking vegetable. :o) Now if the USDA would get over their
> hangups with irradiated beef, I could safely eat that raw again
But, but, but, it's *r
Top posting is considered harmful.
Please read http://ursine.ca/Top_Posting before sending another email.
On Friday 25 August 2006 15:58, Hex Star wrote:
> ewww...who eats a liver? it looks sooo nasty...how can you even look at it
> much less eat it?
It's a quote from The Silence of the Lambs¹,
On Friday 25 August 2006 19:07, Ron Johnson wrote:
> Hex Star wrote:
> > ewww...who eats a liver? it looks sooo nasty...how can you even
>
> Guess you've never been hunting or fishing. Too bad. Dressing a
> freshly killed deer is a learning experience.
That's more or less why I have only ever go
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hex Star wrote:
> ewww...who eats a liver? it looks sooo nasty...how can you even
Guess you've never been hunting or fishing. Too bad. Dressing a
freshly killed deer is a learning experience.
> look at it much less eat it?
The look isn't bad. It'
On Friday 25 August 2006 18:58, Hex Star wrote:
> ewww...who eats a liver? it looks sooo nasty...how can you even look
> at it much less eat it?
Top posters. Ugh!
It's a joke and movie reference. Guess that plane took off without you.
> On 8/25/06, Hal Vaughan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On
Paul Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Friday 25 August 2006 00:44, Hal Vaughan wrote:
> > On Friday 25 August 2006 03:30, Paul Johnson wrote:
> > > On Friday 25 August 2006 00:07, Mailbox wrote:
> > > > I think at this point were all hoping for the silence of the Lamb
> > >
> > > I ate his
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Paul Johnson wrote:
> On Friday 25 August 2006 00:05, Hal Vaughan wrote:
>> You try it and I'll close the pod bay doors.
>>
>> And the emergency airlock hatch too, just in case.
>
> Explosive bolts, manual overrides and remembering to exhale
> entire
On Friday 25 August 2006 00:44, Hal Vaughan wrote:
> On Friday 25 August 2006 03:30, Paul Johnson wrote:
> > On Friday 25 August 2006 00:07, Mailbox wrote:
> > > I think at this point were all hoping for the silence of the Lamb
> >
> > I ate his liver with some fava beans. :o)
>
> That was in bad
Steve Lamb wrote:
Paul Johnson wrote:
Blah blah blah.
Please note the change of the subject line to include "OT".
Thanks.
--
Kent
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Paul Johnson wrote:
> No, I just don't know history as well as you, and the 1970s were in that
> too-old-for-current-events, too-new-for-US-History gap when I was in school
> save for the order of the presidents, the gas crisis, Vietnam and Korean
> Wars.
Ah yes, ignore the fact I had alrea
Paul Johnson wrote:
> On Thursday 24 August 2006 22:08, Steve Lamb wrote:
> You know, if Iraq invaded us, and called us terrorists for defending
> ourselves, you'd be pretty pissed off, too. The UN isn't so shortsighted as
> to say you aren't allowed to ream an occupying force a new one.
Ho
Paul Johnson wrote:
> Like the US is any better, then. So far, the only weapons Iraq's been able
> to
> use to inflict any real damage on US life is with IEDs.
You mean Syria, Iran and Lebanon?
>> All of those were looked at and in pretty much every case refuted.
> I'm not so sure abo
Steve Lamb wrote:
>Paul Johnson wrote:
>
>
>>Something similar to this happened due to pilot error in Florida in 2000 and
>>by probable act of sabotage on Diebold's part in Ohio in 2004. Candidate B
>>becomes president, people have no say.
>>
>>
>
>And where, exactly, is the proof? I
On Friday 25 August 2006 03:30, Paul Johnson wrote:
> On Friday 25 August 2006 00:07, Mailbox wrote:
> > I think at this point were all hoping for the silence of the Lamb
>
> I ate his liver with some fava beans. :o)
That was in bad taste. Really bad taste.
