On Thu, Mar 01, 2007 at 12:33:33AM +1300, Chris Bannister wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 25, 2007 at 11:12:27PM +0100, Joe Hart wrote:
> > I installed fvwm, and I'm running it in another session, I must say,
> > without messing with any configuration, it looks quite impressive. It
> > seems faster than kde,
On Sun, Feb 25, 2007 at 11:12:27PM +0100, Joe Hart wrote:
> I installed fvwm, and I'm running it in another session, I must say,
> without messing with any configuration, it looks quite impressive. It
> seems faster than kde, which is a no-brainer since KDE is so demanding
> on the resources.
Yep
On Mon, 26 Feb 2007 10:42:35 -0500
Celejar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, 25 Feb 2007 23:12:27 +0100
> Joe Hart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> [snip]
>
> > I installed fvwm, and I'm running it in another session, I must say,
> > without messing with any configuration, it looks quite impres
On Sun, 25 Feb 2007 23:12:27 +0100
Joe Hart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[snip]
> I installed fvwm, and I'm running it in another session, I must say,
> without messing with any configuration, it looks quite impressive. It
> seems faster than kde, which is a no-brainer since KDE is so demanding
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote:
> Joe Hart wrote:
> Chris Bannister wrote:
On Wed, Feb 21, 2007 at 06:53:06PM +0100, Joe Hart wrote:
> One of the things that draws me to KDE is the fact that _almost_
> everything is configurable (I can't change the
5 matches
Mail list logo
