Re: hdparm to increase performance

2000-11-14 Thread Michael P. Soulier
On Sun, Nov 12, 2000 at 01:39:19PM -0800, Francois Gouget wrote: > >I don't know. They must be doing something wrong ;-) If it doesn't > then it must be that the accesses are dominated by seeks. > Fragmentation? This should not happen with ext2fs. Maybe random disk > accesses (for checking t

Re: hdparm to increase performance

2000-11-12 Thread Michael P. Soulier
On Thu, Nov 09, 2000 at 10:47:17AM -0800, Jaye Inabnit ke6sls wrote: > > Anyhow, several users did some tweeks and all seemed well tell the > next boot... fsck was the norm, and I actually died hard, down to > e2fsck and rebuilt the superblocks... Doesn't it explicitly say in the article tha

Re: hdparm to increase performance

2000-11-12 Thread Michael P. Soulier
On Fri, Nov 10, 2000 at 08:41:30AM -0800, Krzys Majewski wrote: > > > > I just increased my harddrive throughput by 5 times. > > > > Mike > > Do you notice a difference though? I increased mine from about 3Mbps > to about 18Mbps, but I haven't felt it yet. -chris I did actually. T

Re: hdparm to increase performance

2000-11-12 Thread Francois Gouget
On Fri, 10 Nov 2000, Chris Majewski wrote: [...] > What about when I start netscape? I hear the disk crunching, > so presumably the binary isn't cached. Shouldn't increasing the > disk throughput speed up the time it takes to start netscape? I don't know. They must be doing something wrong ;-

Re: hdparm to increase performance

2000-11-10 Thread Jaye Inabnit ke6sls
Hello, I'll forward to info I just sent our LUG: Be warned > > > From: Jaye Inabnit ke6sls <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Hello, I'm sure many (if not all) have already read the graet article on using hdparm - http://www.oreillynet.com/pub/a/272 I did several tests here. the WD10

Re: hdparm to increase performance

2000-11-10 Thread Chris Majewski
> > to about 18Mbps, but I haven't felt it yet. -chris > >Linux does not swap enough. Remove some RAM :-) > >More seriously, I guess that if Linux has lots of RAM to play with > (here swap in use <10% RAM), and a big cache (30-50% RAM), you're not > going to saturate your disk bandwidth i

Re: hdparm to increase performance

2000-11-10 Thread Francois Gouget
On 10 Nov 2000, Krzys Majewski wrote: > "Michael P. Soulier" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > In case you guys missed this one, check it out. > > > > http://www.oreillynet.com/pub/a/272 > > > > I just increased my harddrive throughput by 5 times. > > > > Mike > > Do you notice

Re: hdparm to increase performance

2000-11-10 Thread Krzys Majewski
"Michael P. Soulier" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > In case you guys missed this one, check it out. > > http://www.oreillynet.com/pub/a/272 > > I just increased my harddrive throughput by 5 times. > > Mike Do you notice a difference though? I increased mine from about 3Mbps to abo

hdparm to increase performance

2000-11-07 Thread Michael P. Soulier
In case you guys missed this one, check it out. http://www.oreillynet.com/pub/a/272 I just increased my harddrive throughput by 5 times. Mike -- Michael P. Soulier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> "...the word HACK is used as a verb to indicate a massive amount of nerd-like effort." -Harley Ha