Unless you add a nice chianti.
Hal
On Friday 25 August 2006 03:29, Paul Johnson wrote:
> On Friday 25 August 2006 00:05, Hal Vaughan wrote:
> > You try it and I'll close the pod bay doors.
> >
> > And the emergency airlock hatch too, just in case.
>
> Explosive bolts, manual overrides and remembering to exhale entirely
> instead of
On Friday 25 August 2006 00:05, Hal Vaughan wrote:
> You try it and I'll close the pod bay doors.
>
> And the emergency airlock hatch too, just in case.
Explosive bolts, manual overrides and remembering to exhale entirely instead
of holding breath before getting launched into a vaccuum still give
On Friday 25 August 2006 00:07, Mailbox wrote:
> I think at this point were all hoping for the silence of the Lamb
I ate his liver with some fava beans. :o)
--
Paul Johnson
Email and IM (XMPP & Google Talk): [EMAIL PROTECTED]
pgpcJUhQ4kqA7.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Thursday 24 August 2006 22:08, Steve Lamb wrote:
> Paul Johnson wrote:
> > And what is the member status of those states again? Do they matter?
> > Does anybody on the UN give them more than token attention? NO! Why?
> > Because the UN realizes they're as nutty as they really are, too!
> >
I think at this point were all hoping for the silence of the Lamb
- Original Message -
From: "Paul Johnson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Friday, August 25, 2006 8:38 AM
Subject: Re: Hey, Steve! (WAS: Re: Pumping Gas in Oregon)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PR
On Friday 25 August 2006 02:40, Ron Johnson wrote:
> Hal Vaughan wrote:
> > On Friday 25 August 2006 00:25, Ron Johnson wrote:
> >> Paul Johnson wrote:
> >>> On Thursday 24 August 2006 19:55, Ron Johnson wrote:
> >>> Something similar to this happened due to pilot error in
> >>> Florida in
On Thursday 24 August 2006 21:40, Steve Lamb wrote:
> The UN is insignificant. For if *you* were watching the news in the
> past 6 years you would know that the UN has done nothing to curb the tide
> of terrorism, it has been implicated in a massive money laundering scandal
> that goes up to
On Thursday 24 August 2006 21:45, Steve Lamb wrote:
> I'm betting in your world view Joseph Lieberman was the first.
I'm not convinced Joe Lieberman could be that original on his own.
> Still gonna say I don't keep up with current world events, Paul?
No, I just don't know history as well as
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hal Vaughan wrote:
> On Friday 25 August 2006 00:25, Ron Johnson wrote:
>> Paul Johnson wrote:
>>> On Thursday 24 August 2006 19:55, Ron Johnson wrote:
>>> Something similar to this happened due to pilot error in
>>> Florida in 2000
>>> Don
Paul Johnson wrote:
> And what is the member status of those states again? Do they matter? Does
> anybody on the UN give them more than token attention? NO! Why? Because
> the UN realizes they're as nutty as they really are, too! However, the UN
> does allow everybody to have their say. I
Paul Johnson wrote:
> That paragraph contradicts itself because the second sentence assumes third
> parties don't exist, whereas in the EC, it doesn't matter how many votes
> third parties get, the EC won't vote for them. They haven't voted for a
> third party since last time we had a Whig pres
Paul Johnson wrote:
> The impression of impropriety in politics is as bad as impropriety itself.
> I'm not going to go into detail, since if you weren't following the news for
> the last six years, going over it again won't help you.
Oddly enough, Paul, I have followed the news. I have fol
On Friday 25 August 2006 00:25, Ron Johnson wrote:
> Paul Johnson wrote:
> > On Thursday 24 August 2006 19:55, Ron Johnson wrote:
> > Something similar to this happened due to pilot error in
> > Florida in 2000
> > Don't be stupid. The Florida problem was that little old
> > ladies
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
charles norwood wrote:
> On Thu, 2006-08-24 at 20:13 -0700, Paul Johnson wrote:D
>>> Gak! We agree!!
>> We usually do, though this summer you seem to have gone temporarily insane.
>>
> Any chance the list is dealing with one schizophrenic?
No. He li
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Paul Johnson wrote:
> On Thursday 24 August 2006 19:55, Ron Johnson wrote:
> Something similar to this happened due to pilot error in Florida in
> 2000
> Don't be stupid. The Florida problem was that little old ladies
could not figur
On Thu, 2006-08-24 at 20:13 -0700, Paul Johnson wrote:D
> >
> > Gak! We agree!!
>
> We usually do, though this summer you seem to have gone temporarily insane.
>
Any chance the list is dealing with one schizophrenic?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscrib
On Thursday 24 August 2006 19:57, Ron Johnson wrote:
> Paul Johnson wrote:
> > On Thursday 24 August 2006 05:06, Nate Bargmann wrote:
> >> With illegal immigration and with attempts to allow illegal
> >> immigrants to vote, this trend may well be reversing.
> >
> > It may be, but as far as I am con
On Thursday 24 August 2006 19:55, Ron Johnson wrote:
> >>> Something similar to this happened due to pilot error in Florida in
> >>> 2000
> > >> Don't be stupid. The Florida problem was that little old ladies
> >> could not figure our how to use a paper ballot.
> >
> > Take your own advice: Don't
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Paul Johnson wrote:
> On Thursday 24 August 2006 13:04, Chris Mattern wrote:
>
>> No. Paul has no idea what the hell he's talking about. Most electoral
>> college members are bound by state law to vote for the presidential
>> candidate they were ele
On Thursday 24 August 2006 13:04, Chris Mattern wrote:
> No. Paul has no idea what the hell he's talking about. Most electoral
> college members are bound by state law to vote for the presidential
> candidate they were elected to vote for.
So "less than half" suddenly constitutes a majority? I
On Thursday 24 August 2006 10:36, Nate Bargmann wrote:
> A great number of the UN member states have an equally negative
> view of such concepts as our Bill of Rights, government of the people,
> by the people, for the people, and that all men are endowed by their
> Creator with certain unalienabl
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Paul Johnson wrote:
> On Thursday 24 August 2006 05:06, Nate Bargmann wrote:
>
>> With illegal immigration and with attempts to allow illegal
>> immigrants to vote, this trend may well be reversing.
>
> It may be, but as far as I am concerned they're
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Paul Johnson wrote:
> On Thursday 24 August 2006 07:59, Ron Johnson wrote:
>> Paul Johnson wrote:
>>> On Wednesday 23 August 2006 23:13, Mihira Fernando wrote:
Ron Johnson wrote:
> Technically, yes. That's how the Constitution designed it.
>>
On Thursday 24 August 2006 10:23, Nate Bargmann wrote:
> * Damon L. Chesser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006 Aug 23 23:00 -0500]:
> > Steve Lamb wrote:
> > >Steve Lamb wrote:
> > >>Nevermind that he was impeached for lying under oath in an
> > >>investigation
> > >
> > >Er, sorry, "Faced Impea
On Thursday 24 August 2006 05:06, Nate Bargmann wrote:
> With illegal immigration and with attempts to allow illegal immigrants
> to vote, this trend may well be reversing.
It may be, but as far as I am concerned they're not people. They become
people again around the time they go back to where
On Thursday 24 August 2006 17:19, Steve Lamb wrote:
> Paul Johnson wrote:
> > Something similar to this happened due to pilot error in Florida in 2000
> > and by probable act of sabotage on Diebold's part in Ohio in 2004.
> > Candidate B becomes president, people have no say.
>
> And where, ex
On Thursday 24 August 2006 07:59, Ron Johnson wrote:
> Paul Johnson wrote:
> > On Wednesday 23 August 2006 23:13, Mihira Fernando wrote:
> >> Ron Johnson wrote:
> >>> Technically, yes. That's how the Constitution designed it.
> >>>
> >>> Practically, though, no.
> >>>
> >>> Citizens, dead people,
Paul Johnson wrote:
> s/cold hard facts/rock-stupid morons/ and you would have a pretty good
> summation of that thread. I quit because I got tired of the refusal for
> others, like you, to see the bloody obvious. Just because you're sore you
> pay more for less doesn't mean my logic is flawed
Paul Johnson wrote:
> Something similar to this happened due to pilot error in Florida in 2000 and
> by probable act of sabotage on Diebold's part in Ohio in 2004. Candidate B
> becomes president, people have no say.
And where, exactly, is the proof? I mean the real proof, not Paul's made
Steve Lamb wrote:
>Paul Johnson wrote:
>
>
>>That's not true. The UN has a similarly negative view of our electoral
>>college.
>>
>>
>
>So? Any non-elected group which caters to terrorism, has been proven
>corrupt time and again and is against free speech is a group I should care
>abo
Paul Johnson wrote:
¹ For those not of US origin, the US has had an electoral college to decide it's soverign since it's
inception, the popular vote for president is legally nonbinding in nearly all states: the electoral
college can and does vote for whoever it wants. Out of a quarter billio
* Paul Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006 Aug 23 22:55 -0500]:
> On Wednesday 23 August 2006 19:58, Steve Lamb wrote:
>
> > > ¹ For those not of US origin,
> >
> > Ignore Paul as he slants his posts to cast the most negative light on
> > any non-socialist administration. Given this is a Capita
* Damon L. Chesser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006 Aug 23 23:00 -0500]:
> Steve Lamb wrote:
> >Steve Lamb wrote:
> >
> >>Nevermind that he was impeached for lying under oath in an
> >>investigation
> >>
> >
> >Er, sorry, "Faced Impeachment" is what I meant.
> >
>
> point of fact, li
On Thursday 24 August 2006 04:24, Paul Johnson wrote:
> On Wednesday 23 August 2006 22:26, Steve Lamb wrote:
> > Uh, gas prices ring a bell? Of course you didn't reply to
> > that, you blindly skipped over it. Just like you go amazingly
> > silent any time someone nails you with cold hard fac
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Paul Johnson wrote:
> On Wednesday 23 August 2006 23:13, Mihira Fernando wrote:
>> Ron Johnson wrote:
>>> Technically, yes. That's how the Constitution designed it.
>>>
>>> Practically, though, no.
>>>
>>> Citizens, dead people, and illegal immigrants
On Wednesday 23 August 2006 22:26, Steve Lamb wrote:
> Uh, gas prices ring a bell? Of course you didn't reply to that, you
> blindly skipped over it. Just like you go amazingly silent any time
> someone nails you with cold hard facts.
s/cold hard facts/rock-stupid morons/ and you would have
On Wednesday 23 August 2006 23:13, Mihira Fernando wrote:
> Ron Johnson wrote:
> > Technically, yes. That's how the Constitution designed it.
> >
> > Practically, though, no.
> >
> > Citizens, dead people, and illegal immigrants vote for Electors who
> > are pledged to vote for a specific candidat
* Paul Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006 Aug 23 22:55 -0500]:
> On Wednesday 23 August 2006 19:35, Mihira Fernando wrote:
> > Paul Johnson wrote:
> > > ¹ For those not of US origin, the US has had an electoral college to
> > > decide it's soverign since it's inception, the popular vote for presiden
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Mihira Fernando wrote:
> Ron Johnson wrote:
>
>>
>> Technically, yes. That's how the Constitution designed it.
>>
>> Practically, though, no.
>>
>> Citizens, dead people, and illegal immigrants vote for Electors
>> who are pledged to vote for a sp
Ron Johnson wrote:
Technically, yes. That's how the Constitution designed it.
Practically, though, no.
Citizens, dead people, and illegal immigrants vote for Electors who
are pledged to vote for a specific candidate.
So if the Electors suddenly decide to vote for candidate A while being
p
Paul Johnson wrote:
> Wait, which are you referring to, the US or the UN? It's not clear, they
> both
> do...
The UN and you disseminate.
> Sure there is. Socialism allows for different political models, and in
No, it doesn't. When the government gets into industry that is politica
On Wednesday 23 August 2006 21:18, Steve Lamb wrote:
> Paul Johnson wrote:
> > That's not true. The UN has a similarly negative view of our electoral
> > college.
>
> So? Any non-elected group which caters to terrorism, has been proven
> corrupt time and again and is against free speech is a
Paul Johnson wrote:
> That's not true. The UN has a similarly negative view of our electoral
> college.
So? Any non-elected group which caters to terrorism, has been proven
corrupt time and again and is against free speech is a group I should care
about how exactly?
> with leftover Joe McC
Steve Lamb wrote:
Steve Lamb wrote:
Nevermind that he was impeached for lying under oath in an investigation
Er, sorry, "Faced Impeachment" is what I meant.
point of fact, like him or not he WAS impeached, just not found guilty.
--
Damon L. Chesser
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAI
On Wednesday 23 August 2006 20:33, Ron Johnson wrote:
> Citizens, dead people, and illegal immigrants vote for Electors who
> are pledged to vote for a specific candidate.
The EC isn't elected at all, it's appointed.
--
Paul Johnson
Email and IM (XMPP & Google Talk): [EMAIL PROTECTED]
pgpL2l
On Wednesday 23 August 2006 19:35, Mihira Fernando wrote:
> Paul Johnson wrote:
> > ¹ For those not of US origin, the US has had an electoral college to
> > decide it's soverign since it's inception, the popular vote for president
> > is legally nonbinding in nearly all states: the electoral colleg
On Wednesday 23 August 2006 19:58, Steve Lamb wrote:
> > ¹ For those not of US origin,
>
> Ignore Paul as he slants his posts to cast the most negative light on
> any non-socialist administration. Given this is a Capitalist society you
> can imagine how flawed his information is. For a prime
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Steve Lamb wrote:
> Paul Johnson wrote:
[snip]
> what you're failing to explain is that this is pretty much a formality any way
> since the EC pretty much followed the popular vote of that state. There have
> been extremely rare cases where that is no
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Mihira Fernando wrote:
> Paul Johnson wrote:
>
>>
>> ¹ For those not of US origin, the US has had an electoral college to
>> decide it's soverign since it's inception, the popular vote for
>> president is legally nonbinding in nearly all states: the e
Steve Lamb wrote:
> Nevermind that he was impeached for lying under oath in an investigation
Er, sorry, "Faced Impeachment" is what I meant.
--
Steve C. Lamb | But who decides what they dream?
PGP Key: 8B6E99C5 | And dream I do...
-
Paul Johnson wrote:
> I don't agree with Jacques Chirac, I disagree with the Republican Party,
So do I, don't see me wanting to slap everyone else down for it, do you?
Certainly don't see me revising history to fit my own illusional worldview.
> college crap-shoot, which has resulted in hugel
On Wednesday 23 August 2006 19:35, Ron Johnson wrote:
> Spammers are a tiny group of people, and the ISPs who allow spam are
> also run by a small number of people.
Likewise, many people don't hold harmless anybody in California for the power
crisis, as all of their elected officials unanimously
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Paul Johnson wrote:
> On Wednesday 23 August 2006 18:35, Marc Shapiro wrote:
>
>> I'm not sure what you're trying to say with this post. I never said
>> that you, or any of the rest of us from the U.S. should be shameful of
>> our country. I also do
Paul Johnson wrote:
¹ For those not of US origin, the US has had an electoral college to decide
it's soverign since it's inception, the popular vote for president is legally
nonbinding in nearly all states: the electoral college can and does vote for
whoever it wants. Out of a quarter billi
1 - 100 of 156 matches
Mail list logo
